Why does He add, "in Himself"? It would have been enough to say, "For as the Father has life, so He has given the Son also to have life." He added, "in Himself," because the Father Himself has life in Himself, and the Son has it in Himself.
He wanted us to understand something by saying, "in Himself." In this word a mystery is hidden. "Knock, and it will be opened" (Lk 11:9).
O Lord, what does what You said mean? "In Himself"; why did You add this? Did the apostle Paul, to whom You gave life, not have life? He had it, He says.
How many men are dead, so as to rise and come to Your word by faith? When they come, will they not have life in You? They will have it, for I said earlier: "He who hears My word and believes Him who sent Me has eternal life" (Jn 5:24).
Therefore those who believe in You have life. But You did not say, "in themselves." When You spoke of the Father, "as the Father has life in Himself," and again when You spoke of Yourself, You said, "so He has given the Son also to have life in Himself."
As He Himself has, so He gave Him to have. Where does He have it? In Himself. Where did He give Him to have it? In Himself. Where does Paul have it? Not in himself, but in Christ. Let us see whether the apostle says this: "It is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me" (Gal 2:20).
But how is this so? "As the Father has life in Himself, so He has given the Son also to have life in Himself," so that He lives not by participation, but unchangeably, and is Himself Life.
Thus He gave the Son also to have life. As He has it, so He gave Him to have it. What is the difference? The one gave, and the other received. Was He already existing when He received? Are we to think that Christ was once without light, when He is the Wisdom of the Father, of whom it is said, "the radiance of eternal light" (Wis 7:26)?
Therefore, when it is said, "He gave to the Son," it is as if it were said, "He begot the Son." For He gave by begetting. How did He give that He should be? He gave so that He should be Life. He gave so that He should be Life in Himself.
What does it mean to be Life in Himself? He did not need life from outside, but was Himself the fullness of life, from which others, believers, live while they live. Therefore He gave Him to have life in Himself. To whom did He give? To His Word, to Him who "in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God" (Jn 1:1).
Turn your thoughts to what we proposed to set aside, so that now, if possible, it may be made clear. Immediately concerning this resurrection He added: "For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has given the Son also to have life in Himself."
What does it mean that the Father has life in Himself? He does not have life somewhere else, but in Himself. Certainly His life is from Himself, and not from elsewhere or from another. He does not borrow life, as it were, nor does He become a sharer in a life that is not His. He has life in Himself, so that life itself belongs to Him.
Whether I can say anything more about this, offering examples for your instruction, will depend on the Lord's help and on the keenness of your attention. God lives, and the soul lives. But God's life is unchangeable, while the life of the soul is unstable.
God neither grows nor ages, but is always the same in Himself, such as He is. He is not one thing now, another later, and a third before. The life of the soul is very unstable. It lived foolishly, and now it lives wisely. It lived unrighteously, and now it lives righteously.
It sometimes remembers, sometimes forgets, sometimes learns, sometimes is unable to learn. Sometimes it loses what it learned, sometimes it grasps what it lost. The life of the soul is changeable.
When the soul lives unrighteously, it is dead. When it becomes righteous, it becomes a participant in another life, which is not ordinary life. It is raised to God and clings to God, by whom it is justified. For it is said: "To him who believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness" (Rom 4:5).
By falling away from Him, the soul becomes unrighteous. By turning toward Him, it becomes righteous. Do you not see that it is as if something cold were heated when placed in fire, and cooled when removed from fire?
Do you not see that it is as if something dark, when brought into the light, were illumined, and became dark when removed from the light? The soul is something like this, but God is not so.
A man may say that he has light in his eyes. But let the eyes, if they can, speak with a voice of their own and say, "We have light in ourselves." What you say is not true. You eyes say that you possess your own light in yourselves. Yes, you have light, but from heaven.
You have light, but if night comes, it is light from the moon or from lamps, not your own. When you are closed, you lose what you receive when you are open. You do not have light in yourselves.
Keep the light, if you can, when the sun sets. Night comes, and you enjoy the light of night. Keep the light when the lamp is taken away. Since, when the lamp is taken away, you remain in darkness, you do not have light in yourselves.
Therefore, to have light in oneself means not to need light from another. See, if anyone understands how He shows the Son equal to the Father, saying, "As the Father has life in Himself, so He has given the Son also to have life in Himself," then the only difference between the Father and the Son is this. The Father has life in Himself, which no one gave Him, while the Son has life in Himself, which the Father gave Him.
But here a cloud arises that must be dispersed. Let us not lose heart. Let us be attentive. There are pastures for the mind. Let us not reject them, that we may live.
