The Church Fathers on this verse

Ephesians 2:3Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

In which also we all conversed in time past, in the desires of our flesh, fulfilling the will of the flesh and of our thoughts, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest:

Douay-Rheims

εν οις και ημεις παντες ανεστραφημεν ποτε εν ταις επιθυμιαις της σαρκος ημων ποιουντες τα θεληματα της σαρκος και των διανοιων και ημεν τεκνα φυσει οργης ως και οι λοιποι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

“All,” because it cannot be said that anyone formed an exception. “In the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the thoughts, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest,” that is, thinking nothing spiritual.

Yet lest anyone suspect that this is said in order to slander the flesh, and lest he think that its guilt is too great, see how the Apostle forestalls this. “Fulfilling,” he says, “the desires of the flesh and of the thoughts,” that is, being carried away by lusts and pleasures.

We provoked God, the Apostle then says, and angered Him. We became only objects of God’s wrath, and nothing else. As a human child is, by nature, human, so we too were children of wrath.

“Like the rest.” This means that no one was free from wrath. Rather, by our deeds, we were all worthy of wrath.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

“Among whom we also all once lived in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the thoughts.”

He comforts them not only by saying that our sinfulness came from the devil. He also does so by placing himself and all the rest in the same condition with them, since no one was without sin.

By “lusts of the flesh” he means those that come from carnal-mindedness. It is clear that he is not blaming the flesh here. For after saying, “fulfilling the desires of the flesh,” he adds, “and of the thoughts,” that is, thinking nothing spiritual.

Read more (153 words)

Therefore the flesh is not worthy of condemnation, but the thought that draws one toward passionate pleasures. Or it may be understood in this way: we defile the mind by thinking evil, and the flesh by carrying it out. You may count adultery and the like as works of the flesh. Envy, remembrance of wrongs, and the like are works of the thoughts.

“And were by nature children of wrath, like the rest.” This is said instead of: we insult and anger God, and in truth we were nothing other than wrath. As a human child is by nature human, so also were we. As those worthy of Gehenna and perdition are called sons of Gehenna and sons of perdition, so those who do what deserves wrath are called children of wrath. The phrase “by nature” is used instead of “truly and actually,” “like the rest,” for no one was free from wrath.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

When we examine the mystery of the divine economy of the incarnate Only-begotten, we say that the Word of God the Father was united in a wondrous and ineffable manner to a holy body possessing a rational soul. At the same time, we understand one Son. This may also be seen in ourselves: the soul is certainly of another essence than the body, yet both are united into one living being, ζῶον.

But some do not understand this in this way. Separating for us a man by himself and in himself, they say that he is joined to the Word, begotten of God the Father, according to dignity or right alone. They do not confess a natural union, that is, a true one, as we believe.

For divine Scripture also speaks in this way: “And we were by nature children of wrath, like the rest” (Eph 2:3). It uses the word “nature” instead of “truly” or “actually.”

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

I have already spoken about nature. When we speak strictly of nature itself, we mean the nature of man’s original creation, according to the image of God Himself and without sin. In another sense, we understand the sinful nature in which we are born astray and subject to our flesh, as punishment for our condemnation. In this connection the Apostle says: “And were by nature children of wrath, like the rest.”

Read more (74 words)

What, then, is the depravity of the natural man, the seed of evil speech from the beginning, and those born in captivity and perdition, by nature children of wrath? Was this implanted in Adam’s nature? By no means. Rather, nature was corrupted in him. From him it passed, and still passes, through all by its natural course. Nothing can preserve us from this perdition except the mercy of God through our Lord Jesus Christ.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

Since it is written, “doing the will of the flesh and of the thoughts” (Eph 2:3), are the desires of the flesh one thing and the desires of the thoughts another? What are they?

In another place the Apostle lists the desires of the flesh in detail and by name, saying: “Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, rivalries, envies, outbursts of wrath, provocations, disputes, heresies, jealousies, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and things like these” (Gal 5:19-21).

Elsewhere he speaks generally: “The mind of the flesh is enmity against God, for it does not submit to the law of God, nor indeed can it” (Rom 8:7).

Read more (78 words)

The desires of the thoughts may be called judgments that are not confirmed by Scripture. Such are those of which it is said: “casting down thoughts and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God,” and thoughts that are not “brought captive to the obedience of Christ” (2 Cor 10:4-5).

Therefore it is necessary and safe always and everywhere to keep what David said: “And Your testimonies are my counsels” (Ps 118:24). See Eph 5:6.

