The Church Fathers on this verse

Judges 4:17Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But Sisara fleeing, came to the tent of Jahel, the wife of Haber, the Cinite, for there was peace between Jabin, the king of Asor, and the house of Haber, the Cinite.

Douay-Rheims

וְסִֽיסְרָא֙ נָ֣ס בְּרַגְלָ֔יו אֶל־אֹ֣הֶל יָעֵ֔ל אֵ֖שֶּׁת חֶ֣בֶר הַקֵּינִ֑י כִּ֣י שָׁל֗וֹם בֵּ֚ין יָבִ֣ין מֶֽלֶךְ־חָצ֔וֹר וּבֵ֕ין בֵּ֖ית חֶ֥בֶר הַקֵּינִֽי׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

One Church Father comments on this verse

Roshdestwenski W.G.

Teacher of the Church

The author of this text recounts the story of Jael, the spouse of Heber, who struck down Sisera, the commander of Canaan, within her tent. Jael took a tent peg and a hammer in hand, approached him quietly, and drove the peg through his head, pinning him to the ground. This moment led to the demise of Sisera, and it raises the question: under what circumstances is Jael celebrated among righteous women? Why does Holy Scripture both commend her actions and extol her in Judges 5:24, which states that Jael, the wife of Heber of Kenite, is to be blessed among women?

Read more (430 words)

To understand Jael's act within its visible context could lead one to perceive it as unlawful. Observers may conclude that she acted wrongly for several reasons: first, she appeared to violate the commandment against murder (Exodus 20:13). Second, Sisera was not only a military leader under the king but also a kinsman to her husband, thus positioning her as a traitor who disturbed peace. Third, being a Kenite, she had no obligation to execute justice against an Israelite enemy. Fourth, she breached the moral obligation of hospitality, greeting him with reassurances of safety. Fifth, it can be seen as cruel to kill a man in despair who placed his trust in another for protection. Sixth, her actions and speech appeared deceitful, which raises moral concerns.

However, we must delve deeper into the matter. When Jael acted against Sisera, she committed no sin whatsoever. Firstly, she was carrying out God's command to eliminate the Canaanites, and it had been prophesied by Deborah that Sisera would meet his end this way. Thus, Jael was executing Divine will. Secondly, the Holy Spirit inspired her actions, and they are consistently celebrated rather than condemned. Thirdly, the conflict faced by Israel was justified, and both Heber and Jael were aligned with this righteous cause. Fourthly, their allegiance was far stronger to the Israelites than to Jabin or Sisera, who did not uphold true worship. Heber descended from Joab, a kin of Moses, sharing in the faith and values of the Israelites. Lastly, had Jael concealed Sisera and failed to inform Barak of his whereabouts, she would have incurred a greater sin by opposing God’s will, the prophetess's prophetic word, the just cause of Israel, and the laws of righteousness.

Moreover, one could argue the following points: a lower moral law does not supersede a higher one, thus principles of true faith and service to God should guide actions of kindness to one another. While it is indeed wrong to engage in violence against kin and disregard rightful authority, acts are justified under direct divine command, as shown through many Scriptures. b) Although Sisera was related to her by treaty, her actions were ultimately for the benefit of those bound more closely to her than he was. c) Jael had the divine right to defeat Sisera at God’s instruction. d) In just warfare, it is appropriate to employ strategy against adversaries. e) Ultimately, truth must take precedence over mere personal kindness. f) Even if Jael's words may seem deceptive, they were not false, as her intentions were noble and her actions aligned with a righteous goal.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.