John Chrysostom
What justification can those have who are given the responsibility of nurturing spiritual lives yet neglect their duty, allowing some souls to suffer while others go uncared for, even as they witness them being devoured by predators or taken by outsiders? Here, the burden is light, and the attentiveness needed is minimal, as the conscience is directed toward righteousness, whereas the labor for both body and spirit is far greater elsewhere. Consider the words of Jacob, the caretaker of livestock: ‘I languished by day from the heat, and by night from the cold, and my sleep fled from my eyes’ (Gen. 31:40). Today, can anyone sincerely claim to have faced dangers and hardships for the sake of their flocks? Among current shepherds, none can assert this.
Read more (380 words)
Only Paul, the teacher to all nations, could proclaim this with confidence, and much more besides. However, one may wonder where Paul encountered such trials. Listen to his words: ‘who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is led into sin, and I do not burn with indignation?’ (2 Cor. 11:29). This is true pastoral compassion! He indicates that the failings of others intensify his own suffering; the trials faced by others amplify his sorrow. Every leader entrusted with guiding the faithful should aspire to emulate him and strive not to fall short of the standard he set through his tireless diligence over many years for those who cannot speak for themselves. If there had been any negligence in his case, misfortunes would not have ensued; but here, if even one soul perishes or is taken away, it is a profound loss, a serious detriment, an unimaginable reproach! If our Lord willingly shed His blood for them, what leniency will be shown to one who neglects the care of those deemed precious by the Lord and fails to fulfill his responsibilities as a shepherd?
The critique extends to the teachers of Israel who failed to nurture and protect the souls entrusted to their care. In this regard, Ezekiel rebuked them, declaring, ‘Woe unto the shepherds of Israel, who shepherd themselves; should not the shepherds shepherd the flock?’ But their actions reflected the opposite, highlighting a severe moral failing and the root of many other injustices. Therefore, the prophet stated that they did not guide the lost back to the right path, nor did they seek the wayward, nor did they mend the brokenhearted, nor did they heal the sick; they cared for themselves rather than the flock (Ezekiel 34:4, 8).
In their betrayal of their duty, the Lord charges them, saying, ‘You ate the fat and clothed yourselves with wool; fattened sheep you slaughtered, but did not feed the flock.’ In contrast, Christ exemplifies the ideal shepherd, declaring, ‘The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep’ (John 10:11). David demonstrated this on numerous occasions, particularly when grave danger loomed over the entire nation. Observing the impending calamity, he lamented: ‘Behold, I have sinned, I have done wickedly; and these sheep, what have they done?’ (2 Sam. 24:17).