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

Divine Scripture can use the word "son" in two senses, calling some sons by nature and others by acquisition and adoption. When Scripture speaks of sons of men and sons of rams, it signifies the essential relation of the one born to the one who begot him. When it speaks of sons of strength (1 Sam 14:52) or children of God (Jn 1:12), it means a close kinship produced by the will of man.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Among whom we all once walked in the desires of our flesh, doing not the will of God, but the will of our earthly mind and flesh. We were by nature children of wrath, like the rest, who even to the present remain stubborn in disobedience. "We all," he says, for the Apostle includes even himself among them. He judged that he too was alien to that grace which had mercy, and will have mercy, on all who believe and receive baptism through it.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

“Among whom we also all once lived in the lusts of our flesh.”

Above, Paul set two concepts side by side: “And you, being dead in your trespasses and sins” (Eph 2:1). To “sins” he attached the words, “in which you once walked.” To “trespasses,” however, nothing seems to have been added to complete the sense.

Now he says, “among whom,” that is, among the sons of disobedience, “we also all once lived in the lusts of our flesh.” He added “we all,” lest he seem, through self-conceit, to exclude himself. But whoever says of himself that he lived in this way confesses past trespasses, not present ones.

“Fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the thoughts.”

Read more (112 words)

In my judgment, there is this difference between a sin of the flesh and a sin of thought. A sin of the flesh is shamelessness and incontinence, and whatever service to it is performed in passionate movements. Transgressions of thought belong to teachings contrary to the truth and to heretical corruption.

Thus we may say that very many heretics, though this is rare, fulfill the desires of thought and not the lusts of the flesh. Many, in contrast to those belonging to the Church, fulfill the lusts of the flesh and not of the mind. And there are very many who fulfill the lusts both of the flesh and of the thoughts.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

In mentioning fleshly lusts, Paul designates them as faithlessness. The lust of the flesh means delight in visible things, so that material elements begin to be called gods, though God appointed them as means for governing the world. But this name, “God,” must refer to God alone, from whom all things come. Since no one is equal to Him in power, no one can possess His name.

If anyone supposes that “fleshly lusts” means something else, let him know that the Apostle lived a blameless life. He lived blamelessly according to the righteousness of the law. Since he followed faith in Christ, Paul says “we”: “We all once lived in the lusts of our flesh.” Every sin is from the flesh, which is the mother of every transgression.

Read more (45 words)

Nature is determined by the will, for man is judged according to the will and not according to nature. Without any doubt, all martyrs and justified persons are good. Yet they are so not because they were born believers, but because they were born anew.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle showed that not only the flesh, but also the soul itself deserves blame. First it receives into itself an inclination toward what is worse, and only afterward, with the help of the flesh, carries out what was conceived by the mind. The Apostle said, "by nature children of wrath," that is, worthy of wrath and the utmost punishment. Thus he called the Antichrist "the son of perdition" (2 Thess 2:3), meaning one worthy of perdition.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

By nature children of wrath. This is again a Hebraism. To be a child of wrath means to be worthy of wrath. The Apostle rebukes the vainglory of the Jews, who claimed for themselves rights to the blessing by natural descent from Abraham. He says that by nature we are subject only to wrath.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The exaltation of Christians is the second manifestation of divine power worthy of glorification. Through the sinfulness of their nature, both bodily and spiritual, and through the influence of a common criminal disposition and the action of the spirit of wickedness, people in time reached such a condition that they were morally dead. Being infinitely guilty before God, they were condemned to death.

But God, through His great love and mercy, forgave us for Christ’s sake. By His grace He made us morally alive, and thereby, as it were, raised us from the dead. In the person of Jesus Christ, the God-man, He lifted us up to heaven. After Him, as after the firstfruits, those who believe in Him must follow in the future, according to the manifestation of grace in them.

Read more (495 words)

In this brief but powerful depiction of the spiritual and moral transformation accomplished in Christians by Jesus Christ, the commentators especially note divine goodness. Thus St. John of Damascus writes: “You Gentiles, says the Apostle, were held in death because of sin, in which you lived under the evil devil, who ruled over you by evil thoughts. God deemed you worthy of mercy and grace, and changed your deadness in sin into life through communion with Christ.”

“What a dark end belongs to the condition of sin! The sinner is spiritually dead, under the tyranny of the devil, possessed by the spirit of the world, and dragged without restraint by the movements of the flesh. He is enslaved to passions of soul and tossed by sinful thoughts. For all this he is a son of sin and therefore liable to eternal punishment.

How can those delivered from such misery fail to glorify the sovereign might of the Deliverer? By His grace He raises the sinner from the death of sin and leads him into the bright life of pleasing God and holiness” (Bishop Theophan).

“All our deeds were worthy not of love, but of wrath and severe punishment. Therefore, if God loved us, it was solely according to His great mercy. Do you see the exceeding greatness of His power in us who believe? Do you see the hope of the calling: He raised us together with Him and seated us together? Do you see the glory of His inheritance?

