The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 1:4Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

That thou mayest know the verity of those words in which thou hast been instructed.

Douay-Rheims

ινα επιγνως περι ων κατηχηθης λογων την ασφαλειαν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 29 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

He says, were eyewitnesses, because this is our chief ground for believing in a thing, that we derive it from those who were actually eyewitnesses.

The Evangelist was so far from being content with his single testimony, that he refers the whole to the Apostles, seeking from them a confirmation of his words; and therefore he adds, as they handed them down to us, who were themselves from the beginning eyewitnesses.

Or it may be, “That thou mightest feel certain and satisfied as to the truth of those things which thou hast heard, now that thou beholdest the same in writing.”

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

He writes to Theophilus, a man probably of some distinction, and a governor; for the form, Most excellent, was not used except to rulers and governors. As for example, Paul says to Festus, Most excellent Festus. (Acts 26:25.)

For frequently, when a thing is asserted by any one, and not expressed in writing, we suspect it of falsehood; but when a man has written what he asserts, we are the more inclined to believe it, as if, unless he thought it to be true, he would not commit it to writing.

By these words it is plainly implied, that Luke was not a disciple from the beginning, but became one in course of time; others were disciples from the beginning, as Peter, and the sons of Zebedee.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

In what he says of the Apostles having been eyewitnesses of the word, he agrees with John, who says, The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory. For the Word by means of the flesh was made visible.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Now they who have attempted to set forth these things in order have laboured by themselves, and have not succeeded in what they attempted. For without the assistance of man come the gifts and the grace of God, which, when it is infused, is wont so to flow, that the genius of the writer is not exhausted, but ever abounding. He well says therefore, Of things which have been fully accomplished among us, or which abound among us. For that which abounds is lacking to none, and no one doubts about that which is fulfilled, since the accomplishment builds up our faith, and the end manifests it.

When he says, It seemed good to me, he does not deny that it seemed good to God: for it is God who predisposes the wills of men. Now no one has doubted that this book of the Gospel is more full of details than the others; by these words then he claims to himself, not any thing that is false, but the truth; and therefore he says, “It seemed good to me, having investigated every thing, to write.” Not to write every thing, but from a review of every thing; “for if all the things which Jesus did were written, I do not think the world itself could contain them.” (John 21:25.) But purposely has Luke passed by things that were written by others, in order that each book of the Gospel might be distinguished by certain mysteries and miracles peculiar to itself.

This expression is used, not that we should suppose the ministry of the word to consist rather in seeing than hearing, but that, because by the word was meant not a word that can be spoken by the mouth, but one of real existence, we may understand that to have been not a common, but a Heavenly Word, to which the Apostles ministered.

Now not only did they see the Lord in the body, but also in the Word. For they saw the Word, who with Moses and Elias saw the glory of the Word. Others did not see it, who could only see the body.

For as many among the Jewish people prophesied by inspiration of the Spirit of God, but others were false prophets rather than prophets, so now also have many attempted to write Gospels which the good moneychanger refuses to pass. One gospel is mentioned which the twelve Apostles are said to have written; another Basilides presumed to write; and another is said to have been by Matthias.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

In order for you to understand and gain a stronger grasp of the solid foundation of the teachings you have received, it is important to avoid being swayed by the accounts that many have attempted to write, as mentioned earlier.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

It is plain that of one kind of knowledge, the end is in the knowledge itself, as in geometry; but of another kind, the end is counted to be in the work, as in medicine; and so it is in the word of God, and therefore having signified the knowledge by the words were themselves eyewitnesses, he points out the work by what follows, and were ministers of the word.

It is written in Exodus, The people saw the voice of the Lord. (Exod. 20:18.) Now a voice is rather heard than seen. But it was so written, to shew us that men see the voice of the Lord with other eyes, which they only have who are worthy of them. Again in the Gospel, it is not the voice that is perceived, but the Word, which is more excellent than the voice.

The effect upon his own mind, St. Luke explains by the expression, of the things which have been fully accomplished among us, i. e. have had their full manifestation among us, (as the Greek word πεπληροφορημένων signifies, which the Latin cannot express in one word,) for he had been convinced of them by sure faith and reason, and wavered not in any thing.

St. Luke hereby explains to us the source of his writing; seeing that what things he wrote, he gained not from report, but had himself traced them up from the beginning. Hence it follows, It seemed good to me also, having carefully investigated every thing from the very first, to write to thee in order, most excellent Theophilus.

Eusebius of Caesarea

4th centuryChurch Father

St. Luke at the commencement of his Gospel has told us the reason of his writing, which was, that many others had rashly taken upon themselves to give accounts of those things of which he had a more certain knowledge. And this is his meaning when he says, Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of things.

Luke is a sure witness, because he obtained his knowledge of the truth either from St. Paul’s instructions, or the instructions and traditions of the other Apostles, who were themselves eyewitnesses from the beginning.

