The Church Fathers on this verse

John 11:52Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And not only for the nation, but to gather together in one the children of God that were dispersed.

Douay-Rheims

και ουχ υπερ του εθνους μονον αλλ ινα και τα τεκνα του θεου τα διεσκορπισμενα συναγαγη εις εν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

13 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

By the children of God the Evangelist means the Gentiles, with reference to the future. In the same way the Lord Himself says, "I have other sheep" (Jn 10:16), calling them this with reference to the future.

But what does "to gather into one" mean? It means that He made those near and those far off one body, so that the man living in Rome regards the Indians as his own members.

What can be compared with such a gathering? And the Head of all is Christ.

Do not be astonished, beloved. The Lord, wise and skillful, often permits even unworthy men to foretell wondrous and great things. This happens not only in the Old Testament, but also in the New.

Read more (56 words)

Listen to what the Evangelist says about Caiaphas, the Jewish high priest: "This he did not say of himself, but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus would die for the nation, and not for the nation only, but also to gather into one the children of God who were scattered abroad" (Jn 11:51-52).

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

He died not for the Jewish nation alone, but also to gather into one the rest of the children of God, that is, the Gentiles.

He calls the Gentiles children of God either with reference to the future, because they were to become children of God. So also elsewhere He says, "I have other sheep" (Jn 10:16), calling them this with reference to the future.

Or He calls them so because He is the Father of all, having begotten us in a creative manner. He honored us by creating us according to His image and likeness.

So also the Apostle Paul, according to the account in Acts (Acts 17:29), says in his discourse to the Athenians: "Therefore, being the offspring of God."

Read more (94 words)

Since man is a living being, higher and Godlike, everyone is called a child of God. Therefore Christ brought us together, though we were scattered.

Satan had separated men from one another and from God in many ways. He disposed each one to rage against his neighbor through love of wealth and glory.

Christ gathered us into one Church and under one yoke. He made near and far one body, so that the man in Rome regards the inhabitants of India as his own members and confesses Christ as the one Head of all.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

As we have said, what the Jews secretly intended to do, their high priest openly counsels them to do. He advises them to kill Christ, as though speaking "for the people," although that people was unrighteous.

He declares a true matter, one arranged not by their evil disposition, but by the power and wisdom of God. They put Christ to death for their own destruction. But He, "being put to death in the flesh" (1 Pet 3:18), became for us the cause of all good things.

By the destruction of the people he means subjection to the power of the Romans and the cessation of the shadow under the law. In trying to avert this, they suffered it.

Read more (340 words)

Thus Caiaphas said what he said according to the lawless disposition of his mind. Yet his word became the expression of the true matter, uttered as if in prophecy.

He foretells how many good things the death of Christ would cause. He says what he did not know and, like Balaam, glorifies God by necessity. Since he held the dignity of high priest, the prophecy was given, as it were, not to him but to the sacred office.

Or else, Caiaphas must not be thought to have received prophetic grace because what he said later happened and was fulfilled. Often what certain people say comes to pass, even though they speak without knowing that it will certainly happen.

Caiaphas says that the death of Christ will be for the Jews alone. The Evangelist says that it was for all mankind.

This is because all of us are called the race and children of God. He is the Father of all, as Creator bringing into being and raising to existence what did not exist.

It is also because from the beginning we were honored by being created according to His image. We received dominion over all things on earth, were deemed worthy of faith in God, and tasted life and sweetness in paradise.

But Satan scattered us. He did not allow us to remain in the same state, but by various means turned man away from devotion to God.

Christ again brought all in and gathered them through faith into one fold, the Church. He subjected all to one yoke, since all became one: Jews, Greeks, barbarians, and Scythians. They are transformed "into one new man" (Eph 2:15) and worship one God.

Caiaphas did not say this by the prophetic Spirit, for the prophetic Spirit does not plot against Christ. He spoke through a certain accidental agreement with the true and future event.

He was permitted to touch such foreknowledge because he was high priest. Thus, by his mouth, what had until then been hidden from men and unknown was proclaimed.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

These words were added by the Evangelist. Caiaphas prophesied only about the Jewish nation, in which were those sheep of whom the Lord Himself said, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Mt 15:24).

