The Church Fathers on this verse

John 19:27Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

After that, he saith to the disciple: Behold thy mother. And from that hour, the disciple took her to his own.

Douay-Rheims

ειτα λεγει τω μαθητη ιδου η μητηρ σου και απ εκεινης της ωρας ελαβεν ο μαθητης αυτην εις τα ιδια

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

“Behold, your Mother.” He said this in order to unite them in mutual love. The disciple understood it so, and therefore took Her to his own.

But why did Christ mention no other woman, though others also stood by the Cross? To teach us to give preference to our mothers.

Indeed, when parents hinder spiritual works, we must not even know them. But when they do not hinder them at all, they must be given everything due and preferred to all other people.

They gave birth to us, raised us, and endured a multitude of labors and sorrows because of us.

By this Christ also stops the mouth of Marcion’s shamelessness. For if He was not born according to the flesh and had no Mother, why does He show such great care for Her alone?

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

So this disciple took Mary to himself, for the Pure One was entrusted to the pure. See how steadfast the female sex is in afflictions, while the men all abandoned the Lord. Truly He has come who strengthens the weak and receives the despised.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Although His sufferings had reached their final extremity, He took care for His Mother, for even while suffering He was dispassionate.

He entrusts Her to the beloved disciple, who was John, the writer of the Gospel. He commands him to take Her home and have Her as a mother.

In turn He commands Her to regard His most trusted disciple as none other than a true son, evidently one who would fulfill with love and tenderness the duty proper to a natural son.

But did Christ say this from fleshly affection, as some foolish people supposed? By no means. To fall into such absurdity belongs only to those with a senseless mind.

What benefit, then, did Christ provide through this? First, let us say that He wished to strengthen the teaching honored also in the Law.

Read more (359 words)

What does the Law of Moses say? “Honor your father and your mother, that it may be well with you” (Ex 20:12).

And it did not stop its word to us with this commandment, but added the threat of death if we should refuse to do it.

It placed sin against God and against fleshly parents, as it were, on equal terms.

Thus the Law commanded that the blasphemer be sentenced to death: “He who names the name of the Lord shall surely die” (Lev 24:16).

It subjected to exactly the same punishment the one who arms his uncontrolled and unbridled tongue against his parents: “He who curses father or mother shall surely die” (Ex 21:17).

If the Lawgiver required us to show such honor to our parents, was it not fitting that so glorious a commandment should also be confirmed by the Savior’s decision?

And since every form of good and virtue proceeds first from Him, why should this not be added to the rest?

Honor toward parents is truly a most honorable form of virtue. Therefore we must not neglect love for them, even if unbearable troubles surround us.

From where, tell me, could one learn this, if not in Christ, who is first and through whom all is first?

Indeed, excellent is the one who remembers the holy commandments and does not thrust away the fulfillment of duty. He does not do this in calm times only, but amid dangers and adversities.

To what has been said I shall add this. Was it not fitting that the Lord should care for His Mother, who was being tempted and troubled by improper thoughts?

Being true God, seeing the movements of the heart and knowing the depths, did He not know the thoughts troubling Her, especially then, by the precious Cross?

Therefore, knowing Her thoughts, He handed Her over to His disciple as to the best initiator into the mystery. He could explain the depth of the mystery beautifully and sufficiently.

For he was a true wise man and theologian, who took Her and led Her away with joy, fulfilling the whole will of the Savior concerning Her.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

And when Mary followed Him even to the Cross, from that day He handed Her over to John, saying, "Woman, behold your son" (Jn 19:26), and to the disciple, "Behold your Mother." By these words He again forbade Her to approach Him. Since He said, "From now on John is your son." The holy author thinks that Mary wished to come near to Her Son crucified on the Cross and embrace Him, but was restrained by Christ's words entrusting Her to John.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

We judge a person's worth not by sex, but by character. Thus Jesus loved the Evangelist John more than the others. He was noble by birth and known to the high priest, yet he did not fear the plots of the Jews. He even brought Peter into the high priest's courtyard. He alone of the apostles stood by the Cross. He received the Mother of the Savior into his own home. He became the chaste son who received the Virgin Mother as an inheritance from the Lord. Cf. Jn 18:15-16. Tertullian even calls the Apostle John "one who voluntarily accepted celibacy" (see On Monogamy 17).

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Your holiness is rightly indignant at the opinion that from the virginal womb, from which Christ was born according to the flesh, there came another birth also.

