The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 3:7Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the eyes of them both were opened: and when they perceived themselves to be naked, they sewed together fig leaves, and made themselves aprons.

Douay-Rheims

וַתִּפָּקַ֙חְנָה֙ עֵינֵ֣י שְׁנֵיהֶ֔ם וַיֵּ֣דְע֔וּ כִּ֥י עֵֽירֻמִּ֖ם הֵ֑ם וַֽיִּתְפְּרוּ֙ עֲלֵ֣ה תְאֵנָ֔ה וַיַּעֲשׂ֥וּ לָהֶ֖ם חֲגֹרֹֽת׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

13 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

And she also offered the fruit to her husband, and he consumed it. Their eyes were both opened, and they recognized their nakedness. This raises an essential question that we resolved to address previously. It is reasonable to inquire about the power of this tree, which, upon eating from it, opened their eyes, and to understand why it is referred to as the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Please bear with me as I elucidate this matter, and help you comprehend that if we accept with discernment what is proclaimed in the sacred Scriptures, we will find nothing too difficult to grasp. It was not the act of tasting the tree that opened their eyes; they had already seen before tasting it. However, eating from the tree symbolized disobedience and a transgression of God's commandment, resulting in their loss of the glory that once enveloped them and rendering them unworthy of such honor. Thus, Scripture expresses, “She ate ... and he ate. And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked.” Having forfeited the supreme grace due to their transgression, they became acutely aware of their physical nakedness, experiencing such shame that they would fully understand the depths to which their disobedience had led them. Initially, they had enjoyed perfect freedom, unaware of their nakedness (they were not truly naked, as the glory above them provided greater covering than any garment). Yet, after consuming it—following the transgression of the command—they became so humbled that they sought a means to cover themselves. The violation of the command had stripped them of that wondrous and extraordinary garment of glory and divine favor with which they were clothed, simultaneously awakening in them an awareness of their nakedness and shrouding them in unutterable shame. “And they sewed together fig leaves and made themselves loincloths.” Reflect, Beloved, on the heights from which the devil’s deception had cast them. Once enveloped in such glory, they now stitch together fig leaves to conceal themselves. Such is the outcome of the devil’s seduction; it does not bestow greater benefit but rather deprives individuals of what they once possessed. Since the act of eating resulted in disobedience, Scripture iterates, “I ate ... and he ate. And their eyes were opened,” referring not to physical sight but to spiritual discernment. By transgressing the commandment, they were made aware of what they previously did not feel due to the grace afforded to them. Therefore, when it states that “their eyes were opened,” understand it to mean that God allowed them to perceive their nakedness and the loss of glory they had previously enjoyed. To further illustrate this Scriptural custom, recall how it describes another instance: when Hagar, fleeing from her mistress, found a young boy under a bush, having set herself away to await his death, Scripture declares, “And God opened her eyes” (Gen. 21:15, 16, 19)—not because her sight was lacking, but because God, at that moment, enlightened her understanding. Do you see that the term “opened” refers not to physical sight but to spiritual awareness?

