The Church Fathers on this verse

John 6:1Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

After these things Jesus went over the sea of Galilee, which is that of Tiberias.

Douay-Rheims

μετα ταυτα απηλθεν ο ιησους περαν της θαλασσης της γαλιλαιας της τιβεριαδος

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

We must not, beloved, enter into disputes with wicked men. Rather, let us learn to yield place to their evil slanders, provided this does not harm our virtue.

In this way every insolence is tamed.

Arrows that strike something resilient, hard, and resisting rebound with greater force against those who shot them. But when the speed of their flight meets no resistance, it quickly loses strength and comes to an end.

So it is with insolent men. When we oppose them, they grow still more savage. When we yield to them and withdraw from them, we easily tame their frenzy.

Thus Christ also, when He learned of the report that had reached the Pharisees, namely that He was gaining disciples and baptizing more than John, withdrew into Galilee.

Read more (54 words)

He did this to extinguish their envy and, by His departure, to tame their rage, which had of course arisen in them from these reports.

Yet when He withdrew again into Galilee, He no longer went to the former places. He did not come to Cana, but to the other side of the sea.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

After the Lord’s stern discourse to the Jews, which aroused envy and anger in them, He calms them by withdrawing from them and goes to the other side of the Sea of Tiberias.

He calls the lake a sea because divine Scripture called gatherings of waters seas (Gen 1:10).

Alternatively, He passes from place to place to test the disposition of the people. While the negligent remained in their place, the more zealous followed Him.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

First of all, I think it necessary to tell the hearers that the Lord’s departures from Jerusalem do not appear to take place without some necessity. In almost every departure, He orders something according to the divine economy. In the very nature of His deeds, as on a tablet, He inscribes mysteries.

As for the purpose of this departure, and what it signified, we shall set this forth in due time, after completing the chapters before us. We shall divide each saying little by little and explain what is useful from the literal sense. Having thus presented it to the readers for understanding, we shall then add the concluding contemplation to the whole, in which we shall gather the particulars together.

Read more (1887 words)

Therefore, we think it necessary first to say what the generally accessible meaning of the saying is. “After this,” it says, “Jesus went away to the other side of the Sea of Tiberias.” We must not carelessly pass over what “this” refers to.

In Jerusalem Christ showed Himself to be a wondrous Physician. He healed a man who had been “in his infirmity thirty-eight years” (Jn 5:5). He did not give medicine or devise any remedy against the sickness. By a word alone, as God, with almighty authority and a will befitting God, He said: “Rise, take up your bed, and go to your house” (Jn 5:8; cf. Mt 9:6).

Since it was the Sabbath, the Jews, suffering from the coarseness of the letter, became indignant in their ignorance. They were more oppressed by the folly they had made their own than the paralytic had been. They were sick with a feeble inactivity toward all good things, paralyzed in mind and infirm in morals.

To them one could rightly say: “Be strengthened, you hands that hang down and you feeble knees” (Is 35:3). They were indignant, declaring that the honor due to the Sabbath had to be observed even by the Lawgiver Himself.

They condemn Christ as a transgressor, not considering the saying: “It is impious to say to a king: You transgress the law” (Job 34:18). For this they received strong rebukes from the Savior.

He gave a long and extensive discourse showing that the inactivity of the Sabbath had been ordained for the ancients in a typological manner. He also showed that “the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath” (Mt 12:8).

But being incapable of any good and ready for every kind of resistance, they rise up against the One who teaches what they ought to learn. They plot the murder of Him who wished to make them wise, rendering Him, as it is written, “evil for good” (Ps 34:12).

After these deeds and words, the Lord withdraws from Jerusalem as if by necessity. This is precisely because the Passover of the Jews was drawing near, as we shall say a little later. He even crossed the Sea of Tiberias itself, or the lake so called in the land of Judea.

As we have just said, the approach of the Jewish Passover especially urged and compelled Him to make this departure and go to other places so far from Jerusalem. Therefore I think it fitting to show that Jesus rightly refused to be in Jerusalem at that time.

The Law of Moses commanded the Jews to go to Jerusalem from all the surrounding regions to celebrate there the typological feast of Tabernacles. From this the spiritual man will understand the gathering of all the saints to Christ. From the whole world, after the quickening of the dead, they will be gathered into the city above, the heavenly Jerusalem. There they will offer thanksgiving for the true feast of Tabernacles, that is, for the raising and immortal abiding of bodies, after corruption has clearly been destroyed and death has fallen into death.

