The Church Fathers on this verse

John 1:8Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

He was not the light, but was to give testimony of the light.

Douay-Rheims

ουκ ην εκεινος το φως αλλ ινα μαρτυρηση περι του φωτος

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

13 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

If he had added this not to remove such a thought, then it would have been only a needless expansion of words. It would have been repetition rather than an explanation of the teaching.

Indeed, after saying that John "was sent to bear witness concerning the Light," why does he still say, "He was not the Light"? After saying that John was sent "to bear witness concerning the Light," why does he still say, "He was not the Light"?

He does not speak without purpose or in vain. Among us, the one who testifies is usually greater than the one concerning whom he testifies, and is often considered more worthy of trust.

Read more (266 words)

Therefore, lest anyone think the same about John, the Evangelist immediately destroys this thought from the very beginning. Tearing it up by the roots, he shows who the witness is, who He is concerning Whom he testifies, and what difference lies between them.

Having done this and shown the incomparable superiority of the latter over the former, the Evangelist proceeds to the following narrative without danger.

If anything absurd existed in the thoughts of foolish men, he has carefully removed it all. Then he proceeds to the continuation of his discourse without any difficulty or hindrance.

Therefore let us pray that, while such lofty truths are revealed and right doctrine is taught, our life may also be pure and our conduct blameless. Teaching brings us no benefit when we do not have good works.

Even if we had complete faith and understanding of the Scriptures, nothing would save us from the fire of Gehenna and the unquenchable flame in eternity if we lacked a good direction in life.

As those who do good works will rise to eternal life, so those who dare to do evil works will rise to eternal and endless punishment.

Therefore let us devote all care to this: that we not destroy the fruits of right faith by evil deeds. Rather, through a good life, let us behold Christ with boldness.

There can be no blessedness higher than this. May we be able to attain it, doing all things to the glory of God, to Whom be glory, with the Only-begotten Son and the Holy Spirit, unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Since it often happens that a witness is greater than the one concerning whom he testifies, the Evangelist refutes this evil thought. He does so lest you suppose that John, who bore witness to Christ, was greater than He, and says, "He was not the Light."

But perhaps someone will say, "Can we not call John, or any other saint, light?" We may call each of the saints light, but we cannot call him Light in this sense.

For example, if someone says to you, "Is John light?" agree. But if he asks, "Is John that Light?" say, "No." For he is not light in the proper sense.

He is light by participation, having his radiance from the true Light.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The Baptist preferred dwelling in the wilderness to life in the cities. He displayed wondrous strength in ascetic struggle and reached the very summit of righteousness among men.

Therefore he quite justly aroused admiration for himself, and some even considered him to be Christ Himself. Thus the leaders of the Jewish assemblies, arriving at such a conjecture because of the excellences of his virtue, sent certain men to him.

They commanded them to ask him whether he was the Christ (Jn 1:19-25). Therefore the blessed Evangelist did not ignore the fact that many idle things were being said about him.

He considered it necessary to add, "He was not the Light." In this way he uproots the error concerning him and again gives a certain credibility to the one sent from God for testimony.

Read more (281 words)

Indeed, is he not greatly exalted and altogether wondrous, who was so distinguished by righteousness that he reflected Christ Himself? Because of the remarkable beauty of his reverence, he was even considered to be the Light itself.

Therefore, he says, he was not the Light, but was sent for testimony concerning the Light. By saying "the Light," to phos, with the article, he clearly indicates the one true Light.

We shall not deny that the blessed Baptist, or even each of the saints, may rightly be called light, because of what our Savior said about them: "You are the light of the world" (Mt 5:14).

It is also said of the holy Baptist, "I have prepared a lamp for My Christ" (Ps 131:17). And again: "He was the burning and shining lamp, and you were willing for a time to rejoice in his light" (Jn 5:35).

But although the saints are light and the Baptist is a lamp, we must not overlook the grace and gift given to them from the Light. The light in the lamp is not its own, and the illumination in the saints is not their own.

Rather, by the radiance of truth they are made bright and shining. They are lights in the world, "holding fast the word of life" (Phil 2:15-16).

What life is this, whose word they held, and by which they were called lights, except the Only-begotten Himself, Who says, "I am the Life" (Jn 14:6)?