Yet the Evangelist knew that there were other sheep, not of this fold, who had to be brought, so that there might be one flock and one Shepherd (Jn 10:16). All this is said only according to predestination.

Those who had not yet believed were not yet either His sheep or the sons of God.

This was added by the Evangelist, for Caiaphas prophesied only concerning the nation of the Jews. There were the sheep of whom the Lord Himself said, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Mt 15:24).

Read more (56 words)

But the Evangelist knew that there were other sheep who were not of that sheepfold. They had to be brought in, so that there might be one sheepfold and one Shepherd (cf. Jn 10:16).

This was said according to predestination, for those who had not yet believed were not yet either His sheep or His children.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

The aim of God’s providence is to unite again, through right faith and spiritual love, those who have been variously torn apart by evil. The Savior also suffered for this purpose: “that He might gather into one the children of God who were scattered abroad” (Jn 11:52). <...>

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

As Jesus Christ was incarnate not only for the Jews, but also for the other nations, so of course He died not for them alone, but also for others.

The teaching and works of Jesus Christ concerned the other nations as well. Though the Jews, who had once first come to know God, now also heard and saw before others, afterward they had to communicate this to others also.

Here the Gentiles are called children of God as those who were to become such. In the same way, and for the same reason, Jesus Christ called them His sheep.

These children of God were scattered by various teachings about God, because they had no good shepherd. Jesus Christ would gather them into one flock, that is, into one faith.

The rest of the chief priests took these words of Caiaphas not as a prophecy, but as counsel, and agreed with them.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

At last the high priest concluded the whole council with his sentence. "Being high priest that year" does not mean that Caiaphas was high priest for that year, and another man for the next, with the office passing between them. It means that Caiaphas was high priest in that memorable year.

He belonged to the sect of the Sadducees (Acts 5:17). By the very tendency of his sect, he was far from valuing anything holy.

"You know nothing," he said. He was evidently addressing the party that gave some support to Jesus. Perhaps they insisted that the Sanhedrin should first ascertain whether Jesus truly was not the Messiah.

"You know nothing," that is, in politics, "nor do you consider that it is better for us that one man should die for the people, than that the whole nation should perish."

Read more (363 words)

John presents Caiaphas' decision in this form, evidently because he learned it from those present in the Sanhedrin who were disposed toward Jesus, such as Nicodemus and Joseph. In relating this, they could not pass over the fact that they had opposed the general opinion. Yet they were repelled by the words of the high priest, which all accepted. How faithful the Evangelist is to his sources.

The supreme government of the people of God accepted his voice. They resolved to put the Son of God to death. Yet they had not decided exactly how or when to carry it out. In general, they did not wish to delay for long.

This is what the raising of Lazarus led to, not of itself, but through the ever-increasing malice of Jesus' enemies. In itself it was an extraordinary miracle of the Savior. It also completed the series of His most glorious deeds.

It was as though this miracle called forth, in proportion to its greatness, an entirely opposite decree from the Sanhedrin. The cave of Bethany gave up its dead man, so that another cave might hide within itself the One who had emptied it.

Thomas, when he said to his fellow disciples, "Let us also go, that we may die with Him," with our Teacher, was not mistaken, at least concerning his Teacher. Jesus Himself, going to Lazarus' tomb, wept.

It seems He wept not only for the dead man whom He meant to raise. He also wept for the malice of men who were soon preparing a tomb for Him. So later He wept over Jerusalem, as He approached it as the meek King.

He saw before Him what was coming. When He went into Judea, He could say, "I have power to lay down My life for My sheep." When He gave up His spirit, shook the earth, and raised the dead, He could say, "I have power to take it again."

What moved Him to surrender Himself into the hands of His enemies? It was that, by the Father Himself and by His own love, He was appointed to be the Lamb who takes away the sins of the world.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The great miracle of the raising of Lazarus had a powerful effect on all who saw it and heard about it. Many of the Jews who witnessed this miracle, until then indifferent to the Lord, now believed in Him.

But the Jews hostile to the Lord were all the more troubled by this. They went to Jerusalem and told the Pharisees everything Jesus had done.

Then the chief priests and Pharisees gathered a council and began to deliberate. What should they undertake against Jesus? He works many miracles. If they leave Him thus, all will believe in Him.

