The Church Fathers on this verse

John 1:43Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

On the following day, he would go forth into Galilee: and he findeth Philip, And Jesus saith to him: follow me.

Douay-Rheims

τη επαυριον ηθελησεν εξελθειν εις την γαλιλαιαν και ευρισκει φιλιππον και λεγει αυτω ο ιησους ο ιησους> OMIT ο ιησους ακολουθει μοι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

In all labor there is abundance (Prov 14:23), says the book of Proverbs. But Christ teaches us something still greater when He says, He who seeks finds (Mt 7:8).

Therefore it seems marvelous to me how Philip followed Christ. Andrew followed after hearing of Christ from John, and Peter from Andrew. But Philip knew nothing of Him from anyone.

Yet as soon as Christ said to him, Follow Me, Philip immediately obeyed Him. Not only did he not leave Him, but he also became a preacher of Him to others.

Hastening to Nathanael, Philip says to him: We have found Him of whom Moses in the Law and the Prophets wrote (Jn 1:45).

Read more (319 words)

Do you see what an earnest soul he had? Do you see how often he reflected on what Moses had written, and how he awaited Christ's coming? The word found shows people who are constantly seeking.

He calls no one to Himself before that person joins himself to Him. He does this not simply, but according to His own wisdom and understanding.

If no one came to Him voluntarily, and He Himself drew each one to Himself, perhaps afterward they would leave Him. But since they themselves resolved on this, they remained firm in their intention.

He calls Philip as one known to Him more than the others. Born and raised in Galilee, Philip certainly knew Christ more than the others.

Thus, having gained some disciples, Christ goes to catch others and draws Philip and Nathanael to Himself.

Therefore Philip probably followed Christ after seeing Peter's companions and after hearing about Christ from John. It is also likely that Christ's voice had its effect in him.

Christ knew who would be useful for Him. But the Evangelist passes all this over. Philip knew that Christ was to come. Yet he did not know that Christ was Jesus. I think he heard this either from Peter or from John.

Thus, having gained some disciples, Christ goes to catch others and draws Philip and Nathanael to Himself.

Nathanael's conversion to Christ is not so marvelous, because the report about Jesus had spread through all Syria; see Mt 4:24. More marvelous is the conversion of Peter, James, and Philip.

This is not only because they believed before they had seen the miracles of Jesus Christ, but also because they were from Galilee. From there no prophet had come, and nothing good could be expected.

For the Galileans were an uneducated, wild, and rough people. Yet here Christ showed His power, choosing from a land that bore no fruit the most worthy disciples.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Andrew, having heard from the Forerunner, and Peter, having heard from Andrew, followed Jesus. Philip, however, seems to have heard nothing. Yet he followed the Lord at once when He said to him, “Follow Me.”

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Philip was of one mind with the preceding disciples and was wholly disposed to follow Christ. The Lord knew that he too would be a good disciple, and therefore He says, Follow Me.

By these words He points to the grace given to him. By commanding him to follow Him, He bears witness to his virtuous life. For He would not have chosen anyone who was not wholly worthy of this.

By these words the Savior proclaims Philip a disciple. Consider whether some wise reasoning is not hidden here also, compelling us to confess that the Son is God by nature.

Although many people were always near the Savior, and multitudes in their thousands surrounded the disciples, the Savior lifted up His eyes and said to them: The harvest truly is plentiful, but the laborers are few.

Read more (161 words)

Therefore pray the Lord of the harvest, that He may send forth laborers into His harvest (Mt 9:37-38; Lk 10:2). By harvest He means nothing other than those who, like ears of grain, grow in piety through faith in Him.

And who can be Lord of such as these, if not the God of all? Paul also entreats those who are still heirs of the promises to be joined to Him through repentance, crying: We beseech you on behalf of Christ: be reconciled to God (2 Cor 5:20).

Therefore, since God is the only Lord of the harvest, because He is Master and Creator of all, the Savior said that it belongs to Him alone to appoint workers.

Then, having Himself done this, He is seen to be God from this authority of His. For He commands Philip to follow Him. Therefore He is true God, since He is manifestly the Lord of the harvest and has revealed Himself through this.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

On the next day Jesus wished to go into Galilee, and He finds Philip and says to him, Follow Me. Now he was from the city of Andrew and Peter. And Philip finds Nathanael (cf. Jn 1:43-44).

