The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 13:12Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people by his own blood, suffered without the gate.

Douay-Rheims

διο και ιησους ινα αγιαση δια του ιδιου αιματος τον λαον εξω της πυλης επαθεν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Do you see the clear type? There, he says, “outside the camp” (Heb 13:11), and here, “outside the gates.” Just as the sacrifices offered for sins were a kind of type and were burned outside the camp, so Jesus, who offered Himself for our sins, suffered outside the gates. Therefore we too must imitate Him who suffered for us and be outside the world, or rather, outside worldly deeds. [...] Then the Apostle explains the typological sacrifice and turns the discourse to the archetype: “For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin are burned outside the camp. Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people by His own Blood, suffered outside the gates.” Consequently, the first was a type of the latter.

Read more (56 words)

Thus Christ fulfilled everything by suffering outside the gates. Here the Apostle also expresses that Christ suffered voluntarily. He proves that those sacrifices were not established without purpose, but were a kind of type. He also proves that the divine economy itself was not accomplished without sufferings, but that Christ’s Blood was carried up into heaven.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

so also Christ, having suffered for the sins of the world, brought His Blood to the Father in the sanctuary, as High Priest, while His Body was crucified outside the gate. Therefore, when our high priests commemorate that sacrifice, they bring the Blood of the Lord into our sanctuary and onto the altar, as into heaven. Therefore the high priests of the Old Testament law cannot eat from this altar, as foreigners and as those who do not think of what is above this world. But we are not such.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

so also Jesus Christ, in order to sanctify His people by His own Blood, willed to suffer outside the gate of the city (cf. Lev 14:12; Mt 27:32).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

Look at the type, compare it with the truth, and behold the likeness. The Law commanded that a red heifer be slain, that the high priest take some of its blood and sprinkle it seven times with his finger before the mercy seat. The heifer itself was burned outside the camp. Its ashes were taken, and by them those called unclean were purified (Num 19:2-9). This was a type of the saving Passion. Here also the body taken from Adam, whose name in Hebrew means “red,” was nailed to the Cross outside the gate. His Blood cleanses our souls, and the ashes are replaced for us by the very life-giving Body.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

In accordance with this type, Jesus also was crucified outside the gate of the city, just as those sacrificial animals were slain outside the camp. Christ suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify His people by His Blood. For the blood of those typological sacrifices also cleansed from that for which they were offered, though not perfectly.

Leo the Great

5th centuryChurch Father

For Christ, our Pascha, has been sacrificed for us (1 Cor 5:7), as the apostle says. God the Son was crucified as the new and true redeeming sacrifice to the Father, but not within the Temple, whose worship had already come to an end. Nor was Christ crucified within the walls of the city, which awaited destruction for its crimes, but outside the camp. Thus, when the mystery of the old sacrifices was exhausted, a new sacrifice was offered upon a new altar. The Cross of Christ is the altar not of the Church alone, but now of the whole world.

Isaac the Syrian

6th centuryChurch Father

The Redeemer and Lord most wisely and very well commanded the one who undertook to follow Him to strip himself and go out from the world (cf. Mt 19:21), because a man must first cast away everything that leads to slackness and only then approach the work. When the Lord Himself began the battle with the devil, He waged it in the driest wilderness. Paul advises those who take up the cross of Christ to go out of the city. “Let us go forth to Him,” he says, “outside the city, and bear His reproach” (Heb 13:12-13), because He suffered outside the city. For if a man separates himself from the world and from everything in the world, he quickly forgets his former habit and former manner of life. He does not labor over this for long.

Read more (151 words)

But when he draws near to the world and to worldly things, the strength of his mind quickly grows slack. Therefore one must know what especially helps and leads to progress in this suffering and saving warfare. Thus it is fitting and helpful in this warfare that the monastic cell be in a poor and insufficient condition. The monk’s cell should be empty and contain nothing that arouses in him desire for repose. When the causes of slackness are removed from a man, there is no danger for him in a twofold warfare, inner and outer. Thus the man who keeps far from himself what serves pleasure gains the victory without difficulty, in comparison with the one who has near him what stirs him to desire. For here the struggle is doubled. The word “most wisely” is not in the Greek edition. It was inserted from the translation of St. Paisius.

Photios of Constantinople

9th centuryChurch Father

This is said for those who ask in perplexity, “How do you say that you have an altar? What was offered on it?” This is Christ Himself, whom you despise from top to bottom and do not see that He was offered as a sacrifice. He is the Sacrifice accomplished for the whole world, and the offering, although He was not offered on your altar. For it is evident that He suffered outside the city of Jerusalem (Heb 13:12). Therefore Paul says to them: “Yes, He suffered outside. Yet precisely through this it came about that we have an altar. For among you also the bodies of sacrificial animals are not burned on the altars themselves, but outside the camp. For this further reason Jesus suffered outside the gates of Jerusalem, that all, and not only the priests, might be sanctified.

