The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 18:25Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

Douay-Rheims

ευκοπωτερον γαρ εστιν καμηλον δια τρυμαλιας ραφιδος εισελθειν η πλουσιον εις την βασιλειαν του θεου εισελθειν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 11 commentaries

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a wealthy person to attain salvation. The analogy suggests that just as a camel cannot fit through such a narrow opening, so too is it exceedingly difficult for a rich individual to be saved. What can be concluded from this? Firstly, it is indeed true that salvation is unattainable for a rich person. Do not argue that someone who has wealth became saved after giving it away. In reality, they were not saved while still affluent, but rather when they became poor; or they were saved as a steward, not as a wealthy man. There is a distinction between a steward and a wealthy individual—one hoards riches for personal gain, while the steward manages resources for the benefit of others.

Read more (136 words)

Therefore, the individual you mention, if saved, did so not through riches, but perhaps by relinquishing all he possessed, or by handling his resources wisely, as a steward would.

Furthermore, while it is indeed challenging for the rich to receive salvation, it is not impossible. It seems that the Lord indicates that one who is enslaved by wealth and bound to it is unlikely to find salvation; however, one who possesses riches without being controlled by them may still face difficulties in achieving salvation due to human frailty. It is nearly unavoidable to misuse what we possess. The adversary seeks to ensnare us, urging the inappropriate use of our resources against the guidelines of stewardship, making it hard to elude his traps. Thus, embracing poverty can be considered a beneficial state, and it stands beyond reproach."

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Due to the ruler's inability to follow the wise counsel of selling his possessions, which would have greatly benefited him, our Lord reveals the affliction that resides within the wealthy. He illustrates this by stating, “How hard it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God! But I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” Here, the term camel is not taken literally as the animal, but rather signifies a thick rope, as it is common among skilled navigators to refer to robust ropes as ‘camels’. Importantly, He does not entirely eliminate the hope for the wealthy, but rather provides a path for their salvation. He clarifies that while it is not impossible for a rich man to enter, it indeed comes with considerable difficulty.

As this authority figure found himself incapable and could hardly tolerate the announcement regarding the sale of the estate, despite the favorable outcome and sufficient compensation, our Lord reveals the frailty hidden within the wealthy, proclaiming: How hard it is for those with riches to enter the kingdom of God! I tell you that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a wealthy individual to enter the kingdom of God (Lk 18:24-25; Mt 19:24; Mk 10:25). Interestingly, Jesus does not utilize the term κάμηλος (camel), which refers to the animal itself, but rather κάμιλος (a thick rope), reflecting the common practice among seafarers who refer to thicker ropes as κάμιλοι.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Great significance lies in these words, profound in their meaning! What stronger declaration could one make against a wealthy individual boasting of their riches than to assert the unnaturalness of such a lack of generosity? We should discard ornamental language, as it diminishes the message! The intention was not to soothe the individual who spurns mercy, but rather to confront him. Yet, if some are more drawn to eloquent speech than to the robust truth conveyed by straightforward language, they should, like earnest suitors seeking a bride, value character over mere appearance.

Read more (299 words)

A bridegroom interested in the virtue of his beloved's spirit will overlook her outward beauty; similarly, those who appreciate linguistic beauty should seek the profound significance—essentially the essence—of the words, rather than merely dwell on the superficial intricacies of language.

Thus, the camel can serve as a symbol for the Gentile nations. The roaring lion, in his quest to consume (1 Pet. 5:8), drives this camel—burdened with treasures—into desolation, reflecting the prophetic visions. They carried their wealth on donkeys and camels amid lamentation and desire (Is. 30:6). It is fitting for the camel to represent the Gentiles, who, before embracing faith, were marred by the distortions of superstition, embodying a kind of bestial repulsiveness. It is easier for such a sinner to enter by the narrow gate—see Matthew 7:13—which symbolizes Christ, who endured the anguish of his corporal existence by death, threading through like a needle, and thus mending the torn fabric of our humanity—than for the Jewish nation, enriched by the law yet lacking in faith, angry and burdened by shame from their transgressions.

