The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 7:26Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For it was fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners, and made higher than the heavens:

Douay-Rheims

τοιουτος γαρ ημιν επρεπεν αρχιερευς οσιος ακακος αμιαντος κεχωρισμενος απο των αμαρτωλων και υψηλοτερος των ουρανων γενομενος

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Do you see that all this is said of Christ’s humanity? When I say “of His humanity,” I mean the humanity united with the Divinity. I do not divide them, but teach that this be understood properly.

Do you see, then, the distinction of the High Priest from the Old Testament priests? All that was said above the Apostle gathered into the words: “Who, like us, was tempted in all things, yet without sin” (Heb 4:15).

“Such,” he says, “was the High Priest fitting for us: holy, innocent.” What does “innocent” mean? Not partaking of evil, not deceitful.

That He is truly such, listen to the prophet, who says, “There was no deceit in His mouth” (Isa 53:9). Can anyone say this of God?

Read more (52 words)

Who would not be ashamed to say that God is not deceitful, not flattering? But this can be said of Christ according to the flesh.

“Holy,” “undefiled,” and this too cannot be said of God, because He is undefiled by His very essence. “Separated from sinners.” Does this alone prove His superiority?

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

From these words it is clear that, as above, so also now he speaks of the flesh. For who could say such things about God and not be ashamed when applying them to the incomprehensible nature of God?

Therefore He is holy, such that He leaves nothing undone that it is fitting for Him to accomplish. He is innocent, that is, a stranger to deceit and evil.

“There was no deceit in His mouth” (Isa 53:9; cf. 1 Pet 2:22). He is undefiled.

Who could call this a praise of God? For He has such a nature that He cannot be defiled. Clearly he says this of the humanity of Christ alone.

“Separated from sinners and exalted above the heavens.” The high priests according to the Law, he says, even if they were holy in all other respects, were still not free from vices as men.

Read more (78 words)

Nor were they entirely separated from sinners. For how could they be, if they themselves were partakers in transgressions?

Besides this, none of them was in heaven. But our High Priest, being filled with every virtue and separated from sinners, has also been exalted above the heavens, sitting on the very throne of the Father.

The expression “exalted” is evidently used of Him according to the flesh. For as God the Word, He was always above the heavens.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

He calls us His brothers, though we were not His brothers but had become enemies through our falls into sin. He is not a mere man, but God, and after granting us freedom He names us His brothers.

For it is said, “I will declare Your name to My brothers” (Heb 2:12). Therefore, if we turn our thought to His nature, the One who redeemed us is not our brother and is not man.

But if we consider His gracious condescension to us, He both calls us brothers and descends to humanity. He will not give God a ransom for Himself, but will give a ransom for the whole world.

For He has no need of purification, but is Himself purification.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

I think even those who think contrary to the truth will agree that this too belongs to the humanity, not to the Godhead. For, to say nothing else, does the phrase "having become higher than the heavens" befit God the Word, who ordered all things? These words reveal the One who, after His Passion, became higher than the heavens. But God the Word has an uncircumscribed nature. Therefore we shall also apply this to the Master Christ as man. We do not understand someone other than God the Word under this name. Rather, we know what belongs to the Godhead and what belongs to the humanity.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

"For such a High Priest was fitting for us," such as the word about Him has shown Him to be and will yet show Him. "Holy," that is, pure. This and the words that follow refer to Christ according to His humanity. "Innocent," that is, free from evil. "Undefiled." The word "innocent" intensifies "holy," and "undefiled" intensifies "innocent." "Undefiled" is intensified by what follows: "separated from sinners." For, according to the word of Scripture, "He committed no sin" (1 Pet 2:22). "And made higher than the heavens." This is because He sat at the right hand of the Father also according to His humanity, since in Him both natures, divine and human, are indivisibly united.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

To this text let us join the following passages, which are akin to it in thought. “By His own blood He entered once into the Holy Place, having obtained eternal redemption” (Heb 9:12).

“Nor that He should offer Himself often,” but “once at the end of the ages He appeared, to put away sin by His sacrifice” (Heb 9:25-26).

“Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many” (Heb 9:28). “We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Heb 10:10).

“He offered one sacrifice for sins and forever sat down at the right hand of God” (Heb 10:12). “By one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified” (Heb 10:14).

