The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 3:21Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the Lord God made for Adam and his wife garments of skins, and clothed them.

Douay-Rheims

וַיַּעַשׂ֩ יְהוָ֨ה אֱלֹהִ֜ים לְאָדָ֧ם וּלְאִשְׁתּ֛וֹ כָּתְנ֥וֹת ע֖וֹר וַיַּלְבִּשֵֽׁם׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Following the revelation of the wife's name, the text illustrates God's goodness by emphasizing that He does not abandon His creation amidst their disgrace and exposure. "And the Lord God made," it states, "the Lord God to Adam and his wife garments of leather, and clothed them." This mirrors a compassionate father who, observing his noble son—raised with utmost care in luxury and comfort—finds that the son has descended into a life of debauchery. The father, in responding to the son's fall from grace, strips away his finery and provides him with simple clothing, ensuring he is not left in utter nakedness and shame.

Read more (563 words)

In a similar way, when Adam and Eve became unworthy of their glorious attire that had met their physical needs, God compassionately stripped them of their former glory but, in His mercy, sought to cover their shame by creating leather garments for them.

Such is the ploy of the adversary: he entices those who yield to him with fleeting pleasures, leading them into depths of depravity, shrouding them in dishonor while exposing them to the derision of others. Yet, the Shepherd of our souls, recognizing their helplessness, does not abandon them. Instead, He devises coverings for them, using their humble garments to illustrate the dignity they lost. "And the Lord God made Adam and his wife garments of leather, and clothed them." Observe how the divine narrative accommodates human understanding. It is crucial to interpret these events with divine significance, and the word "did" should be understood as "commanded." He instructed them to wear leather robes as a constant reminder of their disobedience.

Let those rich in fine garments take heed; they should realize how the benevolent Master has illuminated human nature from the beginning. Although humanity faced the penalty of death due to the transgression of God's command, it was necessary for Him to provide them with a garment to conceal their shame. Thus, He fashioned leather garments, teaching us to eschew a life of indulgence and rather to embrace discipline and hardship. Yet, those caught in material excess may object, asking what it means to adorn ourselves in leather. I do not impose this requirement, for the first humans did not wear these garments eternally; the merciful Lord continually bestows further blessings upon the initial ones.

After mankind fell from a state of angelic existence and became subject to physical needs, God subsequently allowed clothing made from sheep's wool to serve merely as a covering, so that humanity would not live like the unembellished creatures devoid of shame. Therefore, our clothing should serve as a perpetual reminder of the blessings we forfeited and the consequences of our disobedience.

Let those enamored with opulence respond: how can you don such expensive fabrics and incorporate gold into your attire while disregarding that this covering is a substitute for the true punishment due to transgression? Why do you ignore the counsel of the apostle Paul, who teaches, "Having food and clothing, let us be content with these things" (1 Tim. 6:8)? It becomes apparent that our sole concern should be to ensure our bodies are clothed, focusing not on the extravagance of our garments.

Does this imply that God sacrificed oxen or sheep, instituted the practice of skinning them, and developed the art of tanning? To this, we reply: God formed all animals without conjunction or procreation. He created that which did not previously exist, and He is capable of creating entire beings without needing parts from existing creatures. Moreover, the objection arises that God has never created a component of an animal and has never made anything defective. The objector inquires about the source of the skin. I, too, question: how did God transform the Nile's waters into blood without killing any creatures? The river turned to blood, yet no animal was harmed. Similarly, the skins emerged, prompting curiosity about their origin. The skin came forth alongside the animal. Although both my voice and I may grow weary, let this suffice for now.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Though this was intended to convey a deeper meaning, it was nonetheless executed, similar to the spoken words that were expressed with a purpose. As I have frequently mentioned, and will continue to affirm, it is essential for the storyteller of past occurrences to describe them as they truly happened, and to recount spoken words as they were articulated. Just as there is a differentiation in actions between what is performed and the significance behind it, there is a similar distinction in discourse between what is expressed and its underlying meaning. Whether the narration is understood allegorically or in its literal sense, it should not be dismissed simply as an allegory.