Therefore there is in reality one true Light, Who illumines and is not illumined. If, through participation in this one Light, something else is also called light, it must be understood as such by imitation of Him.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

He knew himself. The Lord rightly called him a lamp. The Lord says this about John: "He was the burning and shining lamp, and you were willing for a short time to rejoice in his light" (Jn 5:35).

And what does John the Evangelist say about him? "There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came for testimony, to bear witness concerning the Light... He was not the Light" (Jn 1:6-8).

Who was this? John the Baptist. Who says this? John the Evangelist: "He was not the Light, but came to bear witness concerning the Light."

You say, "He was not the Light." Yet the Light Himself says of him, "He was the burning and shining lamp." "But I know," He says, "what Light I am going to speak of. I know in comparison with what Light the lamp is not light."

Read more (135 words)

Listen to what follows: "That was the true Light, which illumines every man coming into the world" (Jn 1:9). John does not illumine every man. Christ illumines every man.

John acknowledged that he was a lamp, so as not to be extinguished by the wind of pride. A lamp can be both kindled and extinguished. The Word of God cannot be extinguished. A lamp always can.

For if you think that the mountain is the light, you will suffer shipwreck on the mountain and find no consolation in the harbor. But at what should you marvel? At the mountain as a mountain.

Therefore strive upward to Him Who illumines the mountain. The mountain was set there to receive the rays first and communicate them to your eyes. For this reason he is not the Light.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

If the Son is the Light that came into the world, then beyond doubt the world came into being through the Son. For when the Evangelist speaks at the beginning of the Gospel about John the Baptist, he says, "He was not the Light, but came to bear witness concerning the Light."

As we have already said, Christ Himself was "the true Light, which illumines every man coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world came to be through Him" (Jn 1:9-10).

He must therefore be the Word of God, of Whom the Evangelist said that all things came to be through Him.

Read more (51 words)

Otherwise they will be forced to speak of two worlds, one created by the Son and the other by the Word. Or, if the world is one and creation is one, it follows that the same One is Son and Word, before all creation, because creation came to be through Him.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Prophecy belongs to John, but the mysteries of prophecy belong to John’s Lord. So also the priesthood belongs to the son of Zacharias, but authority and priesthood belong to the Son of Mary.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

He further explains the reason for the mission. He came not in order to shine, since he was not the light, but in order to bear witness to the Light. The Evangelist says this so that no one might suppose that the one who bears witness is greater and more trustworthy than the One to Whom he bears witness, as often happens. Since John’s testimony was recent, the Evangelist speaks so that no similar assumption would arise concerning the One to Whom he bore witness.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryChurch Father

There were many who knew John's wondrous conception and birth and marveled at his angelic life. They regarded him as the expected Messiah.

Saint Luke says, "As the people were in expectation, and all reasoned in their hearts about John, whether he was the Christ" (Lk 3:15). Therefore the Evangelist completely uproots this opinion and teaches in a loud voice.

"He was not," that is, John was not "the Light," that is, the expected Christ. John had light, as the other saints also did, shining and pouring forth rays by their good works according to the saying, "You are the light of the world" (Mt 5:14).

But he was not the Light Himself, that is, the Son of God. John had light, but not by nature as God does. He had it by grace and participation, as all the righteous do.

John was not the Light, that is, Christ, but was sent to bear witness concerning the Light. The Evangelist explains what this Light was, saying, "That was the true Light, which illumines every man coming into the world."

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

All the Evangelists speak of John as one sent from God. "The word of God came to John, the son of Zacharias, in the wilderness" (Lk 3:2). Thus the Evangelist Luke speaks of John's calling.

The Evangelist John expresses the same thought in the words: "There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He was not the Light, but was sent to bear witness concerning the Light."

The Evangelist Mark begins his Gospel with the words of the prophet Malachi, applying them to John: "Behold, I send My angel before Your face, who will prepare Your way before You" (Mk 1:2).

The Evangelists Matthew (Mt 3:3), Mark (Mk 1:3), and Luke (Lk 3:4) say that John is the one of whom Isaiah prophesied. He is "the voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord" (Is 40:3).

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Struck by all they had seen and heard, many even asked whether he himself was the Messiah, or at least the prophet like Moses whom they expected (Lk 3:15; Jn 1:19).

His word had such enormous influence over the masses that, had he wished, he could have used that influence to pursue purely political ends. But his aim was not political agitation, but moral and religious rebirth.