Then the people will rise against the Romans. Yet this will end with the Romans utterly devastating Jerusalem and the temple. They will also take from the Jewish people even the slight political independence they had still enjoyed under Roman rule.

Read more (191 words)

Then the high priest Caiaphas said, "Why so much deliberation? It is obviously better that one man should die for the people, than that the whole nation should perish in an uprising. Therefore, whoever this Jesus may be, He must quickly be put to death."

These words came from an evil heart. But the thought expressed in them, that Jesus must die for the people, was true.

Thus the impious mouth of Caiaphas involuntarily uttered a prophecy, because he was high priest that year. In ancient times the high priest was an organ of divine revelation (Ex 28:30; Num 27:21).

For Jesus Christ truly had to die, according to the decree of God, for the salvation of men. "And not for the nation only," the Evangelist observes, "but also to gather into one the children of God who were scattered abroad."

That is, Christ had to die not only for the salvation of the Jewish people. He also had to form from all the people of the whole world the one catholic Church of Christ (cf. 10:16).

After this judgment of Caiaphas, the Sanhedrin made the final decision to kill Jesus.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

In recounting this council of conspirators, the Evangelist John explains on his own behalf that Caiaphas, when saying it was better for one man to die for the people, was in essence not speaking from himself.

He had foretold that Jesus would truly die for the nation. "And not for the nation only," the Evangelist continues, "but also to gather into one the children of God who were scattered abroad."

In saying this, the Evangelist meant not the Jews who were then scattered among the Gentiles in all countries, but the Gentiles themselves.

By ascribing this prophecy to Caiaphas as high priest, the Evangelist relied on the fact that in ancient times the high priests, beginning with Aaron, were heralds of the will of God and prophesied.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The spokesman and herald of this party was the high priest of that time, Joseph Caiaphas. He had been appointed high priest by the Roman procurator Valerius Gratus, when Gratus held the office of governor of that province.

Being in every respect a creature of the Romans, and therefore enjoying no respect among the people, he based his reasoning precisely on his own personal advantage. Covering it with the welfare of the people, he addressed the Sanhedrin with a harsh speech.

"You know nothing," he said. Otherwise you would not be arguing so much and so heatedly in vain. You have not taken into account the chief point, namely what will become inevitable if the complete triumph of Jesus the Galilean is allowed.

Read more (148 words)

The messianic movement that is now clearly threatening to break out will certainly draw the Romans. They will come with their legions, close the temple, and destroy all national institutions, above all the Sanhedrin.

They will deprive the people of every independence. In the event of resistance, they will lay waste the country with fire and sword.

Therefore Caiaphas concluded with ominous solemnity: "It is better for us that one man should die for the people, than that the whole nation should perish."

Caiaphas' thought was clear to everyone. He was plainly demanding the death of Christ as a necessary condition for the salvation of the people.

Yet he himself did not understand what lofty prophecy he was uttering. He foretold "that Jesus would die for the nation, and not for the nation only, but also to gather into one the children of God who were scattered abroad."

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"And not for the nation only," the Evangelist completes the involuntary prophecy of Caiaphas, "but also to gather into one the children of God who were scattered abroad."

By the scattered children of God, in contrast to the nation as Jewish nationality, one must understand the Gentiles (Lk 2:32; 7:5; Jn 18:35; cf. Chrysostom and Theophylact). It does not mean the Jews scattered among the Gentiles (cf. note on Jn 7:35).

The Lord offered a propitiatory sacrifice for the whole world, Jews and Gentiles. Both, by faith in Him, become children of God.

The mode of speech is prophetic: "He called them children of God as those who were to become such" (Euthymius Zigabenus; cf. Rom 9:24ff.; Jn 15:27; Gal 3:14; Eph 1:9ff.; Rom 8:29ff.; Jn 11:25ff.; Jn 16:25ff.; Eph 3:4ff.).

Read more (66 words)

The gathering into one of the children of God means not a gathering into one place, but the gathering of those scattered in various places into one society through faith in Christ, the one Church.

All believers in Christ, scattered everywhere among unbelievers, make up one universal Christian society, one spiritual body. Its Head is Christ, and all the others are its members (1 Cor 12:12ff.).

