On verses 1-6. Before discussing the meaning of the individual expressions, it seems necessary to us to restore the order of reading in this passage as follows: "And you, when you were dead in your trespasses and sins, God made alive with Christ. He, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in the trespasses in which we walked according to the age of this world, according to the will of the prince of the power of the air, the spirit now working in the sons of unbelief. Among whom we too once lived in the desires of our flesh, doing the desires of the flesh and of the thoughts, and were by nature children of corruption, made us alive with Christ." More simply, "and He made us alive with Christ" should be understood as repeated twice.
The causal conjunction where it says, "But God, being rich in mercy" (Eph 2:4), was in our view added either by unlearned copyists or even by Paul himself. He was unskilled in speech, though not in knowledge, which he had acquired abundantly (2 Cor 11:6).
It is plainly said that sin is the death of the soul, in the words: "And you, who were dead in your trespasses and sins" (Eph 2:5). This agrees with what is said in the prophet Ezekiel: "The soul that sins shall die" (Ezek 18:4).
Since trespasses are called paraptomata in Greek, and according to the derivation of that same language this is properly a Scriptural word, the question arises. What meaning do these actions have, or how do they differ from sins? That is, what is the distinction between trespasses, paraptomata, and sins, hamartiai?
Some say that trespasses are, as it were, the beginnings of sins, since thoughts silently, tacita, creep up on us. Yet while there is still some visible resistance on our part, they do not yet thrust us to ruin, ad ruinam. Therefore it is written in the eighteenth psalm: "Who understands trespasses," paraptomata? (Ps 18:13). For it is difficult to understand the roots and source of sins. Sin occurs when something has been expressed in action and has reached completion.
Let us also ask what this means: "in which you once walked, according to the course of this world" (Eph 2:2). Is there another age which does not belong to this world, but to other worlds? Clement also writes of this in his epistle: "The ocean and the worlds beyond it." Or is there only this one world, which unfolds and passes from the time of Adam to its end? Or perhaps the prince of this air, who now works in the sons of unbelief, is otherwise called the world.
It is written in the Epistle to the Galatians: "that He might deliver us from this present evil age" (Gal 1:4). Also in this same epistle: "Redeeming the time, because the days are evil" (Eph 5:16). Likewise, the days of Jacob are shown to be brief and very unfavorable (Gen 47). This is either because the time of this life, in which we are held imprisoned in this body, is heavy and filled with labors, or because Satan himself, as we said above, is called by the name of this world.
This is immediately stated in the following words: "according to the will of the prince of the power of the air, the spirit now working in the sons of unbelief" (Eph 2:2). By the spirit of authority, the prince of the air who is in this spirit, the devil is meant. He now works in the sons of unbelief, because he cannot work in those who believe in the Lord.
Then follow the words: "Among whom we also once lived in the desires of our flesh, doing the desires of the flesh and of the thoughts" (Eph 2:3). His words "among whom" must be referred to trespasses. Above, he placed two ideas side by side equally: "And you, who were dead in your trespasses and sins." To sins he referred the words, "in which you once walked." To trespasses, it seems, nothing had been added to complete the sense. Now he says: In these trespasses we all also lived. And he adds we all, so that he should not appear, through conceit, to exclude himself.
But one who says of himself that he lived in them confesses past trespasses, not present ones. He says, We once lived, not in one trespass, but in the trespasses of our flesh. For the flesh desires against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh (Gal 5:17). We fulfilled not one will of the flesh, but many desires. We fulfilled not only the desires of the flesh, but also of the mind, mentis, instead of which the Latin copies have the word thoughts, cogitationum.
In my opinion, there is this distinction between sin of the flesh and sin of thought. Sin of the flesh is shamelessness and incontinence, and whatever service is performed in passionate movements. Trespasses of thought belong to teachings contrary to the truth and to heretical corruption. Thus we may say that very many heretics, though rarely, fulfill the desires of the mind and not the lusts of the flesh. Conversely, many who belong to the Church fulfill the lusts of the flesh and not of the mind. There are also very many who fulfill the lusts both of the flesh and of the thoughts.
