The Church Fathers on this verse

Isaiah 36:1Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And it came to pass in the fourteenth year of king Ezechias, that Sennacherib king of the Assyrians came up against all the fenced cities of Juda, and took them.

Douay-Rheims

וַיְהִ֡י בְּאַרְבַּע֩ עֶשְׂרֵ֨ה שָׁנָ֜ה לַמֶּ֣לֶךְ חִזְקִיָּ֗הוּ עָלָ֞ה סַנְחֵרִ֤יב מֶֽלֶךְ־אַשּׁוּר֙ עַ֣ל כָּל־עָרֵ֧י יְהוּדָ֛ה הַבְּצֻר֖וֹת וַֽיִּתְפְּשֵֽׂם׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

4 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The individual was truly extraordinary, remarkable in every way. Pay attention: when God purposes to perform something wonderful, He begins with thought. It is said that He challenged all the fortified cities of Judah and captured them, so that one would not assume Jerusalem could withstand its defenses. Reflect on the reality of the husbandman who served as the protector of the city. The enemy managed to seize other cities, yet Jerusalem remained unconquered. However, he waged a prolonged conflict over it. As a valiant warrior, he breached the walls surrounding it and claimed the other cities.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The narrative of historical events is familiar to those who seek understanding. I will summarize it briefly. During Ahaz's reign in Jerusalem, Phakeus, the son of Romelinus, and Raasson, the king of Syria, invaded Judea with intentions to seize Jerusalem itself. Unable to defend his realm, King Ahaz sent envoys to Theglaphalassar, the king of Assyria, seeking assistance. He offered many gifts to persuade the Assyrian king to eliminate the alliances formed against him, particularly those of the kings of Samaria and Syria. Following the fulfillment of this request, Ahaz’s adversaries were defeated, as the Assyrians captured Damascus and Syria, ultimately leading Ahaz to submit and impose tribute and taxes upon his kingdom.

Read more (133 words)

He is noted as one of the most impious kings, engaging in idol worship and opposing God to an extraordinary degree. After Ahaz's death, Hezekiah ascended the throne. Hezekiah, being his son, was devoted to God and distinguished by his commitment to justice and piety. He chose to separate his kingdom from the Assyrian influence, refusing to let it remain subjugated as it had been under Ahaz. This led Sennacherib, the Assyrian king, to feel justified in claiming dominion over all of Judea and its throne. Enraged, he ravaged Samaria and advanced an army against the cities of Judea. After conquering many, he dispatched Rapsacus to Jerusalem, who aimed not to employ martial force in accordance with the rules of war, but rather to sway the populace through threats and promises of favor.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

Some interpretations suggest that Sennacherib was responsible for the capture of Samaria, but this assertion is inaccurate. Sacred scripture informs us that the first devastation of the ten tribes occurred under Ful, the king of Assyria, during the reign of Menaim, king of Israel (2 Kings 15:17-20). Following him, Pheglasphelasar attacked Samaria, being under Phakeh, son of Remaliah (2 Kings 15:29). Subsequently, Salmanassar, during Uzziah’s reign, also took Samaria (2 Kings 17:3-6). The fourth conqueror was Sargon, noted for his victory over Azotus (Isaiah 20:1). The fifth was Asaraddon, who, after removing the Israelites, stationed Samaritans as guardians in Judah. Sennacherib was the sixth, who captured Lachish and besieged Jerusalem (2 Kings 18:13-19).

Read more (780 words)

Some believe these figures refer to the same individual under different names.

As Jewish tradition holds, Rabsak, who communicated in Hebrew, is thought to be the son of the prophet Isaiah, whom they accuse of treachery, and the other son of Isaiah, named Jashuv, signifies “forsaken” in our language. Others argue that Rabsak was a Samaritan, thus explaining his fluency in Hebrew, permitting him to blaspheme God with audacity. It is essential to examine Rabsak’s statements. His claim that the people intended to rely on Egypt, calling it a feeble reed (1 Kings 18:21), is false since there are no records of Hezekiah seeking help from Egypt. However, he accurately remarked, ‘If you declare, “In the Lord our God we trust”’ (1 Kings 18:22), but he misrepresented the truth by alleging that Hezekiah had removed the high places and altars. In reality, Hezekiah acted not against God, but in His favor, striving to eradicate idolatry and insisting on worship centered in Jerusalem, where the temple was situated. It is noted that due to the people's errant habits, they constructed altars on hills to offer sacrifices.

