This was the worse part of the crowd, a rabble of self-willed people. They did not heed the meaning of the Lord’s teachings, but only thirsted for signs and miracles, see below, v. 30.
They probably consisted mostly of Judeans. This may be concluded from their subsequent disputes against Him whom they had just wished to make king. These objections came precisely from those who arrived in the boats, see below, vv. 26-31 and the following objections.
A secondary but curious question is why boats from Tiberias came to the deserted shore of the sea, although it was near Julias Bethsaida. Bethsaida itself lay at a fairly considerable distance from the sea.
Tiberias lay rather far to the south on the western shore of the lake. Near Tiberias also lay Magdala and Dalmanutha, settlements which seem to have supplied the capital with provisions.
Dalmanutha, cf. Mt 15:39 and Mk 8:10, is identified with the place now called Ain el-Barideh, “the cold spring.”
It is very difficult to suppose that boats came from Tiberias specifically to take up the people. Much time would have been needed for news of this to reach Tiberias from Julias Bethsaida.
More time would have been needed for the boats to be fitted out and to cross the lake in order to collect the people remaining there. During that time, they could have reached Capernaum on foot.
We think that a regular service was maintained on the Lake of Tiberias, running in a circuit along the shore between Julias Bethsaida, or its harbor, and Tiberias.
It is said of the people: “they got into the boats.” It is not evident that they hired them. Rather, they apparently made use of them without hindrance, as public property for a fixed fare, in order to go to Capernaum.
Perhaps the crowd remaining on the shore even directly counted on the required arrival of the Tiberian boats. These apparently carried no goods, but transported passengers for a fixed fare.