The Church Fathers on this verse

John 1:9Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

That was the true light, which enlighteneth every man that cometh into this world.

Douay-Rheims

ην το φως το αληθινον ο φωτιζει παντα ανθρωπον ερχομενον εις τον κοσμον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The Evangelist, speaking above about John, noted that he came to bear witness to the Light. He was sent for this very purpose at that time.

But lest anyone, hearing this, should suspect the One witnessed to because the witness had appeared recently, the Evangelist raises the mind higher. He directs it toward a beginningless being, never-ending and never ceasing.

You may ask, How can He who is Son have such being? We are speaking of God, and you ask how this is possible? Do you not fear and tremble?

If someone asked you how our souls, and afterward our bodies, will live forever, you would surely laugh at the question. Such matters are not for the human mind to investigate. Its duty is only to believe.

Read more (1302 words)

Nor should it examine what has been spoken. The power of Him who spoke it is sufficient proof of what was said.

And do you ask us how this is possible, when we say that He who created souls and bodies is without beginning and infinitely surpasses every creature? Who in full reason and sound mind would say this?

You have heard that He was the true Light. Why then do you strive in vain to embrace this endless life with your mind? It is impossible.

Why do you search what cannot be searched? Why do you test what cannot be comprehended? Why do you investigate what is unknown?

Consider the very source of the sun’s rays. You cannot do this. Yet in that case you are neither vexed nor grieved by your weakness.

Why then are you so bold and rash in matters far greater? John, the son of thunder, sounding through the spiritual trumpet, heard from the Spirit that He was the Light and investigated no further.

But you, not having his grace and reasoning only by your feeble arguments, strive to step even beyond the boundary of his knowledge. For this reason you will not attain even the measure of his knowledge.

Such is the devil’s treachery. He leads those who trust him beyond the limits set for us by God, as though we could possess much greater knowledge.

After deceiving us with such hopes and depriving us of the grace of God, he not only gives us nothing more. How could he, being the devil? He also does not allow us to return to the former limits, where we were safe.

He makes us wander everywhere and nowhere permits us to stand. In this way he brought the first-formed man to expulsion from paradise.

By giving him the hope of greater knowledge and honor, the devil deprived him even of what he had peacefully enjoyed before.

Man not only failed to become equal to God, as the devil promised him, but fell under the yoke of death.

Through eating from the tree he not only gained nothing more. In the hope of greater knowledge, he lost no small part of the knowledge he had before.

He began to be ashamed of his nakedness and to hide it, though before the deception he was above such shame.

Even his seeing his nakedness and feeling the need to cover himself with clothing, together with other still greater sorrows, were consequences of the deception.

That we may not suffer the same, let us obey God and remain in His commandments, examining nothing beyond them. Otherwise we shall be deprived even of the blessings already given to us, as these heretics were punished.

As soon as they began to search out the beginning of beginningless life, they lost even what they could have possessed. They did not find what they sought, for that is impossible. Meanwhile they fell away from the right faith in the Only-begotten.

But let us not transgress the eternal boundaries set by our Fathers. Let us follow the laws of the Spirit in all things.

When we hear that He was the true Light, let us investigate nothing further. Nor is it possible for anyone to go beyond this saying.

If God begot in the manner of man, there would necessarily be some division between the begetter and the begotten. But since this begetting is ineffable and proper to God alone, leave aside ordinary notions of before and after.

These are expressions of time, while the Son is the Creator of all ages.

Some say, Therefore God is not Father to the Son, but brother. Tell me, what need is there for such a conclusion?

If we said that the Father and the Son have divided being in Their beginning, perhaps you would have the right to say this. But we avoid such impiety.

We say that the Father is without beginning and unbegotten, while the Son is without beginning and begotten of the Father. What need is there to draw such an impious conclusion from this teaching? There is none.

The Son is the radiance. And radiance is understood inseparably from the nature of which it is the radiance.

For this reason Paul also called the Son by this name, that we might suppose no division between the Father and the Son (Heb 1:3). This is what the name expresses.

