The Church Fathers on this verse

Job 4:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

If we begin to speak to thee, perhaps thou wilt take it ill; but who can withhold the words he hath conceived?

Douay-Rheims

הֲנִסָּ֬ה דָבָ֣ר אֵלֶ֣יךָ תִּלְאֶ֑ה וַעְצֹ֥ר בְּ֝מִלִּ֗ין מִ֣י יוּכָֽל׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

In the context of Scripture, labor often symbolizes sin, as reflected in the phrase, “under his tongue is his torment and plague” (Psalm 9:28). Eliphaz points out to Job, “Have you not spoken something in sin, which is why you are suffering now?” Notably, he emphasizes, “Have you not said” rather than “Have you not done,” indicating that Job's life was marked by righteousness and deeds of virtue. Eliphaz suggests that, although Job's actions are commendable, sin can often manifest in one’s words. He questions, “Who can withstand the weight of your words?” and further probes, “Have you not often spoken?” The confusion Eliphaz expresses does not stem from compassion but from his struggle to confront Job directly. The gravity of Job's words is key. What did Job articulate?

Read more (47 words)

He lamented his desire to escape and be freed from this life. He did not declare, “I am righteous and good, enduring these trials,” but rather expressed his wish to vanish alongside the wicked, to share in their fate. He refrained from proclaiming any of his virtues.

Ireneus (Orda)

19th centuryCommentator

Job's expressions of anguish regarding his circumstances provoke his companions to challenge him, leading to an extended discourse about the reasons behind his suffering. Eliphaz takes the lead in this discussion. After seeking permission to speak, he expresses his astonishment that a man who has frequently offered solace to the afflicted could now voice such intense grievances, especially since his awareness of his own righteousness should guarantee him a positive outcome. He draws from personal experience, stating that the innocent are always spared from destruction, while strength and brutality cannot shield one from the Lord’s displeasure. This prompts him to assert that if Job had truly been virtuous, he would not have encountered such calamities.

Read more (133 words)

To bolster this viewpoint, Eliphaz recounts a unique revelation he received during the night, which led him to understand that before God—who discerns faults even in celestial beings—there is no truly blameless person. He emphasizes that humans can be just as easily consumed by the wrath of God as a worm caught in a gust of wind.

In the fervor of his argument, Eliphaz seems to overlook that every creation, regardless of its order, is inherently good, and that angels possess a relative form of perfection. Thus, his assertion that angels are not without flaws is misguided and does not substantiate the notion that Job was sinful merely due to the imperfections of his humanity. The Church Fathers, such as Athanasius and Chrysostom, provide insights regarding the fall of angels and its implications.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.