The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 13:11Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For the bodies of those beasts whose blood is brought into the holies by the high priest for sin are burned without the camp.

Douay-Rheims

ων γαρ εισφερεται ζωων το αιμα περι αμαρτιας εις τα αγια δια του αρχιερεως τουτων τα σωματα κατακαιεται εξω της παρεμβολης

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Do you see the clear type? There, he says, “outside the camp” (Heb 13:11), and here, “outside the gates.” Just as the sacrifices offered for sins were a kind of type and were burned outside the camp, so Jesus, who offered Himself for our sins, suffered outside the gates. Therefore we too must imitate Him who suffered for us and be outside the world, or rather, outside worldly deeds. [...] Then the Apostle explains the typological sacrifice and turns the discourse to the archetype: “For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin are burned outside the camp. Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people by His own Blood, suffered outside the gates.” Consequently, the first was a type of the latter.

Read more (56 words)

Thus Christ fulfilled everything by suffering outside the gates. Here the Apostle also expresses that Christ suffered voluntarily. He proves that those sacrifices were not established without purpose, but were a kind of type. He also proves that the divine economy itself was not accomplished without sufferings, but that Christ’s Blood was carried up into heaven.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Having shown that what the Jews revered was a type of our worship, he says that the sacrifices in which the people could not share were nothing. In our sacrifice, the high priests of the Old Testament law also have no share, for those sacrifices were types of this one. For as the blood of the animals offered for the sins of the people was brought by the high priest into the sanctuary, while their bodies were burned outside the camp...

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

But as the bodies of those animals, whose blood the high priest brought within the Holy of Holies for sin and cleansing, were burned outside the camp...

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

Look at the type, compare it with the truth, and behold the likeness. The Law commanded that a red heifer be slain, that the high priest take some of its blood and sprinkle it seven times with his finger before the mercy seat. The heifer itself was burned outside the camp. Its ashes were taken, and by them those called unclean were purified (Num 19:2-9). This was a type of the saving Passion. Here also the body taken from Adam, whose name in Hebrew means “red,” was nailed to the Cross outside the gate. His Blood cleanses our souls, and the ashes are replaced for us by the very life-giving Body.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“Whose,” that is, of the animals offered in sacrifice for sins, for the remission of sins. The book of Leviticus speaks of this in detail (Lev 16). Thus the divine Apostle applies the historical type to the truth, for he says:

Leo the Great

5th centuryChurch Father

For Christ, our Pascha, has been sacrificed for us (1 Cor 5:7), as the apostle says. God the Son was crucified as the new and true redeeming sacrifice to the Father, but not within the Temple, whose worship had already come to an end. Nor was Christ crucified within the walls of the city, which awaited destruction for its crimes, but outside the camp. Thus, when the mystery of the old sacrifices was exhausted, a new sacrifice was offered upon a new altar. The Cross of Christ is the altar not of the Church alone, but now of the whole world.

Photios of Constantinople

9th centuryChurch Father

This is said for those who ask in perplexity, “How do you say that you have an altar? What was offered on it?” This is Christ Himself, whom you despise from top to bottom and do not see that He was offered as a sacrifice. He is the Sacrifice accomplished for the whole world, and the offering, although He was not offered on your altar. For it is evident that He suffered outside the city of Jerusalem (Heb 13:12). Therefore Paul says to them: “Yes, He suffered outside. Yet precisely through this it came about that we have an altar. For among you also the bodies of sacrificial animals are not burned on the altars themselves, but outside the camp. For this further reason Jesus suffered outside the gates of Jerusalem, that all, and not only the priests, might be sanctified.

Read more (114 words)

And if the sacrifice was for all, how can this not be an altar?” Yet another interpretation is also given to the expression “that He might sanctify the people.” Consider: Paul says that those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat from our altar. This is not because it is impossible for them, but because, according to their own judgment, they show themselves unworthy. For by the love for mankind of Christ, eating from the altar is not only not forbidden. Rather, He suffered precisely for this, that He might sanctify, as Paul said, not only these or those, but all the people, and give them authority to eat from this altar.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

The bodies are burned outside the camp. On the Day of Atonement, the bodies of the bullock and the goat offered for sin were burned outside the camp, or outside the city (Lev 16:27). To this circumstance the Apostle adapts the fact that Christ suffered outside the city.

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

To implant this truth in the hearts of his readers, the Apostle shows that Christianity and Judaism’s discrimination about foods exclude one another. He also shows that it is very fitting for Christians to renounce their former Jewish habits. We Christians, says the Apostle, have our own sacrificial altar, θυσιαστήριον, that is, the place where Christ was slain, namely the Cross on Golgotha. The people of the Old Testament have no right to share with us in the fruits of Christ’s death on this altar, that is, to eat. They served God by their sacrifices in the tabernacle and then enjoyed the right to eat from the remains of those sacrifices.

Read more (330 words)

To make more clearly visible the incompatibility between walking according to foods and the Christian enjoyment of the saving benefits of Christ’s death, the Apostle chooses the image of eating from the altar to denote this enjoyment. Speaking in Old Testament language, this eating would be an eating from the propitiatory sacrifice (v. 11), which the law had already forbidden to be eaten. In that case the body of the sacrificial animal was burned outside the camp. In this propitiatory sacrifice of the Old Testament, the New Testament sacrifice was presented typologically. Therefore, to fulfill the type and to offer the sacrifice of reconciliation for the sanctification of the people, Jesus suffered outside the gates of Jerusalem (v. 12). For by His time the former camp had been replaced by the city of Jerusalem. Like the camp, it represented the visible Kingdom of God. But what is the meaning of the type and of its fulfillment? In the burning of the sacrifice offered for the sins of the whole people, the people were shown that sin itself was being subdued and destroyed by this burning. This sin was united to the body of the animal that stood in man’s place. Every destruction or putting to death, so as not to defile the Hebrew community, had to take place outside the camp. From this it is clear that Christ also, as the One who put sin to death in His own body, had to accomplish this outside the holy city. Whoever does not acknowledge this great meaning of Christ’s death, and tries to find support for his life not in Christ but in the Jewish laws about food, has no right to enjoy the fruits of Christ’s death on the Cross. Therefore the Apostle exhorts his readers to go out beyond the camp and bear Christ’s reproach. That is, they must end communion with Judaism and take upon themselves the shame which renouncing Judaism entails in the eyes of the Jews.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 21 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ὧν
    hōn
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. εἰσφέρεται
    eispheretai
    I lead into
    G1533 · εἰσφέρω
  4. ζῴων
    zōōn
    an animal
    G2226 · ζῷον
  5. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. αἷμα
    haima
    blood
    G129 · αἷμα
  7. περὶ
    peri
    about
    G4012 · περί
  8. ἁμαρτίας
    hamartias
    a sin
    G266 · ἁμαρτία
  9. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  10. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. ἅγια
    hagia
    set apart
    G40 · ἅγιος
  12. διὰ
    dia
    through
    G1223 · διά
  13. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  14. ἀρχιερέως
    archiereōs
    high priest
    G749 · ἀρχιερεύς
  15. τούτων
    toutōn
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  16. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  17. σώματα
    sōmata
    body
    G4983 · σῶμα
  18. κατακαίεται
    katakaietai
    I burn up
    G2618 · κατακαίω
  19. ἔξω
    exō
    without
    G1854 · ἔξω
  20. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  21. παρεμβολῆς
    parembolēs
    a camp
    G3925 · παρεμβολή