The Lord Jesus would not have chosen birth from the Virgin if He had thought She would become so incontinent as to defile with human seed the bridal chamber of the Lord’s Body, that palace of the eternal King.

Whoever asserts this merely repeats the impiety of the Jews, who say that He could not be born of a Virgin.

If even bishops affirm such a thing and suppose that Mary gave birth many times, then the Jews will dispute the truth of the faith with still greater zeal.

And what of the Lord’s words to His Mother concerning the Evangelist John: “Woman, behold, Your son,” and to John concerning Mary: “Behold, your Mother”?

Read more (213 words)

What does it mean that the Lord, crucified on the Cross and taking away the sin of the world (cf. Jn 1:29), publicly declared the purity of His Mother?

For what else was this said, if not to stop the lying mouth of impiety, so that anyone daring to accuse the Mother of the Lord might be struck dumb?

The Witness is Himself the Judge and defender of His Mother’s chastity. She was only betrothed to Joseph and did not know conjugal union by the right of the marriage bed (cf. Mt 1:18).

If children were to be born to Her from Joseph, the Lord would not have wished to separate Her from conjugal fellowship with Her husband.

But if this is not enough, the Evangelist added another testimony: “The disciple took Her to his own.” Did he cause a divorce? Did he steal a wife from her husband?

Why then does the one who reads this in the Gospel waver and stagger, as though suffering shipwreck?

This is the Son’s testimony to the purity of His Mother. This is Mary’s inheritance, abounding in pure modesty. This is the completion of fulfillment.

The Lord said this and gave up the spirit (Jn 19:30), crowning the mystery with the good crown of filial love.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

Then He said to the disciple, "Behold your Mother." See the commentary on Jn 19:26. "And from that hour the disciple took Her to his own," according to the command of the Teacher.

Gregory the Great

6th centuryChurch Father

When the Virgin Mother, at the lack of wine, wished Him to work a miracle, She was immediately answered: “What is that to Me and to You, Woman?” (Jn 2:4).

It was as though He said, “That I am able to work a miracle comes from the Father, not from the Mother.”

By the nature of His Mother, He who by the nature of the Father performed miracles was able to die.

Behold, while on the Cross and dying, He acknowledged His Mother, whom He entrusted to the disciple, saying, “Behold, your Mother!”

And behold, He says, “What is that to Me and to You, Woman? My hour has not yet come” (Jn 2:4).

This means: “In the miracle, which I performed not according to Your nature, I do not know You. But when the hour of death comes, I know You as My Mother, for I can die according to Your nature.”

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

Jesus loves more than the others the one who was chaste when He chose him, and who remained chaste forever. It is related that Christ called John from his wedding, when he wished to enter marriage. Therefore He bestowed upon him, who was kept from fleshly pleasures, the desired sweetness of His love. When Christ was dying on the Cross, He entrusted His Mother to him, so that a virgin might guard the Virgin. After His posthumous ascent into heaven and His Resurrection, His Mother would not lack a son, and Her most pure life would be preserved by his most pure service.

Dimitri of Rostov

17th centuryChurch Father

Here I shall cite the word of Saint John Chrysostom on the Lord’s Crucifixion, concerning the lament of the Most Holy Theotokos.

“Why did the Mother who bore the Most Pure One suffer unbearably? For what reason? Because She is His Mother.

What sting did not wound Her soul? What arrows did not pierce Her heart? What spears did not tear Her whole being?

Therefore She could not remain with the women standing with Her near the Cross, suffering and weeping with Her over the calamity. She could not even stand at a distance.

Unable to endure the trembling of Her heart, and desiring to hear the last words of Her beloved Son, She drew close to Him. Standing by the Cross and weeping, She cried out with groaning:

Read more (275 words)

‘What is this horror, unbearable to My eyes, My Master? What is this wonder that darkens the sunlight, O My Son? What is this incomprehensible mystery, sweet Jesus?

I cannot see You naked, You who clothe Yourself with light as with a garment. And now what do I see? Soldiers cast lots for Your garment, the garment I wove with My own hands.

My soul is torn, seeing You hanging in the midst of the whole universe upon the high tree, between two evildoers.

One You bring into paradise, showing the image of the Gentiles’ conversion. The other, who blasphemes, You endure with patience, showing the image of Jewish hardness.

O envy! You passed by all the righteous who have lived from the beginning of time and touched My sweetest Child.

O heavenly and bodiless Powers! Gather with Me and weep. O sun! Suffer with My Child. Turn into darkness, for soon the light of My eyes will descend beneath the earth.

