John Chrysostom
And she also offered the fruit to her husband, and he consumed it. Their eyes were both opened, and they recognized their nakedness. This raises an essential question that we resolved to address previously. It is reasonable to inquire about the power of this tree, which, upon eating from it, opened their eyes, and to understand why it is referred to as the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Please bear with me as I elucidate this matter, and help you comprehend that if we accept with discernment what is proclaimed in the sacred Scriptures, we will find nothing too difficult to grasp. It was not the act of tasting the tree that opened their eyes; they had already seen before tasting it. However, eating from the tree symbolized disobedience and a transgression of God's commandment, resulting in their loss of the glory that once enveloped them and rendering them unworthy of such honor. Thus, Scripture expresses, “She ate ... and he ate. And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked.” Having forfeited the supreme grace due to their transgression, they became acutely aware of their physical nakedness, experiencing such shame that they would fully understand the depths to which their disobedience had led them. Initially, they had enjoyed perfect freedom, unaware of their nakedness (they were not truly naked, as the glory above them provided greater covering than any garment). Yet, after consuming it—following the transgression of the command—they became so humbled that they sought a means to cover themselves. The violation of the command had stripped them of that wondrous and extraordinary garment of glory and divine favor with which they were clothed, simultaneously awakening in them an awareness of their nakedness and shrouding them in unutterable shame. “And they sewed together fig leaves and made themselves loincloths.” Reflect, Beloved, on the heights from which the devil’s deception had cast them. Once enveloped in such glory, they now stitch together fig leaves to conceal themselves. Such is the outcome of the devil’s seduction; it does not bestow greater benefit but rather deprives individuals of what they once possessed. Since the act of eating resulted in disobedience, Scripture iterates, “I ate ... and he ate. And their eyes were opened,” referring not to physical sight but to spiritual discernment. By transgressing the commandment, they were made aware of what they previously did not feel due to the grace afforded to them. Therefore, when it states that “their eyes were opened,” understand it to mean that God allowed them to perceive their nakedness and the loss of glory they had previously enjoyed. To further illustrate this Scriptural custom, recall how it describes another instance: when Hagar, fleeing from her mistress, found a young boy under a bush, having set herself away to await his death, Scripture declares, “And God opened her eyes” (Gen. 21:15, 16, 19)—not because her sight was lacking, but because God, at that moment, enlightened her understanding. Do you see that the term “opened” refers not to physical sight but to spiritual awareness?
Now regarding the other inquiry: why is this tree named the tree of the knowledge of good and evil? Many engage in debate, insisting that Adam, after consuming the fruit, gained the ability to discern good from evil. Such thinking is utterly foolish. To preclude this misconception, we have recently discussed the wisdom bestowed by God upon humanity, illustrated by Adam’s naming of all creatures—beasts, birds, and unspoken animals—and the added gift of prophecy. How could one who named and spoke marvelously about his wife be ignorant of good and evil? If such ignorance were plausible, we would again be slandering the Creator. How could God give a command to one unversed in what evil is? It is not so; rather, Adam clearly understood. Consequently, from the beginning, God fashioned humanity with self-control; otherwise, he could not rightly be both punished for his transgressions and rewarded for obedience. The mortality imposed upon him due to his disobedience is evident from the command and subsequent events. Recall what the woman said to the serpent: “The fruit of the trees we may eat; but of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, God said, 'Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.’” Thus, prior to tasting, they were immortal; if not, God would not have inflicted death as punishment even after their transgression. Who would argue that humanity received the knowledge of good and evil only after eating the fruit, when he was already endowed with wisdom prior to that act, not to mention the gift of prophecy? How rational is it to conclude that various animals possess the instinct to discriminate between beneficial and harmful plants, while humankind—being a rational creature—remains oblivious to good and evil? However, some may argue that the Scriptures themselves designate this tree as the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Indeed, it is necessary to grasp the reasons behind the name given to this tree. It received such a title not because it imparted this knowledge, but because it was