CHAPTER 15: Evidence that the seven spirits resting on Christ, as prophesied, represent the Holy Spirit Himself. Moreover, Akindinus refers to the Holy Spirit as a creature, claiming that these seven spirits are indeed creatures. Yet, in a display of profound malice, Akindinus attempts to depict the seven spirits, described in the prophecy of Isaiah, as creatures, showing no shame or sorrow for the prophetic declaration: “A rod shall come forth out of the root of Jesse, and a flower shall spring up from its root, and the Spirit of God shall rest upon it” (Isaiah 11:1-2). Subsequently, the prophet elucidates the nature of this Spirit of God by stating, “The Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and strength, the Spirit of knowledge and godliness, the Spirit of the fear of God” (Isaiah 11:2-3). Thus, these spirits are indeed the Spirit of God, and Akindinus further mislabels Him a creature by categorizing them as such. Noteworthy is Gregory, a great theologian, who asserts that these seven spirits are the Holy Spirit Himself, as articulated in his “Homily on Holy Pentecost.” He states, “This Holy Spirit was preached by the prophets, as in the words, ‘The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, for He hath anointed me’ (Isaiah 61:1), and ‘the seven spirits rest upon Him’ (Isaiah 11:1-2).” He continues, “The Holy Spirit was always, is, and will be,” and he also lists: “the Spirit of wisdom, understanding, knowledge, godliness, counsel, strength, and fear” as mentioned in the Scriptures. He concludes that these and similar spirits are identified with the Holy Spirit. Further, Gregory notes that Isaiah chose to refer to these spiritual energies as spirits, indicating that to speak of “the wisdom and power of the Spirit” is equivalent to stating “the spirit of wisdom and power.” How can we then claim that the wisdom and power of the Spirit are created? Athanasius affirms, “One and the same is the Spirit, from Whom come all divisions, and He remains inseparable in nature.” 59. Additionally, one of the energies of the Spirit is identified by the Lord in the Gospels: according to Luke, as “the finger of God” (Luke 11:20), and according to Matthew, as “the Spirit of God” (Matthew 12:28). After suffering severe plagues, the magicians in Egypt recognized, “This is the finger of God” (Exodus 8:19). Basil the Great, in his “Words of Objection,” describes this finger as one of the unique gifts of the Holy Spirit. Which of the creatures could rightfully be called the finger of God? By what spirit did the Lord drive out demons, if not by “the Spirit of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 12:28)? Can the Holy Spirit be classified as merely one of the separate gifts? If it is one, then all others must be as well. Therefore, Basil, in his “Chapters of Objection,” compiles all the gifts of the Spirit and the fruits mentioned by Paul (Galatians 5:22) alongside those spirits cited by Isaiah. He observes: “None of these gifts has been acquired by the Holy Spirit, but rather they have all existed from eternity, as the Spirit of God, and of Him who has been revealed. He emanates from God and exists in hypostases, while they, emanating from Him, are His energies.” Consequently, the energies of the divine Spirit are manifold, and they are all singular while remaining non-essences; for He alone, subsisting in hypostasis, possesses all at all times. Thus, this great teacher also affirms. 60. Furthermore, the prophet clearly emphasized the superiority of these spirits by the term “rest,” for resting signifies the dignity of the Lord. Since the spirits rested upon the “flower from the root of Jesse,” that is, that which is derived from the Master, how can they be creations? It is only through Him that what is derived from Him is brought into existence. Despite the distinction of the energies of the Spirit, there are not many eternal spirits; these are merely the performances, revelations, and inherent energies of the one Spirit. Maximus, wise in divine matters, noted that the Lord holds these by nature, as God and Son of God. How can these inherent energies of the Son be creatures? How can one argue that the divine nature would also be shown to be created by one who reduces these natural energies of God to that of created beings? Akindinus especially clings to this point, demonstrating that he lacks a true sense of the fear of God and brazenly challenges it when he states: “How can this fear be uncreated, unless the deity itself fears, if this deity is by nature essential to Him? This logically follows from his perspective, as he refers to these energies of the Spirit as non-temporal, given that fear is also one of its energies.”