Now regarding the other inquiry: why is this tree named the tree of the knowledge of good and evil? Many engage in debate, insisting that Adam, after consuming the fruit, gained the ability to discern good from evil. Such thinking is utterly foolish. To preclude this misconception, we have recently discussed the wisdom bestowed by God upon humanity, illustrated by Adam’s naming of all creatures—beasts, birds, and unspoken animals—and the added gift of prophecy. How could one who named and spoke marvelously about his wife be ignorant of good and evil? If such ignorance were plausible, we would again be slandering the Creator. How could God give a command to one unversed in what evil is? It is not so; rather, Adam clearly understood. Consequently, from the beginning, God fashioned humanity with self-control; otherwise, he could not rightly be both punished for his transgressions and rewarded for obedience. The mortality imposed upon him due to his disobedience is evident from the command and subsequent events. Recall what the woman said to the serpent: “The fruit of the trees we may eat; but of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, God said, 'Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.’” Thus, prior to tasting, they were immortal; if not, God would not have inflicted death as punishment even after their transgression. Who would argue that humanity received the knowledge of good and evil only after eating the fruit, when he was already endowed with wisdom prior to that act, not to mention the gift of prophecy? How rational is it to conclude that various animals possess the instinct to discriminate between beneficial and harmful plants, while humankind—being a rational creature—remains oblivious to good and evil? However, some may argue that the Scriptures themselves designate this tree as the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Indeed, it is necessary to grasp the reasons behind the name given to this tree. It received such a title not because it imparted this knowledge, but because it was from this tree that the transgression of the commandment originated, resulting in the awakening of sin and shame. Thus, it is customary in the Holy Scriptures to name locations based on events that occurred there, which is why this tree is referred to as the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, meant to signify the obedience or disobedience exercised therein. The compassionate Lord, from the beginning, aimed to teach humanity to recognize that they have a Creator and Maker who fashioned all visible things and created humankind. He sought to demonstrate His authority through this simple command. Just as a generous proprietor, having given someone a splendid home, does not claim absolute ownership but retains a small share to remind that person of their dependency, so our Lord entrusted humanity with all visible creation. He permitted them to dwell in Paradise and utilize its offerings, thereby preventing them from gradually forgetting their true origin and becoming overly proud of their dignity. He commanded them to refrain from one specific tree, imposing a grave consequence for its violation, to instill in them the awareness that they were under their Master and used all other things according to the grace of the Master. However, as Adam, through carelessness and with his wife, fell into misfortune by violating this command and eating from the tree, Scripture named it the tree of the knowledge of good and evil—not because before this he lacked awareness of good and evil, but to signify the experience of shame and loss that ensued after eating. For after consuming the fruit, they lost the highest glory and became acutely aware of their physical nakedness, hence the scripture describes it as the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Do you understand why Scripture says, “The eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked”? Have you grasped why this tree is called the tree of the knowledge of good and evil? Contemplate the shame that overtook them after they ate from the tree and transgressed the Lord's command, “And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.” Reflect upon the glory they fell from into utter humiliation. Those who once lived as earthly angels were now fashioning garments from leaves. Such is the reality of sin—it not only strips us of the greatest joy but also plunges us into profound shame and degradation, robbing us of our blessings and our confidence. Yet, to prevent our consideration of humanity's sin in eating from the tree and disobedience from leading to despair, let us shift our focus to another tree—the tree of the cross—and examine the calamities this act caused and the benefits it brought. The misfortunes arose not from the tree itself but from the negligence and contempt for the commandment. The first tree introduced death, as death followed disobedience, while the latter granted immortality. The first expelled us from paradise; the latter elevated us to heaven. For one transgression, Adam suffered severe consequences; the latter liberated us from countless burdens of sin and restored our confidence before God. Do you see the distinction between these two trees? Do you perceive the wickedness of the devil, the negligence of humanity, and the compassion of the Lord? Therefore, I implore you to arm yourselves with this life-giving tree and, through its strength, put to death the passions that threaten your soul, just as the Apostle Paul states, “And those who belong to Christ have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires” (Galatians 5:24). This signifies that those who wholly surrender to Christ mortify every impure desire that arises within them, detrimental to the well-being of their soul. By emulating their example, we too shall render our faculties dormant to the dominion of the devil and, in this present life, navigate the tumultuous and perilous sea peacefully, and, having reached the serene haven of God’s grace, receive the promised blessings for those who love Him, in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom be glory, together with the Father and the Holy Spirit, now and forever, and unto ages of ages. Amen.

I am aware that some criticize the Lawgiver, suggesting that the law is to blame for humanity's fall into sin. It is essential to address this matter and demonstrate through action that God established the law not out of animosity toward humanity or a desire to shame our nature, but from love and concern for us. To understand that the law was given as a sign of unity, heed what Isaiah states: For He has given us the law as a help. The one who harbors hatred offers no assistance. The prophet proclaims: Thy word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path (Psalm 118:105). One who hates does not illuminate the darkness with a lamp, nor does one who misleads guide anyone toward the light. Solomon further remarks: For the commandment is a lamp, and the teaching is light; reproofs of instruction are the way of life (Proverbs 6:23). Notice, it’s not only help, nor merely a lamp, but light and life—these qualities are characteristic not of one who seeks to destroy, but of one who extends a hand to uplift.

Read the full text in the app

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Their eyes were opened, not for the purpose of becoming divine as the serpent had claimed, but rather to perceive their own vulnerability, which the adversary desired. This is the reason why the eyes of the ancestors were initially enlightened to behold all things; they were confined in such a way that they could not see the tree of life or their own state of nakedness. The adversary was filled with envy towards the ancestors because they, adorned with glory and empowered by the divine word, stood above all of creation; to them alone was the promise of eternal life associated with the tree of life.

Read more (189 words)

Consequently, feeling envy for both Adam's existing state and the future glory to come, the adversary devised schemes and, in a brief encounter, seized from them what they should have safeguarded through a prolonged struggle.

Had the ancestors exhibited willingness and repented following their disobedience to the divine command, they would not have regained their prior state, but at the very least, they could have avoided the curses laid upon the earth and upon themselves. Indeed, God delayed His coming so that they might recognize their mutual sinfulness, and when He, the Merciful Judge, finally arrived, they might plead for mercy. The serpent’s arrival was swift, so that the alluring sight of the tree would not diminish temptation, while the Judge's coming was slow to grant the ancestors the chance to prepare their hearts for prayer. Yet, the urgency of the tempter did not assist them, despite its potential benefits; nor did they capitalize on the Judge's delay, even though it served a similar purpose. Thus, their eyes were opened, not to attain divinity as the serpent proposed, but to acknowledge their nakedness, which was what the adversary sought.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

It is clear to those who pay careful attention that Adam and Eve had their eyes opened even before they partook of the forbidden fruit. How could "the woman see that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise" (Genesis 3:6) if her eyes had not yet been opened? This illustrates why Sacred Scripture refers to the awareness that came after sin, as immediately following that act, the conscience was struck with pain.

John Damascene

8th centuryChurch Father

Through the temptation by the demon, the embodiment of wickedness, humanity was led astray, failed to adhere to the commandments of the Creator, lost divine grace, forfeited confidence before God, and became vulnerable to the hardships of a life filled with suffering—this is symbolized by the fig tree's leaves (Genesis 3:7).

Irenaeus of Lyon

2nd centuryChurch Father

Their eyes were opened, and they realized their nakedness, prompting them to sew fig leaves together to cover themselves. Adam, tempted by another under the guise of eternal life, was immediately filled with dread and attempted to conceal himself, not believing he could escape God's presence, but feeling ashamed and unworthy to stand before God after violating His command. The beginning of wisdom stems from reverent fear of the Lord (Psalm 110:10). Awareness of his wrongdoing led to repentance, and God bestows His mercy upon those who turn back to Him. Adam demonstrated his remorse by donning fig leaves, despite the availability of other, less uncomfortable foliage. Instead, he chose a covering befitting his disobedience, gripped by the fear of God.

Read more (197 words)

He subdued the powerful cravings of his flesh, having lost his innate purity and childlike state, and realized the gravity of his actions. He adorned himself and his wife with the reins of self-discipline, revering God as he awaited His presence, symbolically expressing his state. He may have lamented, "By my disobedience, I have forfeited the robe of holiness gifted by the Spirit and now feel deserving only of this attire, one that brings discomfort and wounds the flesh." He would have continued in this garment of humility had the compassionate Lord not clothed them with garments made of leather in place of fig leaves. God did not question them with the intent to shift blame onto the wife, nor did He question her to attribute fault to the serpent. She recounted the event, saying, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate” (Gen. 3:13). He refrained from inquiring of the serpent, fully aware of its role in the transgression. Instead, He first pronounced a curse upon it, turning His focus to the man with a renewed reproach. For God harbored disdain for the one who led man astray, yet offered compassion for the one who was misled.

Marcus the Ascetic

4th centuryChurch Father

As previously mentioned, we grapple with the urges for indulgence that our physical being harbors and the pridefulness that influences both you and me. These two desires led Eve into temptation and misled Adam: through lust, the fruit was portrayed as desirable for sustenance and pleasing to the senses; through pride, the enticement was made, “You will be like gods, knowing good and evil.” The first humans, Adam and Eve, felt shame in their nakedness; similarly, we, having lost the innocence of our souls, experience shame in our conscience. Hence, we attempt to cover ourselves with garments of fig leaves, enveloped in hollow rhetoric and deceptive images.