By such an image the Apostle corrects the absurd thoughts that enter the minds of senseless people.

When you hear of radiance, says the Apostle, do not think that the Son has no hypostasis of His own. Such a thought is impious and belongs to the madness of the Sabellians and Marcellians.

We do not teach this. We say that He has His own hypostasis.

Therefore, after calling Him radiance, the Apostle adds that He is also the image of the hypostasis of the Father (Heb 1:3). By this he expresses both His own hypostasis and His consubstantiality with Him whose image He is.

As I have already said, there is no single expression sufficient to convey to men this whole teaching about God. It is desirable, at least, to combine several expressions and draw from each what is fitting.

Thus we can render worthy doxology to God. I say worthy, that is, according to our strength.

But if anyone thinks he can speak worthily of the very essence of God, and strives to prove that he knows God as God knows Himself, he has no knowledge of God at all.

Knowing this, let us hold firmly to what was handed down to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the Word. Let us examine nothing further.

Two dangers threaten those sick with this disease. One is that they labor in vain, seeking what cannot be found. The other is that they provoke God by striving to transgress the limits He has set.

There is no need to tell you what wrath this arouses in God, for you all know it. Therefore, let us withdraw from the folly of the heretics and attend to His words with trembling, that He may always guard us.

"But to whom will I look," He says, "except to the meek and humble, the silent one who trembles at My words" (Isa 66:2).

Nothing prevents us today from touching again on these words. Last time the exposition of doctrines did not allow us to follow fully all that was read.

Where are those who say that the Son is not true God? Here He is called "the true Light," and elsewhere Truth itself and Life itself.

We shall examine those latter words more clearly when we come to them. For now we must speak to your love about the Light.

If He "enlightens every man coming into the world," why do so many remain unenlightened? Surely because not all have known the faith of Christ.

How then does He "enlighten every man"? According to each one’s receptivity.

If some, by their own will, close the eyes of the mind and do not wish to receive the rays of this Light, their darkness does not come from the nature of the Light. It comes from their malice, for they willingly deprive themselves of the gift.

Grace is poured out upon all. It is not alien to Jew, Greek, barbarian, Scythian, free man, slave, man, woman, elder, or youth. It is equally near to all and calls all with equal honor.

But those who do not wish to make use of this gift must justly ascribe such blindness to themselves.

When the entrance is open to all and no one blocks it, if some remain outside through self-chosen hardness, they perish for no other reason than their own wickedness.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The Evangelist intends to speak about the divine economy of the Only-begotten in the flesh: that He came to His own and that He became flesh. Therefore, lest anyone suppose that He did not exist before the Incarnation, he raises the thought to His being before every beginning.

He says that the true Light existed even before the Incarnation. By this he overthrows the heresy of Photinus and Paul of Samosata, who claimed that the Only-begotten received being when He was born of the Virgin, and did not exist before this.

And you, Arian, who do not confess the Son of God as true God, hear what the Evangelist says: "the true Light." And you, Manichaean, who say that we were created by an evil creator, hear that the true Light illumines every man.

Read more (156 words)

If the evil creator is darkness, he cannot illumine anyone. Therefore we are creations of the true Light.

And how, someone will say, does He illumine every man, when we see some darkened? As far as depends on Him, He illumines all.

Tell me, are we not all rational? Do we not all know by nature what is good and what is opposed to it? Do we not have the ability, through reflection on creatures, to know the Creator?

Therefore the reason given to us, which teaches us by nature and is called the natural law, may be called the light given to us by God. If some have made evil use of reason, they have darkened themselves.

Others resolve this objection as follows. The Lord, they say, illumines every man who comes "into the world," that is, into a better state, and who strives to adorn his soul rather than leave it disordered and shapeless.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

There was the true Light. The divine Evangelist profitably returns to explain what has been said. He clearly distinguishes the true Light, that is, the Only-begotten, from what is not such, namely created beings.

What is by nature is clearly distinguished from what is by grace. What is communicated is distinguished from what receives communication. What gives itself to those in need is distinguished from what is given.