Titus of Bostra

4th centuryChurch Father

He says, of things, because not by shadows, as the heretics say, did Jesus accomplish His advent in the flesh, but being as He was the Truth, so in very truth He performed His work.

Greek Expositor

5th centuryChurch Father

The whole Preface of this Evangelist contains two things; first, the condition of those who wrote Gospels before him, (Matthew and Mark for example;) secondly, the reason why he also himself proposed to write one.

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

Nevertheless both Matthew and John were obliged in many things that they wrote to consult those who had had means of knowing the infancy, childhood, and genealogy of our Lord, and of seeing the things which he did.

The many who are mentioned, he reckons not so much by their number, as by the variety of their manifold heresies; men who were not endued with the gift of the Holy Spirit, but engaging in a vain work, have rather set forth in order a relation of events, than woven a true history.

Theophilus means, “loving God,” or “being loved by God.” Whoever then loves God, or desires to be loved by Him, let him think this Gospel to have been written to him, and preserve it as a gift presented to him, a pledge entrusted to his care. The promise was not to explain the meaning of certain new and strange things to Theophilus, but to set forth the truth of those words in which he had been instructed; as it is added, That thou mightest know the truth of those words in which thou hast been instructed; that is, “that thou mightest be able to know in what order each thing was said or done by the Lord.”

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Luke commences his account with an introduction outlining the reasons, objectives, and aims behind composing his Gospel. He writes because numerous individuals had already initiated the creation of written records concerning the well-documented events of the Gospel narrative. The Evangelist does not explicitly detail what these various reports entailed. The term έπιχρησαν appears again in St. Luke's Acts (Acts 9:29, 19:13), where it signifies attempts that were ultimately without success. Nevertheless, the term itself merely implies undertaking a challenging endeavor and does not inherently criticize those attempts. Διηγησιν, particularly in its singular form, refers to a coherent narrative or depiction. Άνατάξασθαι translates to organizing or composing in an orderly fashion.

Read more (181 words)

Additionally, the Evangelist mentions that these records were structured as conveyed by the apostles of Christ. However, as indicated in verses 3 and 4, Luke felt dissatisfied with the existing reports, considering them inadequate for a comprehensive understanding of Christian doctrine. Through his own writing, he aimed to address these shortcomings by delivering a narrative that encompassed a) completeness (ανωθεν, πάσιν), b) precision (ακριβώς), and c) chronological arrangement of the Gospel events (καθεξής). This formed the endeavor Luke set for himself while composing the Gospel. The goal of Luke’s writing was to provide readers, particularly Theophilus, whom Luke specifically addressed, with a robust foundation rooted in the apostolic tradition pertaining to the teachings and works of the Lord, presented through a detailed, accurate, and cohesive account of the Gospel story. This illustrates that while St. Matthew aimed at addressing the faith needs of Jewish Christians from the onset of his Gospel, and St. Mark concentrated on the requirements of the Gentile Christians, St. Luke approached the matter from a shared Christian perspective, intending to meet the faith needs of both groups.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

The Apostle Matthew is credited with authoring the first Gospel, in which he recorded what he knew with assurance and significance in order to convince the Jewish people that Jesus, the Son of the Virgin Mary, is the Messiah foretold in numerous prophecies found in the Scriptures. Following him, Mark, who was a companion of the Apostle Peter, documented the oral teachings of Peter at the behest of Christians in Rome; this work, once finished and endorsed by Peter, became known as the Gospel of Mark. During this period, various individuals attempted to narrate the life events of Jesus Christ, but their accounts proved to be unreliable, leading the Church to dismiss them.

Read more (168 words)

In response, Luke, who accompanied the Apostle Paul, chose to provide an orderly account after thoroughly investigating all matters from the very beginning. He articulates the intent of his Gospel, stating that since many have undertaken to compile narratives of the events widely known among us, handed down by those who were eyewitnesses and servants of the Word from the start, it seemed fitting for him, after careful inquiry, to write an orderly account for you, esteemed Theophilus, so that you may understand the solid foundation of the teachings you have received. Much later, when John was the sole surviving Apostle, the bishops of Asia Minor requested him to author a new Gospel to counter the heresies that were on the rise. John complied with their plea and wrote his fourth Gospel, clarifying its purpose with these words: But these things are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name (John 20:31).

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The Third Gospel was authored by St. Luke, a well-known associate of St. Paul during his evangelical missions. The name Luke derives from Lucas or Lucilius. Hailing from the city of Antioch in Syria, his precise background remains uncertain. Trained as a physician, he is fondly referred to as Paul’s ‘beloved physician,’ as he likely offered his medical expertise during moments of illness and distress that frequently accompanied Paul during his arduous endeavors. In ancient times, medical training was often the domain of lower social classes, including slaves who were specifically educated for such roles. It is plausible that Luke practiced medicine in coastal towns and aboard ships, eventually becoming an attending physician to Paul on one of his journeys.