Read more (255 words)

In contrast, the Lord provides us with a serious covering symbolized by animal skins, representing a life of asceticism, and calls out, “In your endurance, you will gain your souls.” He imparts guidance related to this covering: the individual who permits malice or any other sin to corrupt their soul will bring about its destruction; whereas, one who eradicates malice and sin from their life will preserve their soul for eternal existence.

Our enemies, as previously stated, consist of the indulgence intertwined with our corporeal nature and the pride that claims us both. They led Eve and Adam astray; indulgence highlighted the tree as pleasing for nourishment and beautiful to behold, while pride added, “You will be like gods, knowing good and evil.” As the original Adam and Eve recognized their nakedness and felt shame, likewise, we, having dispelled kindness from our perception and recognizing our own lack of virtue, confront moments of shame before one another. We then cover ourselves with fig leaves, donning a façade of words, pretense, and self-rationalization. However, the Lord offers us a more substantial covering of leather, instructing, “In your endurance, you shall gain your souls,” and further advises: the one who destroys their soul through vengeance or other sins will lead it to ruin; yet the one who sacrifices their soul without nurturing sin will ultimately find it, and it will be preserved for eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom belongs all glory, honor, and worship, alongside the everlasting Father and the life-giving Spirit. Amen.

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

Following the transgression of our ancestors, who felt shame and fashioned coverings from fig leaves, the fig tree can rightly symbolize mankind's inclination towards sin, which possesses a deceptive allure. Beneath its branches, the Lord's elect sat, unaware of their divine selection; it was there that the Lord observed Nathanael reclining without recognizing Him (John 1:48).

Photios of Constantinople

9th centuryChurch Father

What does it signify that their eyes were opened (Gen. 3:7), and how did the fall into sin lead to the opening of their eyes? The opening of their eyes was not a direct result of their sin, as it is not recorded that this occurred at the moment of their transgression, but rather afterward. It is written, "And the woman took of the fruit and ate, and gave also to her husband, and they ate. And the eyes of both of them were opened" (Gen. 3:6-7). This indicates that following sin, there is often an awakening to the reality of wrongdoing, where the depth of one’s boldness becomes apparent.

Read more (374 words)

Once the initial fervor and impulsiveness that drive one to sin subside, the intellect, akin to breaking through a dense darkness and waking up, begins to reflect on what has transpired and recognizes the current state compared to how it was previously. Conscience, now stirred and revitalized, brings clarity to what was obscured by passion. Conversely, in the act of sin, thoughts become paralyzed and discernment is clouded by the apparitions conjured by the evil one, who tempts and obscures the mind. Following the wrongful act, the enemy displays the consequences of their actions and reveals the enormity of their transgression, which he had previously concealed through deceit, seeking to lead the sinner into despair. Therefore, their eyes being opened should not be interpreted as a reference to their condition before the command was breached—for at that time, their understanding was intact until the serpent ensnared them with his deceptions, and their minds were alert to their rightful actions. It was not that they lacked sight and gained it through sin; rather, they were blinded during their transgression and regained their sight once the act ceased. The wicked adversary of our nature, aware through his own experience that recognition of sin typically follows an evil act (though he himself does not seek repentance), tempted Adam and his companion with the notion that by disobeying the command, "In the day in which you eat of it your eyes shall be opened" (Gen. 3:5). Ever the deceiver, he intertwined truth with his many lies, claiming, "You shall be like gods, knowing good and evil." They came to know good and evil, not in receiving divine enlightenment, but were instead trapped in their sinful desires. After their disobedience, awakening to the reality of their actions and the boldness of their sinfulness became apparent. Why, then, upon their eyes being opened, did they first recognize their nakedness and feel shame? This is because the passions associated with procreation strike more powerfully than other transgressions if not governed by the principles of chastity. The urge for physical intimacy brings forth additional desires, and from that moment, all other sins become subject to scrutiny, as both spiritual and secular laws often ascribe this to the frailty of intellect and immaturity.

