To address this matter, if one evaluates this act solely based on its outward appearance, without understanding its deeper implications, one might conclude that Jael committed an unlawful act for several reasons: a) She appeared to violate the fifth commandment, which prohibits murder (Exodus 20:13). b) She took the life of a man who was a commander in the king's army, one who was allied with her husband, thus acting against a supposed friend, making her a betrayer and breaking the peace. c) As a Kenite, she seemingly lacked the right to execute justice on Sisera, who was not of her own people. d) She breached the duty of hospitality, having welcomed him with promises of safety. e) It is viewed as cruel and inhumane to slay a man who is already in peril and who depended on her for protection. f) Her actions were marked by deception, suggesting that she engaged in betrayal and falsehood. However, this view simplifies the situation.
Now, let us consider a different perspective: Jael's action against Sisera was not sinful at all. Firstly, God commanded the annihilation of the Canaanites, and the prophetess Deborah had foretold that Sisera would be delivered into the hands of a woman; thus, Jael acted in accordance with God’s will. Secondly, the Holy Spirit guided her to fulfill Deborah's prophecy, and her brave actions are commended rather than condemned. Thirdly, the conflict waged by Israel was righteous, and both Heber and Jael were called to aid in this divine mission. Fourthly, their allegiance was more closely aligned with the Israelites than with Jabin or Sisera, both of whom lacked true worship. Heber descended from the lineage of Joab, a relative of Moses, sharing the same faith and devotion as the Israelites, which earned them their favor. Fifthly, had Jael concealed Sisera rather than revealing his location to Barak, she would have committed an even greater sin by acting against the expressed will of God, the prophecy of Deborah, and the just cause for which they fought.
Additionally, objections can be raised in another manner: a) The lower laws are subordinate to the higher laws, thus the commands related to true faith and divine service should take precedence in evaluating our duties and love toward others. While it is wrong to hate parents, harm children, disrespect authority, betray allies, or act treacherously, such actions can be justified when commanded by God. This principle has numerous biblical precedents. b) Although Jael killed Sisera, he was an ally of hers, yet she acted primarily for the benefit of those who were far more aligned with her in faith. c) Jael had the divine right to eliminate Sisera as per God's command pertaining to the Israelites. d) In just warfare, strategic deception against foes is permissible. e) The truth of God's command surpasses notions of personal compassion. f) Finally, while Jael's words and actions were seemingly devious, they ultimately served a righteous purpose; therefore her intentions were good, revealing that her actions, although they contradicted her words, were directed toward achieving a virtuous outcome.
THEOSIS