O moon! Hide your rays, for the dawn of My soul already enters the tomb.

Where has Your beauty hidden itself, You “fairest of the sons of men” (cf. Ps 44:3)? How has the brightness of Your eyes grown dim, O Eye that dries up the depths?’

Having said this, the Theotokos grew faint. Standing before the Cross, covering Her face with Her hands, She was in despair and perplexity.

Then Jesus, inclining His head to the right side and gently turning His lips, said, ‘Woman! This is Your son,’ pointing to His disciple John the Theologian.

Reflecting on all this, O right-believing soul, pray to God with tears, saying: ‘Lord, have mercy.’

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

As He was completing His ministry and going to the Father, Jesus spoke from the height of the Cross to His Mother and to His beloved disciple, the Apostle John. He said to them, "Woman, behold your son," and, "Behold your mother!"

These words prove that Jesus was the only Son of His Mother. If She had four other sons besides Jesus, could it have been said that from that time only John would be Her son? Why would John have had to take care of Her, and even take Her into his own home, if She still had four sons?

When Christ departed from this world, His Most Holy Mother remained alone, and there was no one to care for Her. Joseph was no longer alive at that time. The so-called brothers of the Lord were sons of Mary of Cleopas, Her kinswoman, and they were not even among the followers or disciples of Jesus. There were no other relatives.

Therefore, seeing His Mother and His beloved disciple standing with Her, Jesus was pleased to entrust Her care to this disciple, John. Turning to Her, He said, "Woman, behold your son," and with His glance He indicated John to Her. Then, turning to John and indicating His Mother with His glance, He said, "Behold your mother!"

John himself relates this, adding that from that hour this disciple took Her to his own. That is, he received Her into his home and cared for Her until Her death, as a son cares for his mother.

The Evangelists Matthew and Mark, speaking of the women present at the death of Jesus and looking on Him from afar, do not mention the Theotokos (Mt 27:55-56; Mk 15:40-41). From this one may suppose that the Theotokos was not present at the very death of Her Son.

It is quite possible that Jesus Himself wished to spare His Mother the terrible anguish of soul at the sight of Her Son dying on the Cross. Perhaps by His glance He gave John to understand that he should lead Her away to his home.

Yet then one must admit that John led the Theotokos away and himself returned again to the Cross. For he speaks also of what took place afterward, and he accompanies his account with these words: "And he who saw it has borne witness, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he tells the truth" (Jn 19:35).

It is difficult, almost impossible, to suppose that John, after bringing the Theotokos to his house, at once left Her alone in such a terrible and sorrowful moment. Therefore there is sufficient ground to think that the Theotokos remained to the end at the Cross itself, or only a little distance from it.

"And the people stood by, looking on" (Lk 23:35). But where are the other Apostles besides John? Where are those constant companions of Christ who had resolved to follow Him on His last journey to Jerusalem, and there to die with Him?

Where is Peter, who so confidently swore that he would lay down his life for Him? Where are they in this sorrowful hour of their Teacher, Whom they had so recently acknowledged as the Son of God? Where are they? Where have they scattered?

Death of Judas

There, far from Golgotha, Judas is running and looking back. The chief priests rejected his repentance, and he threw down before them their pieces of silver. In his hands they had been silent witnesses of his vile betrayal.

He thought to free himself from this accuser and thereby calm his conscience. But alas! His conscience, having entered into its rights, tormented him more and more. Without his noticing it, it drew him where he could find true peace and forgiveness of his grave sin.

It drew him to the innocent Victim of his betrayal. Surely he stood in the crowd surrounding Pilate's praetorium. He listened to the words of the Roman governor, which gave hope for the acquittal of the Innocent One.

He was almost calmed when Pilate said with authority to the malicious Sanhedrin, "I find no fault in this Man!" But Pilate's ensuing hesitations, his compliance, his fear of being denounced to Caesar, and the order to scourge Christ must have torn Judas's heart with unspeakable pain.

When the chief priests cried out and the people took up the cry, "His blood be on us and on our children," Judas understood that he had taken upon his soul not only his own sin of betrayal, but also the sin of the people. He had taken the curse the people invoked upon themselves.

Judas ran from the praetorium, now having lost every hope that Pilate would acquit Christ. He ran outside the city, thinking that there, in solitude, he would find peace. But then he saw a crowd coming out of the city gates, preceded and accompanied by Roman troops.

