The Church Fathers on this verse

Joshua 1:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Moses my servant is dead: arise, and pass over this Jordan, thou and thy people with thee, into the land which I will give to the children of Israel.

Douay-Rheims

מֹשֶׁ֥ה עַבְדִּ֖י מֵ֑ת וְעַתָּה֩ ק֨וּם עֲבֹ֜ר אֶת־הַיַּרְדֵּ֣ן הַזֶּ֗ה אַתָּה֙ וְכָל־הָעָ֣ם הַזֶּ֔ה אֶל־הָאָ֕רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֧ר אָנֹכִ֛י נֹתֵ֥ן לָהֶ֖ם לִבְנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

5 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 6 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Who among us is unaware that nothing quite compares? It is recorded that Moses, My servant, passed away. If being called a servant is such a remarkable distinction, what kind of judgement do we deserve, we who are referred to as sons yet remain ungrateful to Him? Even a title as elevated as that of archangels would not surpass this, for it is impossible to fully articulate this level of honor. Just as God is beyond expression, so too is His service.

In the end, there exists a form of servitude in our way of living, as stated, "Moses My servant died." Though all the Israelites were servants, Moses stood out distinctly in his vibrant life. The Apostle Paul, rather than adopting the most prestigious title, referred to himself as a servant of Jesus Christ.

Read more (43 words)

There is no title that rivals this esteemed designation. Indeed, pay attention to what God Himself declares: "Moses My servant died." Additionally, it is said to Isaac, "Thy servant" (Gen. 24:14). Such a designation brings joy to the angels, cherubim, and seraphim alike.

The name of Joshua serves as a foreshadowing of Christ. What does this mean? Were there not others named Jesus? Indeed, his original name was Hosea, which was later changed as a prophetic sign. Just as Joshua led the Israelites into the promised land, so Jesus Christ guides us into eternal life. Neither the law nor Moses accomplished this, for they remained outside; the law cannot grant entry, but it is grace that does so.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Jesus, the son of Naveen, attained greatness through his connection with Moses, which involved not only instruction in the commandments but also a divine setting apart through grace. When the glory of the Lord radiated with His divine essence, it was Jesus who occupied the chosen position. As Moses conversed with God, Jesus too was enveloped in a holy cloud (Ex. 24:12 ff.). While the priests and the people remained at the foot of the mountain, Jesus ascended with Moses to receive the Law. The entire assembly stayed within the encampment, as Jesus stood outside, at the site of revelation. When the cloud of glory descended and God addressed Moses, Jesus remained behind him as a devoted servant; though youthful, he did not leave his position, while the elders watched from afar, trembling at the miraculous works of God.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

After the passing of Moses, the servant of the Lord, God spoke to Joshua, son of Nun, Moses' assistant, instructing him that Moses had died and urging him to rise and lead the people across the Jordan into the land He promised to them. The insightful Paul highlighted that the Old Testament serves as a foreshadowing of the New Testament, stating that these accounts were documented for our instruction, illustrating that the culmination of the ages had arrived. In his letter to the Galatians, he elaborated that Scripture records, "Abraham had two sons: one by a slave woman and the other by the free woman. The son of the slave was born in the ordinary way, but his freeborn son was a result of the promise. These two sons represent two covenants."

Read more (301 words)

Paul crafted this teaching not by dismissing history but by drawing connections between the symbols and the ultimate truth—linking Abraham to God, his wives to the two covenants, and his sons to the two nations. Similarly, when referring to Moses, one ought to see the law, while Jesus represents the Savior named after him. The Scriptures affirm that the law is synonymous with Moses, as evidenced by the passages proclaiming that “they have Moses and the prophets” and noting that “even to this day, when Moses is read, a veil lies over their hearts.”