CHAPTER 16. On the nature of fear as an energy of the Spirit: its essence and how it arises in those esteemed. 61. Let him be abashed for having written previously, in the third of the theological Hundreds, that these energies are inherent in the Son by nature, and for proclaiming that “fear is pure” (Psalm 18:10), since it exists without sorrow due to transgressions, and will endure eternally, as it is inherently implanted by God in creation, manifesting His intrinsic superiority over all kingdoms and powers. For this fear is that which the Psalmist expresses: “The fear of the Lord abideth pure forever” (Psalm 18:10). This, then, is the spirit of fear: the inherent worthiness of God, the very notion that He elicits fear. How can God’s intrinsic worthiness be a creation? This fear also resided in the Son of God. 62. But whoever insists that fear is not intrinsic to God, but asserts that the deity also fears, will deny that Christ possessed it, portraying the prophet as deceitful. For whom did Christ fear, upon whom, according to prophecy, “the spirit of fear” (Isaiah 11:3) rested? Furthermore, according to John, “Fear casts out fear, for fear is torment; but perfect love casts out fear” (1 John 4:18). He who claims that the “spirit of fear” resting on the Lord is a creation—while contradictorily asserting it is fitting to fear Him who embodies this spirit—clearly judges the super-perfect God-Man, equal to the Father, to be less than perfect and even lesser than those who bear God. Therefore, we must regard the spirit of fear, along with the other energies of the Spirit, as unceasing, even if this displeases Akindinus. For neither does God possess fear in a creaturely sense, despite Akindinus’s misguided assertions that He is not fearful. 63. The prophet Isaiah, while enumerating these spirits, underscores the divinity of this fear, and prophetically addresses those like Akindinus who reduce the Holy Spirit to the status of a creature. Regarding the other gifts of the Spirit, he contented himself with stating that they rest upon Him of whom the prophecy speaks, yet he included fear with a further remark: “The spirit of the fear of God shall fill Him” (Isaiah 11:3). Is the Spirit that filled the “Flower” in whom “the fullness of the Godhead dwells” (Colossians 2:9) a creature? What blasphemy! Yet the prophet, with this additional note, provided insight to those who seek understanding regarding what this Spirit of God signifies. By asserting that “the spirit of the fear of God shall fill Him,” he added that “He shall not judge according to appearance, but shall reprove according to the heart” (Isaiah 11:3). Is this not a profound demonstration of fear that Christ exhibited when He, knowing the hearts of those He encountered, asked the renowned Pharisees, “What are you thinking in your hearts?” (Luke 5:22)? 64. This spiritual fear, unique to those more richly endowed with the Spirit's gifts, instills in them insight, evoking awe in others. Thanks to them, “the secret heart” of those who approach, as Paul explains, “will be revealed, and so, falling down, they will worship God, declaring that truly God is with them” (1 Corinthians 14:25). For those who lack such capability, but still resonate with the Spirit's weighty presence, a preparatory fear is induced, which serves to turn them away from transgressions against God, thereby granting them the gift of immutability, as they become more attuned to receive this gift through understanding and diligence aligned with knowledge. Thus, Basil the Great identified the spirit of fear as the immutability of the divine Spirit. How can that essential energy of the Spirit, by which we receive the communion of immutability, be classified as a creation? 65. The prophet Zechariah too spoke of these seven energies of the Spirit, saying: “These seven are the eyes of the Lord, which observe the whole earth” (Zechariah 4:10). And the most theologically astute and dearly beloved disciple of the Lord, in his “Revelation,” writes: “Grace to you and peace from God, and from the seven Spirits which are before the throne of God, and from Christ” (Revelation 1:4-5). Does he not clearly indicate to all the faithful that these refer to the Holy Spirit?