Therefore he took upon himself no other task than the office of a moral and religious teacher, or prophet. His word thundered like a hammer, breaking the hardest heart. It burned like a flame, penetrating the most hidden thoughts.

Read more (982 words)

He did not confine himself to general exhortations and rebukes. He denounced with truly prophetic sharpness and directness. "You brood of vipers!" he cried to the crowd of Pharisees and Sadducees who had come to hear his preaching, more to criticize than to confess and repent. "Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?"

According to the Evangelist, "the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by John" (Lk 7:30). Thus they did not accept his mission, even declaring him to be possessed (Lk 7:33).

He exposed all the emptiness and uselessness of their petty ritual disputes and casuistry. For this they in turn hated him. But since John had his authority not from them, but from above, he did not flatter them.

He addressed them with the same prophetic severity as he addressed the crowds they despised, demanding that they "bear worthy fruit of repentance."

In their narrow, pedantic arrogance, they considered their share in the kingdom of the Messiah already secure, simply because they were descendants of Abraham. They supposed that his righteousness would be imputed to them.

In their view, only Israel could find favor with God, precisely by virtue of its ancestral character. They thought and taught that the Kingdom of Heaven would be a purely Jewish kingdom, and that all other nations would be excluded from it.

But John mercilessly overthrew this false casuistic construction. "Do not think to say within yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' For I tell you that God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham," and to exclude you, his supposed sons, from the Kingdom if you do not repent.

Such preaching could not fail to strike the scribes and Pharisees. They enjoyed universal honor among all, yet this man addressed them with threatening rebuke.

They imagined that he would be before them like a reed shaken by the wind. In reality, he proved to be an unshakable oak. Flattery and fear were as foreign to his great soul as his rough mantle would have been among the soft garments of a king in a palace.

The sharp contrast between John's teaching and the teaching of the rabbis appeared with special force in the answers he gave to his various questioners.

If fire threatened the rabbis themselves, what fate, in their opinion, must have awaited ordinary people? Yet from the prophet's mouth thundered words that not only aroused fear, but also directed men toward a higher morality in outward deeds.

When the people heard John's terrible preaching, that "even now the ax is laid to the root of the trees; every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire," they asked him in trembling, "What then shall we do?"

He answered them: "He who has two tunics, let him give to him who has none; and he who has food, let him do likewise" (Lk 3:9-11).

If they would help the hungry and the naked, and see in this their duty of love for mankind, they would thereby prove the sincerity of their repentance.

John embraced all classes with his human sympathy. Like Christ Himself, he rejected none of them. The publicans, despised by all, from whom the Pharisees withdrew as from the accursed, found consolation and assurance that they too could receive a share in the Kingdom of Heaven.

When the publicans asked him, "Teacher, what shall we do?" he answered them: "Collect no more than what is appointed for you."

Soldiers also asked him, "And what shall we do?" He said to them: "Do violence to no one, accuse no one falsely, and be content with your wages."

If the publicans honestly fulfilled their duty, and if the soldiers did not use their strength to insult others, but remained faithful to their standard and content with their modest position, this would be a sign of their good repentance.

It would be a sign of their fidelity to conscience, which would bring down upon them the blessing of God.

Yet while demanding practical fruits of repentance, John also pointed out that all who repented would receive special help from above in their moral efforts. He declared that the help of the Spirit of God was necessary for complete inner transformation.

"I baptize with water, but One mightier than I is coming, the strap of whose sandals I am not worthy to loose. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire."

The hardened would undergo baptism by fire. To the contrite would be given the heavenly gift of a higher will, higher power, and higher knowledge of God, as well as higher communion with Him.

Knowing the needs of the time and filled with the spirit of the prophets, he could not forget how the Old Testament prophets proclaimed, as a sign of the Messiah's coming, that Jehovah would "pour out His Spirit on all flesh" (Joel 2:28).

They also proclaimed that He would "pour water on him who is thirsty, and streams on the dry ground," and that "His Spirit would be on the house of Israel" (Isa 44:3; Ezek 39:29).

Therefore he could not doubt that the One toward Whom he was only the heralding voice, the One whose sandals he would have counted it too great an honor even to loosen, would come not only with vengeance, but also with blessing.

For this He would bring with Him the highest life-giving power, namely the power of the Holy Spirit.

Thus, under the influence of John's preaching and the extraordinary rite of baptism performed by him, the expectation of the Messiah proclaimed by the new prophet grew and strengthened more and more in the soul of the people.