Read more (131 words)

After forsaking their original state of innocence, Adam and Eve brought upon themselves the garments of mortality. The true dignity of humanity lies in being the reflection and likeness of God, and this divine image is maintained solely in connection to the Source from which it originates. Therefore, the closer one is to God, the less one prioritizes self. Yet man, in his desire to grasp his own autonomy, drew inward as if pulled by his own gravity. Aspiring to be like God, beyond the influence of anyone, he was consequently removed from his rightful center and relegated to the lowest state—sharing a fate akin to that of creatures. Though elevated in status, human beings failed to comprehend this reality, thus becoming akin to irrational animals and losing their true essence.

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

Our nature, having become inclined toward passion, encountered the inevitable outcomes of a passionate existence. However, in returning to a state of pure bliss, it will no longer suffer from the consequences of wrongdoing. Thus, since everything that was added to human nature from the irrational life did not persist within us until humanity fell into passion due to sin, it is essential to abandon passion along with all that accompanies it. Therefore, it is illogical to seek in the life to come what arose within us because of our passions. If an individual sheds a torn garment, they will no longer bear the mark of the worn-out clothing.

Read more (58 words)

Similarly, when we remove this earthly and corrupt covering—symbolizing the exterior formed from the lifeless essence that we have adopted through our passions—we will cast off all that belongs to this lifeless exterior. From this unreasonable nature, we have inherited experiences such as physical union, conception, procreation, impurity, nurturing, sustenance, development, flowering into maturity, decline, illness, and death.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Following the account of the punishment meted out to the tempter and the tempted, Moses recounts how the Lord God fashioned garments of skin for Adam and his wife, adorning them in this manner. These garments were possibly crafted from animal skins or divinely created, as indicated by Moses' narrative that the Lord made these clothes and dressed Adam and Eve. One might consider that the patriarchs, upon touching their belts, discovered they were adorned in robes made from the skins of slain animals, potentially before their very eyes, enabling them to partake of the meat and cover their nakedness with the hides. In the death of these creatures, they perceived the mortality of their own bodies.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

What are we to understand by the leather garments mentioned in Genesis 3:21? Some who enjoy elaborate explanations suggest that the skins represent the flesh subject to mortality. Others claim these garments were crafted from tree bark. I cannot accept either of these interpretations; the former is overly strained, while the latter leans towards the fantastical. If Sacred Scripture indicates that the body was formed prior to the soul, does it not seem outlandish to propose that, through disobedience, our first parents received flesh that was destined to perish? To speculate about the source of God's skins and create an entirely new type of garment appears unnecessary.

Read more (43 words)

Instead, we should be satisfied with the text as it stands, acknowledge that nothing is beyond the capability of the Creator, and marvel at His boundless mercy, for He cares for those who have sinned and does not leave the vulnerable without covering.

John Damascene

8th centuryChurch Father

assumed a mortal nature, that is, fragile and earthly flesh, which symbolizes the wearing of skins. By the just decree of God, humanity was expelled from paradise, faced condemnation to death, and fell under the power of decay.

Caesarius of Nazianzus

4th centuryChurch Father

What are we to understand regarding God’s act of dressing Adam in animal skin? Was it through slaughtering the cattle? Allow me to offer a response once more, dear debater. Which task is less demanding and requires no effort: to establish the heavens from water, to lay the foundation of the earth not upon water, to consolidate the darkness of the waters into one gathering, and to adorn all creation appropriately: to crown the skies with stars, to make the earth thrive with vegetation, to create a sea that nurtures fish - or to stitch together the skin and provide clothing for the bare man? To bring forth a living creature - or to clothe it?

Read more (87 words)

To dry up the sea by mere command, and lead six hundred thousand individuals, along with women and children, across with feet unwashed - or by command to cover the needy with garments? To split the unhewn rock and allow water to flow - or to provide clothing for the exposed? To alter the course of the Jordan River and guide people - or to clothe the unclothed? To breathe life into ashes and animate - or to clothe the being of intellect that emerged from them?