Yes, you will say, it is clear that He raised us together. But by what does the Apostle prove that He seated us together in the heavens in Christ Jesus? By the same thing by which he proves that He raised us together. No one would ever have risen unless the Head had risen. And when our Head rose, we too were raised.

In exactly the same way He seated us together. When the Head sits, the body sits with Him. “If we endure with Him, we shall also reign with Him” (2 Tim 2:12). If we have died with Him for sin, we shall also live with Him. Truly, the gift of the Spirit and of revelation is needed to understand the depth of these mysteries.

“If we also wish to know how He seated us together, listen to what Christ Himself says to the disciples: ‘You shall sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel’ (Mt 19:28). To sit at the right hand is an honor higher than every honor, after which there is no further dignity.

To sit with Christ is truly ineffable wealth. It is truly the exceeding greatness of His glory. Consider with whom you will sit. But who are you? Dead, a child of wrath by nature. What right thing have you done? Nothing. Now it is truly fitting to cry out: ‘O the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God!’ (Rom 11:33)” (Chrysostom).

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

“Among whom also we all...” We all, that is, the Jews. There is no exception. Spiritual deadness from sins was everywhere.

“Among whom,” εν οις, to what should this be referred? The nearest preceding noun is “sons of disobedience.” If it is referred to them, the sense will be: among them, that is, among the sons of disobedience. The Greek “we lived,” ανεστραφημεν, properly means “we moved about,” and this supports it.

Yet one cannot say of the Jews in general that they moved about among the sons of disobedience. Their distinguishing mark was to live apart from all. This is how they conducted themselves, not only in their own land, but also when they lived in the dispersion.

Read more (1250 words)

Therefore it seems better to refer εν οις to παραπτωμασι, transgressions. He derives spiritual deadness from two causes, from transgressions and sins. Applying this principle to the Gentiles and the Jews, he says to the first: εν αις, that is, αμαρτιαις, “in which,” meaning in sins.

But applying it to the Jews, he says εν οις, that is, παραπτωμασι, “in which,” meaning in transgressions. Blessed Jerome understands this connection in the same way.

“‘In which’ must be referred to transgressions. Above he sets forth two things, transgressions and sins. Then, referring to sins, he said: ‘in which you once walked.’ But there he said nothing by way of explanation and application about transgressions.

Now he says: ‘in which also we all lived,’ that is, in transgressions. He does this so that it may not seem that, out of pride, he excludes himself and the Jews from the number of sinners.”

It is noteworthy that, when speaking of the sinful deadness of the Gentiles, the Apostle explains that they were held in sins, or drawn toward them, by the deceits of the world and the snares of the prince of this age.

But when he brings the Jews under the same deadness, he says that they sank into transgressions because they lived in the lusts of the flesh. They were not drawn to them by an external force, but fell into sins by their own corrupted will.

They did the will of the flesh and of thoughts. The thought is given that neither the world nor the devil had such power over the people of God as they displayed over the Gentiles.

Indeed, all the orders of personal, family, ecclesial, and civil life among the Jews were established according to a pattern from above. All were sanctified by the will of God and led toward moral improvement and nearness to God.

The corrupting customs of the world could make their way among them only like thieves, by an unlawful path. Among the Gentiles, these customs constituted the very substance of their life. They were begotten from the passions, and they fed and inflamed the passions.

Likewise, the prince of the world lost power over the Jews as soon as they received the sign of God’s election, by which they became God’s portion.

The prince of the world, together with his customs, could enter the Jewish sphere only when they themselves summoned him. This happened when, casting off the yoke of God’s good will, they voluntarily gave themselves to his alien yoke.

The Apostle points to this when he says that we too were all in sins, living in the lusts of the flesh. The world and the prince of this age had no power over us. But we ourselves sank into sins, living in lusts.

We were enemies to ourselves. Our lusts took the place, for us, of the corrupting force of the world and of its prince. But if one could think thus about the Jews, should one not judge Christians in this way still more?

There would be no place among us for the world and the devil if we were not prone to lusts.

By the lusts of the flesh, or by the lustful flesh, one should understand here, in general, the sin-loving movements of the heart. Their distinguishing mark is self-pleasing. This is a disposition of the soul by which it does everything only to please itself.

It acts contrary to the demands of conscience and the promptings of the fear of God, which are openly and clearly presented. Self-pleasing has two forms of manifestation: the will of the flesh and of thoughts, of course sinful thoughts.

In other words, these are bodily passions and passions and inclinations of the soul. “Doing the will of the flesh and of thoughts” means that whatever the flesh desired and whatever the soul devised to please itself, that, or that alone, we did.

We followed the demands and attractions of the passions and inclinations of body and soul, all of them self-loving.

Chrysostom says: “We all lived, thinking of nothing spiritual. He says all, because it cannot be said that anyone was an exception in this case.

