The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 13:10Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And Lot lifting up his eyes, saw all the country about the Jordan, which was watered throughout, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrha, as the paradise of the Lord, and like Egypt as one comes to Segor.

Douay-Rheims

וַיִּשָּׂא־ל֣וֹט אֶת־עֵינָ֗יו וַיַּרְא֙ אֶת־כָּל־כִּכַּ֣ר הַיַּרְדֵּ֔ן כִּ֥י כֻלָּ֖הּ מַשְׁקֶ֑ה לִפְנֵ֣י ׀ שַׁחֵ֣ת יְהוָ֗ה אֶת־סְדֹם֙ וְאֶת־עֲמֹרָ֔ה כְּגַן־יְהוָה֙ כְּאֶ֣רֶץ מִצְרַ֔יִם בֹּאֲכָ֖ה צֹֽעַר׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

4 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

After witnessing such humility from Abraham, Lot, as his nephew, ought to have shown respect to the patriarch by granting him, rather than claiming for himself, the privilege of choosing freely. It is a common tendency among us, as human beings, that when we perceive adversaries attempting to engage us in contention over something, striving to assert their dominance, we resist the temptation to accept degradation, refusing to concede. However, when we observe them relenting, offering us heartfelt expressions that provide us full freedom, we often feel a semblance of shame in light of their profound humility, leading us to cease our disputes and surrender authority to them, even if, in our eyes, they seem lesser. This is the response Lot should have exhibited towards his uncle; yet, as a young man driven by the desire for more, he quickly seeks out what appeared to be the most advantageous position, making his own selection instead.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Even though God had assured Abram of that territory (Gen. 12:7), He permitted Lot (Gen. 13:9) to select for himself the region near the Jordan, specifically the entire area of Sodom, through which the Jordan River ran.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Pride is a companion to those who deviate from the truth. Just as Abraham displayed humility in granting the choice to another, Lot exhibited arrogance by claiming that choice for himself: righteousness is brought low, while wickedness is lifted high. Lot ought to have placed his trust in the one who was more experienced to steer clear of peril. Ultimately, he chose poorly. He first raised his gaze and examined the land, focusing on what is not primary but rather secondary, that is, the last.

Read more (225 words)

Concerning possessions, they are largely inherited, with some being more functional while others are more enjoyable. Naturally, they should not be divided into portions; otherwise, the worth of each piece would be reduced. When parties cannot reach a consensus on what is more beneficial, the enjoyable is compared to the beneficial. People have diverse preferences: some favor the practical, while others appreciate the delightful. The weak tend to opt for what is pleasing at the expense of what is essential. A steward or worker in the fields can sometimes provide greater utility than a town dweller. Should the chooser lack wisdom, they may select the cook or minstrel, mistaking charm for value, and overlook what is truly beneficial. Even when resources are equal, a more discerning host is likely to dismiss the appealing but perhaps superficial, as it can quickly stir envy and awaken greed. Here, however, Scripture does not specify which side is more advantageous or enjoyable, lest it seem that Abraham intentionally dazzled the young man’s imagination. While the desirable is noted, the beneficial remains unmentioned. It was unnecessary for the patriarch to carve the land into two sections; he merely partitioned what was at hand. Since it was impossible for both to lay claim to the same territory, the one who embodied the highest righteousness humbly offered the decision to the other.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

He observed the entire plain of the Jordan, fully irrigated, before the Lord brought destruction upon Sodom and Gomorrah, resembling the Lord's garden and the land of Egypt, extending all the way to Zoar. When one reads these verses in the sequence presented in the Hebrew text, it might seem that the location of Zoar should be in Egypt; however, this city is close to Sodom and was named by Lot (Genesis 19:22). Some have resolved this ambiguity through the Syriac translation, which refers to it as Tzoan rather than Tzoar, linking it to Tanis. Nonetheless, even based on the Hebrew text, which is supported by the Samaritan and Greek versions, the issue can be clarified by connecting the phrase "even to Tzoar" with the plain of the Jordan. Such rearrangement of terms is consistent with features of the Hebrew language (Hab. 24:20).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.