Thus our Lord Jesus Christ at one and the same time censures the stubborn Jewish people for resisting God the Father Himself. By saying that He received a commandment from Him and does not speak from Himself, He clearly shows Himself to be the Prophet foretold in the Law and proclaimed by the voice of God the Father from very ancient times.
He summons them, though disobedient, to remember that if they refuse to obey His words, they will surely undergo inevitable punishment and suffer what God declared. For those who transgress the holy commandment of God the Father and reject the life-giving word of God, our Savior Christ, must they not fall into the most terrible miseries?
Must they not remain without share in the life given by Him, justly hearing what was spoken by the voice of the prophet: “O earth, earth, hear, hear the word of the Lord: behold. I will bring evils upon this people, the fruit of their turning away, because they have not listened to My law, and you have rejected My word” (Jer 6:19)?
We find that the Jews are subject to a twofold accusation. They did not honor even the Law itself, although they regarded it as holy and dear, since they did not receive Him who had been proclaimed to them.
Nor did they heed the words of Christ our Savior, although He openly announced that He is the Prophet clearly preached by the Law (Deut 18:18). For He says that He uses words proceeding from God the Father.
Let no one think that there is any lessening of the Lord in any respect, either in essence or in divine dignity, when He says that He speaks nothing from Himself, but from the Father. First, let him reason again and answer our question.
Would anyone consider the name and work of prophecy fitting for Him who truly is, and is honored as, true God by nature? Everyone, even the very simple, I think, will reject this, considering it incredible that God, who speaks in the prophets, should be called a prophet.
For He Himself “multiplied visions,” as it is written (Hos 12:10), and “was represented by the hands of the prophets.” Therefore, since He received the name and form of servitude like ours, and in our likeness was called a prophet, the Law necessarily ascribed to Him what belongs to a prophet.
That is, He asks something from the Father and receives a commandment, “what to say and what to speak.” In addition, I think it necessary to say this also. Although the Jews honored the Law very highly, believing it had been spoken by God, they nevertheless did not receive the words of the Savior, who was transforming the ancient ordinances into spiritual worship.
What was the reason they did not wish to receive the transformation of the types into the truth? It was that they did not know the true God by nature. Nor did they have in mind that, being the Word of the Father, the Only-begotten wore our flesh for our sake.
Otherwise, at once worshiping God and immediately turning to everything well-pleasing to Him, they would have rendered Him fitting glory. Instead, the wretched men supposed that He was one like us. Thinking Him a mere man, they believed He thought so much of Himself that He even tried to destroy the very laws given by God the Father.
Thus they shamelessly said to Him: “It is not for a good work that we stone You, but for blasphemy, because You, being a man, make Yourself God” (Jn 10:33).
Therefore, by His great mercy and wise providence, our Lord Jesus draws His hearers away from their ingrained suspicion. He shifts His speech from His simple and merely human appearance to Him who is indisputably and unanimously worshiped by all, namely God the Father.
In every way He desires to shame the ignorant heart of the Jews, and by various means He seeks to direct the foolish toward the desire to know what is true and fitting.
The same words and arguments may be used by anyone to repel the slander of impious heretics. They think that the Son must be in some respect lesser than His Begetter, because He declares that He speaks nothing from Himself, that a commandment has been given to Him, and that He speaks as He has heard.
I consider what has been said sufficient. Nevertheless, I shall add something else to expose the unbridled boldness of their tongue. If you wish, leaving aside for the present the discourse concerning the divine economy with the flesh, we can prove that even concerning the Only-begotten Himself it is rightly and beautifully said: “For I do not speak from Myself, but the Father who sent Me, He gave Me a commandment, what I should say and what I should speak.”
He Himself, the living and hypostatic Word of God the Father, necessarily utters what is in Him. Bringing to light what is well-pleasing to His own Begetter, He says that He receives this as a commandment.
That this is truly so, and not otherwise, may be seen in ourselves. For the spoken word, consisting in the combination of words and expressions and uttered outwardly by articulate sound, receives, as it were, a commandment from our mind and reveals what is in it.
This happens in a brief moment. What the mind understands, it immediately transmits also to the voice. The voice, bringing outward what is within, reveals what is contained in the mind, changing nothing in what is commanded to it.
What, then, is strange, someone might say to them, if the Word, being Son of God the Father, reveals the will of Him who begot Him? He does not do so as our word does, for God is above every comparison.
And does not the prophet say that the name most fitting for Him is “Messenger of Great Counsel” (Is 9:6)? I think this too is clear. Therefore, in both essence and dignity, the Only-begotten suffers no loss if it is said that He received a commandment from God the Father.
For we ourselves often command something to others and order them to do it. Yet for this reason we are not deprived of our likeness, nor do we cease to be men, as though less consubstantial, either before the commandment or after the commandment.
But, you will say, although they remain consubstantial, those inferior in dignity among us serve others. To this I also answer you concerning the Only-begotten. If it had not been written of Him that, “existing in the form of God, He did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant, and being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself” (Phil 2:6-8), then your objection might have some force.
But if the form of subjection and self-emptying is evident, why do you irrationally reproach Him who underwent even this condition for our sake? Therefore, having presented a full explanation of the soundness of the doctrines, we affirm that in the proposed saying our Lord Jesus Christ spoke providentially.