The Church Fathers on this verse

Leviticus 11:47Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

That you may know the differences of the clean, and unclean, and know what you ought to eat, and what to refuse.

Douay-Rheims

לְהַבְדִּ֕יל בֵּ֥ין הַטָּמֵ֖א וּבֵ֣ין הַטָּהֹ֑ר וּבֵ֤ין הַֽחַיָּה֙ הַֽנֶּאֱכֶ֔לֶת וּבֵין֙ הַֽחַיָּ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֖ר לֹ֥א תֵאָכֵֽל׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Cyril. It is stated that both the deceased and clean animals are considered impure, and it is noted that touching a deceased animal can render one unclean. The scripture declares, “And when any cattle dies which you use for food, he that touches its dead body shall be unclean until evening; and he that eats its dead meat shall wash his clothes, and shall be unclean until evening; and he that carries its dead body shall wash his clothes, and shall be unclean until evening” (Lev. 11:39-40). This passage, as I understand it, clearly implies that one should refrain from associating with a brother who is a fornicator, licentious, an idolater, a wrongdoer, a drunkard, or a glutton; it states that one should not even share a meal with such an individual (1 Cor. 5:11).

Read more (255 words)

Hence, if any individuals recognized as righteous, those who have been purified and welcomed into spiritual communion through faith, become ensnared by the deadness of sin, they are deemed 'unclean,' and are ultimately rejected. For anyone tainted by dead works brings defilement upon those who remain in fellowship with him. Yet, if someone is defiled, they may attain cleanness through water by evening, as has been made clear in the preceding discussion. It is important to note that both the one who consumes the dead and the one who simply touches them is regarded as unclean by the law. This stance does not absolve the partaker from vice or guilt nor deem the person who approaches them innocent. We must therefore be diligent not just to avoid the wrongful acts of the immoral but also to refrain from fellowship with them; as it is stated, “Whosoever toucheth pitch shall be defiled” (Sir. 13:1), and this saying holds true. Moreover, the law has selected significant examples to illustrate moral conduct, as can be inferred from what follows: “Ye shall not defile your souls with any creeping animal, nor make yourselves unclean by them, that ye may be unclean by them: for I am the Lord your God” (Lev. 11:43-44). What impurity could the death of an animal and contact with the deceased impart to the human soul? What damage could come from food contained within the belly and expelled, as the Saviour pointed out (Matt. 15:17)? Palladius. I believe that none, indeed; your thoughts are sound.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

In summary, regarding the New Testament: If one considers being selective about food to be beneficial, let them remember that the Israelites wandered in the desert for forty years and were sustained by manna, yet still could not purify their minds. Conversely, the ark brought cleansing to all who were within it, for through faith they were delivered from the flood.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.