The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 7:27Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Who needeth not daily (as the other priests) to offer sacrifices, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, in offering himself.

Douay-Rheims

ος ουκ εχει καθ ημεραν αναγκην ωσπερ οι αρχιερεις προτερον υπερ των ιδιων αμαρτιων θυσιας αναφερειν επειτα των του λαου τουτο γαρ εποιησεν εφαπαξ εαυτον ανενεγκας

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Does not the sacrifice itself also prove it? Yes, the sacrifice. How?

“Who does not need,” he says, “daily, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the sins of the people. For He did this once, when He offered up Himself.”

What is “this”? Here the Apostle begins to speak about the superiority of the spiritual sacrifice.

He spoke about the difference between the priests, the Old Testament priest and the New Testament Priest. He spoke about the difference between the covenants, the old and the new, though not fully, yet he did speak.

Read more (224 words)

Here at last he begins to speak about the sacrifice itself. When you hear that Christ is Priest, do not think that He constantly performs priestly service. He performed the priestly act once, and then sat down at the right hand of the Father.

So that you may not think that He stands above and performs priestly service, the Apostle shows that this was a work of the divine economy.

As He was a servant, so also He was Priest and minister. As He did not remain a servant, though He had become a servant, so He did not remain a minister, though He had become a minister.

For it belongs to a minister not to sit, but to stand. Here the Apostle expresses the greatness of the sacrifice. It was one sacrifice, offered once, and had as much power as all the others together did not have.

Yet he is not speaking about this yet, but only about the following: “He did this once.” What is “this”?

“It was necessary,” he says, “that this One also have something to offer” (Heb 8:3). He did not offer for Himself. How could He, being sinless, offer sacrifice for Himself?

He offered for the people. What are you saying? Did He have no need to offer for Himself, and is He so powerful? Yes, he says.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Having said that our High Priest is separated from sinners, he now expands on this and says that He is so free from sins that, even when He offered His own body in sacrifice, He did not offer it for Himself.

For how could this be, when He committed no sin? Rather, He offered it for us.

There is also another advantage. The high priests according to the Law offered sacrifices daily, because they could not cleanse once for all. But He offered a sacrifice of such great power that through it He cleansed the world at once.

Thus Christ surpasses the priests in this also. For He did this once, offering Himself in sacrifice.

Read more (81 words)

What does this mean? It means that He offered sacrifice for the sins of men, and not for Himself. He performed the priestly act once, he says, and afterward sat at the right hand of the Father as Lord.

So that, hearing that He is Priest, you may not think that He constantly stands and performs priestly service, he shows that He became Priest according to the divine economy.

When the divine economy was completed, He again assumed His own majesty.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

He calls us His brothers, though we were not His brothers but had become enemies through our falls into sin. He is not a mere man, but God, and after granting us freedom He names us His brothers.

For it is said, “I will declare Your name to My brothers” (Heb 2:12). Therefore, if we turn our thought to His nature, the One who redeemed us is not our brother and is not man.

But if we consider His gracious condescension to us, He both calls us brothers and descends to humanity. He will not give God a ransom for Himself, but will give a ransom for the whole world.

For He has no need of purification, but is Himself purification.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

He has no need, like the other priests, first to offer sacrifices for His own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He did this once, offering Himself in sacrifice, not for Himself, but for the sins of men.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle presented two qualities that those deemed worthy of the priesthood did not have. They both offered sacrifices often and offered for themselves, because they sinned as men. Being subject to sins, they did not have such boldness for the offering of sacrifices. But Christ does neither the one nor the other. He does not offer for Himself, because He has no share in sin. He does not offer often, because one sacrifice is sufficient for salvation. They offered something else in sacrifice, but He offered His own body. He Himself became both priest and sacrifice, and, as God, receives the gift with the Father and the Spirit.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“Who does not need daily, like the high priests, to offer sacrifices first for His own sins and then for those of the people.” For they were under sin, but this One alone is sinless.

They performed priestly rites every day throughout their whole life, but Christ performed His once.

“For He did this once.” This, that is, what? The sacrifice, not for His own sins, but for the sins of the people.

When did He do this? “When He offered Himself.” He offered Himself in sacrifice for us when He handed Himself over to death.

Therefore this one sacrifice, by its surpassing height, was fully sufficient before God for the forgiveness of all sins previously committed and for complete purification from them.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

To this text let us join the following passages, which are akin to it in thought. “By His own blood He entered once into the Holy Place, having obtained eternal redemption” (Heb 9:12).

“Nor that He should offer Himself often,” but “once at the end of the ages He appeared, to put away sin by His sacrifice” (Heb 9:25-26).

“Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many” (Heb 9:28). “We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Heb 10:10).

“He offered one sacrifice for sins and forever sat down at the right hand of God” (Heb 10:12). “By one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified” (Heb 10:14).

Read more (1225 words)

Is the daily offering in sacrifice of Christ’s Body and Blood, in the Mystery of the Eucharist and in many Christian churches, consistent with the Apostle’s teaching on the unity of Christ’s sacrifice?

Does Christ’s sacrifice remain one, despite the repeated and universal celebration of the Eucharist? We answer: yes, it remains one.

The unity, or identity, of Christ’s sacrifice is seen from the following.

1. On Golgotha and in the often-celebrated Eucharist, one and the same Thing Offered, or Person Offered, remains.

In His discourse on communion, the Lord said: “The bread which I shall give is My flesh, which I shall give for the life of the world” (Jn 6:51).

From this it is clear that in the Eucharist, under the form of bread, the very Flesh of Christ is broken and offered in sacrifice.

It is the same Flesh that was given up for the life of the world to the sufferings and death of Golgotha.

One thing is not offered on the altar’s holy table, while another was once offered on Golgotha. Here and there, there is one offering.

The Apostle Paul says that “we all partake of the one bread” (1 Cor 10:17). The Bread of the Eucharist always and everywhere remains one.

For its substance is the one and same unchanging Flesh of Christ.

Were it not for this invisible and everywhere one substance, the Apostle would not have called the Bread of the Eucharist one.

For bread, as the work of human hands, will not be tomorrow what it is today, nor in one church what it is in another (1 Cor 11:25-27).

Although the Eucharistic service is celebrated by various persons, the One Who offers the sacrifice of the Body and Blood remains the one Christ. Priests are only His visible instruments.

That Christ, Who gave His Flesh over to suffering and death, Himself gives it in the Eucharist for the faithful to eat, is seen from the same discourse on communion.

There the Lord says that He Himself, and no other, will give the bread of life, which is His Flesh (Jn 6:51 and others).

The Jews understood His words in no other way when they said, “How can He give us His flesh to eat?” (Jn 6:52).

But if Christ gives us His Flesh in the Eucharist to eat, then He also offers it at that time as a saving sacrifice.

For we know that the giving of the Body and Blood in this Mystery has the meaning of a sacrifice.

Therefore the Lord said: “This is My Body, given for you, broken for you. This cup is the New Testament in My Blood, which is poured out for you” (Lk 22:19-20; 1 Cor 11:24).

He did not say, “given to you” or “broken to you,” as though He wished only to show for whom the Body is broken and given.

He said, “for you,” wishing to show for whom the Body is offered in sacrifice.

Therefore in the Eucharist, the One Who Gives, Breaks, and Pours Out, even by the hands of priests, is at the same time the One Who offers sacrifice.

And who among men, even if sanctified by the grace of the Holy Spirit, would dare to dispose of the Flesh and Blood of Christ?

He would not dare unless the very One Offered presided over the sacrifice.

Therefore in the Eucharist, always and everywhere, there is one Offerer: the King of kings, “Who comes to be slain” as sacrifice “and to be given as food to the faithful,” in the words of the Church hymn.

The Stundists will say to us: why do you present Christ as repeatedly offering His Body and His Blood, when the Apostle clearly teaches that Christ sanctified us by the one offering of His Body (Heb 10:10, 14)?

But we too acknowledge that Christ’s offering of His Body was once for all. The Body and Blood of Christ do not repeatedly become a sacrifice for us.

Yet, having been offered once, they did not afterwards lose the sacrificial significance that became theirs in the days of the Son of God’s saving self-emptying for us.

Always and everywhere they are a sacrifice for us.

The Blood of the covenant did not dry up on Golgotha, nor is it silent. It speaks and cries out, like the blood of Abel.

Only it speaks better. It cries out not for vengeance on the guilty, but for their forgiveness and mercy (Heb 12:24).

Where, then, is this interceding Blood on earth? Nowhere but in the Church, in the Chalice where the Lord Himself appointed it to be.

He said: “This cup is the New Testament in My Blood,” and, “This is My Blood of the New Testament” (Lk 22:20; Mt 26:28).

Thus the Body and Blood of Christ were offered in sacrifice once for all. But their sacrificial, or intercessory, significance was joined to them forever.

It remains unchangeably with Christ’s humanity in every condition. This is so whether it sits at the right hand of the Father on the throne of glory.

It is so whether it is present under the forms of bread and wine on the holy table of the church. It is so whether it is broken or given to the faithful.