If the Son is the true Light, then besides Him there is no true Light. Creation has no power in itself either to be or to be called light. Nor can it produce light as the fruit of its own nature.

Rather, as it exists from non-being, so also, not being light, it can be raised to being light. This happens by receiving into itself the radiance of the true Light. It is illumined by participation in the divine nature. By imitation of it, it is called light and is light.

But the Word of God is light according to essence. He is not such only through participation by grace. He does not have this dignity as something accidental or added, like grace. He has it as the unchanging fruit of an immutable nature.

It is an inalienable good that has passed from the Father to the Heir of His essence. Creation cannot attain being light in this way. Since it does not possess, it receives. Since it is darkness, it is illumined. It possesses grace as something found and bestowed.

Through the love for mankind of Him who gives, it receives dignity. Thus the Son is the true Light, while creation is by no means so.

Since there is this distinction, and so great a distance between the Son of God and creation with respect to identity of nature, should we not rightly suppose that those who call Him created speak nonsense? More than this, they will be found outside all sound understanding.

They set the Creator of all things in the rank of creatures. They do not see, as it seems to me, to what impiety this audacity may bring them, since they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertions (1 Tim 1:7).

For us, who are accustomed to examine the truth in the words before us more precisely, the Son, that is, the true Light, will in no way prove created, made, or in any respect of the same nature as creation. Anyone may see this everywhere and very easily.

This is no less clear from the arguments that follow, gathered for understanding the words before us.

Arguments or reasonings by which one may know that the Son alone is the true Light, while creation is not, and therefore He is not of one nature with it.

If the Son, being the radiance of the glory of God and the Father (Heb 1:3), is therefore the true Light, then He must not be of one nature with creation. Otherwise creation too would be regarded as the radiance of the glory of God and the Father.

It would have the ability to be by nature what the Son is.

Another. If all creation can be the true Light, why is this applied to the Son alone? According to the law of equality, the ability to be the true Light ought surely to be assigned also to creatures.

Yet this will not befit any creature. It is said only of the essence of the Son. Therefore, in its proper and true sense it must be used only of Him, and by no means of creatures.

How, then, will He be of one nature with creation, and not rather above creation, since He exists above it together with the Father?

Another. If a light that is not true is not the same as the true Light, since the designation of the two has some distinction, and if the Son is called the true Light and is such by nature, then creation will not be the true Light.

Therefore things so different from each other are not of one nature with one another.

Another. If the Only-begotten is not alone the true Light, but creation too can be the true Light, why does He enlighten every man coming into the world? If created essence has this in itself, it was superfluous for it to be illumined through the Son.

Yet He enlightens, and we all participate in Him. Therefore the Son and creation are not the same in the quality of their essence. What participates is not identical with what communicates.

Another. If being the true Light does not belong by nature to the Son alone, but creation also has light, then what the Psalmist said to certain persons will, I think, prove superfluous: “Draw near to Him and be enlightened” (Ps 33:6).

For the true Light absolutely cannot be light by participation in another, nor shine by illumination from another. Rather, it must receive perfect purity from its own nature.

But we see that man needs the Light, since he is of created nature. The Psalmist speaks the truth when he cries as if to the Word of God: “For Thou wilt light my lamp, O Lord my God; Thou wilt enlighten my darkness” (Ps 17:29).

Therefore we are not the true Light. We participate in the illuminating Word, and by nature are alien to the true Light, which is the Son.

Another, from the same. If the human mind is called a lamp, according to what is sung in the Psalms, “For Thou wilt light my lamp, O Lord” (Ps 17:29), how can we be the true Light?

Light is brought and given to the lamp. And if the darkness within us is illumined by the Only-begotten alone, is He not rather the true Light, while we are not?

If this is true, how can He, who so far surpasses creation, be of one nature with it?

Another. If being the true Light can belong to creation, as without doubt it belongs to the Son, then man, as part of creation, will evidently be the true Light.

But in that case, to whom did God and the Father promise through the holy prophets, saying, “The Sun of Righteousness shall rise for you who fear My name” (Mal 4:2)? What then? Did the true Light need the Sun that illumines?