Symeon the New Theologian

10th centuryChurch Father

However, since the Lord commanded the firstborn not to partake of the tree of knowledge, and Adam disregarded this divine command, failing to trust the words of the Creator and Sovereign who stated, “In this day if you eat of it, you shall die by death,” instead listening to the deceitful words of the wicked adversary, who proclaimed, “You shall not die by death, but in this day if you eat of it... you shall be like a god. You shall be like the gods, knowing good and evil,” Adam, having eaten from that tree, instantly shed his incorruptible glory and dignity, and clothed himself in the shameful nakedness of corruption. Upon realizing his nakedness, he hid himself and fashioned garments from fig leaves to cover his shame.

Dimitri of Rostov

17th centuryChurch Father

When their understanding was enlightened to recognize their state of nakedness, they immediately became aware of their shame towards one another. At that very moment they consumed the forbidden fruit, the desire of the flesh surged within them; they were both overtaken by intense longing, and guilt and fear overwhelmed them, prompting them to cover their exposed bodies with fig leaves. However, upon hearing the Lord God walking in the Garden at midday, they concealed themselves beneath a tree, for they could no longer bear to face their Creator, whose commandments they had disobeyed, hiding in fear and great trepidation from His presence.

Read more (122 words)

The deepest sense of shame arises from the awareness of nakedness, particularly exterior nakedness. When Adam realized in Eden that sin had deprived him of his cloak of innocence, he felt a profound shame, especially regarding his wife. In his distress, he sought to escape and cover himself with fig leaves. Since that time, every modest and God-fearing individual, even when alone in solitude, recalls the all-seeing gaze of God and the watchful presence of his guardian angel, maintaining a sense of modesty even while disrobing. Similarly, the father, upon witnessing the return of his prodigal son, instructs his servants, “Bring the best robe and clothe him” (Luke 15:22), thus covering his nakedness so that he does not stand before me uncovered.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Opened eyes. This phrase, the opening of the eyes, does not imply the utmost level of understanding. In Hebrew culture, this expression conveys an inadvertent realization of something previously overlooked (Gen. 21:19). Such was the case with the forefathers' awareness of their nakedness. Nakedness, as interpreted through the modesty of sacred language, signifies both internal and external disgrace (Ex. 32:25, Abb. 2:15). The shame experienced by the sinning forefathers was internal, stemming from their fear and desire to conceal themselves from God, and external, as it necessitated covering. Inner nakedness represents the loss of original purity and grace, while outer nakedness indicates a perception of some flaw or impurity in the physical body.

Read more (126 words)

Those who felt this sense of nakedness believed that it could be remedied by girding themselves. Indeed, certain areas of the body were particularly prone to this feeling. This may be attributed either to the inherent consequences of the forbidden fruit, which harmed the body, or to the influence of rampant sensuality. However, since the experience of nakedness is accompanied by reverence for God, it can be directly linked to the workings of conscience. The loins, which are the visible source and sign of progeny (Gen. 24:2, Gen. 49:10, Heb. 7:5, 10), symbolize for Adam all of humanity and the various sins and repercussions that arise from the original transgression; additionally, the source of God’s blessing becomes for him a source of deep shame and anguish.

Makarios (Bulgakow)

19th centuryCommentator

The repercussions of our ancestors' transgression include the loss of purity, a distortion of the will, and a tendency toward evil over good. This is clearly illustrated by the immediate consequences of their sin: upon disobedience, both realized their nakedness, a condition they had previously been unaware of.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

The harmful effects of disobeying God's command soon became evident. The serpent's words came to fruition: the eyes of the wrongdoers were indeed opened, but not to acquire a divine knowledge of good and evil without succumbing to sin; instead, they gained a painful awareness of their moral decay. ‘Know ye how nazi besha.’ Prior to the fall, their bodies served as pure vessels for their untainted souls. The intellect governed their desires, and there were no chaotic impulses within them, so their nakedness evoked no shame. However, the mind lost its authority over the flesh.

Read more (99 words)

From their carnal nature emerged impure desires, instilling a profound sense of shame within the souls of the ancestors—they felt embarrassed in each other’s presence, unable to view one another unclothed without succumbing to disordered thoughts and feelings. Their shame compelled them to ‘sew fig leaves and make girdles for themselves,’ crafting coverings for their loins from fig leaves. Although the feeling of shame is painful, it serves a beneficial purpose: it revealed that our fallen ancestors were dissatisfied with their condition and capable of repentance, though, as we will explore, this repentance was neither immediate nor entirely sincere.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.