In the Eucharist, the Body and Blood of Christ are a sacrifice for us, not by virtue of a new sacrifice of them, but by virtue of the change of bread and wine into Christ’s Body and Blood.

The following circumstance can clarify the thought about the constant intercessory, or sacrificial, significance of Christ’s Body and Blood.

When the Lord instituted the Eucharist, He designated His Body as sacrificial not only once, and not only in one condition of that Body.

He said first, “broken for you” (1 Cor 11:24), and then, “given for you” (Lk 22:19).

The expression “for you,” which indicates the intercessory, or sacrificial, significance of the Body, belongs to it both when it is broken and when it is given.

Therefore it belongs to it constantly and can never be taken from it.

The same thought is also suggested by this. In the Old Testament, the sacrificial animal was considered and called a sacrifice and a holy thing not only at the moment of sacrifice.

It was so called also after the sacrifice, when the remains of the sacrifice were given to the priests or eaten (Lev 2:3, 10; 6:18, 26, 30; 7:6, 16; 10:17, and many others).

The meat of pagan sacrifices is also called idol-sacrifice when it is set upon the table (1 Cor 10:28).

Therefore Christ’s Body is a sacrifice wherever it may be, but especially in the Eucharist, where it is offered to us for eating.

Thus the Body and Blood of Christ appear in the Eucharist as sacrifice through their very presence there, and not because they are offered there anew in sacrifice.

They could not and never can lose the sacrificial quality they received in the days of the Son of God’s self-emptying.

Christ’s sacrifice is one in the object of the offering, for the One Offered is one. It is one in the Person Who performs the offering, for the Offerer is one.

It is also one in the action of the sacrifice, as a once-for-all offering that continues in its effects.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

The holiness and sinlessness of Christ the High Priest (Heb 7:26-28).

In the numerous and changing succession of mortal priests of the Old Covenant, there could be all kinds of men. Some were good, others less good. Some prayed zealously for the people, others less zealously, and some were even negligent and careless.

Yet all in general were sinful men, more or less. Meanwhile humanity needed “a High Priest holy, innocent, undefiled, and separated from sinners,” and so forth.

Such a High Priest was the Lord Jesus Christ. He had no need, like those others, to offer sacrifices daily, first for His own sins and then for the sins of the people.

“Is this, then, not the greatest advantage of the New Testament High Priest, that the oath-bound word of God the Father, after the Old Testament Law, appointed as Priest the Son, perfected forever?”

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The exaltation of Jesus above the heavens has this consequence: He no longer needs to repeat His sacrifice daily, καθ' ἡμέραν, as the high priest who offered sacrifice each year, first for himself and then for the sins of the people. For through Him one all-sufficient sacrifice has been offered. That this sacrifice truly has unceasing significance, the Apostle again proves from the fact that it was offered not by a weak high priest, but by the perfect Son of God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 26 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ὃς
    hos
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  2. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  3. ἔχει
    echei
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  4. καθ᾽
    kath
    down from
    G2596 · κατά
  5. ἡμέραν
    hēmeran
    a day
    G2250 · ἡμέρα
  6. ἀνάγκην
    anankēn
    necessity
    G318 · ἀνάγκη
  7. ὥσπερ
    hōsper
    just as
    G5618 · ὥσπερ
  8. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. ἀρχιερεῖς
    archiereis
    high priest
    G749 · ἀρχιερεύς
  10. πρότερον
    proteron
    former
    G4387 · πρότερος
  11. ὑπὲρ
    hyper
    in behalf of
    G5228 · ὑπέρ
  12. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. ἰδίων
    idiōn
    one's own
    G2398 · ἴδιος
  14. ἁμαρτιῶν
    hamartiōn
    a sin
    G266 · ἁμαρτία
  15. θυσίας
    thysias
    a sacrifice
    G2378 · θυσία
  16. ἀναφέρειν
    anapherein
    I carry up
    G399 · ἀναφέρω
  17. ἔπειτα
    epeita
    then
    G1899 · ἔπειτα
  18. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  19. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. λαοῦ
    laou
    a people
    G2992 · λαός
  21. τοῦτο
    touto
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  22. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  23. ἐποίησεν
    epoiēsen
    I do
    G4160 · ποιέω
  24. ἐφάπαξ
    ephapax
    once
    G2178 · ἐφάπαξ
  25. ἑαυτὸν
    heauton
    himself
    G1438 · ἑαυτοῦ
  26. ἀνενέγκας
    anenenkas
    I carry up
    G399 · ἀναφέρω