Philip had already been called by the Lord. He says to him: We have found Him of whom Moses in the Law and the Prophets wrote, Jesus, the son of Joseph (Jn 1:45).

He was called the son of the man to whom His Mother was betrothed. For all Christians know well from the Gospel that He was conceived and born without violation of Her virginity.

This is what Philip said to Nathanael. He also added the place of His origin: from Nazareth. And Nathanael said to him, From Nazareth something good can come (cf. Jn 1:45-46).

Read more (221 words)

How should this be understood, brethren? Not as some pronounce it. For it is usually pronounced: Can anything good come out of Nazareth? Especially since Philip's words follow: Come and see (Jn 1:46).

These words of Philip can follow either statement. Either you pronounce the phrase as an affirmation: From Nazareth something good can come, and the other answers, Come and see.

Or you pronounce it as doubting and asking: Can anything good come out of Nazareth? and the other answers, Come and see. Whether it is pronounced one way or the other, the following words will not contradict it.

We, however, must examine how these words are more correctly understood.

What kind of man this Nathanael was we learn from what follows. Listen to what kind of man he was. The Lord Himself bears witness about him.

As the great Lord was revealed through the testimony of John the Baptist, so blessed Nathanael was revealed through the testimony of the Truth.

Yet even if the Lord had not been witnessed to by John, He Himself would have borne witness to Himself, because the Truth is sufficient as His own witness.

But because men could not find the truth, they sought it with the help of a lamp. Therefore John was sent, so that through him the Lord might be revealed.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

On the next day Jesus Christ wished to go, but He does not find Philip on the next day. Rather, this happened afterward, after the calling of Peter and Andrew, James and John, as one may learn from the other Evangelists.

Why then did this Evangelist not mention how Jesus Christ drew them while walking by the Sea of Galilee? Because Matthew and Mark transmitted this. Since they omitted what concerned Philip, this Evangelist narrates it.

Jesus Christ said to him, Follow Me. Knowing that Philip also strongly desired to follow Him after hearing about Him from those who had followed before, but was afraid, Jesus Christ removes his fear.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryChurch Father

Both the coming of Jesus Christ into Galilee and Philip's being in that place were not without providence, but according to divine foreknowledge and ordering.

Jesus Christ, as God who knows the heart, foresaw Philip's disposition to receive the faith. He was pleased to come into Galilee at the very time when Philip was there.

Thus He called him and enrolled him in the company of His disciples. Through him He would also enlighten with faith Nathanael, who was worthy of faith.

Likewise Philip, who was from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter, was then in Galilee according to God's providence.

Read more (178 words)

But both the means by which Jesus Christ called Philip and Philip's complete obedience to Jesus Christ are worthy of wonder. Jesus said to him only one word: Follow Me. Without delay he left everything and went after Him.

From this it is evident that Philip had either already been taught about Jesus Christ by his countrymen, Andrew and Peter, or that the most mighty power of Jesus Christ's word disposed his good will in a wondrous way. Or both did so.

How often Christ also calls us by the Gospel voice, that we may reject vanity and follow Him. Yet we do not obey His divine voice at all, but remain unbending and unchanged in our fleshly desires.

That Philip not only immediately followed Christ who called him, but also showed great zeal that others might follow Him, is evident from the following Gospel words.

Philip found Nathanael and said to him, We have found Him of whom Moses in the Law, and the Prophets, wrote: Jesus, the son of Joseph, who is from Nazareth (Jn 1:45).

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

On the next day, intending to depart for Galilee, Jesus Christ meets Philip. Philip was already prepared for faith in Jesus Christ through the Baptist, whose disciple he probably was.

He may also have been prepared through Andrew and Peter, his fellow villagers. Thus a single word from Jesus Christ was enough for him to follow Him.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

On the next day Jesus was preparing to go, or had already gone, into Galilee. His disciples were with Him: Andrew, John, Peter, and perhaps James.

Jesus meets Philip, an acquaintance of Andrew and Peter, who lived in the same city with them, Bethsaida. He says to him, Follow Me. Philip immediately followed Him.

The calling of Philip and Nathanael.

Whether Philip had been at the Jordan with John, and whether he had heard his testimony concerning Jesus Christ, is unknown. One may suppose that he had been there and had heard John's testimony.

