Theophylact of Bulgaria
"It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a wealthy person to attain salvation. The analogy suggests that just as a camel cannot fit through such a narrow opening, so too is it exceedingly difficult for a rich individual to be saved. What can be concluded from this? Firstly, it is indeed true that salvation is unattainable for a rich person. Do not argue that someone who has wealth became saved after giving it away. In reality, they were not saved while still affluent, but rather when they became poor; or they were saved as a steward, not as a wealthy man. There is a distinction between a steward and a wealthy individual—one hoards riches for personal gain, while the steward manages resources for the benefit of others.
Read more (136 words)
Therefore, the individual you mention, if saved, did so not through riches, but perhaps by relinquishing all he possessed, or by handling his resources wisely, as a steward would.
Furthermore, while it is indeed challenging for the rich to receive salvation, it is not impossible. It seems that the Lord indicates that one who is enslaved by wealth and bound to it is unlikely to find salvation; however, one who possesses riches without being controlled by them may still face difficulties in achieving salvation due to human frailty. It is nearly unavoidable to misuse what we possess. The adversary seeks to ensnare us, urging the inappropriate use of our resources against the guidelines of stewardship, making it hard to elude his traps. Thus, embracing poverty can be considered a beneficial state, and it stands beyond reproach."