The Church Fathers on this verse

Leviticus 13:25Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

The priest shall view it, and if he see it turned white, and the place thereof is lower than the other skin: he shall declare him unclean, because the evil of leprosy is broken out in the scar.

Douay-Rheims

וְרָאָ֣ה אֹתָ֣הּ הַכֹּהֵ֡ן וְהִנֵּ֣ה נֶהְפַּךְ֩ שֵׂעָ֨ר לָבָ֜ן בַּבַּהֶ֗רֶת וּמַרְאֶ֙הָ֙ עָמֹ֣ק מִן־הָע֔וֹר צָרַ֣עַת הִ֔וא בַּמִּכְוָ֖ה פָּרָ֑חָה וְטִמֵּ֤א אֹתוֹ֙ הַכֹּהֵ֔ן נֶ֥גַע צָרַ֖עַת הִֽוא׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Cyril. To make a more precise distinction regarding these afflictions, the law states: "And if there be suspicion and supposition that leprosy has appeared either in a blistered wound, or in a part of the body once burnt, let the priest again apply the same care and observation. And if the seemingly blossoming white has not changed into leprosy, then let it be clear, it is said. But if the white appearing to change into leprosy, he shall be unclean and defiled" (Leviticus 13:18-28). The Law thus teaches us that spiritual weaknesses, which are countless, can be healed through a righteous life. However, if through our negligence they are allowed to resurface, Christ, our great High Priest, will assess them and deliver a just verdict.

Read more (126 words)

If the affliction has manifested only in thoughts, then the individual is not without fault: he is considered excommunicated (Leviticus 13:26), though not entirely cast away or dead. Yet, if the affliction has progressed beyond mere thoughts to desires, resulting in a complete deterioration of the individual, then the penalty for defilement must be imposed. Therefore, we must exercise great caution against reviving dormant passions, to avoid reopening spiritual wounds and reverting to former sins. Otherwise, we may find ourselves echoing the words of the saint: “But it happens to them according to the faithful proverb: the dog returns to his vomit, and: the washed pig goes to wallow in the mud” (2 Peter 2:22). Palladium. I believe your observations are both correct and quite pertinent.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

It is far more advantageous to remain uninjured and not require a healer. Restoration does not equate to joy for those who have been healed; it merely signifies an escape from affliction. Hence, the one who has been healed should exercise caution to avoid falling into sin again, lest they encounter even greater adversity. In the book of Leviticus, we find the admonition that underscores the importance of seeing with clarity. The veil over the law must not prevent us from perceiving deeper truths. For instance, leprosy often originates at the site of a burn’s scar or wound, altering the skin's hue and adding a new defilement to the existing blemish of the sore.

Read more (49 words)

I mention this to caution anyone who dismisses the call to repentance, thinking after transgressing that they can endure God’s wrath until their situation is judged. It is crucial that they resist sinning again to avoid the need for healing and the possibility of sustaining further harm after recovery.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.