Read more (1225 words)

Is the daily offering in sacrifice of Christ’s Body and Blood, in the Mystery of the Eucharist and in many Christian churches, consistent with the Apostle’s teaching on the unity of Christ’s sacrifice?

Does Christ’s sacrifice remain one, despite the repeated and universal celebration of the Eucharist? We answer: yes, it remains one.

The unity, or identity, of Christ’s sacrifice is seen from the following.

1. On Golgotha and in the often-celebrated Eucharist, one and the same Thing Offered, or Person Offered, remains.

In His discourse on communion, the Lord said: “The bread which I shall give is My flesh, which I shall give for the life of the world” (Jn 6:51).

From this it is clear that in the Eucharist, under the form of bread, the very Flesh of Christ is broken and offered in sacrifice.

It is the same Flesh that was given up for the life of the world to the sufferings and death of Golgotha.

One thing is not offered on the altar’s holy table, while another was once offered on Golgotha. Here and there, there is one offering.

The Apostle Paul says that “we all partake of the one bread” (1 Cor 10:17). The Bread of the Eucharist always and everywhere remains one.

For its substance is the one and same unchanging Flesh of Christ.

Were it not for this invisible and everywhere one substance, the Apostle would not have called the Bread of the Eucharist one.

For bread, as the work of human hands, will not be tomorrow what it is today, nor in one church what it is in another (1 Cor 11:25-27).

Although the Eucharistic service is celebrated by various persons, the One Who offers the sacrifice of the Body and Blood remains the one Christ. Priests are only His visible instruments.

That Christ, Who gave His Flesh over to suffering and death, Himself gives it in the Eucharist for the faithful to eat, is seen from the same discourse on communion.

There the Lord says that He Himself, and no other, will give the bread of life, which is His Flesh (Jn 6:51 and others).

The Jews understood His words in no other way when they said, “How can He give us His flesh to eat?” (Jn 6:52).

But if Christ gives us His Flesh in the Eucharist to eat, then He also offers it at that time as a saving sacrifice.

For we know that the giving of the Body and Blood in this Mystery has the meaning of a sacrifice.

Therefore the Lord said: “This is My Body, given for you, broken for you. This cup is the New Testament in My Blood, which is poured out for you” (Lk 22:19-20; 1 Cor 11:24).

He did not say, “given to you” or “broken to you,” as though He wished only to show for whom the Body is broken and given.

He said, “for you,” wishing to show for whom the Body is offered in sacrifice.

Therefore in the Eucharist, the One Who Gives, Breaks, and Pours Out, even by the hands of priests, is at the same time the One Who offers sacrifice.

And who among men, even if sanctified by the grace of the Holy Spirit, would dare to dispose of the Flesh and Blood of Christ?

He would not dare unless the very One Offered presided over the sacrifice.

Therefore in the Eucharist, always and everywhere, there is one Offerer: the King of kings, “Who comes to be slain” as sacrifice “and to be given as food to the faithful,” in the words of the Church hymn.

The Stundists will say to us: why do you present Christ as repeatedly offering His Body and His Blood, when the Apostle clearly teaches that Christ sanctified us by the one offering of His Body (Heb 10:10, 14)?

But we too acknowledge that Christ’s offering of His Body was once for all. The Body and Blood of Christ do not repeatedly become a sacrifice for us.

Yet, having been offered once, they did not afterwards lose the sacrificial significance that became theirs in the days of the Son of God’s saving self-emptying for us.

Always and everywhere they are a sacrifice for us.

The Blood of the covenant did not dry up on Golgotha, nor is it silent. It speaks and cries out, like the blood of Abel.

Only it speaks better. It cries out not for vengeance on the guilty, but for their forgiveness and mercy (Heb 12:24).

Where, then, is this interceding Blood on earth? Nowhere but in the Church, in the Chalice where the Lord Himself appointed it to be.

He said: “This cup is the New Testament in My Blood,” and, “This is My Blood of the New Testament” (Lk 22:20; Mt 26:28).

Thus the Body and Blood of Christ were offered in sacrifice once for all. But their sacrificial, or intercessory, significance was joined to them forever.

It remains unchangeably with Christ’s humanity in every condition. This is so whether it sits at the right hand of the Father on the throne of glory.

It is so whether it is present under the forms of bread and wine on the holy table of the church. It is so whether it is broken or given to the faithful.

In the Eucharist, the Body and Blood of Christ are a sacrifice for us, not by virtue of a new sacrifice of them, but by virtue of the change of bread and wine into Christ’s Body and Blood.