Read more (536 words)

According to tradition, he also had skills in painting, with icons attributed to him revered by the Orthodox Church as sacred relics. The timing of his conversion to the Christian faith is unclear; however, one tradition suggests he was among the seventy disciples of Christ, rendering him at least partially an eyewitness to the events of Christ’s earthly ministry. His earliest mention occurs in Troas, where he joined Paul on a journey to Macedonia, prompting the use of the first-person plural ‘we’ in the narrative of the Acts of the Apostles (Acts 16:9). Although the specifics of his conversion are unknown and not documented, he appears to have been well-acquainted with Paul before becoming an active companion. St. Luke accompanied the apostle to Philippi, after which he seems to have remained there, as he is not mentioned in the subsequent accounts of the second missionary journey. He reunited with Paul during the third journey in Philippi (Acts 20:6) and traveled alongside him through Miletus, Tyre, and Caesarea to Jerusalem, where he remained through the upheaval that led to Paul’s imprisonment. From that time onward, he was constantly at Paul’s side, enduring the harrowing shipwreck vividly recounted in Acts as they journeyed to Rome. Following Paul’s martyrdom, historical records do not reflect further details of Luke’s life; however, he continued the mission of his esteemed mentor, whom Paul had esteemed highly, referring to him in his second letter to the Corinthians as ‘a brother praised in all the churches for preaching the gospel.’ Traditional accounts suggest that Luke suffered martyrdom, thus receiving a martyr’s crown alongside many of the apostles. He is believed to have composed his Gospel around 60 A.D. Through his travels with Paul, he acquired a profound comprehension of the gospel, recognizing it as the comprehensive expression of Christ’s teachings in diverse contexts and possessing firsthand knowledge of Christ’s earthly existence. Inspired by the Holy Spirit, he crafted his Gospel with the intention of addressing a certain venerable Theophilus, who was evidently esteemed within the Christian community and sought to understand ‘the firm foundation of the doctrine in which he had been instructed.’ Prior to this, the Gospels of Matthew and Mark and other assorted accounts of notable occurrences had been in circulation; however, St. Luke aimed to provide, after meticulous research of these texts and various narratives, a reliable account of the doctrine he had learned. Aiming to ‘describe in order’ the earthly life of the Savior to Theophilus, he utilized his own experiences as an eyewitness and testimonies from other ‘eyewitnesses and ministers of the Word’ (Luke 1:1-4). Since Theophilus was likely a Gentile, the entire Gospel was crafted for Gentile Christians more broadly. Thus, the genealogy of Christ traces back to Adam, the forefather of all humanity, rather than being limited to Abraham as in Matthew’s account. The Gospel predominantly emphasizes the historical aspects of Christ’s life, offering a meticulous narrative particularly in its initial chapters, which recount events leading up to the birth of the Savior. Comprising 24 chapters, the Gospel concludes with the account of Christ’s ascension into heaven, after which the apostles ‘returned to Jerusalem with great joy and remained always in the temple, glorifying and blessing God.’

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The term 'doctrine' refers to the core beliefs of the Christian faith. According to the Evangelist, the essential underpinning of this belief system is the account of the life and teachings of Jesus Christ, commonly known as the Gospel narrative. This doctrine remains steadfast and unwavering when the events within the Gospel are deeply examined and scrutinized (Luke 1:3), thereby elevating it beyond any uncertainty. The Gospel serves as the cornerstone for the entire structure of the Christian Church as a community of believers. The phrase 'in whom he was instructed’ marks the initial evidence of catechetical teaching for those joining the Christian community, representing the foundational instruction in faith drawn from Gospel accounts. The Evangelist aims to solidify this foundational teaching through both the oral and written dissemination of the Gospel narrative, particularly seeking to embed this understanding within the heart of Theophilus.

Nekrasow A.A. Prof.

19th centuryCommentator

Our recommended passage emphasizes that numerous individuals have made an effort to create a detailed narrative of the occurrences which have profoundly impacted our faith. After thoroughly investigating everything from the beginning, I have dared to present this account to you, esteemed Theophilus, as these events have been transmitted to us by those who were firsthand witnesses and servants of the Gospel.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 8 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἵνα
    hina
    in order that
    G2443 · ἵνα
  2. ἐπιγνῷς
    epignōs
    I come to know
    G1921 · ἐπιγινώσκω
  3. περὶ
    peri
    about
    G4012 · περί
  4. ὧν
    hōn
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  5. κατηχήθης
    katēchēthēs
    I instruct orally
    G2727 · κατηχέω
  6. λόγων
    logōn
    a word
    G3056 · λόγος
  7. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. ἀσφάλειαν
    asphaleian
    safety
    G803 · ἀσφάλεια