Rabsak's claim regarding Hezekiah's inability to procure riders for the promised two thousand horses illustrates not the weakness of the Jewish people—their knowledge of horsemanship being foreign—but their adherence to God's commandments, which explicitly instructed kings against amassing horses or multiplying wives (Deuteronomy 17:16-17). Rabsak taunted that if Hezekiah's forces could not withstand his least servant, how would they endure against the might of a king? Yet when Rabsak challenged them on their trust in the Lord, he astutely acknowledged that his invasion was commanded by the Lord: ‘The Lord said to me, “Go into this land and ravage it”’ (1 Kings 18:25). This serves as evidence that his presence and conquest of many cities were according to divine will.

In the fourteenth year of King Hezekiah's reign, Sennacherib, the king of Assyria, attacked all the fortified cities of Judah, capturing them. He sent Rabsak from Lachish to Jerusalem with a formidable army, stopping at the upper pool's waterworks by the whitewashing field. Eliakim, son of Helkiin, the house steward, and Sobnah, the scribe, along with Joach, son of Asaph, came to encounter him. Rabsak conveyed to them a message from the Assyrian king, questioning their reliance and strategies: ‘What is this hope in which you trust? Or how do you prepare to renew your struggle?’ He accused them of relying on Egypt’s fragility, claiming that any who leaned upon it would be harmed, likening Pharaoh to a broken reed. Then he undermined their faith by stating that if they declared their trust in the Lord, it was the same God whose high places Hezekiah had removed, commanding worship at His altar in Jerusalem.

Rabsak further attempted to intimidate them, offering two thousand horses, insisting that they could not field riders, casting doubt on their capacities. He provocatively questioned how they could withstand the power behind his lord, the king of Assyria. He bellowed that he had come to plunder the land at the Lord’s command, emphasizing that his victories demonstrated divine endorsement. The records in the books of Days and Kings recount Hezekiah’s reign, detailing that he was twenty-five when he began his rule in Jerusalem, spanning twenty-nine years. He acted right in the Lord’s sight, following David’s legacy, and in his faithfulness to the Lord, he distinguished himself among the kings of Judah. His devotion led to a resistance against Assyrian dominance, yet he ultimately faced challenges (2 Kings 18:1-7). Seven years later, during the fourteenth year of Hezekiah, Sennacherib besieged Judah’s fortified cities. Hezekiah, eager for peace, humbled himself and promised to bear any charge (2 Kings 18:14). After paying tribute and stripping the temple doors of their adornments, Sennacherib sent Tartan and Rabsak from Lachish to confront Hezekiah in Jerusalem. They positioned themselves against the upper pond’s conduit, calling for the king, prompting Eliakim, Sobnah, and Joach to meet them. Rabsak mimicked the prophets, asserting authority by declaring, ‘Thus saith the great king, the king of Assyria.’ Eliakim, pertinent to the prophecy’s vision, was to be entrusted with authority over Jerusalem and Judah (Isaiah 22:20-21). Some traditions suggest that upon facing Rabsak’s threats, Eliakim surrendered Jerusalem, save for the fortress of Zion and the temple. There is confusion regarding Sobnah; records mention him as an officer to be captured by Assyrians, but the Sobnah mentioned in this account serves as a scribe. Rabsak, credited with speaking Hebrew, is associated with Isaiah's lineage, further complicating interpretations regarding his origins and motives. His statements of blasphemy and accusations against Hezekiah serve to explore the depth of divine sovereignty and human worship amid trials.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

This account is also referenced in the book of 2 Kings (2 Kings 18:17-20). Isaiah associated this narrative with his prophecy, demonstrating its accuracy rather than deviating from his message. His earlier prophecies concerning Babylon, Tyre, Egypt, and other nations highlighted the incarnation of our Savior, the disbelief and consequences faced by the Jewish people, as well as the calling and redemption of the Gentiles. He also predicted the forthcoming invasion by the Assyrians and the eventual downfall of the Jewish nation as ordained by God. Thus, it was entirely fitting for him to recall this account, illustrating the truth of his prophecy. The fulfillment of his words concerning Sennacherib would serve as confirmation that all his other prophecies would likewise be realized.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.