from this tree that the transgression of the commandment originated, resulting in the awakening of sin and shame. Thus, it is customary in the Holy Scriptures to name locations based on events that occurred there, which is why this tree is referred to as the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, meant to signify the obedience or disobedience exercised therein. The compassionate Lord, from the beginning, aimed to teach humanity to recognize that they have a Creator and Maker who fashioned all visible things and created humankind. He sought to demonstrate His authority through this simple command. Just as a generous proprietor, having given someone a splendid home, does not claim absolute ownership but retains a small share to remind that person of their dependency, so our Lord entrusted humanity with all visible creation. He permitted them to dwell in Paradise and utilize its offerings, thereby preventing them from gradually forgetting their true origin and becoming overly proud of their dignity. He commanded them to refrain from one specific tree, imposing a grave consequence for its violation, to instill in them the awareness that they were under their Master and used all other things according to the grace of the Master. However, as Adam, through carelessness and with his wife, fell into misfortune by violating this command and eating from the tree, Scripture named it the tree of the knowledge of good and evil—not because before this he lacked awareness of good and evil, but to signify the experience of shame and loss that ensued after eating. For after consuming the fruit, they lost the highest glory and became acutely aware of their physical nakedness, hence the scripture describes it as the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Do you understand why Scripture says, “The eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked”? Have you grasped why this tree is called the tree of the knowledge of good and evil? Contemplate the shame that overtook them after they ate from the tree and transgressed the Lord's command, “And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths.” Reflect upon the glory they fell from into utter humiliation. Those who once lived as earthly angels were now fashioning garments from leaves. Such is the reality of sin—it not only strips us of the greatest joy but also plunges us into profound shame and degradation, robbing us of our blessings and our confidence. Yet, to prevent our consideration of humanity's sin in eating from the tree and disobedience from leading to despair, let us shift our focus to another tree—the tree of the cross—and examine the calamities this act caused and the benefits it brought. The misfortunes arose not from the tree itself but from the negligence and contempt for the commandment. The first tree introduced death, as death followed disobedience, while the latter granted immortality. The first expelled us from paradise; the latter elevated us to heaven. For one transgression, Adam suffered severe consequences; the latter liberated us from countless burdens of sin and restored our confidence before God. Do you see the distinction between these two trees? Do you perceive the wickedness of the devil, the negligence of humanity, and the compassion of the Lord? Therefore, I implore you to arm yourselves with this life-giving tree and, through its strength, put to death the passions that threaten your soul, just as the Apostle Paul states, “And those who belong to Christ have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires” (Galatians 5:24). This signifies that those who wholly surrender to Christ mortify every impure desire that arises within them, detrimental to the well-being of their soul. By emulating their example, we too shall render our faculties dormant to the dominion of the devil and, in this present life, navigate the tumultuous and perilous sea peacefully, and, having reached the serene haven of God’s grace, receive the promised blessings for those who love Him, in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom be glory, together with the Father and the Holy Spirit, now and forever, and unto ages of ages. Amen.
I am aware that some criticize the Lawgiver, suggesting that the law is to blame for humanity's fall into sin. It is essential to address this matter and demonstrate through action that God established the law not out of animosity toward humanity or a desire to shame our nature, but from love and concern for us. To understand that the law was given as a sign of unity, heed what Isaiah states: For He has given us the law as a help. The one who harbors hatred offers no assistance. The prophet proclaims: Thy word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path (Psalm 118:105). One who hates does not illuminate the darkness with a lamp, nor does one who misleads guide anyone toward the light. Solomon further remarks: For the commandment is a lamp, and the teaching is light; reproofs of instruction are the way of life (Proverbs 6:23). Notice, it’s not only help, nor merely a lamp, but light and life—these qualities are characteristic not of one who seeks to destroy, but of one who extends a hand to uplift.