We have not said this as though heretics do not also fulfill the lusts of the flesh, for fleshly vices are found among them more than among our own. We have said it so that, through the example presented, what we wished to show might be understood more easily.
"And we were," he says, "by nature children of wrath, like the rest" (Eph 2:3). Let the heretics who assert that there are many natures answer how Paul, who was without doubt spiritual by nature, was a child of wrath like the rest, who until then were in error.
We affirm that originally, by nature, all men were children of wrath. This is either because of the lowly and mortal body, and the attachment of the human mind to evil (Gen 8:21), for which reason Solomon says that there is no righteous man on earth: "There is no righteous man on earth who does good and does not sin" (Eccl 8:21). Or it is because, in the course of time, after we have the capacity for knowledge of God and attain maturity, we sin either by word, deed, or thought.
Thus we were children of wrath, like the rest, as were all the saints who were redeemed from wrath by the blood of Christ. For if Paul, who lived blamelessly according to the requirements of the law, says that by nature he was a child of wrath, why should we fear to testify that those who later became saints were also children of wrath? Of all of them it may truly be said: "When the commandment came, sin came alive," and they themselves died.
Children of wrath must be understood as one understands a son of perdition, a son of lawlessness, and a son of death. This does not mean that in their nature there is some wrath, perdition, or lawlessness that has children. It means that they are called children of the quality that works in individual persons. In the same way, sons of Gehenna are those who are to be burned with the fire of Gehenna.
Another interpreter thinks that we are called children of wrath in the same way as children of the devil, because the devil is perdition, wrath, and death. "Mighty death has devoured" (Is 52 and following), and: "The last enemy to be destroyed is death" (1 Cor 15:26). With reference to the devil himself it is said: "Perdition was created" (Ezek 28 and following). It was created by its own will, not created so from the beginning.
Thus he is called death because, through his envy, death came into the earthly world, and through him all who formerly lived became dead. He is called perdition because he destroys those whom he deceived. So also he is called wrath because of the cruelty he displays toward men.
Now he adds: "For He also raised us up with Him and made us sit at His right hand in the heavenly places." Thus the question is asked: How did God, who saved us and raised us, at the same time make us sit with Christ? If anyone wants to give a simpler answer, he will affirm that, in view of God's foreknowledge, the Apostle spoke of what is to be as though it had already been accomplished. Scripture commonly represents the future through the past tense. Thus, concerning the Cross of the Lord: "They pierced My hands and My feet" (Ps 21:17). Elsewhere, concerning His Passion: "As a sheep He was led to slaughter" (Is 53:7). Again, concerning the suffering of scourging: "By His wound we were healed" (Is 53:5). And elsewhere: "For the iniquity of My people He was led to death" (Is 53:8).
Since the future is always uncertain to men, lest their hope waver and become unstable, what God knows will be is spoken of as already accomplished. For to Him nothing is uncertain. Thus those who hear it will regard what is to be accomplished as though it had already been accomplished. According to the teaching of the wise, what has already been cannot be counted as not having been accomplished.
Another interpreter, understanding the resurrection and kingdom of Christ in a spiritual sense, did not hesitate to affirm that the saints already sit and reign with Christ. For just as the saint is not in the flesh, though he lives in the flesh, but has his conduct in heaven while walking on earth, and, ceasing to be flesh, is wholly turned into spirit, so also he sits in the heavens with Christ. For the kingdom of Christ is within us (Lk 17:21), and where our treasure is, there our heart will be also (Mt 6:21). Being firm and unshaken, we sit with Christ, who is Wisdom, Righteousness, and Truth.
It may also be said that, just as we have received only the pledge of the Holy Spirit and have not yet received His fullness, so we sit and reign with Christ while not yet having received perfect dwelling in the heavens.