The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 15:10Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And he took all these, and divided them in the midst, and laid the two pieces of each one against the other: but the birds he divided not.

Douay-Rheims

וַיִּֽקַּֽח־ל֣וֹ אֶת־כָּל־אֵ֗לֶּה וַיְבַתֵּ֤ר אֹתָם֙ בַּתָּ֔וֶךְ וַיִּתֵּ֥ן אִישׁ־בִּתְר֖וֹ לִקְרַ֣את רֵעֵ֑הוּ וְאֶת־הַצִפֹּ֖ר לֹ֥א בָתָֽר׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

It is stated that He took the animals and divided them into two parts. It is essential to recognize that God's choice of these specific creatures, which were required for the covenant with Abraham, was intentional and significant. He instructed that they should be three years old, symbolizing their maturity and completeness. Abraham then divided the animals, placing one half opposite the other, except for the birds, which he did not divide.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The curious may ponder the significance of these events, examining the nature of the oath and the meaning behind the term ‘dissected,’ the flight of the birds, and their movement toward the offerings. They may also reflect on why Abraham was positioned ‘near them’ and the flame that passed ‘between the dissected.’ All these elements can be understood.

Read more (247 words)

The Chaldeans had a custom in which a man would swear an oath by walking between two animals that had been cleaved in two, thus signifying, in essence, ‘Let not the same fate befall me as these.’ Given that Abraham hailed from Chaldean roots and had recently departed from his homeland, the Sovereign Lord guided him to perform the ceremony in a manner familiar to him, thereby perfectly intertwining the mystery of Christ with the sacrifice represented.

Moreover, while the animals are severed into parts, the two birds remain intact. This raises the question: why is this so? The Only Begotten - the Word of God ‘became flesh’ (John 1:14), subjecting Himself to what could metaphorically be considered dissection. Discussions regarding Him arise from a dual perspective. We recognize His divine and incomprehensible birth from the Father while also contemplating the mystery of the Incarnation. This profound truth is seldom fully articulated, thus presenting a challenge for those who are unacquainted with it. Nevertheless, while the discourse about Him takes on dual facets, He remains singular and unchanged, not severed in two through His union with humanity. Christ is one and indivisible. This is exemplified by the undivided nature of the birds, as it is noted, ‘the birds...were not divided.’ As one who shares our earthly existence, He is represented in a calf, a goat, and a sheep, but at the same time, He is envisioned as being from heaven, represented by birds, since He is divine.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Thus, it is stated that he ‘only did not split the birds,’ indicating that division occurs solely among the fleshly realms, never affecting the spiritual ones. The spiritual beings are either entirely removed from the burdensome interactions of worldly life, resembling the turtledove, or they coexist with humanity, akin to the dove. Nonetheless, both birds are equally pure and innocent. This conveys that within the nation of Israel, destined to receive the promised land, the future heirs of the covenant and inheritors of the kingdom will dwell eternally with them in perfect joy.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

The separation of animal genders symbolized the segmentation of Abram's lineage into various tribes, while the undivided nature of the birds represented their harmonious unity.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

In this discussion, I will refrain from delving deeply into this holy event. However, I would like to point out that the Hebrew scripture states: "And the birds of prey descended upon the corpses, and Abram drove them away." Through his righteousness, Israel frequently found rescue from disaster.

Caesarius of Arles

6th centuryChurch Father

Consider particularly the account of Abraham: "He divided the animals in two and laid one part against the other, but the birds were not cut up," as stated in Scripture. What does this signify, dear friends? Within the universal Church, those who are driven by worldly desires are often at odds, while those who are led by the Spirit remain united, as Scriptures indicate they are divided against each other. Why is there discord among the fleshly individuals? Because those ensnared by the allure of this world fail to strive against divisions and conflicts within themselves; thus, they are at odds with one another.

Read more (331 words)

Conversely, the birds, symbolizing the spiritually minded, are not torn apart. Why is this so? Because they share one heart and one spirit (Acts 4:32) in the Lord; their desires are harmoniously aligned. The turtledove and the dove mentioned serve to illustrate these souls. The turtledove represents purity, while the dove symbolizes innocence. All who revere God within the Catholic Church are naturally pure and simple, enabling them to resonate with the Psalmist: "Who would give me wings like a dove? I would fly away and be at rest" (Psalm 54:7). As noted, "And the bird finds a place to nest, and the swallow a home for her young" (Psalm 83:4).

Fleshly individuals, easily disunited, labor under the oppressive burdens of vice, while the spiritual ascend on the wings of virtues. With the commandments of love for God and for their neighbor as their guiding wings, they rise to the heavens. With the Apostle, they can proclaim, "Our citizenship is in heaven" (Philippians 3:20). When the minister proclaims, "Woe is our heart," they can respond confidently and passionately, "We belong to the Lord"; yet, not many within the Church can express this genuinely and responsibly.

Thus, Abraham did not separate the birds, for spiritual individuals, possessing one heart and one soul, cannot divide their love for God from their love for neighbor. They declare with the Apostle, "Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution?" (Romans 8:35), and proceed to enumerate other potential separations, concluding with "No created thing can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord" (Romans 8:39). Therefore, tribulation cannot sever spiritual believers from Christ, though trivial talk can lead fleshly individuals apart. A cruel sword will not cleave the former, but base emotions can easily rend the latter; nothing severe can break the bonds of the spiritual, while even a kind word may sway the carnal. Hence, Abraham divided the animals, yet left the birds intact.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

He divided them in two. (Jer. 34:18, 19) It is clear that this separation, along with the arrangement of the animals into their respective parts, was carried out at God's command, even though the account in Moses's narrative may not present the full details. The ritual described here was a common practice of covenant or union in ancient times (Jer. 34:18, 19) and was also observed among the Gentiles. This ritual gave rise to expressions such as "cutting a covenant" and “binding vow” (Iliad. V. V. 124). The act of those entering into covenant passing between the two halves of the animals likely symbolized that, just as these divided parts once composed one body and shared one life, the two parties entering into agreement pledge to be guided by one spirit and to form a unified community. In this way, God, using the customary rite characteristic of human agreements in establishing a covenant with Abram, takes into account the Patriarch's lack of reliable worldly allies for his protection and comes extremely close to him.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

The separated halves of the sacrificial animals symbolized both parties of the covenant—Abram and his descendants, alongside God. The act of God moving between the divided parts represented His commitment to form an unbreakable bond with Abram and his lineage, much like the unity of the animal before it was dissected. This indicated that He would uphold His promise with the same sanctity as individuals who threaten themselves with dire consequences should they fail to uphold their pledged loyalty. No indication is given that Abram was required to walk between the halved animals as a demonstration of his or his descendants' faithfulness to the covenant. This was not needed because it was solely God's responsibility to affirm the trustworthiness of the promise He established. However, later on, the Lord would call upon Abram and his descendants to demonstrate their allegiance to Him through the establishment of circumcision.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.