In front of the crowd they carried crosses, the instruments of torment and execution. "Now," Judas thinks, "everything is over. Now nothing can blot out my sin." He stops and looks at Golgotha. He waits to see what will happen next, though he knows perfectly well how the Romans crucify those condemned to execution.

When all was accomplished, when the innocent Sufferer had been nailed to the Cross, Judas awoke from his stupor and ran in the direction opposite from Golgotha, looking back. But where is he running? And why?

Tormented by conscience, he decided that such a man as he could not live, and that these torments must be ended. Then a withered tree appeared before his eyes, on which he could settle accounts with life.

He hurries toward it, approaches it, stands on a large stone, and with convulsive movements of his hands throws his belt over the tree. He ties one end to the trunk, puts the noose around his neck, casts one last look at Golgotha, and throws himself from the stone.

The noose tightened around his neck. After a few convulsive movements, his dead body hung there, then broke loose and fell. Thus the betrayer condemned himself to execution, and was his own executioner.

Where are the other ten Apostles?

But where are the other ten Apostles? Where are those whom Christ, in His last farewell discourse, called His friends (Jn 15:15)? We find no answers to these questions in the Gospel.

Yet, knowing the events that preceded and followed, we can form a fairly plausible supposition about the state of soul of the ten Apostles who fled.

The Apostles, with all the Jews of that time, expected the Messiah as a warrior King of Israel, who would overthrow the Roman yoke, subdue all the nations of the earth, and subject them to the authority of the Jews.

Such were the Jews' ideas about the Messiah's purpose. These dreams were so enticing that even the Apostles, to whom Christ had often said that His Kingdom was not of this world, could not free themselves from them.

They dreamed of the places they would occupy in the Kingdom of the Messiah. They even disputed among themselves about which of them would be assigned the most honorable place in this Kingdom, and who would be greatest.

The "sons of thunder," John and James the sons of Zebedee, even dared to ask the Lord to make them equal with Himself in His Kingdom. They asked Him to seat one at His right hand and the other at His left.

Their faith in such a brilliant and warlike Kingdom of the Messiah was so strong, and at times so darkened their reason, that they did not even believe the Lord's words about His coming sufferings, death, and Resurrection.

These sufferings were utterly incompatible with their ideas of the King of Israel. How could He suffer? And die? Could the Messiah die? No, He would reign forever. Therefore He could not die.

But how would Christ rise, if as Messiah He could not even die? This last question was an insoluble perplexity for the Apostles. They could not understand it at all, nor did they try to resolve it.

They were amazed that Jesus delayed so long in revealing His Kingdom. They were probably perplexed as to why He refused to be proclaimed King of Israel, when the crowd miraculously fed by Him wished to take Him by force and lead Him to Jerusalem for that purpose.

They were already losing hope that their dreams would be fulfilled when Jesus set out on His last journey to Jerusalem. They urged Him not to go there, to what in their opinion was certain death.

If they now admitted the possibility of His death, it was, of course, only because faith in Him as Messiah had already been shaken. Only love for Him, as Prophet and Wonderworker, compelled them to follow Him.

Thomas said, "Let us also go, that we may die with Him," and all went. The solemn entry of Jesus into Jerusalem, and the victorious cries of the people who joyfully greeted their King-Messiah, temporarily revived in the Apostles' hearts hope for the imminent revelation of a brilliant Kingdom.

But the final rupture between Jesus and the ruling party, and the people's cooling toward Him, again cast Christ's friends into grief. When He was bound like a criminal and led to trial, they all left Him in fear.

The most ardent of them, and seemingly the most devoted to Christ, denied Him three times, even fearing to name Him. Yet even after this they could still cherish the hope that by some miracle their Teacher would free Himself from the shameful execution threatening Him.

Then He, triumphing over His enemies, would reveal His Kingdom. With this hope they surely came to Golgotha and mingled with the crowd. But alas! These hopes, too, were not destined to come true.

Christ not only did not use His wonderworking power to save Himself from execution, but even prayed for His executioners. When He had been crucified, and the malicious Jews mockingly addressed the Crucified One, saying, "If You are the Son of God, come down from the Cross," did doubt not creep into the souls of the Apostles?

Did they not pray to Him inwardly, "Lord, if You are the Son of God, come down from the Cross and reveal Your Kingdom! Then all will believe in You. Lord, do not delay! Come down from the Cross! Come down, Lord!"

If the Cross afterward became a great stumbling block for many who were ready to believe in Jesus as the Son of God, did the Cross not also become a stumbling block for the Apostles? Did it not cast them into grief, despondency, despair, and disillusionment?