But God and the Father promised to give Him to us, surely because we were in need. Having received Him, we were illumined. Therefore the Only-begotten differs from us and from creation in identity of nature.

He is the true Light, and He has the nature that enlightens those who need light.

Another. If the Son alone is not the true Light, but creation also has the Light, then He will evidently be in us as well. What cause, then, moved the saints to cry to God, “Send forth Thy light and Thy truth” (Ps 42:3)?

Tell me, what profit did they think they brought us when they so often uttered such words? If they knew that man needs the Light and requires participation in it from another, can anyone truly say that he himself is the true Light?

But if man did not need the illuminating Word, why did they vainly call upon One who could bring no profit? Yet it cannot be said that the mind of the saints deviated from the truth.

Again, God and the Father Himself sends us the Son as to those who need light. Therefore the Only-begotten is distinct by nature from creation, as the One who enlightens is distinct from those who need light.

Another. If we see creation needing the Light, and the Only-begotten enlightens it, then creation does not lead itself to the Light. Therefore it is not the true Light, as the Son is.

Another. If the natural and true Light is not darkened, and the Only-begotten is the true Light, and creation also is the true Light, why does Scripture say of the Son, “The darkness did not overcome Him”? And why does Paul say of us, “In whom the god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers” (2 Cor 4:4)?

Again the Savior Himself says, “While you have the light, walk in the light, lest darkness overtake you” (Jn 12:35). It is certainly evident to all that if some of us were not overtaken by darkness, the Savior would not have said this.

How, then, will the Only-begotten and creation be identical by nature? How will the unchangeable be identical with the changeable? How will He who admits no deficiency be identical with what is darkened and can receive illumination?

Such illumination is evidently added to it, and is not innate in its nature itself.

Another. If the Only-begotten alone is not the true Light, but creation has light as being of one nature with Him, how can we cry to God and the Father, “In Thy light shall we see light” (Ps 35:10)?

If we are the true Light, how can we be illumined in another? But if we say this as those who need an incoming light, then evidently we shall not prove to be the true Light.

Therefore we are not of one nature with the Word, who so far surpasses us by nature.

Another, by way of interpretation. Our Lord Jesus Christ is found saying in the Gospels, “This is the judgment, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than the light, for their works were evil. For everyone who does evil hates the light and does not come to the light” (Jn 3:19-20).

But if the Only-begotten is the true Light, and creation can likewise be true light, why does He come to illumine it, while it loved darkness? How can it fail to come to the light, if it itself is the true Light?

For what belongs to things by their nature has this belonging rooted in them. But what is chosen by desire does not have such stability.

For example, no one acquires the being of a rational man by his own will, since he has this by nature. But by his own will each person can be either bad or good. Likewise, it is in each person’s power to love what is right or its opposite.

If, then, creation is light by nature, since the name true Light signifies this, why does it not come to the light? Or how can it love darkness?

Evidently, it cannot be the true Light by nature. Rather, it freely makes a voluntary choice of the better or the worse.

Thus our opponents must either dare to assert that the Son has no natural advantages over creation, so that their blasphemy may be more clearly exposed. Then they will hear from all, “The Lord will destroy all flattering lips, and the boastful tongue” (Ps 11:4).

Or, if they clearly acknowledge that these qualities belong to Him according to His essence, let them not unite creation with Him into unity of nature. As we have just proved, creation does not possess this.

Another. If the Word of God alone is not the true Light, but creation also, like Him, can be the true Light, why does He say, “I am the light of the world” (Jn 8:12)?

How can we be deprived of the most excellent advantage of nature, if we too can be the true Light, as created essence has light? But if the Only-begotten speaks the truth, “I am the light of the world,” then creation can be light only by receiving it from Him.

It can be light in no other way. And if so, it is not of one nature with Him.

Another. If the Son alone is not the true Light, but this also belongs to creatures, what shall we say when the most wise Peter writes to us in his Epistle, “You are a chosen race. A royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for possession, that you may proclaim the virtues of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light” (1 Pet 2:9)?

