The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 16:20Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And they hearkened not to him, but some of them left until the morning, and it began to be full of worms, and it putrified, and Moses was angry with them.

Douay-Rheims

וְלֹא־שָׁמְע֣וּ אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֗ה וַיּוֹתִ֨רוּ אֲנָשִׁ֤ים מִמֶּ֙נּוּ֙ עַד־בֹּ֔קֶר וַיָּ֥רֻם תּוֹלָעִ֖ים וַיִּבְאַ֑שׁ וַיִּקְצֹ֥ף עֲלֵהֶ֖ם מֹשֶֽׁה׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

4 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

The narrative recounts another remarkable event, highlighting that those who gathered for the day did not store away anything for the following day. However, if someone hoarded a portion of their provisions, the leftovers became spoiled and infested with worms.

This serves as a poignant reminder to the greedy that what is hoarded beyond necessity ultimately becomes worthless. In the life to come, this excessive accumulation transforms into a source of torment for those who sought to preserve it. Furthermore, when one reflects on the concept of the enduring worm, it becomes clear that it is sustained by the very desire of greed.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

Why did the manna that was stored for another day become corrupted? This occurred because it breached the divine command. When God instructed the Israelites to live without anxiety, He assured them of daily sustenance. However, in their lack of faith, they chose to keep some for the following day, resulting in its decay. That this spoilage was not inherent to the manna itself is demonstrated by the Sabbath, during which the harvest collected on the fifth day remained intact. Additionally, the manna preserved in the ark throughout generations serves as further evidence of this truth.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

What is the significance of manna, and what does it imply when those who collect more than enough are able to partake of it? ‘Manna’ signifies “the word of God,” which, through action and understanding, is effectively absorbed by all and sustains the spirit. When individuals engage with it wisely—by adhering to a balanced approach of virtues and steering clear of both excessive and deficient behaviors—they gather sufficient manna. However, if one mishandles this word by allowing an excess—consider, for instance, the virtue of chastity—if an individual refrains from promiscuity yet holds disdain for marriage, it indicates that the concept of chastity has become inflated within them due to this excess.

Read more (131 words)

This not only leads to the emergence of the notion but also cultivates harmful desires, akin to the production of worms.

In this teaching, the importance of maintaining a balance—often referred to as the ‘middle way’—is a recurring theme among the Fathers of the Church. They echo the ethical views that emphasize moderation, where virtue reflects a conscious choice that resides between two extremes: excess and deficiency. This understanding aligns with the wisdom of Aristotle, as discussed in various theological writings that highlight how virtues foster a sound disposition of the soul, combining reason with moral judgment. The Holy Fathers frequently reiterate this idea, linking the practice of prudence with this balanced approach, encouraging adherents to navigate life as soldiers of Christ by maintaining harmony between spiritual fervor and earthly considerations.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

Persistent in their disobedience and often sidestepping commands, the people harbor distrust even when they witness the Lord's astonishing provision. It seems that a spirit of greed prompts some individuals to attempt to gather excess supplies. However, they face consequences in the spoilage of the manna, and Moses confronts them for their lack of faith.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.