Read more (114 words)

And if the sacrifice was for all, how can this not be an altar?” Yet another interpretation is also given to the expression “that He might sanctify the people.” Consider: Paul says that those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat from our altar. This is not because it is impossible for them, but because, according to their own judgment, they show themselves unworthy. For by the love for mankind of Christ, eating from the altar is not only not forbidden. Rather, He suffered precisely for this, that He might sanctify, as Paul said, not only these or those, but all the people, and give them authority to eat from this altar.

Benjamin (Krasnopevkov-Rumovsky)

18th centuryChurch Father

Why did Christ deign to shed His Blood on the Cross not in Jerusalem, but outside it? Augustine, in his homily on the Cross and the thief, speaks about this subject in this way: “Why is Christ put to death on the height of the Cross, and not under the roof of a building? In order,” he answers, “to cleanse the air. Second, the Redeemer dies not on an altar and not under a roof made above, but under heaven. This is because at the death of the Lamb on high, the air was cleansed, and the earth also was cleansed by the Lord’s Blood falling upon it.” Further. He dies not under a roof and not in the Jewish temple, lest the Jews appropriate this saving sacrifice to themselves or think that this sacrifice is offered only for that people. Finally, the Savior died outside the city and outside the walls so that you might understand that, just as the sacrifice offered for the human race is universal, so also the cleansing is universal.

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

To implant this truth in the hearts of his readers, the Apostle shows that Christianity and Judaism’s discrimination about foods exclude one another. He also shows that it is very fitting for Christians to renounce their former Jewish habits. We Christians, says the Apostle, have our own sacrificial altar, θυσιαστήριον, that is, the place where Christ was slain, namely the Cross on Golgotha. The people of the Old Testament have no right to share with us in the fruits of Christ’s death on this altar, that is, to eat. They served God by their sacrifices in the tabernacle and then enjoyed the right to eat from the remains of those sacrifices.

Read more (330 words)

To make more clearly visible the incompatibility between walking according to foods and the Christian enjoyment of the saving benefits of Christ’s death, the Apostle chooses the image of eating from the altar to denote this enjoyment. Speaking in Old Testament language, this eating would be an eating from the propitiatory sacrifice (v. 11), which the law had already forbidden to be eaten. In that case the body of the sacrificial animal was burned outside the camp. In this propitiatory sacrifice of the Old Testament, the New Testament sacrifice was presented typologically. Therefore, to fulfill the type and to offer the sacrifice of reconciliation for the sanctification of the people, Jesus suffered outside the gates of Jerusalem (v. 12). For by His time the former camp had been replaced by the city of Jerusalem. Like the camp, it represented the visible Kingdom of God. But what is the meaning of the type and of its fulfillment? In the burning of the sacrifice offered for the sins of the whole people, the people were shown that sin itself was being subdued and destroyed by this burning. This sin was united to the body of the animal that stood in man’s place. Every destruction or putting to death, so as not to defile the Hebrew community, had to take place outside the camp. From this it is clear that Christ also, as the One who put sin to death in His own body, had to accomplish this outside the holy city. Whoever does not acknowledge this great meaning of Christ’s death, and tries to find support for his life not in Christ but in the Jewish laws about food, has no right to enjoy the fruits of Christ’s death on the Cross. Therefore the Apostle exhorts his readers to go out beyond the camp and bear Christ’s reproach. That is, they must end communion with Judaism and take upon themselves the shame which renouncing Judaism entails in the eyes of the Jews.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 15 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. διὸ
    dio
    wherefore
    G1352 · διό
  2. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  3. Ἰησοῦς
    iēsous
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  4. ἵνα
    hina
    in order that
    G2443 · ἵνα
  5. ἁγιάσῃ
    hagiasē
    I make holy
    G37 · ἁγιάζω
  6. διὰ
    dia
    through
    G1223 · διά
  7. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. ἰδίου
    idiou
    one's own
    G2398 · ἴδιος
  9. αἵματος
    haimatos
    blood
    G129 · αἷμα
  10. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. λαόν
    laon
    a people
    G2992 · λαός
  12. ἔξω
    exō
    without
    G1854 · ἔξω
  13. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  14. πύλης
    pylēs
    a door
    G4439 · πύλη
  15. ἔπαθεν
    epathen
    I am acted upon
    G3958 · πάσχω