The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 1:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Pharao therefore charged all his people, saying: Whatsoever shall be born of the male sex, ye shall cast into the river: whatsoever of the female, ye shall save alive.

Douay-Rheims

וַיְצַ֣ו פַּרְעֹ֔ה לְכָל־עַמּ֖וֹ לֵאמֹ֑ר כָּל־הַבֵּ֣ן הַיִּלּ֗וֹד הַיְאֹ֙רָה֙ תַּשְׁלִיכֻ֔הוּ וְכָל־הַבַּ֖ת תְּחַיּֽוּן׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

In his directive, the Pharaoh ordered the midwives to execute the newborn males of Israel; due to their refusal to comply, he made the act a punishable crime among the people.

It is remarkable how all circumstances—both those that seem to work in our favor and those that appear to be against us—ultimately lead to our benefit. To understand this, consider the following: Pharaoh decreed that infants be cast into the river. Had there been no such decree, Moses would not have been saved and raised within the palace walls. When he was concealed, he held no honor; yet, once he was placed in the river, his status was elevated. This was orchestrated by God to demonstrate His power and wisdom.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

What action does the lawless individual take? He becomes consumed by fury and leads his people to employ the most brazen acts of injustice. In a figurative sense, as referenced in Exod. 1:16, when this vile and violent scheme against the Hebrew people fails to materialize due to God preventing such evil from occurring, Pharaoh ultimately resorts to overt brutality. He no longer finds it necessary to subtly oppress the Hebrews, choosing instead to declare open conflict, condemning those who are born to inhuman fates.

Read more (214 words)

It is stated, “Then Pharaoh commanded all his people, saying, Every son born to the Hebrews shall be thrown into the river, and every daughter shall be left alive.” The female children pose no threat to him, as women are not viewed by him as possessing a warrior's spirit or wisdom. In contrast, he perceives the male children, regarded as capable and valiant, as a source of potential problems. Similarly, the dragon, corrupted by bloodshed—meaning Satan—finds the gentle and submissive nature of women appealing, as it lacks the fortitude and shrewdness of the male. Instead, he perceives in men a fierce potential for bravery that vanquishes weakness and timidness, as well as a robust intellect. For this reason, he spares the female sex from his malicious schemes, as it seems unwise to contend with those already diminished and vulnerable, willingly surrendering to his will. Rather, he seeks to eradicate the male sex by ensnaring them in temptations. This notion is echoed in the words of the psalmist David, who states, “If the Lord had not been with us when men rose up against us, they would have swallowed us up alive, when their fury was kindled against us; the waters would have drowned us, the floods would have passed over our souls” (Ps. 123:2-4).

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

When the decree of the oppressor mandated the annihilation of males, Moses came into existence. How then can we emulate this extraordinary birth of Moses through our own volition? Another may contend that it is not within our power for man to replicate such a magnificent entry into life. However, initiating imitation is not particularly challenging, nor is it as formidable as it may seem. For everyone acknowledges that all things subject to change are in constant flux, never remaining static but transitioning from one state to another, continually improving or deteriorating as a consequence of these transformations. It is crucial to discern how these principles apply.

Read more (269 words)

The material and emotional tendencies to which human nature is predisposed, represent a feminine aspect of existence that delights the oppressor; conversely, the strength and unwavering nature of virtue, embodying a masculine essence, stand in opposition to the oppressor and evoke suspicion of rebellion against his dominion. Thus, whatever is subject to transformation must be perpetually renewed; within that nature, which is readily alterable, one will not find anything that remains entirely unchanged. Therefore, birth is not contingent upon external influences, as is the case with anything physical; rather, such a birth transpires through our own free will, making us, in a manner of speaking, creators of ourselves. We give rise to our own essence as we choose, shaping ourselves according to our desires—either in virtue or vice—into the identity we seek, whether male or female. Indeed, it is also within our capacity, much to the dismay of the oppressor, to enter the world through a more admirable birth; and even if it were contrary to the oppressor's wisdom, we can emerge and participate in life, bringing joy to those who nurture this beautiful fruit, which embodies the thoughts of virtuous fathers. Therefore, this message conveys how, by drawing wisdom from history, we can elucidate this profound meaning: laying the foundation for a virtuous existence and being born in a manner that brings sorrow to the adversary—an unwelcoming birth for him, in which the trials of existence are endured willingly. For there is no other way for a man to inflict sorrow upon his opponent than by manifesting within himself the very signs that attest to triumph over him.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

When the king was ridiculed by his wives, unbeknownst to him, he resolved to pollute the waters of the river with the blood of newborns and to offer their flesh as sustenance for the fish. However, this plan did not yield the intended outcome, as the population of the Hebrews continued to grow. He succeeded in filling the river with the corpses of infants, yet simultaneously, Egypt, which he sought to avoid, became inundated with Hebrews. Upon witnessing the river tainted with the bodies of infants, Pharaoh felt a moment of joy. Nonetheless, as he realized that the Hebrews were overwhelming all of Egypt, his joy turned to deep anxiety.

Read more (41 words)

The king's decree remained in effect, but despite its execution, his intentions were thwarted; along the riverbanks lay countless infant bodies like swarming locusts, and, to the king’s distress, the cries of infants continued to echo through the streets of Egypt.

Nestor the Chronicler

12th centuryChurch Father

During that period, Moses was born among the Israelites, prompting the wise men to inform the Egyptian ruler: ‘A child has been born to the Israelites who will bring about the downfall of Egypt.’ Consequently, the king ordered that all male Hebrew infants be cast into the river.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

Until now, Pharaoh's decree had remained hidden and likely limited to the elite among the Israelites; however, he now disregards all sense of decency, inciting national fervor and enmity. He turns the entire Egyptian populace, historically antagonistic towards outsiders, into willing conspirators and executors of this heinous act. Through a formal edict publicly announced, the Egyptians are empowered to invade the private lives of foreigners and seize newborn sons from their mothers among all segments of the Hebrew community. The ancient world has often displayed horrific acts of brutality. For example, Thucydides recounts the murder of 2,000 Ilots as a strategy to diminish their ranks and eliminate their finest youth under a guise of supporting the Spartans.

Read more (108 words)

Additionally, the book of Yashar narrates a dream experienced by Pharaoh prior to the command to cast newborn boys into the river. In his vision, he observes an aged man with scales; one pan bears all the nobles of Egypt while the other holds a white lamb, which tips the scales. When Pharaoh convenes the wise men, the tale continues, Balaam, son of Beor, advises that the Israelite boys be cast into the waters, arguing that since Abraham was unharmed by flames, Isaac was spared from the sacrificial knife, and Jacob prospered despite the trials under Laban, only the ordeal of water could pose a threat to Israel.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.