Looking from afar at their crucified Teacher, turning to Him with a plea that He come down from the Cross, and not seeing this plea fulfilled, they could reach hopeless despair.

Their cherished dreams of the brilliant Kingdom of the Messiah collapsed. Their hopes of a prominent share in that Kingdom collapsed. Everything was over. Everything was lost.

How many times that Kingdom had seemed in their dreams so near, so possible. Had they not once asked Jesus what would be given them for having left everything and followed Him?

Christ had answered them that when He sat on the throne of His glory, they too would sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Not having understood the true meaning of these words of the Lord, they could now remember them.

In sorrow and despair they could ask themselves, "Where are these promised twelve thrones? And where is the throne of glory of Jesus Himself? Is it this Cross? And will we too have to share His lot?

Will they crucify us also, as His disciples, accomplices, and executors of His will? Oh, why has He brought us to such a terrible, unbearable situation? Why did He speak of these thrones, when for Himself, instead of the Kingdom of glory, the Cross awaited?

Oh Lord, if You are the Son of God, come down quickly from the Cross and sit on the throne of Your glory! Come down, Lord! Come down!"

These cries, now of doubt and fear, now of vague hope and, after it, hopeless despair, tormented the hearts of the ten Apostles hiding in the crowd around Golgotha. They could not yet understand and grasp the whole great meaning of the events taking place.

They did not yet understand Christ Himself. They did not know that only by death and Resurrection would Christ conquer the world. They had forgotten His words in the farewell discourse: "Take courage; I have overcome the world."

Only after the Lord's Resurrection, and after the descent of the Holy Spirit upon them, were their hearts, until then hardened, opened. Only then was their reason enlightened, darkened as it had been by the Pharisaic false teaching about the Kingdom of the Messiah.

Read the full text in the app

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"He took Her to himself": into the circle of his nearest relatives, or into his own house, which this family seems to have had in Jerusalem. Tradition says that until the very death of the Theotokos, John lovingly fulfilled toward Her the duties of a tender son.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

How did the gaze of Jesus upon His Mother echo in His soul, when she so loved her Son and was so pierced by sorrow? His address to His most pure Mother shows that even now He was calm.

Even now He was above the infirmities of humanity. Even now He was the divine Jesus. Yet He does not turn His gaze away from His Mother.

He looks upon her condition and reveals His care for her, the care of a tender Son for His beloved Mother. What wondrous union of the divine with the human, of the heavenly with the earthly.

He honors His Mother as Mother. Yet He says to her, "Woman," and not "Mother." By not calling her Mother, He shows that He is above earthly bonds.

Read more (1104 words)

"Woman" is an honorable name for the Virgin and Mother. It expresses reverent love toward a person (Jn 2:4; Jn 4:21; Jn 20:13-15; Lk 22:57), yet toward one who is, as it were, outside kinship.

"Woman, behold your son," the divine Jesus says to His Mother, pointing to the disciple. My tender, beloved disciple will take My place for you.

"Behold your Mother," He says to the disciple, confirming His will concerning His Mother. My Mother will be your Mother. Love her and care for her as your own mother.

A son's love for his mother will tell you what you must do for her. You, as son, must care for all her needs. You must provide the helpless one everything necessary for earthly life, for its preservation and peace.

What care for His Mother. And what a lofty distinction for the disciple.

Why did the Lord entrust His Mother to no one else, but only to John? Why did He not entrust her to His Mother's sister, who stood there by the cross?

If He did not entrust her to Joseph, it was because the Betrothed was no longer living. He had long been absent from the Gospel history.

Mary of Clopas, the sister of His Mother, showed great love for Jesus by standing at His cross. Yet it is known that her children, the kinsmen of Jesus, were not lofty in spirit (Jn 7:3-5).

John, on the contrary, was such as none of even the best disciples of Jesus Christ was. The beloved disciple repaid love with the most tender and faithful love.

His love is visible even at the cross, where he alone of all the disciples stands, and stands near the Mother of his Lord. How could He entrust His Mother to anyone other than him?

The beloved disciple had another distinction. He was and remained a virgin until the grave. This clothed him with a new right to the distinction with which the Lord honored him.

"To the virgin disciple John," said Blessed Jerome, "the virgin Lord entrusts His virgin Mother."

"And from that hour the disciple took her to his own."

The Mother and the disciple understood that the Lord had joined them so that they would never be separated, and so that the peace of His Mother would be a sacred concern for the disciple. The disciple hastened to fulfill the Teacher's will.