What darkness is there in us at all? In what darkness were we found, if we ourselves are the true Light? How could we have been called to light, if we were not in darkness?

Yet the preacher of truth does not speak falsely, he who dared to say, “Do you seek proof that Christ speaks in me?” (2 Cor 13:3). And we have been called into His marvelous light (1 Pet 2:9), therefore from darkness, and in no other way.

If this is right, then creation is not the true Light. The Son alone is properly and truly Light. Created things are light by participation in Him, and therefore they are not of one nature with Him.

Other proofs, with scriptural sayings added, which by very simple reflections lead readers to confess that the Son of God alone is the true Light. The nature of creatures is illumined by receiving light from Him. It cannot be Light according to essence, as He is.

The Psalmist says, “Let the light of Thy countenance be marked upon us, O Lord” (Ps 4:7). What is this countenance of God and the Father, whose light has been marked upon us, if not the Only-begotten Son of God?

Read the full text in the app

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

But the apostles too, my brothers, are lamps of the day. Do not think that John alone is a lamp and that the other apostles are not. The Lord says to them: "You are the light of the world" (Mt 5:14).

But lest they think that they are that very Light, the Light called by name, of which it is said, "That was the true Light, which enlightens every man coming into the world," He added, when He said, "You are the light of the world": "No one, when he has lit a lamp, puts it under a vessel" (Mt 5:15).

Having called you light, He called you a lamp. Do not be exalted in pride, lest the little flame be extinguished. I do not put you under a vessel, but I make you shine by placing you on a lampstand.

Read more (550 words)

And what is the lampstand for the lamp? Hear about the lampstand. If you are to be a lamp, you will also have a lampstand. The Cross of Christ is the great lampstand. Whoever wishes to shine will not disdain the wooden lampstand.

Therefore, why did he come? "To bear witness to the Light" (Jn 1:7). Why? "That all might believe through him" (Jn 1:7). And to what Light did he bear witness? "That was the true Light" (Jn 1:9).

Why was "true" added? Because an enlightened man is also called light, but the true Light is He Who Himself enlightens. Even our eyes are called lights. Yet if no lamp is lit at night, or if the sun shines by day, these lights are open in vain.

So John also was a light, but not the true Light. If he had not been illumined, he would have remained darkness. Through illumination he became light.

Had he not been illumined, he would have remained darkness, like all the ungodly. To them, once they had believed, the Apostle said: "You were once darkness" (Eph 5:8).

But now, since they believed, what are they? "But now," he says to them, "you are light in the Lord" (Eph 5:8). If he had not added "in the Lord," we would not have understood what was said.

He says, "Light in the Lord," that is, you were darkness not in the Lord. "You were once darkness"; here he did not add, "in the Lord." Therefore darkness is in you, but light is in the Lord.

So also John "was not the Light, but was sent to bear witness to the Light" (Jn 1:8).

Where, then, is this Light Himself? "That was the true Light, which enlightens every man coming into this world" (Jn 1:9). If He enlightens every man coming into this world, then He enlightened John himself.

Thus He Himself enlightened the one who, by His will, was to speak of Him. Understand, beloved. He was coming to weak souls, to sick hearts, to the eyes of the soul covered with a veil. To them He came.

And how could such a soul see what is perfect? Often we learn of the rising of the sun, which we cannot look at with our eyes, by some body that has been illumined.

Even those whose eyes are diseased can see a wall, a mountain, a tree, or something similar when it has been illumined and filled with sunlight. Through something illumined, the sun's rising is revealed to those whose sight is not yet strong enough to behold it.

So it was with all those to whom Christ came. They did not have sufficient sight to see Him. He covered John with His rays, and through him the Enlightener was revealed.

John confessed that he was the one illumined and enlightened, not the One Who illumines and enlightens. Through him was revealed the One Who enlightens, the One Who illumines, the One Who fills.

Who is this? He is the One "Who enlightens," he says, "every man coming into the world" (Jn 1:9). For if man had not departed from there, he would not need enlightenment.

