The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 47:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Except the land of the priests, which had been given them by the king: to whom also a certain allowance of food was given out of the public stores, and therefore they were not forced to sell their possessions.

Douay-Rheims

רַ֛ק אַדְמַ֥ת הַכֹּהֲנִ֖ים לֹ֣א קָנָ֑ה כִּי֩ חֹ֨ק לַכֹּהֲנִ֜ים מֵאֵ֣ת פַּרְעֹ֗ה וְאָֽכְל֤וּ אֶת־חֻקָּם֙ אֲשֶׁ֨ר נָתַ֤ן לָהֶם֙ פַּרְעֹ֔ה עַל־כֵּ֕ן לֹ֥א מָכְר֖וּ אֶת־אַדְמָתָֽם׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Except for the territory belonging to the priests, that alone is not available for purchase, for the priests were given the bread designated for them by Pharaoh without cost.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Joseph could have squandered the wealth of Egypt and the royal treasures, but he chose not to waste resources on others' behalf. Instead, he opted to sell the bread to those in need rather than hand it out freely; had he given it to a select few, the vast majority would have been left empty-handed. He favored a distribution method that ensured abundance for all, opening the storerooms so that everyone could purchase grain, thereby encouraging them to continue cultivating the land rather than relying on free handouts. He understood that those who depend on what belongs to someone else often neglect their own responsibilities.

Read more (210 words)

Thus, he first gathered all the funds available, and in the end, he transferred ownership of the land to the king. This act was not meant to strip everyone of their properties, but rather to reinforce the community’s welfare, implementing a tax to ensure they could retain their ownership in peace. Those from whom he acquired the land recognized his actions not as a loss of their rights, but rather as a means of safeguarding their lives. They expressed gratitude, saying, “You have saved our lives; we have found favor in the sight of our lord.” They lost nothing of their holdings by regaining their rights and retained what was of true value while gaining renewed hope for the future.

What a remarkable leader he was! Instead of chasing fleeting accolades through excessive generosity, he solidified the benefits of wise governance by ensuring that the people contributed to their own welfare through taxes. In times of famine, they were instructed not to seek foreign assistance. It is far wiser to give a portion of one’s yield than to gamble away everything. Joseph instituted a policy of collecting one-fifth of the harvest, showcasing both insight and compassion in his tax strategy. Following his example, Egypt never again faced such devastating famine.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Alongside the priests, the soldiers possessed the fields in a manner that did not confer true ownership, as evidenced by the annual change in their proprietors. The people engaged in farming by renting land from the king, the priests, and the soldiers, with only the land of the priests being exempt from purchase. Diodorus attests that one-third of the land in Egypt was allocated to the priests, another third to the king, and the remaining third to the soldiers. The income generated from these lands supported the expenses of sacred rituals and the sustenance of the priests, maintaining their esteemed status. They held significant advantages of honor and authority under the reign of the king. The rulers desired that divine service retain a consistent form and that its ministers remain unchanged, ensuring that those who advised and guided them in critical state matters were not lacking in any regard.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.