The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 6:18Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

That by two immutable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we may have the strongest comfort, we who have fled for refuge to hold fast the hope set before us.

Douay-Rheims

ινα δια δυο πραγματων αμεταθετων εν οις αδυνατον ψευσασθαι θεον ισχυραν παρακλησιν εχωμεν οι καταφυγοντες κρατησαι της προκειμενης ελπιδος

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

“That by two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie.” What two? Which things? By what He said and promised, and by the fact that He joined an oath to the promise. Since among men what is confirmed by an oath is considered more trustworthy, He therefore added an oath. Do you see that God does not look to His own dignity? In order to persuade men, He permits even what is unworthy of Him to be said of Himself, precisely so as to give assurance. Concerning Abraham, the Apostle shows that everything was God’s work and not the work of Abraham’s longsuffering, since God was pleased to add an oath. Just as men swear, God also swore by Himself. Men swear by Him as greater, while He did not swear by one greater, and yet He fulfilled it.

Read more (137 words)

An oath by oneself is not the same in man and in God, because man does not have authority over himself. Therefore you see that this was said by the Apostle not so much with regard to Abraham as with regard to us. “That we,” he says, “who have fled for refuge might have strong consolation to lay hold of the hope set before us.” Above he said, “having patiently endured, he obtained the promise.” Now he says, “that we might have strong consolation.” Yet he did not add, “because God swore.” What does “the hope set before us” mean? On the basis of those promises, he says, we await the future. If they were fulfilled after a long time, then this also will certainly be fulfilled. Thus what happened with Abraham assures us concerning the future.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

“That by two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie.” Which two? Both by the fact that He simply spoke and promised, and by the fact that He joined an oath to the promise. Since among men what is confirmed by an oath is considered more trustworthy, God also added it. “In which” means “from which”: from these two things the promise appears most certain, and it is impossible for God to lie. Therefore, as He swore for our sake, though it is unworthy of Him to swear, so also understand the phrase that “He learned from the things which He suffered.” For men too consider what is known by experience more trustworthy. “We who have fled for refuge might have strong consolation, to lay hold (κρατήσοα) of the hope set before us.” That is, great consolation and encouragement.

Read more (117 words)

This is said not so much with regard to Abraham as with regard to us, who have fled to Him, that is, who have placed our hope in Him. In what, then, do we have encouragement? In holding fast (κρατήσοα) to the hope set before us. On the basis of what was given to Abraham, we should be convinced also concerning the promises that concern us. We should not doubt the coming and heavenly good things for which we hope. Rather, we should hold this hope firmly and securely and not lose it. For the promise to Abraham is a promise also to us, and especially to us who have believed in Christ, as was said above.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

The Lord, through Moses, gave ordinances concerning sacrifices, and the whole book called Leviticus is full of prescriptions about them. Thus the one who offered sacrifice might receive approval, while the one who neglected them, as disobedient to the command, would incur blame. Yet through the prophets He says, “Who has required this from your hands? I did not speak to your fathers about sacrifices of slaughter, nor did I give them commandments concerning burnt offerings” (Isa 1:11-13; cf. Jer 7:22). From this it may appear that Holy Scripture is not in agreement with itself, or that God, Who gave these commandments, is not true. But the Author of truth is not false, for “it is impossible for God to lie,” as Paul affirms.

Read more (262 words)

Rather, it is better to say that all things are true for those who think rightly and receive the prescriptions of the law with faith. At the same time it seems to me, and may God help me through your prayer, that this objection is not far from the truth. At the beginning there was no decree or law concerning sacrifices of slaughter. Nor was there a commandment from God, the Giver of the law, concerning burnt offerings. Sacrifices were introduced for this reason: that they might have symbolic meaning and be types. For the shadow of the good things to come was closely joined to the Law (Heb 10:1). These types were established only until the time of correction (Heb 9:10). Therefore the whole law was not concerned with sacrifices. Rather, in the law there was only one collection of prescriptions about sacrifices. Through them it persuaded in advance that men should refrain from idolatry and care for nearness to God. Through them it also proclaimed the present time in figure. Therefore, neither at the beginning, when He brought the people out of Egypt, nor when the Hebrews came to Mount Sinai, did God give them prescriptions concerning sacrifices of slaughter and burnt offerings. For God is not man, so that He would necessarily have to concern Himself about this beforehand. His command was that they should learn to know Him as the true God, and not regard His Word as lower than the falsely named gods. These do not exist in reality and possess no more than an empty appearance.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Through two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie: one, that He swore by Himself; and another, of which David said, The Lord has sworn and will not repent, You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. To us, who have become heirs of this promise, firm consolation appears. We have fled for our strengthening not to the justice of God, that is, not like those of old, but have turned to the very mercy of God.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