But here he needs enlightenment because he departed from there, where man could always have been embraced by the Light.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

He always was, according to the theological teaching concerning Him set forth above. As God, He always was. As man, He began His existence.

If He illumines every man coming into the world, how did so many remain unenlightened? As far as depends on Him, He illumines all. Some remain unenlightened by their own will.

The grace of light, like the sun, has been poured out upon all. Those who do not wish to use this grace are themselves guilty of not being illumined.

He called this Light true because it cannot be compared with any other and surpasses every other, as Light in the highest sense.

Read more (69 words)

The true Light is also called the true image, true wisdom, true life, and the like. This is not said to disparage other holy images, the wisdom of the Divine Scriptures, or the present life, much less the future life.

Rather, such an expression always indicates something incomparable with anything else by reason of its superiority. "Into the world" may also mean: into the true world of the virtues.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryChurch Father

This Light, he says, was the true Light, that is, natural Light in the highest sense. He is eternal, inexhaustible, unchangeable, independent, self-existent, without beginning, ever outpouring Himself and illumining every man coming into the world.

How does this Light illumine? By planting in the heart of each one the power of reason, wisdom, and knowledge, and the seeds of true knowledge of God.

It is true that angels also enlighten men. This can be seen in Manoah the father of Gideon, Daniel the prophet, Zacharias the parent of the Forerunner, Joseph the betrothed of the Virgin, and many others enlightened by angels.

Men also enlighten men, as Philip enlightened the eunuch, Peter enlightened Cornelius, and the other Apostles and preachers of the Gospel enlightened all believers.

Read more (208 words)

But both angels and men enlighten as teachers. They borrow light from God and communicate it to others. The true Light, that is, the Son of God and Word, borrows from no one.

Having light naturally from Himself, He enlightens creatively, giving us the powers through which we become rational, wise, and pious.

But if the Son of God illumines every man coming into the world, why do some remain unenlightened, unable to see the light? Just as God grants the sun as a common benefit to all, while the blind are not illumined by it because they lack sight.

So also God pours out saving grace upon all, yet not all become pious. The wicked turn away from such light by their own choice.

Or, just as a farmer scatters seed everywhere but gathers fruit only where there is good soil, so God sows the seeds of knowledge and truth in every human heart. Yet they bear fruit only in those who have a good disposition.

The preacher of God confirms this by the following words: "He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him."

Innocentius of Kherson

19th centuryChurch Father

But the Evangelist seems unwilling to part from the heavenly history. Having woven the first thread, he turns again to his beloved subject. "There was the true Light, which enlightens every man coming into the world." Beautiful and powerful is the expression, "coming into the world." Man, as it were, comes forth from the kingdom of light. He enters the world like a guest already prepared, like a pilgrim. Provision for the journey is given to him, and a sign is set upon his brow: indelible seals.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"That was the true Light," and so forth: the past tense, "was," is used here, as in the following verses up to verse 14, because the discourse concerns the Word before His Incarnation, as in the first four verses.

Only from verse 14 does the discourse begin concerning the Word incarnate. The Word was the Light of the world always, even before His Incarnation (Jn 1:4; cf. Theophylact).

"The true Light": the word "true" is usually opposed to untrue, false, or illusory. Here, however, the contrast is somewhat different.

The Lord Himself calls His Forerunner "the burning and shining lamp" (Jn 5:35). The light from that lamp was certainly not illusory or false, for it was the light of directly revealed truth.

Read more (402 words)

Thus the contrast here is this: John shone with light, and that light was true, not illusory or false, yet it was not his own. It was borrowed, or poured upon him from God.

The Word, the Messiah, is called the true Light as self-existent Light, Light according to His very essence, not borrowed Light. He is the source of every light and enlightenment.

"Why is 'true' added here to the word Light? Because a man illumined from above is also called light. But the true Light is the One Who illumines.

So John was light, but not the true Light. If he had not been illumined, he would have been darkness. By illumination from another, he became light" (Augustine).