And this Messiah finally came. He appeared openly before the people after His long, unknown stay in distant Nazareth.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"He was not the Light," and so forth: this is an emphatic indication of the distinction between the greatest of the Old Testament prophets, the witness concerning the Light, and this very Light, the Messiah.

"The Evangelist does not say this simply or without reason. Among us, a witness is often greater and more trustworthy than the one concerning whom he testifies.

Lest anyone think this about John, the Evangelist immediately forestalls this wrong opinion and uproots it. He shows who the one testifying is, who He is to Whom testimony is borne, and how great the difference is between the witness and the One witnessed to" (Chrysostom).

"We may call every saint light, but a saint is light not by nature, but by participation, for he has brightness from the true Light" (Theophylact). The same is true of John in relation to Christ.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

People even regarded John as the Messiah, but this was an error. He was indeed a burning lamp, Jn 5:35, yet his light was kindled by Another. He bore witness to the Light, yet this did not make him equal to Him of whom he testified. He was only the dawn before the sun that followed him. He was a great prophet, like whom none had arisen before him. Yet he himself declared plainly that he was not the Christ, Jn 1:20.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

When the fullness of time drew near, there were in Israel those awaiting deliverance. Among the Gentiles there were also many thirsting for true enlightenment, as they showed by receiving the Old Testament Revelation.

Therefore, when John, the one sent, appeared, those who sensed beforehand the nearness of spiritual revival were stirred and streamed to him. They hoped to meet in him the deliverance from darkness they awaited and the consoling enlightenment of God's Light.

But he was not what they hastily supposed him to be. He was not the Light, but only sent before Him as His herald and Forerunner.

As a minister of the truth, sent from the true God, he himself bore witness to this without hesitation. From himself he directed all to the true Light.

Read more (446 words)

The souls thirsting for light were like brides. He, as the friend of the Bridegroom, escorted them to this Bridegroom. It pleased God to establish such an order for the manifestation of the true Light, that there should be a Forerunner to point Him out.

In this order there is a testimony to the truth. In this there is testimony that John is from God. Since he is from God, He to Whom he bore witness is also from God.

Falsehood could not have such an order. No false messiah could have endured a forerunner without suspicion and disturbance. Nor could a false forerunner have stood firm in his false forerunnership without claiming a higher title for himself.

The truth lies precisely here: the Forerunner, so exalted, humbly turns away the higher title from himself. He says that the One Whom all await is not he, but One coming after him, Whom he will indicate and truly did indicate.

Such is the meaning of John in the economy of arranging the saving path for us, the poor. But this order, once begun, does not cease.

John, sent from God for testimony, has not left the scene and will not leave it until the end of the age. The true Light is in the Lord.

Yet no one comes to Him without witnesses. The Apostles succeeded John, and after them pastors and teachers. In the Church there is always testimony pointing to the unfailing Light in the Lord.

If a soul is troubled by conscience and seeks a reconciler, the pastor points Him out on the Cross. In the Mystery of Repentance he reconciles that soul with God and gives it peace within itself.

If a soul grows weak in struggle and seeks strengthening, the pastor points it to the source of life-giving powers in the Mystery of the Body and Blood of the Lord. He gives it to drink from them, uniting it with the Lord through Communion.

How many need the indication and interpretation of the truth! The pastor points out this truth in the voice of the Church, which is the echo of the voice of her Head Himself.

Thus he calms doubts that are agitated and that agitate. The pastor is the escort of souls to the Bridegroom. Therefore woe to the pastors who make the souls that turn to them stop at themselves.

The instrument of the pastoral word is the prophetic and apostolic sayings. Therefore woe to pastors who invent their own forms of speech.

And woe to souls that, instead of these divinely granted guides, are content either with their own unreliable perceptions or with the directions of self-appointed guides.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 11 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  2. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  3. ἐκεῖνος
    ekeinos
    that
    G1565 · ἐκεῖνος
  4. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. φῶς
    phōs
    light
    G5457 · φῶς
  6. ἀλλ᾽
    all
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  7. ἵνα
    hina
    in order that
    G2443 · ἵνα
  8. μαρτυρήσῃ
    martyrēsē
    I witness
    G3140 · μαρτυρέω
  9. περὶ
    peri
    about
    G4012 · περί
  10. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. φωτός
    phōtos
    light
    G5457 · φῶς