"And from that hour the disciple took her to his own." As soon as he heard the Lord's will, he cared for the Mother's peace of soul.

So that the sorrow of the Mother of Jesus, already so strong, would not increase at the sight of the Son's last and most terrible sufferings, John immediately withdrew with her from Golgotha.

The loving son found it painful that his new Mother had suffered so much until then. Therefore he hastened to comfort her as much as a son could. And we see the Mother of Jesus no more on Golgotha (Mt 27:56; Mk 15:40).

"And from that hour the disciple took her to his own," or, as an ancient teacher says, "the disciple took the Virgin blessed in childbirth to live in his own house."

The loving disciple understood the command of the beloved Teacher. He did not limit his care for her to temporary consolation, but hastened to provide her with a peaceful dwelling and support.

This act of the disciple lets us see how the all-pure Virgin Mother had lived until then. Full of faith and love, she had constantly remained with her divine Son.

As He had nowhere to lay His head, so she also lived. She wandered with Him through cities, villages, and deserts.

Her most pure soul reverently attended to the words and deeds of the eternal Word and great Messenger of God. Under the shelter of His power, she did not think about earthly things.

Now her new son, fulfilling the Lord's will, sheltered her in his house, to protect her from the needs and dangers of earthly life.

From the Gospel it is evident that Saint John had property in Jerusalem (Mk 1:20; Mk 15:41; Jn 18:15). Therefore soon after this we see John again on Golgotha, while we no longer see the Mother of Jesus there (Jn 19:28-31, 35).

Afterward the Theotokos remained with John in Ephesus, as the Council of Ephesus testified. Thus the disciple fulfilled the Lord's will.

"Why," says Saint Chrysostom, "did the Lord remember no other woman, though another also stood there, except His Mother?" He answers the question thus.

"He teaches us that something special must be rendered to mothers. Parents who hinder us in the spiritual life should not even be known. But when they do not hinder it, we must render them everything due and prefer them to others.

For they gave us birth, raised us, and endured a thousand sorrows."

Yes, if even then, when our Lord was so tormented by the sorrows and sufferings of the Cross, He showed such care for His Mother, then His example clearly sanctified the careful love of children for parents.

Even while He was occupied with so great a struggle as the redemption of guilty humanity, He showed this care. His beloved disciple, to whom He handed the testament concerning His Mother, explains His will to us by his actions.

Truly, after this, how can that soul be called Christian which is cold, harsh, and insolent before parents? How can those children be called Christians who think only of their own rest, pleasures, advantages, and honors, while abandoning aged parents without care?

Christianity does not teach this. In commanding Christians to honor father and mother, the Apostle points out the special property of this ancient commandment: "This is the first commandment with a promise" (Eph 6:1-3).

This means that those who fulfill this commandment stand under God's special protection. Those who do not fulfill it are, more than other sinners, under God's wrath, and should not expect good for themselves even in this life.

"Children," the same Apostle teaches, "obey your parents in all things, for this is pleasing to God" (Col 3:20). Children must repay their debt to parents, for this is a good work and pleasing to God (1 Tim 5:4).

"If anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever" (1 Tim 5:8). Such is the Christian teaching concerning the relation of children to parents.

Lord Jesus, let it not be among us that Your great name be dishonored by our life. Amen.

Tichon (Pokrovski)

19th centuryChurch Father

See verse 26. The good and devoted disciple lovingly received the testament of his dying Teacher. He took His Mother into his own home under his filial care, and as a loving son he guarded and comforted Her until Her most honorable Dormition.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 20 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. εἶτα
    eita
    then
    G1534 · εἶτα
  2. λέγει
    legei
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  3. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. μαθητῇ
    mathētē
    a learner
    G3101 · μαθητής
  5. Ἴδε
    ide
    See! Lo! Behold! Look!
    G2396 · ἴδε
  6. ἡ
    hē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. μήτηρ
    mētēr
    a mother
    G3384 · μήτηρ
  8. σου
    sou
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  9. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  10. ἀπ᾽
    ap
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  11. ἐκείνης
    ekeinēs
    that
    G1565 · ἐκεῖνος
  12. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. ὥρας
    hōras
    an hour
    G5610 · ὥρα
  14. ἔλαβεν
    elaben
    I receive
    G2983 · λαμβάνω
  15. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. μαθητὴς
    mathētēs
    a learner
    G3101 · μαθητής
  17. αὐτὴν
    autēn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  18. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  19. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. ἴδια
    idia
    one's own
    G2398 · ἴδιος