"He illumines every man": that is, everyone who has not lost the capacity to receive this light or enlightenment from the Word (v. 12), whether Jew or Gentile (Jn 12:46).

"Coming into the world": according to the structure of the Greek phrase, this expression can be referred either to the word Light or to the word man.

In the first case the meaning is: the true Light, the Word and Messiah, illumines every man by coming into the world. In the second: the true Light illumines every man coming into the world, or being born.

Cyril of Jerusalem and blessed Augustine, among others, hold the first interpretation. The latter is almost universally accepted.

The first is preferred because the Messiah is sometimes called in this same Gospel the One coming into the world (Jn 6:14; 18:37), and the Light that came into the world (Jn 3:19; 12:46).

Also, with the word "man," the addition "coming into the world" or "being born" seems unnecessary. A similar transposition of words and phrases occurs often in John, for example here in Jn 1:12.

"How, someone will say, does He illumine every man, when we see some darkened? As far as depends on Him, He illumines all.

Tell me, are we not all rational? Do we not all know by nature the good and what is opposed to it? Do we not have the ability, through reflection on creatures, to know the Creator?

Therefore the reason given to us, which is also called the natural law, may be called the light given to us by God. If some have made evil use of reason, they have darkened themselves" (Theophylact; cf. Chrysostom, who understands this as grace).

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Word is the true Light, not in the sense that John and the other messengers were a false light. "You are the light of the world," the Savior said to the Apostles (Mt 5:14).

The Word is the true Light in the sense of Light that is unborrowed, eternal, and that pours out His light upon everything that proves luminous. He is the source of every knowledge and every wisdom.

Should the words erchomenon eis kosmon be referred to the light, phos, or to the man, anthropon? The latter explanation should be preferred to the former.

First, it belongs to almost all the ancient teachers, Chrysostom, Cyril of Alexandria, the Syriac translation, and others. Second, it is natural to connect the nearest terms, as here anthropon erchomenon.

Read more (165 words)

Third, among the rabbis the expression "to come into the world" is usual in the sense of a man's birth. Fourth, it is also usual among the sacred writers: Job 1:21; Eccl 5:11; Wis 7:6; 2 Tim 1:6; and in John himself, Jn 16:21.

Thus, according to the meaning of the Evangelist's words, there is one Enlightener for everyone who appears in the world.

"The Word, the true Light," says Saint Cyril of Alexandria, "illumines everyone who appears in the world, since no man is illumined otherwise than by the light of truth, which is God Himself."

The Word is the Light not only for particular persons, generations, or peoples, but for all men of all places and times. He is Light for uncultivated and cultivated peoples alike (Jn 12:46; Tit 2:11; Gal 3:28; Col 1:20).

This excludes every other source of true enlightenment. But whether all in fact receive the enlightenment of the eternal Light is another question. The discourse about this follows below.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

The characteristic features of the true Light. Therefore John was not the inexact light. True, "he was a burning and shining lamp" (Jn 5:35), as are all the God-enlightened lights.

But in all of them the light was not their own light, but borrowed. They were not sources of light. The source of light is outside and above them.

As planets send the observer to the sun for the explanation of their brightness, so all who are enlightened by God point to the beginning of their light in God and in the Lord Jesus Christ.

He is the "true Light," the real and only Light, "which illumines every man coming into the world." Thus the characteristic feature of the true Light is the enlightenment of all.

Read more (437 words)

This does not mean that everyone has already been enlightened. No, many remain unenlightened by Him. It means that if anyone is enlightened, he is enlightened only by Him.

Whoever is not enlightened by Him displays only an appearance of enlightenment, however much he may be praised as enlightened. Outside the Lord Jesus there is no light, but all is gloom and thick darkness.

The enlightenment given by Jesus Christ is spiritual enlightenment. Spiritual darkness consists of ignorance of God and of His good intentions concerning us, joined with the absence of fear.

It also consists of the confusion of conscience and sinful impurities, joined with negligence and carelessness. It consists of the griefs of a heart tormented by passions and satisfied by nothing, joined with spiritual tastelessness and insensibility.