By two things the Apostle meant the word and the oath. For even by using only His word, God fulfills the promise. Much more does He do so when He joins an oath to the word. This, says the Apostle, He did to give us firm assurance. He teaches us to await the promises of God and not to fall into unbelief if we do not see the promised thing fulfilled. For hope that is seen is not hope (Rom 8:24).

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

It is the same either way. If God simply gave a promise, it is immutable and firm. If an oath is added to the promise, it remains equally immutable and firm. The oath was added for our more perfect assurance, so that on these two grounds we might have strong consolation and lay hold of the hope set before us. That is, we should have the strongest attraction of soul and persuasion of mind toward inheriting what was promised. We have fled to God, certainly by faith, as did Abraham, our father according to faith.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryChurch Father

The two immutable things are God’s promise and His oath. By these two it is impossible for God to lie. The hope set before us is the hope of receiving in Christ Jesus the blessing that grants the Kingdom of heaven. God promised this blessing to Abraham with an oath, saying, “Blessing I will bless you,” and, “In your seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed” (Gen 22:17-18). God made an oath so that, by these two unchanging and immutable things, namely the promise and the oath, we might flee by faith to Jesus Christ. We should be strongly persuaded to undoubting hope that we will receive blessing and salvation. Since God promised with an oath, we should be assured that it is impossible for Him not to fulfill the promise. Thus we should remain unshaken in this hope amid all circumstances that meet us during our temporal life.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

By two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie. Immutability refers to the promise and the oath. The Apostle applies them to Christians and wishes to give them consolation in this. He says that, in giving promises to Abraham, God gave promises also to us in his person, as Abraham's true descendants by faith (Rom 4:12). And by promising Jesus Christ the high priesthood with an oath, God thereby assures us of the eternal salvation that we receive through this priesthood (Heb 7:19-20).

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

In this section of chapter 6, the Apostle urges his readers to await the fulfillment of the divine promises with faith and longsuffering. As an example of constancy in hope, he sets forth Abraham, who "after he had patiently endured, obtained the promise" (v. 15).

He places the foundation of firm hope in the fact that God confirmed His promises by an oath, and that He cannot lie either in oath or in promise (v. 18). At the same time, the Apostle gives us the true understanding of an oath and of its lawful use.

Read more (531 words)

"When God made a promise to Abraham, because He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself." By these words the Apostle points to what God said to Abraham after the sacrifice of Isaac: "By Myself I have sworn. Because you have done this thing, and have not withheld your son, your only son, for My sake, blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your seed" (Gen 22:16-17).

"Men indeed swear by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is for them an end of every dispute." By the greater, κατὰ τοῦ μείζονος, the Lord is meant here. This is why an oath has confirmatory force. This is why that force extends to every dispute among them, so that an oath removes every possibility of contradiction.

"Thus God, desiring to show the immutability of His counsel, interposed with an oath." To make these last words clearer, one must know that the Slavonic says a verb meaning "acted as mediator," while the Greek has ἐμεσίτευσεν, from "mediator," μεσίτης. Both mean that He became mediator through an oath.

A mediator is a person who strives to reconcile two hostile or disputing sides, or who helps negotiations between people divided by distance and mutual difference. When God mediated by an oath, it means that He placed Himself between man and Himself.

This idea is very proper to Scripture. According to its teaching, God is advocate, surety, and mediator between man and Himself. Thus Job cried out, turning to God: "Lay down a pledge for me with Yourself; who is there who will pledge himself for me?" (Job 17:3).

If God placed Himself as mediator in that unique oath when He swore by Himself, then clearly He appears as the same mediator and surety when He does not swear by Himself, but men swear by Him as the greater.