Concerning what usually happened historically and actually, one must say that the crowd coming to Jerusalem was beyond number. Especially at that time, then, the Pharisees could naturally have great power. They pretended to defend the Law and accused as a transgressor, or as one who seemed to them a transgressor, in the midst of such a multitude.

There is absolutely no difficulty in inflaming a measureless gathering of a herd-like crowd when someone says that it has been insulted. He may try to stir it even against those who have in no way insulted it. Like water or fire, without reasoning or inquiry, it rushes violently everywhere and attacks everything appointed to suffer from it.

Knowing this, the Lord removes Himself from Jerusalem together with the disciples and goes “to the other side of the Sea of Tiberias.” That the Lord turns away from the murderous Jews, acting very rightly, we may also learn from this event. The blessed Evangelist himself says: “After this Jesus walked in Galilee, for He would not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill Him” (Jn 7:1).

Someone may say: I can agree that He refused to walk in Judea so as not to undergo premature death. But I still do not understand why He avoids the feast itself.

So also those who were considered Christ’s brethren approached Him in Galilee and said: “Depart from here and go into Judea, that Your disciples also may see the signs which You do” (Jn 7:3). But the Lord said to them: “You go up to the feast. I am not going up to this feast, because My time has not yet been fulfilled” (Jn 7:8).

Thus it is clear and evident that the Savior withdrew from Jerusalem and undertook this departure not willingly, but while avoiding the vileness of the unbelievers. He was evading the malice of His persecutors and skillfully turning aside the arrow of hatred.

He withdraws from His persecutors, although He had the power to suffer nothing even if He remained. He also does this in order to sketch for us a good example, not of cowardice, but of prudent foresight and love for neighbor.

Guided by this as by a pattern toward knowledge of what is useful, we must know what to do when enemies persecute us. Even if no harm at all seems presently to threaten us from them, we should withdraw in some way. By doing so, we repel the greatest violence of their attacks and avoid the sudden heat of their anger.

We shall then encounter the weakened anger of those who wrong us and cut off the boldness of their violence. We do good to those who might not have been good to us. We are not receiving good, as is evident, nor seeking our own advantage, but that of others.

Thus it belongs to love to offer complete non-resistance to those who wish us evil. We do not abuse our ability to suffer nothing if we are present among enemies. By remaining, we would excite in them a stronger fury which lacks the power to prevail over the one hated. Such love, which existed in Christ in its purest form, “does not seek its own,” as Paul says (1 Cor 13:5).

Direct the sharp vision of your mind again to what is written. You will find with wonder the highest providential wisdom in the withdrawals of our Savior, I mean from Jerusalem.

Often He is driven out by the madness of the Jews and stays among foreigners. He even seems, perhaps, to be saved among them and to receive due honor. Through this He gives precedence to the Church from the Gentiles. By the reverence of others He exposes Israel’s hatred of God. By the meekness of the former He shows the savagery of the latter, so that in the end they may be shown in every way to be deservedly and justly deprived of the promise given to the fathers.

Having withdrawn from Jerusalem, the Lord does not stay in one of the neighboring cities, nor settle in one of the border villages. He goes “to the other side of the Sea of Tiberias.” By this He most clearly threatens those who have resolved to persecute Him. He will depart from them and withdraw from the whole people so far that, in a certain sense, He will make even the way of turning to Him inaccessible for them.

For the sea is wholly impassable to human feet. He will appear to say something similar to them in later places in the Gospel: “You will seek Me and will not find Me” (Jn 7:34), and, “Where I am going, you cannot come” (Jn 8:21).

Indeed, the path of righteousness is very level, easy to traverse, and free of every difficulty for those who come to Him through faith. But it is very difficult and steep, and rather completely impassable, for those who provoke Him to wrath. This accords with what one of the holy prophets said: “The ways of the Lord are straight, and the righteous shall walk in them, but the ungodly shall stumble in them” (Hos 14:10).

Thus the intervening space of the sea signifies the difficulty, or rather the inaccessibility, for the Jews of the spiritual path to Him. So also God promises in the prophets to block the ways of the impious soul, saying: “Therefore, behold, I will hedge up her way with thorns, and she shall not find her paths” (Hos 2:6).

What thorns signified there, the sea signifies here. It separates those who senselessly resolved to insult from the One insulted. It lies between the Righteous One and the ungodly.

