The Church Fathers on this verse

Isaiah 20:6Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the inhabitants of this isle shall say in that day: Lo this was our hope, to whom we fled for help, to deliver us from the face of the king of the Assyrians: and how shall we be able to escape?

Douay-Rheims

וְ֠אָמַר יֹשֵׁ֨ב הָאִ֣י הַזֶּה֮ בַּיּ֣וֹם הַהוּא֒ הִנֵּה־כֹ֣ה מַבָּטֵ֗נוּ אֲשֶׁר־נַ֤סְנוּ שָׁם֙ לְעֶזְרָ֔ה לְהִ֨נָּצֵ֔ל מִפְּנֵ֖י מֶ֣לֶךְ אַשּׁ֑וּר וְאֵ֖יךְ נִמָּלֵ֥ט אֲנָֽחְנוּ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Residing near the region of Thebes are the Blemmians, also referred to as Ethiopians, who possess remarkable proficiency in archery. They coat their arrows with a potent poison, which, upon striking an adversary, guarantees death, causing the victim to collapse swiftly as if bitten by a serpent. Consequently, during times of conflict, the Egyptians often employed these Ethiopians, placing substantial trust in their abilities. However, when met with the valor of the Assyrians, the Ethiopians faced defeat and were taken captive alongside the Egyptians. As stated, the Egyptians shall feel shame for relying on the Ethiopians.

Read more (176 words)

When they experience loss and captivity, the inhabitants of this region will lament, asking who can rescue them from the grip of the Assyrian king and how they can find salvation. Egypt is referred to as an island because it is encircled by rivers and lakes. The text illustrates the inhabitants expressing remorse for having placed their faith in the Ethiopians; if those they depended on were captured, what hope remained for their own salvation? Hence, it is preferable to place one’s trust in the Lord rather than in humanity, as noted in Psalm 117:9. The prophet Jeremiah further emphasizes, “Cursed is the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm” while declaring, “Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is” (Jeremiah 17:5, 7). The prophetic messages carry inherent value for us, and although historical occurrences might lack spiritual interpretation, they offer significant lessons. As Paul mentions, “These are all the examples given to those of old, but they were written for our admonition” (1 Cor. 10:11).

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

The Spirit entered me and brought me to my feet; then He addressed me, instructing me to go and confine myself to my home (Ezekiel 3:23). Overwhelmed by the radiant glory of the Lord, the prophet prostrated himself but was raised up by the Spirit that came into him. This Spirit set him upright and commanded him to shut himself away in his dwelling. Having been fortified by the vision of the Lord’s majesty, he need not fear anyone or feel intimidated by any man; instead, he was to return home, either for his physical needs or as a prophetic sign of impending siege. Just as Isaiah, stripped of his garments, prophesied the three-year captivity and disgrace of the people, so you, by isolating yourself, will signify the siege upon Jerusalem.

Read more (581 words)

In the year when Tartan arrived at Azotus, sent by Sargon, the king of Assyria, to wage war and capture the city, the Lord spoke to Isaiah son of Amoz: “Go, strip off your clothes and discard your sandals.” He complied, walking exposed and barefoot. The Lord proclaimed, “Just as My servant Isaiah has gone naked and barefoot for three years to symbolize the coming fate of Egypt and Ethiopia, so shall the king of Assyria carry captives from Egypt and settlers from Ethiopia—young and old alike—exposed and humiliated, as a disgrace to Egypt. They will be terrified and shamed at Ethiopia, their former hope, and Egypt, their pride. On that day, the inhabitants of that coastal region will lament, ‘These were our salvation; we relied on them to rescue us from the king—how can we escape?’”

This chapter is presented in full so that we might analyze its various components. Azotus, known as Ezdod in Hebrew, was the foremost city among the five principal cities of Palestine, which fell under the control of Oargon, the king of Assyria, also named in various ways, who dispatched his commander Tartan for this purpose. Thus, as one city fell, Isaiah received divine instruction to remove his prophetic garments, symbolizing mourning for the people’s sins, along with his shoes. He walked naked and barefoot, typifying the future suffering of the Egyptians and their Ethiopian allies, illustrating that as Isaiah’s exposure induced horror, so too would the devastation of Egypt and Ethiopia lead to their disgrace.

Let no one consider this a contradiction to the promises of prosperity for Egypt, as the earlier prophecies spoke of blessings following tribulations, whereas this addresses forthcoming captivity. Sargon, freshly victorious, pressed into Judah, conquering Israel, Damascus, and the Philistines, and had soon turned his sights toward Egypt. Upon receiving news of invasions in other cities, Rabsak returned to find King Sargon contending with Labnah and hearing of Pharak, the Ethiopian king, preparing for battle (4 Kings 19:8-9).

Through this narrative, we observe the obedience of the prophets; the esteemed Isaiah, as tradition holds him to be a relative of Hezekiah, willingly walked unclothed, recognizing that no honor surpasses the commands of God. The implication of “three years as a sign concerning Egypt and Ethiopia” indicates imminent destruction within that timeframe. The phrase denotes the disgrace that would fall upon the inhabitants of the island—Jerusalem—who relied on Egypt and Ethiopia, only to witness their downfall and captivity.

Thus unfolds the providential design of God, who exercises His inscrutable judgment over humanity. Israel placed trust in Damascus, defying divine wrath, leading to its ruin; Judah found reliance in Egypt, only to see Egypt's fall. The Egyptians, too, looked to the Ethiopians, who were tragically defeated as well. The Assyrians, blinded by hubris, would ultimately meet their demise at the hands of Babylon; Babylon opposed God yet would succumb to the Medes and Persians. While the latter factions persecuted the people of God, the fierce Ram scattered nations across the east and west, until the goat, representing Alexander, crushed the Ram. This final figure, boasting excessive pride, would perish through treachery, and his kingdom, weakened by internal conflict, would eventually be overtaken by the Romans. The Roman Empire, characterized by its brutal domination and persecution, inflicted suffering on the faithful. Yet, as prophesied, the divine stone, uncut by human hands, will undoubtedly shatter the brittle empires of earth, illustrating that what was once strong will now turn to fragments (Dan. 2).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.