The Lord, and only the Lord, removes this threefold darkness and fills the soul with light on every side. From Him comes the fear of God, awakened by the word of truth delivered by Him.

This truth concerns God and our complete dependence on Him. From Him comes the pacification of conscience through the forgiveness of sins, by the power of His death.

From Him comes strength to resist everything that can trouble the conscience. From Him also comes the contentment of the heart, which is satisfied by Him alone.

He wipes away every tear, removes every burden, and grants every rest, according to His promise: "Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest" (Mt 11:28).

Therefore anyone who cleaves to the Lord becomes so luminous that even outsiders can see it in the brightness of his gaze and in the joyful state of spirit reflected in words, deeds, and movements.

Their inner being is filled with light. They are bright through the taste of blessings already received and through the hope of receiving still better and greater ones.

They are bright with love and goodness, bright with piety and filial fear of God. All this is given to them by the Lord Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God.

He taught us the truth, suffered for us, merited for us the Spirit of grace, and opened for us the doors of the Heavenly Kingdom. He has already entered there as Forerunner, drawing us all to Himself and awaiting all.

There are many self-appointed lights, but none of them drives away our darkness or gives true brightness. May the Lord grant all who seek enlightenment to find the true Light.

May they not be carried away by these phantoms, which do not enlighten, but darken more and more.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

"There was the Light," en to phos, just as in the first verse, "there was the Word," en ho Logos. Here absolute being is indicated.

It is not temporal, passing, accidental, or changing being, but the eternal being of "the Light that illumines every man." This Light alone is called true, and with the same meaning of eternal, because only the eternal can be called true.

In Holy Scripture the words true and eternal are very often identical. "My Father gives you the true bread from heaven" (Jn 6:32), says the Lord.

He contrasts "the bread of God, which comes down from heaven and gives life to the world" (Jn 6:33), and which is the Lord Himself (Jn 6:34), with the manna, the passing bread eaten by the Israelites in the wilderness (Jn 6:31).

Read more (322 words)

"I am the true vine," the Lord also says (Jn 15:1), that is, the one true vine, the eternal one. The true Light illumines every man, not only the Jew, but every man created according to the image and likeness of God.

Every man has been given a soul capable of receiving the Light, if only an evil will does not turn him away from the Light and make him seek darkness (cf. Jn 3:20).

It is further said that the true Light illumines every man "coming into the world." We cannot pass over in silence a particular reading of verse 9 allowed by some.

This reading refers the word erchomenon to the word light, and not to the word man. According to this reading, one would translate: "There was the true Light, coming into the world, which illumines every man."

But let us note that all the most ancient translations read the ninth verse as the Slavonic and Russian translations do. That is, they refer the word "coming" to the word "man."

Among translations known to us, this is how the Vulgate and the Biblia Sacra read it: omnem hominem venientem in mundum. So also Luther's translation, and Sacy's French translation according to the Vulgate.

So too the Sainte Bible of 1731 printed at The Hague, the English Authorized text and Revised Version of 1881, and the New Testament revised by David Martin, Brussels, 1861. Ostervald, however, holds the indicated change.

Every man entering the world is not left helpless by the Lord. He is enlightened by the light of divine revelation and by the spark of divine light within him, located in his conscience (cf. Rom 2:10-16, 27-29).

Therefore he is responsible when he closes his eyes so as not to see the light of revelation, goodness, and love. The following verses, 10-13, answer this thought. They separate those who received the Lord from those who did not receive Him.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 13 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  2. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  3. φῶς
    phōs
    light
    G5457 · φῶς
  4. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. ἀληθινὸν
    alēthinon
    true
    G228 · ἀληθινός
  6. ὃ
    ho
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  7. φωτίζει
    phōtizei
    I illuminate
    G5461 · φωτίζω
  8. πάντα
    panta
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  9. ἄνθρωπον
    anthrōpon
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος
  10. ἐρχόμενον
    erchomenon
    I come
    G2064 · ἔρχομαι
  11. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  12. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. κόσμον
    kosmon
    the world
    G2889 · κόσμος