But this type also seems to contain for us, as in seed, another hidden mystery. When Israel was released from the land of Egypt, Pharaoh was greatly provoked. Raging against the people’s unexpected prosperity, he began to pursue them and dared to satisfy his envy and grief by war.

He pursued them, thinking to force those who had only just come out from service to him back into slavery. But God leads the people through the midst of the sea.

The persecutor, very savage and wholly unrestrained in anger, had madly resolved by his ungovernable fury to fight against God. He is drowned with his whole army in the midst of the sea, while Israel alone is saved.

Let Moses now come before us, the one who once lamented the madness of the Jews. Let him speak to them, indignant at their impiety against Christ: “A crooked and adulterous generation, is this how you repay the Lord?” (Deut 32:5-6).

Do you pursue beyond the sea the One who led you through the midst of the sea and mighty waves? Are you not ashamed to persecute Him? This, then, is your lot, O Jew. The sea will finally drown you. For as it was then with those men, so now with Christ and the godless Jews. Death belongs to the persecutors, not to the Persecuted.

Blessed David also sings to us in one place: “Let not the tempest of waters drown me, nor let the deep swallow me up” (Ps 68:16). He indicates the most terrible shipwreck of the Jewish synagogue and refuses to be submerged with it in the depth of ignorance.

But the calamity that then befell the Egyptians and their ruler concerned the earthly body. The Jews endure a far greater punishment in relation to a higher matter. They suffer injury of soul, receiving repayment according to their wicked deeds.

Pharaoh is justly punished for attempting by force to turn the free man into a slave. In turn, Israel is also lawfully subject to retribution. It does not come into bondage to the Master of all. Rather, through its great pride, Israel itself becomes toward God what Pharaoh had been toward Israel in violence.

It should be observed that the Evangelist calls the Lake of Tiberias a “sea,” following the words of divine Scripture. For the Creator called “the gatherings of the waters seas” (Gen 1:10). Among outside writers too, the word is often used indifferently, so that they sometimes do not refuse to call the sea a lake.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“After these things Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, which is the Sea of Tiberias,” that is, the Sea of Galilee or Tiberias. He calls the Lake of Tiberias the Sea of Galilee, as is said in the Gospel according to Matthew.

Jesus Christ went there to avoid the anger of the rulers of the people, which had been stirred up by the words He had spoken.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

Meanwhile the people were setting out from all the cities to Jerusalem for the approaching feast. With the spread of the preaching about Jesus, and after John's death, their attention and respect for Jesus had increased.

They gathered to Him in ever greater numbers from day to day.

The Lord Himself did not intend to go to Jerusalem, for His time had not yet come; Jn 7:6, 8.

Thus now, because of the reports about Herod's desire and in order to give His disciples rest, the Lord resolved to go with them to a solitary place, Bethsaida, lying on the other side of the Lake of Galilee.

This city, in the region of Gaulanitis, belonged not to Herod Antipas but to his brother Philip; Lk 9:10.

They crossed the lake. The people followed Him along the shore.

Read more (43 words)

Seeing that His withdrawal was in vain, the Lord turned to the people with teaching about the Kingdom of Heaven and mercifully healed the sick.

The day was already passing, but the people did not leave Him, and meanwhile they remained without food.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The withdrawal of Jesus Christ from the territory of Herod to the eastern side of the sea: Lk 10, Mk 30-32, Mt 13, Jn 1.

The first three Evangelists connect Jesus Christ's withdrawal to the eastern side of the sea with several things.

On the one hand, it is connected with the report brought by the disciples of John the Baptist about the martyr's death of their teacher; Mt 12-13.

On the other hand, it is connected with the return of the twelve apostles from their preaching journey. For them, as for Himself, Jesus Christ sought solitude and rest; Mark.

Finally, it is connected with the report about opinions concerning Jesus at Herod's court and Herod's intention to see Jesus; Lk 9-10.

Read more (245 words)

Thus the disciples of Christ, exhausted by their journey, needed solitude in general. So did Jesus Christ Himself, who was constantly pressed by the people.

But the news of the murder of John the Baptist, together with the report that the murderer wished to see Jesus, compelled the Lord to withdraw to the eastern side of the sea.

He went into the territory of the tetrarch Philip, the only son of Herod the Great of whom good memories remained among the people; see Lk 3:1.