But so that no one might suspect that this is said with the intention of slandering the flesh, and so that he might not think its guilt too great here, see how the Apostle forestalls all such suspicions and thoughts.

He says, ‘doing the will of the flesh and of thoughts,’ that is, being willingly carried away by lusts and pleasures.”

In the word “thoughts,” Theodoret sees how sin is first conceived in sinful thoughts. Then, through the will’s joining itself to them, it is carried out in deed through the body.

“The Apostle,” he writes, “showed that not only the flesh, but the soul itself deserves blame. For it first receives into itself an inclination toward what is worse, and then, with the help of the flesh, puts into action what was conceived by the mind.”

But someone may think: why does he not call himself dead, as he called the Gentiles? This is already understood of itself. Since they were in sins, they were also dead. For where sin is, there also is spiritual death.

Besides this, he later directly numbers the Jews among the spiritually dead when he says: “even when we were dead through transgressions.” There, under “we,” he includes both Jews and Gentiles.

“And we were by nature children of wrath.” Since, by doing the will of the flesh and of thoughts, we sank into sins, for this reason we were also under God’s wrath.

“We provoked God, we angered Him, and we became only an object of God’s wrath, and nothing else,” says Chrysostom.

Theodoret writes the same: “The Apostle said ‘by nature children of wrath,’ that is, worthy of wrath and extreme punishment. Thus he called the Antichrist the son of perdition (2 Thess 2:3), that is, worthy of perdition.”

According to Oecumenius and Theophylact, they became children of wrath as those who do works worthy of wrath.

Basil the Great, in his 268th short rule, says: “One becomes a child of wrath insofar as he has made himself worthy of wrath. For the Apostle called those who are worthy of the Lord and do the works of light and day sons of light and sons of day (1 Thess 5:5).

So also must the words ‘we were children of wrath’ be understood.” “The word ‘by nature’ stands in place of ‘truly, genuinely,’ αληθως και γνησιως” (Oecumenius, Theophylact).

“As also the rest.” “This means that no one was free from wrath. But all of us, according to our deeds, were worthy of God’s wrath” (Chrysostom).

Sin made all equal, as St. Paul depicts more fully in the Epistle to the Romans, gathering various indications of this from the Old Testament Scriptures (Rom 3:10-18).

What a dark picture of the state in sin! The sinner is spiritually dead, under the tyranny of the devil, possessed by the spirit of the world, and unrestrainedly drawn by the movements of the flesh. He is enslaved to the passions of the soul and troubled by sinful thoughts.

For all this he is a son of wrath and, consequently, liable to eternal punishment. How can those delivered from such distress fail to glorify the sovereign might of the Deliverer? By His grace He raises the sinner from sinful death and brings him into the radiant life of pleasing God and holiness.

Tertullian

3rd centuryTeacher of the Church

"And were by nature children of wrath, like the rest." As a Jew, Paul was one of the sons of resistance in whom the devil worked when he persecuted the Church and Christ the Creator. This is why he says, "we were children of wrath." But he says "by nature," so that the heretic, since the Creator called the Jews sons (Ps 28:1; Lk 20:36), may not think that the Lord is the creator of wrath. When the Apostle says, "we were by nature children of wrath," the Jews are sons of the Creator not by nature, but by the election of the fathers. He attributes the sons of wrath to nature, not to the Creator.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 30 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  2. οἷς
    hois
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  3. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  4. ἡμεῖς
    hēmeis
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  5. πάντες
    pantes
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  6. ἀνεστράφημέν
    anestraphēmen
    I overturn
    G390 · ἀναστρέφω
  7. ποτε
    pote
    at one time or other
    G4218 · ποτέ
  8. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  9. ταῖς
    tais
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. ἐπιθυμίαις
    epithymiais
    desire
    G1939 · ἐπιθυμία
  11. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. σαρκὸς
    sarkos
    flesh
    G4561 · σάρξ
  13. ἡμῶν
    hēmōn
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  14. ποιοῦντες
    poiountes
    I do
    G4160 · ποιέω
  15. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. θελήματα
    thelēmata
    will
    G2307 · θέλημα
  17. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  18. σαρκὸς
    sarkos
    flesh
    G4561 · σάρξ
  19. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  20. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  21. διανοιῶν
    dianoiōn
    understanding
    G1271 · διάνοια
  22. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  23. ἤμεθα
    ēmetha
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  24. τέκνα
    tekna
    a child
    G5043 · τέκνον
  25. φύσει
    physei
    nature
    G5449 · φύσις
  26. ὀργῆς
    orgēs
    anger
    G3709 · ὀργή
  27. ὡς
    hōs
    as
    G5613 · ὡς
  28. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  29. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  30. λοιποί
    loipoi
    left
    G3062 · λοιπός