Behold, you say, you yourself assert that the Father gave life to the Son, so that He might have it in Himself, just as the Father has life in Himself. You say that the Father possesses it and the Son possesses it. The Father is life and the Son is life. Both together are one life, not two, for there is one God and not two Gods. The same is true of life.
How, then, did the Father give life to the Son? Not as though the Son previously had no life and received life from the Father in order to live. If this were so, He would not have life in Himself.
Consider what I said about the soul. There is a soul which, even if it is irrational and unrighteous, is still a soul. Even if it is impious, it remains a soul. Thus it is one thing to be a soul, and another to be rational, righteous, and pious.
Therefore there is something in which it is still irrational, still unrighteous, still impious. Yet it is not nothing and is not without life. Through various actions the soul shows itself to be alive, even when it does not show itself to be rational, pious, and righteous.
Indeed, if it were not alive, it would not move the body. It would not command the feet to walk, the hands to work, the eyes to see, and the ears to hear. It would not open the mouth for speech, nor move the tongue to pronounce sounds.
By these actions it shows that it lives and that it is something better than the body. But does it show by these actions that it is rational, pious, and righteous? Do not foolish, impious, and unrighteous men walk, work with their hands, see, hear, and speak?
When the soul rises to something which it is not and which is above it, by which it exists, then it gains rationality, righteousness, and piety. Without this, although it exists, it is nevertheless dead. It does not have the life by which it itself lives, but only the life by which it gives life to the body.
For in the soul, one thing is that by which the body receives life, and another is that by which the soul itself receives life. The soul is certainly better than the body, but God is better than the soul itself.
Therefore the soul, even if irrational, unrighteous, and impious, is the life of the body. But since God is its own life, just as the soul, dwelling in the body, gives it energy, beauty, movement, and the work of its members, so God, being the life of the soul, gives it rationality, piety, righteousness, and love.
Thus what is given to the body by the soul is one thing, and what is given to the soul by God is another. The soul gives life and is given life. It gives life to what is dead, even if it itself has not been enlivened.
When the Word reached the hearers and entered them, and they not only heard but obeyed, the soul rose from its death to its life. That is, it rose from unrighteousness, irrationality, and impiety to its God, who is for it rationality, righteousness, and light.
Let it rise to Him. Let it be illumined by Him. "Look to Him," says the psalm. And what will this give us? "And you will be radiant" (cf. Ps 33:6). But if, by looking, you are illumined, and by turning away, you sink into darkness, then your light was not in yourselves, but in your God.
Look to Him, that you may rise. But if you turn away from Him, you will die. Therefore, if by turning toward Him you possess life, and by turning away you die, then your life was not in you. For your very life is the same as your light. "For with You is the fountain of life; in Your light we see light" (Ps 35:10).
It is not, then, that the Word of God, the Son of God, was something before receiving life and then had life through participation in the Father, as the soul is one thing before it is illumined and becomes better when illumined by participation in what is better. No. He has life in Himself, and by this He Himself is life itself.
What, then, does He mean when He says, "He has given the Son to have life in Himself"? I will say it briefly: it means that He begot the Son. Not that He was without life and suddenly received life, but that, being begotten, He became Life.
The Father is Life without being begotten. The Son is Life by being begotten. The Father is not begotten by any father. The Son is begotten by God the Father. The Father owes His being to no one, but that He is Father is manifested through the Son.
The Son, both in being Son and in being what He is, is from the Father. Therefore He said, "He has given the Son to have life in Himself," as if saying, "The Father, who is Life in Himself, begot the Son, who would be Life in Himself."
He wanted "gave" to be understood as "begot." It is as if we said to someone, "God gave you being." To whom did He give it? If He gave being to someone already existing, He would not have given him being, because the one able to receive would already have existed before it was given.
When you hear, "He gave you being," it means that you did not yet exist so as to receive being. By existing, you received that you should be. A builder gave being to this house, that it should be. What did he give it? He gave it to be a house.
To whom did he give it? To this house. What did he give it? To be a house. How could he give the house that the house should be a house? If the house was already a house, to whom did he give that it should be a house?
What then does it mean that he gave it to be a house? It means that he built it, that it should be a house. What did the Father give the Son? He gave Him to be His Son. He begot Him, that He should be Life.
That is, He "gave Him to have life in Himself," so that He should be Life, needing no other source of life. He was not to be thought to have life by participation in another. If He had life by participation, He could, by losing participation, be without life. You must neither imagine, suppose, nor believe this concerning the Son.
Therefore the Father has life, and the Son has life. The Father has it in Himself and not from the Son. The Son has it in Himself, but from the Father. He was begotten by the Father so that life would be in Him Himself.
The Father is not begotten and is Life in Himself. He begot the Son not as lesser, but by begetting made Him equal. For He who created all times in complete perfection did not need time in order to become perfect.