The deserted place to which Jesus and His disciples withdrew was, according to Luke, near Bethsaida.

Since, in connection with all the preceding and following narratives, the matter here concerns a crossing to the eastern side of the sea, this means that the Bethsaida mentioned is the eastern one.

It is Bethsaida Julias, not far from where the Jordan flows into the Sea of Galilee. It was so named by the tetrarch Philip in honor of Augustus' daughter Julia.

Consequently, John's expression πέραν της βαλάααης της Γαλιλαίος, τής Ttjfcptdioc must be understood as giving two names for one and the same sea.

The second name, properly indicating the shore of Tiberias, was probably used by the Evangelist because Jesus and the apostles set out from that shore.

The latter is indicated by verse 23, where it says that on the next day other boats came from Tiberias to the place of the miraculous feeding of the people; cf. v. 22.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Having entered the boat, He ordered His disciples to sail toward Bethsaida. This was not the Bethsaida from which Peter and other apostles came, and which, being near Capernaum, was not a deserted place.

It was another Bethsaida, situated at the northeastern corner of the lake, a little beyond the place where the Jordan flows into it.

Like its western namesake, it was at first a small settlement. But shortly before this, Philip, tetrarch of Iturea, enlarged and adorned it, naming it Bethsaida Julias for distinction.

The added name was given in honor of Julia, the beautiful but corrupt daughter of the emperor Augustus.

It was there that the boat with Christ and the apostles set its course. Their weary and burdened hearts were seeking rest.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"After this Jesus went," and so forth. Of all the events from the second Passover during Christ's public ministry (Jn 5:1) to the third (Jn 6:4), and even to the Feast of Tabernacles after this third Passover (Jn 7:2), John describes only two in chapter 6.

These are the miraculous feeding with the loaves and the Lord's miraculous walking on the sea. He also sets forth one discourse of Christ about the bread of life.

The first three Evangelists describe many events from that long period of Christ's activity in Galilee, as one sees by comparing their chronology with John's.

Therefore there is a break here in the sequence of John's narrative, and a very long one. It extends over the events of almost a whole year.

Read more (397 words)

The discourse after the healing of the paralytic at Bethesda took place at the second Passover (Jn 5:1). The events described in chapter 6 took place before the third Passover (Jn 6:4).

Therefore John's statement that after this Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, and a great multitude followed Him, should not be understood as immediate.

It does not mean that this happened directly after the discourse following the healing of the paralytic, or that the people followed Him from Jerusalem.

Rather, after the mentioned discourse, the Lord departed from Jerusalem and Judea, came into Galilee, and lived and acted there for a long time and in many ways, as the first three Evangelists narrate.

Before the third Passover, He once went to the sea, or to the other side, πέραν, of the Sea of Galilee, of Tiberias. At that time a great multitude followed Him.

"The Sea of Galilee": see the note on Mt 4:18.

"In the vicinity of Tiberias" means, properly, the Sea of Galilee, of Tiberias, according to its other name.

John also calls the Sea of Galilee the Sea of Tiberias in another place of the Gospel, Jn 21:4.

Therefore there is, properly speaking, no basis for translating it "in the vicinity of Tiberias." This is all the more so because the feeding of the people described below took place near Bethsaida, far from Tiberias; Lk 9:10.

John adds this other name of the Sea of Galilee perhaps because, for his first readers in Asia Minor, it was better known by this second name.

The city, named Tiberias by Herod Antipas in honor of the Roman emperor Tiberius, may have been better known to them.

Or else the expression must be translated thus: He went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee from Tiberias.

That is, He went to the eastern or northeastern side of the Sea of Galilee, since Tiberias lay on the western shore, closer to the south, of this sea.

Tiberias, a city built by Antipas with a royal palace, was the residence of the ruler of Galilee. It was inhabited mostly by pagans, and was relatively rich and beautiful.

The Lord, it seems, did not go there, probably because He did not find there sufficiently good soil for the sowing of His word, and did not wish to cast pearls before swine.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Verses 1-4. “After these things Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, of Tiberias.” The expression “after these things” indicates an indefinite time, either shorter or longer. After the paralytic had been healed in chapter 5, many miracles were performed, according to verse 2. John does not relate them. Many events occurred which are described by the other Evangelists, and much time passed. According to John himself, the feeding of the people with five loaves took place when “the Passover, the feast of the Jews, was near” Jn 6:4. That is, it occurred before the third Passover, when Jesus was not in Jerusalem.