The following circumstance can clarify the thought about the constant intercessory, or sacrificial, significance of Christ’s Body and Blood.

When the Lord instituted the Eucharist, He designated His Body as sacrificial not only once, and not only in one condition of that Body.

He said first, “broken for you” (1 Cor 11:24), and then, “given for you” (Lk 22:19).

The expression “for you,” which indicates the intercessory, or sacrificial, significance of the Body, belongs to it both when it is broken and when it is given.

Therefore it belongs to it constantly and can never be taken from it.

The same thought is also suggested by this. In the Old Testament, the sacrificial animal was considered and called a sacrifice and a holy thing not only at the moment of sacrifice.

It was so called also after the sacrifice, when the remains of the sacrifice were given to the priests or eaten (Lev 2:3, 10; 6:18, 26, 30; 7:6, 16; 10:17, and many others).

The meat of pagan sacrifices is also called idol-sacrifice when it is set upon the table (1 Cor 10:28).

Therefore Christ’s Body is a sacrifice wherever it may be, but especially in the Eucharist, where it is offered to us for eating.

Thus the Body and Blood of Christ appear in the Eucharist as sacrifice through their very presence there, and not because they are offered there anew in sacrifice.

They could not and never can lose the sacrificial quality they received in the days of the Son of God’s self-emptying.

Christ’s sacrifice is one in the object of the offering, for the One Offered is one. It is one in the Person Who performs the offering, for the Offerer is one.

It is also one in the action of the sacrifice, as a once-for-all offering that continues in its effects.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

The holiness and sinlessness of Christ the High Priest (Heb 7:26-28).

In the numerous and changing succession of mortal priests of the Old Covenant, there could be all kinds of men. Some were good, others less good. Some prayed zealously for the people, others less zealously, and some were even negligent and careless.

Yet all in general were sinful men, more or less. Meanwhile humanity needed “a High Priest holy, innocent, undefiled, and separated from sinners,” and so forth.

Such a High Priest was the Lord Jesus Christ. He had no need, like those others, to offer sacrifices daily, first for His own sins and then for the sins of the people.

“Is this, then, not the greatest advantage of the New Testament High Priest, that the oath-bound word of God the Father, after the Old Testament Law, appointed as Priest the Son, perfected forever?”

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

We needed a High Priest with such qualities, τοιοΰτος, that is, precisely according to the order of Melchizedek. We needed One who could always intercede for us before God.

At the same time, the Apostle unites into one conception all the properties that made Jesus the true, ever-living High Priest who intercedes for us before God. From the characterization of His person, he proceeds to portray His high-priestly ministry.

Characterizing now the person of Jesus as High Priest, the Apostle calls Him holy, ίσιος, pious, indicating His relation to God. He calls Him free from malice in relation to men, and unstained by any sin, αμίαντος.

These definitions refer to the pure humanity of Jesus, our High Priest. The following ones indicate His royal, heavenly majesty.

Read more (60 words)

He is already now separated from sinners. That is, He no longer needs to suffer for their sins by taking their guilt upon Himself.

He has become higher than all the heavens through which He passed (Heb 4:14). The Apostle of course mentioned this last circumstance because it most clearly testifies that Christ truly became our constant Intercessor before God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 18 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Τοιοῦτος
    toioutos
    of such a kind
    G5108 · τοιοῦτος
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ἡμῖν
    hēmin
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  4. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  5. ἔπρεπεν
    eprepen
    it becomes
    G4241 · πρέπω
  6. ἀρχιερεύς
    archiereus
    high priest
    G749 · ἀρχιερεύς
  7. ὅσιος
    hosios
    holy
    G3741 · ὅσιος
  8. ἄκακος
    akakos
    innocent
    G172 · ἄκακος
  9. ἀμίαντος
    amiantos
    undefiled
    G283 · ἀμίαντος
  10. κεχωρισμένος
    kechōrismenos
    I separate
    G5563 · χωρίζω
  11. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  12. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. ἁμαρτωλῶν
    hamartōlōn
    sinning
    G268 · ἁμαρτωλός
  14. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  15. ὑψηλότερος
    hypsēloteros
    high
    G5308 · ὑψηλός
  16. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  17. οὐρανῶν
    ouranōn
    the sky
    G3772 · οὐρανός
  18. γενόμενος
    genomenos
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι