The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 49:7Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Cursed be their fury, because it was stubborn: and their wrath, because it was cruel: I will divide them in Jacob, and will scatter them in Israel.

Douay-Rheims

אָר֤וּר אַפָּם֙ כִּ֣י עָ֔ז וְעֶבְרָתָ֖ם כִּ֣י קָשָׁ֑תָה אֲחַלְּקֵ֣ם בְּיַעֲקֹ֔ב וַאֲפִיצֵ֖ם בְּיִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

In conclusion, after recounting the actions of Simeon and Levi, James includes a condemnation, stating, “Cursed is their anger, for it is cruel, and their fury, for it is fierce.” This refers to the cunning they employed against the Shechemites, misleading them and attacking them treacherously; their anger is described as brazen, hasty, and reckless. The Shechemites, believing they would gain their favor, were instead met with fierce hostility and treated as adversaries. Following his remarks on their wrongdoing, James also hints at the consequences they would face: “I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel.” He indicates that they will be dispersed widely, ensuring that all will recognize this as a punishment for their brazen actions.

Read more (69 words)

However, it is clear that this prophecy was not realized in Simeon and Levi themselves but in their descendants. The tribe of Levi was indeed dispersed—each of its parts belonged to the other tribes; likewise, the tribe of Simeon, which faced a similar outcome, was allocated territory that lay outside the fringes of the other tribes and did not receive, as the others did, a consolidated and unified inheritance.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Let us listen to the voices of those who have struck down such a holy young man: ‘Cursed be their wrath, for it is harsh, and their rage, for it is fierce.’ What have they endured? They are dispossessed of their homeland, have abandoned their native soil, are scattered, and wander as exiles, strangers, and the destitute. Indeed, just as a bird feels when it leaves its nest, so does a man feel when he is forced from his home. However, it is important to note that for those who have attacked the veins of the young man, this act will be a curse. In contrast, for those who grieve and seek to rid themselves of such a grievous sin, it will lead to redemption, purification, and forgiveness of transgressions. This is further illustrated by the teachings of the Law.

Read more (301 words)

In Deuteronomy, we find: ‘If in the land which the Lord thy God gives thee to possess, a slain man is found lying in the field and it is not known who killed him, let thy elders and thy judges go out and measure the distance to the cities that are around the slain man; And the elders of that city which shall be nearest to the slain man, let them take a heifer which hath not been worked and which hath not worn a yoke: and let the elders of that city lead that heifer into a wild valley that is neither cultivated nor sown, and let them slay the heifer there in the valley: and the priests, the sons of Levi, shall come in...; and all the elders of that city that are nearest to the slain man shall wash their hands over the head of the slain heifer in the valley and declare, ‘Our hands have not shed this blood, nor have our eyes seen it; cleanse Thy people Israel, whom Thou, O Lord, hast redeemed..., and impute not innocent blood to Thy people Israel. And they shall be free from the blood.’ Thus you shall purge yourself from the innocent blood’ (Deuteronomy 21:1-9). While this topic will be discussed in detail later, let us now observe this: you see how some exonerate themselves from the charge of bloodshed, and the young woman symbolizes Immanuel for us. They should proclaim, ‘Our hands have not shed this blood.’ The people of Israel, however, will not be found making such a declaration. Rather, in their assault on the young man, the Jews brazenly asserted, ‘Our hands have shed this blood.’ This aligns with what they irrationally proclaimed regarding Christ: ‘His blood is upon us and upon our children’ (Matt. 27:25).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Cursed be their anger, for it grew fierce against the Shechemites. Their wrath intensified, as from the moment the Shechemites convinced the sons of Jacob to allow their sister to marry Shechem, until they underwent circumcision and faced illness as a consequence, a considerable amount of time elapsed. Yet throughout this period, the anger of Simeon and Levi remained unchecked. I will separate them within Jacob, indicating a division between them. Following the curse, they will no longer share the unity they once had. They acted in collusion, without consulting their brothers, to seek revenge for the dishonor of Dinah. I will divide them in Jacob, meaning among Jacob's descendants, and scatter them throughout Israel, among the tribes of Israel.

Read more (111 words)

The evidence of their separation is seen in Zamvrias from the tribe of Simeon and Phinehas from the tribe of Levi. Just as Levi and Simeon plotted to take lives for their sisters, Phinehas later killed a descendant of Simeon and his wife. Not only did God divide Simeon and Levi in their attitudes, rendering their previous consensus futile, but He also scattered these tribes among the others. The tribe of Levi was dispersed, receiving portions in each of the tribes, and unlike his brethren, Levi did not receive a designated inheritance. The descendants of Simeon, due to their limited territory, were compelled to reside within the inheritances of their brothers.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

He continues by declaring, "Cursed be their fury, for it is unchecked, and their wrath, for it is fierce. I will divide them in Jacob, and scatter them in Israel." Levi did not obtain a personal inheritance; instead, he was allocated numerous cities among the tribes for his dwelling. Concerning Simeon, it is noted in the book of Joshua that he, too, lacked a personal inheritance, receiving land within the boundaries of Judah. The book of Chronicles elaborates that since Simeon had increased in number but had no land to inhabit, he ventured into the wilderness.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

He also addressed Simeon and Levi, stating that he would divide them in Jacob and scatter them among Israel. This indicates that they would find redemption in the assembly of the nations. For after the shepherd has been struck, the flock that was once gathered is dispersed (Zech. 13:7; Matt. 26:31)—that He who was not present may enter, leading to the salvation of all Israel (Rom. 11:26). Furthermore, we must have even greater faith regarding the tribe of Levi, as it appears this lineage is what the Lord Jesus identifies with concerning the body He took on. From this tribe came the priests Levi and Nathan, who are mentioned by St. Luke as part of the Lord's genealogy in the Gospel he authored (Luke 3:29-31).

Read more (56 words)

As the Priest of the Father and the supreme High Priest— as it is written, Thou art a priest forever (Ps. 109:4; Heb. 5:6; Heb. 7:17)—He must therefore inherit the priestly lineage. For this reason, Moses blessed the tribe, proclaiming, Give to Levi the lot of election, and to the holy man his truth (Deut. 33:8).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

He does not condemn individuals, but rather their wicked desires, their wrath, their fury. He equates anger with desire, as anger springs from it, and one who harbors anger is driven by a wish to retaliate against an adversary. This punishment served merely as a preliminary indication. Indeed, He declares, ‘I will divide them in Jacob, and scatter them in Israel.’ The tribe of Levi was dispersed due to exceptional honor, ensuring that within each tribe there would be Levites and priests, allowing all to derive blessings from them. They were not granted a distinct inheritance; rather, cities were designated to them in each tribe, along with a specified amount of land within the borders. Meanwhile, the tribe of Simeon received no separate inheritance, but, as foretold by the Patriarch, was intermingled with the other tribes.

Hippolytus of Rome

2nd centuryChurch Father

He referred to their wrath as the fury in which they persistently tensed their bow, resisting the Holy Spirit. "I will divide them by Jacob, and scatter them by Israel." Who were Jacob and Israel if not the sacred firstborn of God? Those who rebelled against Him now faced scattering across the globe, having been vanquished by their adversaries.

Rufinus of Aquileia

5th centuryChurch Father

In terms of historical interpretation, this passage condemns the actions of those who, through deceit and malice, murdered Shechem, the son of Hamor. Shechem sought to join the people of Israel after having relations with their sister. In retaliating, he caused the deaths of all his people, prompting their father Israel to say, "Ye have made me hateful in this world" (Gen. 34:13-29). Consequently, Israel denounces their rage and foolishness, foretelling that they will be dispersed among the tribes of Israel. Ultimately, it is from this lineage that the Levites and priests will arise, who will not have their own designated portion of land.

Ignatij (Briantchaninow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Simeon and Levi were not granted the privileges of the firstborn. Their propensity for violence is marked by a curse, and their descendants are fated to be dispersed among the tribes of their brothers.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

I will divide them in Jacob, and scatter them in Israel. To prevent the dangerous unity of the two brothers from being replicated by their offspring, Jacob determined that they should be separated—that is, the tribes of Simeon and Levi were not to be adjacent; and scattered, meaning that neither tribe was to inhabit a singular location but to be distributed among the various tribes of the children of Israel. This decision initially applied to the tribe of Simeon, which was situated amidst the territory of the children of Judah (Hab. 19:1), and therefore distinct from the other tribes. Due to a lack of suitable grazing land in its original inheritance, this tribe later had to extend its settlements to Gedor and Seir (1 Chronicles 4:38-43).

Read more (154 words)

The tribe of Levi was allocated designated cities within each of the twelve other tribes. Tertullian and Ambrose, following Jewish tradition, also indicate that while the tribe of Levi produced priests, the tribe of Simeon generated scribes and legal scholars, necessitating their distribution across the different tribes. There is a question regarding the seeming contradiction between Jacob’s condemnation of the Levites, who are deprived of their share of the inheritance, and the blessing they receive from God, who chooses to be their portion (Num. 18:20). The resolution is that Jacob does not ultimately condemn Simeon and Levi; rather, his judgement regarding seniority, which he removes from Reuben, is meant to be conferred upon the most worthy, assigning precedence to Judah. The Levites are scattered both as a consequence of their ancestor’s actions and to avert harmful associations; however, they are simultaneously favored by God for their unwavering commitment to faith (Exodus 32:26, Numbers 25:10-13).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.