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Verses 51-52. "This he did not say of himself; but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus would die for the people," the Evangelist remarks.

Caiaphas speaks according to his malicious politics, not realizing the lofty truth that he utters. As high priest, he was the organ through which the will of God was proclaimed to men.

"Grace used only his mouth, but did not touch his unclean heart" (Chrysostom).

The providence of God, caring for the destinies of the world, mocked human politics. It compelled the expiring high priesthood, against the will and consciousness of its bearer, to speak of the true reconciling sacrifice for the world.

Pilate, against his will and consciousness, proclaimed the royal dignity of Christ Jesus. Caiaphas proclaimed His high-priestly dignity.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

In the assembled Sanhedrin, now turned into an assembly of conspiratorial murderers, the high priest Caiaphas begins to speak. More precisely, it is Joseph, surnamed Caiaphas.

The indication that Caiaphas' name was Joseph is found in Flavius Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, book 18, chapter 3. According to Winer, with references to the Targum on Proverbs (chapter 16, 26), Caiaphas is a word meaning indentation, lowering, depressio. See Smith's Dictionary, ad voc.

It should be noted that the expression in verse 51, "being high priest that year," does not mean that he was appointed for one year. It means that in that very remarkable year he was high priest.

Read more (382 words)

According to Flavius Josephus, Joseph Caiaphas was appointed high priest by the authority of the proconsul of Judea, Valerius Gratus, Pilate's immediate predecessor.

During twelve years of his proconsulship, from A.D. 15 to 27, Valerius Gratus replaced four high priests: Ananias, Ishmael, Eleazar, and Simon, the predecessor of Caiaphas.

The high priesthood had long since lost its important significance. Both the Idumean kings and the Roman proconsuls appointed Jewish high priests quite arbitrarily by their own authority, most often because of bribery.

Nevertheless, the high priest, though unworthy, was a servant of God. He stood before God in prayer for the people, vested in sacred garments, and was an instrument of God. For "there is no authority except from God" (Rom 13:1).

Therefore God was pleased to choose him so that, through his mouth, as the representative of the Jewish people, a prophecy would be uttered, though unconsciously. It concerned the meaning for all men of the coming death of our Lord Jesus Christ.

"It is expedient," says the high priest, "that one man should die for the people (λαός), and not that the whole nation (ἔθνος) should perish."

By the word λαός, people, are meant the individual persons who compose the multitude. But ἔθνος means the structure of state life, the totality of the people as a distinct tribe and race.

In this sense ἔθνος is also used of all other peoples. "The first of the nations is Amalek," ἀρχὴ ἐθνῶν Ἀμαλὴκ, it says in Num 24:20. Compare the still more general use in Gen 10:32.

In this saying of Caiaphas, however, λαός, according to the speaker's understanding, meant exclusively the people of Israel, the chosen people. Yet in the prophecy he unconsciously uttered, this word received an all-embracing human meaning, incomprehensible to Caiaphas himself.

The Evangelist explains this, saying that Caiaphas uttered a prophecy: the Lord Jesus was pleased to die for the people, "and not for the people only," in the sense Caiaphas understood, "but also to gather into one the scattered children of God."

The prophecy spoken by Caiaphas is striking. It shows how the very enemies of the Lord were instruments of God for the glorification of God Incarnate and for the establishment of faith in the Crucified One, "who bore our sins and infirmities and sicknesses."

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 18 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. οὐχ
    ouch
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  3. ὑπὲρ
    hyper
    in behalf of
    G5228 · ὑπέρ
  4. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. ἔθνους
    ethnous
    a race
    G1484 · ἔθνος
  6. μόνον
    monon
    only
    G3441 · μόνος
  7. ἀλλ᾽
    all
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  8. ἵνα
    hina
    in order that
    G2443 · ἵνα
  9. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  10. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. τέκνα
    tekna
    a child
    G5043 · τέκνον
  12. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  14. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. διεσκορπισμένα
    dieskorpismena
    I scatter
    G1287 · διασκορπίζω
  16. συναγάγῃ
    synagagē
    I gather together
    G4863 · συνάγω
  17. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  18. ἕν
    hen
    one
    G1520 · εἷς