Read more (841 words)

The events closest to the miraculous feeding of the people were the sending of the Apostles to preach, and their return to Jesus with news of their success, Mk 6:7, 30; Lk 9:2, 10. Another circumstance connected with the preaching of the disciples was the alarm of Herod Antipas. By his will the Forerunner was beheaded, Mt 14:12. This Herod was a ruler in name, but in reality the obedient servant of a wanton woman. He was as superstitious as he was sensual, as vain as he was soulless. Hearing of the preaching and miracles of Jesus, he anxiously said: “This is the Baptist risen from the dead.” Passionately attracted to the marvelous, he wished to see Jesus in order to be an eyewitness of His miracles, Lk 9:7, 9. It is understandable that the Lord Jesus wanted nothing to do with such an empty man. And so, both so that His disciples could rest in a solitary place and so that He might not meet the soulless Herod and his servants, He withdrew beyond the Sea of Galilee, Mk 6:14-16; Mk 6:31; Mt 2:13, a misprint in the original, more correctly Mt 14:1-2. The Slavonic translation, “He went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, of Tiberias,” is as inaccurate and obscure as the Russian: “He went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, to the region of Tiberias.” Before this, Jesus had been in Nazareth and its environs, Mt 13:54; Mk 6:5-6. Tiberias is four and a half hours northeast of Nazareth, and three hours south of Capernaum. All these places were on the western side of the Sea of Galilee. Since Tiberias lay on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee, Plinius, Hist. 5, 15, Jesus could not, after crossing to the eastern shore, have been “in the region” of Tiberias. The Slavonic translation followed the thought of Zigabenus: “to the other side of the Sea of Galilee or Tiberias.” But in the original text there is no ητοι, “or.” Holding strictly to the text, one translates: Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, opposite Tiberias. According to St. Luke, Jesus withdrew to a deserted place near Bethsaida, Lk 9:10. John points out a mountain in this wilderness, where the disciples and the Savior rested, Jn 6:3. Bethsaida on the eastern side of the Sea of Galilee was otherwise called Julias. It is known not only to Josephus, De bello Iud. 3, 10, 7, but also to Pliny, Hist. nat. 5, 15. Being in lower Gaulanitis, it belonged to the tetrarchy of Philip, Josephus, De bello 2, 9, 1; Antiq. 18, 2, 1. Consequently it was not under the authority of Herod Agrippa, the wretched murderer of the Forerunner. “And a great multitude followed Him.” According to St. Mark, “they ran there on foot from all the cities and arrived before them” Mk 6:33. Jesus and the disciples crossed to the eastern shore in a boat, Mt 14:13. The people went around the lake by land, yet arrived at the place before Jesus. “So great was their desire, so strong was their thirst, that they overcame every obstacle,” says Chrysostom. “Because they saw His signs which He performed on those who were sick.” In saying this, the Evangelist John assumes that his readers know from the other Gospels about the healings performed by the Savior before this time. And indeed, according to Lk 9:27 and following, and Mt 9:35 and following, many miracles had just been performed. Almost all of them consisted in the healing of the sick. In the wilderness of Bethsaida, according to Luke, the Savior “spoke” to those who came “about the kingdom of God, and healed those who had need of healing.” St. Mark depicts the reality more precisely and vividly. “When Jesus came out” of the boat, “He saw a great multitude and was moved with compassion for them, because they were like sheep without a shepherd; and He began to teach them” Mk 6:34. John notes: “Now the Passover, the feast of the Jews, was near.” Why is this noted? Most likely to explain why there was now such a large crowd around Jesus. People went to Jerusalem for Passover in whole caravans. These pilgrims, of course, hoped that the great Teacher would also go to Jerusalem for Passover, and that they would accompany Him. Yet the law prescribed celebrating Passover in Jerusalem. None of the circumstances that, according to tradition, exempted some from the Passover journey applied to Jesus Christ: illness, old age, blindness, or lameness. Nevertheless, Christ Jesus was not in Jerusalem for this Passover. In Himself He showed the Lord of the Sabbath and of the Passover. Or, as Chrysostom says, He did this “taking as the occasion the corruption of the Jews.” The miraculous feeding of the people that followed is described by all four Evangelists, Mt 14:15-21; Mk 6:35-44; Lk 9:12-18. John supplements the description of the others with several particular details, though he also omits some things.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