Thus, just as Moses led the people into the promised land after his death, Christ, who arrived at the culmination of the law, unlocked the heavenly kingdom for believers. The Scriptures declare that “the end of the law is Christ, for righteousness to everyone who believes." Before John, the law and prophets proclaimed the coming of the kingdom, and from John's time, it has been forcefully advancing, with the desperate seizing its opportunities.

What a fitting role for our Lord Jesus Christ in ministering! The text reveals that God spoke to Joshua, the assistant to Moses, and the Apostle tells us that "Christ Jesus has become a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, in order to confirm the promises made to the fathers." At the appointed time, God sent His Son, born of a woman, under the law, to redeem those under the law, allowing us to be adopted as His children. Therefore, Christ is both the one who lived under the law and the minister of the circumcision. He expressed to the Jews, "If you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me." The Jews affirmed to Joshua, “If we will heed Moses' every command, we will listen to you.”

Lactantius

4th centuryTeacher of the Church

The prophet does not declare, "The Lord spoke to me," but rather directs his message towards Jesus, indicating that he was not referring to himself but to Christ—God communicated with Him during that moment. Jesus embodies the essence of the Messiah, and his name was initially Hosea (Num. 13:17). Anticipating the future, Moses instructed that he be called Jesus so that when he was chosen to lead the army against Amalek, which attacked the children of Israel, he could conquer the foe through the strength of his name and guide the people into the promised inheritance. In this way, he also mirrored Moses by illustrating that the new covenant established through Jesus Christ would need to surpass the one delivered through Moses.

Roshdestwenski W.G.

Teacher of the Church

God instructed Joshua to traverse the Jordan River and enter the Promised Land: Arise now, and cross the Jordan, you and all these people, into the land that I am giving to them. The two kingdoms referred to in the book of Deuteronomy—Zion, king of the Amorites, and Og, king of Bashan—alongside Moses's designation of the two tribes of Israel, the Reubenites and the Gadites, were intended for possession, though they were located within the vicinity of the Jordan River. However, they fell under the borders of the Promised Land. This prompts an important question: was it allowable for some of the Hebrew people to establish their homes in these regions adjacent to the Jordan River?

Read more (388 words)

It is understood that the Promised Land, which God vowed to bestow upon the Israelites, encompassed only regions situated beyond the Jordan River to the east. Due to Moses and Aaron's lack of faith, these leaders were denied the honor of entering the land, as stated in Numbers 20:12: And the Lord said unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye have not believed to sanctify Me before the children of Israel, therefore, ye shall not bring this host into the land which I have given them.

EXPLANATION. The Promised Land, evident from the descriptions of ancient Palestine, was divided into two areas separated by the course of the Jordan River. Thus, all territories located both near and across the Jordan River were included within the boundaries of the Promised Land. Given this positioning, there is no doubt that the kingdoms of Zion, king of the Amorites, and Og, king of Bashan, though they were in proximity to the Jordan River, were part of the Promised Land. This is underscored by the fact that the descendants of Noah, from whom the Canaanites descended, spread their settlements widely, claiming all areas near the Jordan River. It is clear that the two Amorite kings, Zion and Og, were of Canaanite lineage, residing on the eastern bank of the Jordan River. This is supported by the account in Genesis 10:16.

After addressing this matter, another question arises: why is the Promised Land referred to exclusively as the region divided by the Jordan? The answer lies in specific circumstances worth noting: (a) The territory beyond the Jordan River, where the Hebrews were commanded by God to relocate, is termed the Promised Land because it held the primary and most valuable possessions of the Canaanites, who traced their origin to these regions beyond the Jordan. (b) This area possessed more extensive and favorable lands, more suitable for habitation than the initial land from which the Hebrews migrated. (c) Additionally, a larger number of Hebrews were expected to relocate beyond the Jordan River and establish their permanent settlement there. (d) This area beyond the Jordan also held significance as the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord was situated there. Most importantly, it should be recognized that God aimed to fulfill the mystery of human Redemption through His Son directly within the borders beyond the Jordan.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.