This passage is very obscure. Therefore we have decided to translate literally Origen's interpretation of it from the tenth book of the Stromata. We do so not because individual expressions cannot be explained in their own place and proper sense, but because, when separated from what precedes, they form a difficult whole. If understood merely as they stand, they seem to flow with unexpected inconsistency and to contradict themselves.
These, then, are Origen's words: "This passage is difficult, and in our judgment it should be explained thus. He who is free and follows the Spirit and truth in the higher sense despises the former types and the letter. Therefore he must not look down upon those who are lesser. Nor should he give occasion for self-abasement to those who cannot rise to the higher sense. For although they are weak, and in comparison with the Spirit are called flesh, nevertheless they are the flesh of Christ.
If such a man understands the mystery of the flesh that serves the weaker, he does something for the sake of the weak. Thus, while he possesses knowledge, his brother, for whom Christ died, does not perish.
Therefore consider carefully whether this meaning can be drawn from what follows. He says, 'You, brethren, were called to freedom.' Perhaps he says this because not all could understand the calling to freedom. Therefore now you hear, 'Only do not give your freedom as an occasion for the flesh.'
For the greater must serve the lesser through love, since he who wishes to be great shall be the servant of all (Mt 20:16; Mk 10:43-44). Therefore let the spiritual man not tear the flesh of Christ. Let him not give them occasion to bite Him, who calls them not to consume one another.
Thus he who walks in the Spirit, and in the Spirit follows the words of the Scriptures, must not desire their fleshly sense. But if we understand the words, 'Walk in the Spirit, and do not follow the desires of the flesh,' simply, then Paul seems, as many think, suddenly to turn against the proofs and purpose of this whole epistle.
For immediately afterward there follows, 'But if you are led by the Spirit, you are no longer under the Law' (Gal 5:18). Up to this point the discourse is, in some measure, coherent. But if we again follow the simple understanding, he suddenly transfers us to instructions hard to connect with what precedes.
These are the discussions concerning flesh and spirit: 'The works of the flesh are known, such and such.' Conversely, 'The fruits of the Spirit are love,' and so forth. Yet even in these words we must not despair of seeing coherence.
The historical books of the divine Scriptures contain an indication of the works of the flesh. They do not greatly help those who understand them only as written. Indeed, who will not learn incontinence, and count fornication as nothing, when he reads of Judah going in to a wanton woman, and of the patriarchs having several wives (Gen 38:8)?
How will he not incline toward idolatry who thinks that the blood of bulls, and the other sacrifices in Leviticus, mean no more than the letter of the Law shows? As for enmity, the plainly expressed word of Scripture teaches it. It is approved by this passage: 'Desolate daughter of Babylon! Blessed is he who repays you for what you have done to us. Blessed is he who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rock' (Ps 136:8-9).
So also it is written, 'In the morning I will destroy all the sinners of the earth' (Ps 100:8), and other passages of this kind. They speak of enmity, zeal, anger, disputes, and dissensions. If we do not have higher perceptions, then the examples of former life urge us toward these things more than they draw us away.
Even heresies have their source rather in a fleshly understanding of Scripture than in the activity of our flesh, as very many suppose. Moreover, through a literal understanding of the Law, we are taught envy and incontinence in drink. Noah after the flood became drunk, as did the patriarchs in Egypt at Joseph's brother's house (Gen 9:21; Gen 43:34).
In the book of Kings excess in food is depicted, as are David's dancing and his playing on timbrels before the ark of God's covenant (2 Sam 6:5). Similar examples occur elsewhere. The question is how the simple word of Scripture, called flesh, summons us to sorceries and evil deeds, if we pass to the Spirit of the same Scripture.
I think this is what is signified by Daniel and the three youths being found ten times wiser than the magicians and diviners of the Gazarenes and Chaldeans. So also Moses was instructed in all the wisdom and learning of Egypt. Therefore, if anyone remains in the fleshly understanding of Scripture, this becomes the cause of many evils. Those who do this will not inherit the Kingdom of God.
Let us then seek the Spirit and the fruits of Scripture, which the Apostle does not call known. For the fruits of the Spirit in the Scriptures are found with great difficulty, labor, and fitting study. Therefore, it seems to me, the Apostle Paul spoke circumspectly and cautiously concerning the fleshly sense of Scripture: 'The works of the flesh are known' (Gal 5:19).
But concerning the spiritual fruits he did not say, as there, 'The fruit of the Spirit is known.' Rather he said, 'But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace,' and so forth (Gal 5:22). Therefore, if we leave the types and pass to the truth and Spirit of Scripture, love will at once be revealed to us first.
Passing from love to joy, we come to peace, through which we inherit patience. Who will not learn mercy and goodness when he understands that the punishments addressed through the prophets to the nations, and those in the Law which seem harsh to some, are healings rather than punishments? These are wars, the destruction of nations, and threats against them.
For the Lord will not be angry forever (Isa 57:16). Therefore, when this becomes clear to us, we shall have a more rational faith. Continence will accompany improved conduct. Moderation and purity will follow this. Afterward the Law will become everything for us."
Thus far Origen. To these words of his we may add our own thought. Men were called from slavery under the Law to the freedom of the Gospel. It was said to them above, 'Stand fast, and do not again be fastened to the yoke of slavery.' Now they are persuaded that, having received the yoke of Christ and the sweet commandments of the Gospel, they must not think it permitted to use this freedom of life as an occasion for fleshly desires.
That is, they must not live according to the flesh, nor be circumcised according to the flesh. Rather, they must choose to stand firmly in the Spirit, spiritually cut away the foreskin, and, stretching toward the higher regions of the Spirit, leave behind the lowliness of the letter.
But this may also be understood otherwise. Perhaps someone will say, 'Paul, I have ceased to be under the Law, and from slavery I have been called to freedom. Therefore I must live as befits freedom. I must not hold to any commandments, but do, perform, and follow whatever pleases me and whatever my will suggests.'
To this the Apostle replies, 'It is true that we have been called to the Spirit of freedom, yet in such a way that freedom itself must not be enslaved to the flesh. We must not think that everything is lawful for us, or that everything is possible. Therefore it is better that, having ceased to be slaves of the Law, we should choose mutual service through love. Thus the commandments of the Law, expressed in scattered parts, are contained in one heading concerning love.'