Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)
Part 3. There is uncertainty regarding the authorship of the account of the kings and certain elders of Idumea, specifically whether it was penned by Moses or incorporated into his writings by another who aimed to align with his message (Genesis 36:31-43). Some scholars argue that this catalog of Idumean rulers could not have originated within Moses' text. This perspective is supported by two main considerations: first, Moses could not have referenced kings in Israel since their monarchy arose several centuries after his time.
Read more (301 words)
Secondly, it seems unlikely that the nation of Idumea, which shared origins with Israel, could have had eight monarchs prior to Moses’ era, especially as they transitioned from a patriarchal system to governance by elders, eventually leading to a united form of leadership, followed by a return to rule by elders (1 Chronicles 1:51).
However, the first argument is somewhat diminished by the possibility that Moses could have prophesied future kings of Israel based on the insights from divine revelation pertaining to Israel (Genesis 35:11). In this context, his statement about Idumea may imply that ‘These are the kings of Idumea, who existed for a time before the kings from the lineage of Israel, as was foretold to him.’ The second argument also lacks robustness when we consider that the kings mentioned in Idumea’s list spanned various generations and ruled in different locations, indicating they were likely selected from the elders of distinct Idumean tribes, making it improbable one would ascend to the throne at a young age. Hence, the succession detailed in Moses’ list could have occurred within the span of his lengthy life, which lasted a hundred and twenty years. It is interesting to note that more detail is provided about the last king listed than about his predecessors, and notably, his death is not recorded, whereas all former kings are mentioned (Num. 20:14). Was this not the king who ruled during the time when Moses dispatched envoys from Kadesh to the king of Edom? (Num. 20:14). It does not detract from the authenticity and integrity of Moses’ writings to suggest that the account of Esau's descendants may have been added posthumously, similar to the additions made in Deuteronomy concerning his death; nevertheless, it is clear from the context that such a hypothesis is not necessary at this point.