Like all the Jews, he expected the Messiah in the splendor of earthly greatness. Yet he followed Jesus without objection, though He was a poor Man and outwardly in no way resembled the conqueror imagined by the Jews of that time.

Read more (215 words)

In their blindness, they dreamed that this conqueror would subject all nations of the earth to Israel. Philip's friend Nathanael strengthens us in this supposition.

Nathanael had not heard John's testimony concerning Jesus. Therefore he did not immediately believe that Jesus of Nazareth could be the Messiah.

However it may have been, Philip followed Jesus. After conversing with Him, he became finally convinced of Him. Meeting Nathanael, he told him with rapture that Jesus, the son of Joseph, from Nazareth, is the One of whom Moses and the Prophets wrote.

Calling Jesus the son of Joseph from Nazareth, Philip of course did not know that Jesus had been born in Bethlehem and was not Joseph's son. In speaking this way, he repeated the commonly accepted opinion of that time concerning Jesus' origin.

Nathanael belonged to the kind of people who try first to be convinced of the truth of what they are asked to believe. Knowing that the inhabitants of Nazareth did not enjoy a good reputation, he doubted the truth of Philip's words.

He said, Can anything good come out of Nazareth? Philip did not begin to argue with him, but left him to be convinced for himself that Jesus of Nazareth is truly the promised Messiah.

Come and see, Philip said to him.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The third day after His return from the wilderness was apparently spent by Jesus Christ in conversation with His new disciples. On the fourth day He wished to set out on the return journey to Galilee.

On the way He met another young fisherman, Philip from Bethsaida. Philip bore a Greek name. Perhaps it was given to him after the tetrarch Philip, since the custom of naming children after reigning sovereigns has always been widespread among the people.

If so, he was about thirty years old at that time. It is also possible that his Greek name indicated his close relations with some Greek-speaking population that lived mixed with the Galileans along the shores of the lake of Gennesaret.

Read more (43 words)

This easily explains why the Greeks who, in the last week of Christ's life, wished to see Him, turned precisely to him and not to some other Apostle.

At the single authoritative word, Follow Me, Philip followed Christ and became His permanent disciple.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

On the next day means after the preliminary calling to apostleship of Andrew and Peter (Jn 1:40-41), and perhaps also of John and James. The Evangelist himself, out of modesty, is silent about this, but it may be supposed with some grounds.

He wished to go into Galilee means that, having formed the intention, He was preparing to go into Galilee.

This is not the journey into Galilee described by the first three Evangelists as taking place at the beginning of the Lord's public ministry, after the baptism and temptation (Mt 4:12; Mk 1:14; Lk 4:14).

The journey into Galilee mentioned by the first three Evangelists occurred after John the Baptist had been taken into custody. This one was earlier (cf. Jn 3:24; Jn 4:1-3).

Read more (211 words)

The first Evangelists are silent about this, and only John speaks of it.

He finds Philip: not yet on the way to Galilee, but only when He had formed the intention to set out. It seems this happened there, on the banks of the Jordan.

Was Philip perhaps even a disciple of John the Baptist? At least he was from Bethsaida, from the same city as Andrew, who had been a disciple of the Baptist and now followed the Lord Jesus.

Peter was also from there, and his brother Andrew had likewise drawn him to Christ. Was it not through these two new disciples of His that the Lord found this new disciple too?

Follow Me: this was not yet the calling to apostolic ministry, which, according to the first three Evangelists, took place later (Mt 10:1 and note, and parallels).

Rather, it was the Lord's preliminary acquaintance with His future disciple, as with the others mentioned in this chapter. They all follow the Lord together into Galilee, where soon they were all at the wedding in Cana (Jn 2:2, 11).

Perhaps all these Galileans were disciples of the Baptist. Now, having become acquainted with the Lord, they followed Him to their homeland, Galilee, where He had now intended to go.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

On the next day He wished to go forth into Galilee, and He found Philip and said to him, Follow Me. Now Philip was from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.

Bethsaida, the homeland of Peter and Andrew, was on the western shore of the Galilean lake (Jn 12:21). There was another Bethsaida, from which the wilderness began (Lk 9:10).

This one lay on the eastern shore of the Galilean lake and was named Julias in honor of Augustus's daughter Julia.