From this the true understanding of an oath becomes clear. It consists in this: when men assure one another, they call God as witness, mediator, and surety. They do this with the thought that He will help fulfill the promise and punish intentional violation or false assurance.

What impious or irreverent thing can be found in such an oath? God Himself swore, though He had no one by whom to swear except Himself. His promises, being incapable of falsehood, needed no confirmation by oath. Distrust of them would have been a crime on man's part.

Therefore an oath is all the more fitting among men. Human words can be true insofar as they are accompanied by thought of the Most High, the all-knowing God, who is the highest Truth and hates all who speak falsehood (Ps 5:6).

As soon as the remembrance of God leaves a man, his mouth and heart are filled with falsehood. Whoever in an oath calls God as mediator and surety of his promises or assurances thereby confesses a reverent remembrance of Him as the Knower of hearts.

He confesses Him as the One who knows that his words are sincere and that his promises contain no deceit. It is therefore understandable why, as the Apostle says, "an oath," used for confirmation, "ends every dispute" among men.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

“For men swear by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is the end of every dispute among them” (Heb 6:16). But do men do well when they swear, and is an oath at all permissible? No, it is not permissible, some speculators answer; an oath is a sinful thing, as the Quakers, Count L. Tolstoy, and others say. But these speculations are refuted by the Apostle’s following words concerning God. Desiring to show more abundantly to the heirs of the promise the immutability of His will (Heb 6:17), for example, to Abraham, that he would become father of many nations, God interposed an oath. Since He could swear by no one higher, He swore by Himself, as said above (Heb 6:13).

Read more (168 words)

The Apostle Paul does not here directly raise the question of the oath and therefore does not make a deliberate decision on it. By the words cited above he has in view only strengthening hope in the persecuted and suffering Hebrews to whom he writes his epistle. He wishes to dispose them to wait patiently for the fulfillment of God’s promises, because they are immutable. Nevertheless, in the Apostle’s words cited above there is undoubtedly an indirect decision on the question of the oath. If it were in no case permissible for men to use an oath, as something sinful, then the Lord would never have used it for them. He would not have assured Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob of anything by oath. Yet the Lord did this. Did not God the Father Himself swear, to assure men concerning the eternal high priesthood of His Son? Indeed: “The Lord has sworn and will not repent: You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek” (Ps 109:4).

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

To move his readers still more toward longsuffering, the Apostle next shows that, as heirs of the promises given to Abraham, they must pay special attention to this: God swore to Abraham concerning the faithful fulfillment of these promises. And what is an oath? An oath has great significance. It puts an end to every contradiction and every dispute, finally confirming the truth of the words of the one who swears. On this basis God also, for the reassurance of all whom the promise concerned, swore according to human custom that He would fulfill it. Thus two things should reassure us: the promise itself, which as the word of the true God is already immutable in itself, and still more, the oath of God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 20 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἵνα
    hina
    in order that
    G2443 · ἵνα
  2. διὰ
    dia
    through
    G1223 · διά
  3. δύο
    dyo
    two
    G1417 · δύο
  4. πραγμάτων
    pragmatōn
    a thing done
    G4229 · πρᾶγμα
  5. ἀμεταθέτων
    ametathetōn
    unchanged
    G276 · ἀμετάθετος
  6. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  7. οἷς
    hois
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  8. ἀδύνατον
    adynaton
    incapable
    G102 · ἀδύνατος
  9. ψεύσασθαι
    pseusasthai
    I lie
    G5574 · ψεύδομαι
  10. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. Θεόν
    theon
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  12. ἰσχυρὰν
    ischyran
    strong
    G2478 · ἰσχυρός
  13. παράκλησιν
    paraklēsin
    exhortation
    G3874 · παράκλησις
  14. ἔχωμεν
    echōmen
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  15. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. καταφυγόντες
    kataphygontes
    I flee for refuge
    G2703 · καταφεύγω
  17. κρατῆσαι
    kratēsai
    I lay hold of
    G2902 · κρατέω
  18. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  19. προκειμένης
    prokeimenēs
    I am set before
    G4295 · πρόκειμαι
  20. ἐλπίδος
    elpidos
    hope
    G1680 · ἐλπίς