We have spoken more than once about the significance of the Gospel according to John. It supplements and unites the accounts of the first three Gospels. It does not place in the foreground the many miracles of the Lord, recorded by the first three Evangelists, though not all of them; cf. Jn 21:25. Rather, it especially sets forth the Lord’s words and His teaching, which disclose to us the mystery of the Incarnation of God the Word. Thus the deeds of the Lord in Galilee are all compressed into a few verses of chapters 2 and 4, and into chapter 6. Yet chapter 6 contains, if one may so express it, the essence of all the Lord’s miracles. It presents Him as healer, verse 2, as giver of blessings, verses 5-14, and as sovereign over all the powers of the world, verses 18-20.

Read more (654 words)

But this chapter contains something still higher. It contains the teaching about the bread of life and the bread from heaven, verses 26-38. It reveals who the bread of eternal life is, verse 35. It speaks of the infinite mercy of Him who “will not cast out the one who comes to Him,” verse 37. It speaks of His unity with the Father, verses 38-40. It also speaks of the great mystery of eating the flesh and blood of the God-man, which are the bread of the soul, verses 48-58. Chapter 6 ends with the account of the falling away of those who could not receive these words, verses 60-66. It is completed by Peter’s moving exclamation, as from the depth of his soul he confessed the Lord Jesus to be the Christ. “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.” “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Lord, we repeat with Peter, to whom shall we go if You leave us? But You have said: “The one who comes to Me I will not cast out.” Yet amid this light of faith, which illumined Peter and the other faithful disciples, there stands out sharply and darkly the unfortunate man whom the devil had marked as his prey. For by his own will he had surrendered himself to him, verses 70-71. “After these things Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, of Tiberias.” The Evangelist John says nothing about the Lord’s return from Jerusalem to Galilee. He only indicates that the Lord “walked in Galilee, for He did not wish to walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill Him” Jn 7:1. Since in verse 4 of this sixth chapter he says that the second Passover was approaching, see our schematic list of events, it is evident what happened after the healing of the paralytic at the pool of Bethesda. After the denunciation of the Jews, who reached the height of malice, the Lord left Jerusalem for Galilee. He was not in Jerusalem at all, neither for the second Passover nor even before the autumn Feast of Tabernacles, Jn 7:2-10. That feast preceded the third and last Passover. Thus He was absent for about seven months, from the end of February, or the beginning of March, until September. However, since we do not know the time of the healing of the sick man at Bethesda, we cannot determine with certainty how long the Lord stayed in Galilee. Perhaps the healing was performed in the autumn after the first Passover. The Evangelist John does not enumerate all events. He selects only those that provided occasion for setting forth the most important truths of the Lord’s teaching. Among these belongs that moment in the Lord’s earthly life when He sets forth the teaching on the bread of life. The sea, called by John “of Galilee, of Tiberias,” is of course the Lake of Gennesaret. It was also called Tiberias from Tiberias, the capital of Herod the tetrarch. Pausanias, though quite incidentally, speaks of the Lake of Gennesaret, which he calls Tiberias, book 5, chapter 7, §3. Cf. also Pliny, Natural History 5, 15, §2. In Strabo 17, 2, §16, 1, Caus. 755, the lake is called Gennesaret. The Lord goes “to the other side of the sea,” that is, to the other side of the lake. As is clear from Lk 9:10, this was a deserted place near a city called Bethsaida. But one must remember that this was not the ancient Bethsaida, “house of fish,” which lay on the western shore of the lake north of Tiberias. It was the so-called Bethsaida Julias, built on the site of a village by the tetrarch Philip and named in honor of the daughter of Augustus. Cf. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, books 17 and 18:3. It lay northeast of the lake, in the hills.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 12 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Μετὰ
    meta
    with
    G3326 · μετά
  2. ταῦτα
    tauta
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  3. ἀπῆλθεν
    apēlthen
    I come or go away from
    G565 · ἀπέρχομαι
  4. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. Ἰησοῦς
    iēsous
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  6. πέραν
    peran
    over
    G4008 · πέραν
  7. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. θαλάσσης
    thalassēs
    the sea
    G2281 · θάλασσα
  9. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. Γαλιλαίας
    galilaias
    Galilee
    G1056 · Γαλιλαία
  11. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. Τιβεριάδος
    tiberiados
    Tiberias
    G5085 · Τιβεριάς