By noting Philip's place of residence, the Evangelist certainly wishes to indicate that Philip had been somewhat prepared to become a hearer of Jesus through close acquaintance with Andrew and Peter, his fellow citizens.

Read more (45 words)

The Knower of hearts saw that Philip's soul, prepared by conversation with his fellow citizens, was ready to follow Him. Therefore He offers Philip neither instruction nor exhortation, but only says, Follow Me. And Philip went.

What Philip then heard from Jesus justified his expectations.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

We mentioned above that the Lord was staying somewhere near the Jordan on the way from Bethabara to Galilee. Bethabara lay beyond the Jordan, that is, in the part of Palestine called Perea.

In all likelihood, however, the road from Bethabara to Galilee did not run on the Transjordan side, but on the right side of the river through Samaria.

When the Gospel says that the Lord was pleased to go forth into Galilee, one must understand that the Lord wished to return within the borders of the region called Galilee.

This part of Palestine, together with Perea, was then governed by the tetrarch Herod Antipas, son of Herod I and Malthace, the mother of Archelaus.

Read more (435 words)

After the death of Herod I, Emperor Augustus divided his possessions among his three sons according to his will. Archelaus, with the title of ethnarch, received Judea, Samaria, and Idumea.

Philip received Trachonitis, Iturea, Batanea, and Auranitis. Galilee and Perea were allotted to Herod Antipas. Philip and Herod bore the title of tetrarchs.

The cruelty of Archelaus caused his exile to Gaul in the tenth year of his reign. For this reason Judea was governed by a Roman procurator.

This border ran along the valley of Jezreel, about half a degree, or about fifty versts, north of Bethabara.

The Lord does not meet Philip by chance, but finds him. The Lord Himself chooses the disciples (Jn 15:16). The Father gave them to the Son (Jn 17:6).

We do not know where the Lord finds Philip. It may even have been already within the borders of Galilee, where the Lord was going with Andrew, Simon, John, and perhaps James.

Nor do we know Philip's origin. Yet one cannot fail to notice that his name is certainly Greek. It is remarkable that the Greeks who wished to see the Lord addressed their request precisely to him (Jn 12:20-21).

Perhaps Philip was by blood half-Jew and half-Greek. We shall see below, however, that some persons, such as Nathanael, are called by their surnames rather than their names.

Concerning Bethsaida, the homeland of Philip and of Peter and Andrew, it must be noted that there were two Bethsaidas. One was Galilean, of which this passage speaks.

The other was Bethsaida Julias, on the border of Galilee and Perea, more precisely Gaulanitis, north of the Sea of Galilee or Tiberias.

This latter Bethsaida, Bethsaida Julia, became a city only under the tetrarch Philip, as Flavius Josephus indicates. This latter Bethsaida was named Julias by the tetrarch Philip in honor of Augustus's daughter.

Apparently it did not lie right on the shore, although the name Bethsaida means house of fish. The Lord's miracle of multiplying the loaves and fish was performed near this second Bethsaida Julias.

This is clear from comparing Mk 6:31-53, especially verse 45, with Lk 9:10. See also Jn 6:17 and Mt 14:14-34.

For after this miracle the Lord's disciples get into a boat to cross the sea and return home to Capernaum (Jn 6 and others).

Galilean Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter, from which Philip also came, was on the western shore of the lake near Capernaum.

Undoubtedly this house of fish was the older of the two settlements of the same name. It was called Bethsaida because its whole population was engaged in fishing.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Τῇ
    tē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. ἐπαύριον
    epaurion
    tomorrow
    G1887 · ἐπαύριον
  3. ἠθέλησεν
    ēthelēsen
    I will
    G2309 · θέλω
  4. ἐξελθεῖν
    exelthein
    I go out
    G1831 · ἐξέρχομαι
  5. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  6. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. Γαλιλαίαν
    galilaian
    Galilee
    G1056 · Γαλιλαία
  8. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  9. εὑρίσκει
    heuriskei
    I find
    G2147 · εὑρίσκω
  10. Φίλιππον
    philippon
    Philip
    G5376 · Φίλιππος
  11. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  12. λέγει
    legei
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  13. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  14. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. Ἰησοῦς
    iēsous
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  16. Ἀκολούθει
    akolouthei
    I accompany
    G190 · ἀκολουθέω
  17. μοι
    moi
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