Romanos Melodos

6th centuryChurch Father

At last, the adversary takes pleasure in stripping away my dignity, yet he fails to recognize that my God, the Compassionate One, adorns me, so I implore Him, have mercy on me, for I have stumbled. God Himself, moved by compassion for my state of vulnerability, envelops me; through this act, He demonstrates His care for me even after my transgressions. In His mercy, I plead, have mercy on me for I have fallen! The garment He provides signifies my future restoration; shortly after clothing me, He carries me and saves me. In His great mercy, I ask, have mercy on me, for I have fallen! Soon, Adam, you have come to understand the intent of My generosity: therefore, as the Compassionate One, I will not take away your hope. O Merciful One, have mercy on me, for I have fallen! Truly, I do not wish for death for that which I have created; now that I have sufficiently illuminated you, I will bring glory to him who cries out, “Mercifully, have mercy on me for I have fallen”!

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

After illustrating sin and the resulting nakedness, as well as the fate of sin following its act within the narrative framework, Moses subsequently explains what occurred significantly alongside the nakedness. The leather garments bestowed upon the first humans, as noted by Gregory the Theologian, pertain to the flesh that is both coarse and mortal. While it is indeed accurate that humanity's body became coarse and mortal through the fall into sin, it is incorrect to assert that man was devoid of flesh before this event; his body was fashioned prior to the soul, and the leather garments given to him do not truly symbolize flesh, nor do the fig leaves represent a legitimate form of clothing.

Read more (300 words)

It would not be unusual to refer to garments made from bark or plants as leather, but the closest interpretation of this term points towards garments made from animal hides. Since the need for such clothing indicates the beginning state of the current human condition, and since Moses often describes the tangible, which he refers to as the observable, the phrase “God made Adam and his wife leather garments” suggests that God provided fallen humanity with a flesh resembling that of cattle. The act of God clothing humans underlines His Providence and compassion for sinners. The same confusion that drove them to seek coverings hindered them from crafting sufficient and perfect garments; God enhances their efforts to ensure these coverings serve as protection against shame and external threats to the body. The attire devised by sinners stands as a reminder of sin as dreadful as nakedness itself. However, God, in His mercy, transforms it into a testament of His care for them. Why does God draw upon animal skins for clothing rather than plant materials? How could man, unfamiliar with the notion of death, wear the skin of slain creatures without revulsion? These questions may be resolved with the understanding that God once instructed man on how to offer animal sacrifices and utilize their hides for clothing, signaling to him the need to vanquish within himself animalistic desires and passions. This would also keep before him the future sacrifice of the victorious seed of the woman, allowing him to be clothed by faith in its merits and strength. This perspective also clarifies the roots of bloody sacrifices already made by Adam’s descendants (Gen. 4:4), which were certainly not of their own devising, and highlights the origin of the law that grants the priest the skin of the burnt-offering (Lev. 7:8).

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

The sense of disgrace experienced among each other, before the Lord, and in their own consciences, which was stirred in the fallen ancestors by their awareness of nakedness, compelled them to cover themselves. This feeling and the subsequent act of covering were esteemed by the Lord as a sign of sincere repentance for their transgressions. In place of the inadequate covering made from leaves that obscured only parts of their bodies, He bestowed upon them a complete and lasting garment crafted from animal skins. Clothing served not only as a moral barrier against disgrace and a safeguard of modesty but also fulfilled a physical need.

Read more (96 words)

Sin introduced afflictions and ailments to our forebears' previously resilient and pain-free nature, rendering clothing essential for protection against cold, moisture, and heat. The material from which their garments were fashioned holds great significance. Although God could have supplied them with attire made from various other materials, He specifically chose that which required the shedding of the blood of innocent creatures. This selection may be seen as a means for the Lord to instruct humanity not only in the practice of attire but also in the necessity of atonement through animal sacrifices to seek His favor.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.