Furthermore, we can also comprehend this teaching in a moral sense concerning any sinner and the self-righteous rich man. Does it not seem that the tax collector in the parable, weighed down by his sins and too ashamed to raise his eyes to God, can pass through the eye of the needle represented by his confession into God's kingdom, much like a camel, more easily than the Pharisee, who is self-assured in his prayers, boasts of his perfection, seeks personal glory, criticizes acts of charity, extols himself, blames others, and prefers to call God as a witness rather than turning to Him in supplication? And if one despises a camel, let him disdain the one who embodies an even greater repugnance than a camel.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

This is all made evident in that chapter.

Notes: * Matthew 19:24-26.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

When the young man left, the Lord told His disciples how challenging it is for a wealthy individual to enter the kingdom of heaven. By "wealth," He referred not just to money or possessions, but to everything that people typically regard as valuable, excluding God. The disciples, interpreting His words literally, asked, "Who then can be saved if every earthly attachment hinders entry into God's kingdom?" The Lord replied, "with men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible." Humanity, unable to sever ties with worldly possessions on its own, can attain such detachment through divine grace. Each disciple began to reflect on their own situation.

Read more (41 words)

While it appeared they had given much to follow the Lord—leaving family, homes, and belongings—they also recognized a lingering lack of the purity and detachment that the Lord desired. What was their fate? Would it mirror that of the young man?

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

After the young man had left, Jesus, observing the surroundings, sought to emphasize His message by stating: “How hard it is for those who possess wealth to enter the kingdom of God!” The disciples were taken aback by His remarks. Yet, Jesus reiterated this statement, elaborating on the challenge faced by the affluent in attaining entrance to the heavenly realm: “How hard it is for those who trust in riches to enter the kingdom of God!” He complemented this with the saying, “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” The disci

Read more (114 words)

ples were astonished by His teachings and inquired, “Then who can be saved?” Every individual grapples with various sinful tendencies and vices; some earthly attachments can be even more compelling and corrupting than the yearning for wealth. If it proves so challenging for a wealthy individual to enter the kingdom of God, who then has the hope of salvation? In response, Christ said, “With men it is impossible, but with God all things are possible.” Indeed, it is arduous for someone devoted to material wealth or other earthly pursuits to find salvation, as achieving freedom from the chains of sin is a formidable task; such liberation is attainable only through the grace of God.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a proud wealthy individual to enter the kingdom of God. While the Greek term "kamelon" can be translated as "camel," some interpret it as a ship's rope. Possessing wealth, when honestly obtained as a blessing from God, is not inherently sinful, and one should not feel compelled to abandon it at all costs. The true danger lies not in the wealth itself, but in the enslavement to it through greed, which diverts one's focus away from God. This inclination can be so overpowering that those who surrender to it struggle to overcome it.

Read more (43 words)

Therefore, it is generally quite challenging for a wealthy person to enter the kingdom of God, and just as impossible for an arrogant rich person as it is for a camel or a ship's rope to pass through the eye of a needle.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

From this event, Christ imparted a vital teaching to His listeners, emphasizing how challenging it is for a wealthy individual to enter the kingdom of God. He stated, "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle," a phrase that referred to the small side gates of city walls, which were accessible only to certain individuals, making it impossible for a laden camel to squeeze through such narrow openings. This serves as a metaphor for the difficulty faced by a wealthy person, who is entirely consumed by worldly possessions, in obtaining entry into the kingdom of God.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The narrative of the dialogue with the affluent young man and the disciples in Luke aligns perfectly with the descriptions found in Hebrews. Similarly, Luke's portrayal of the conversation is consistent with the accounts presented in Mark and Matthew, the latter of which includes a more detailed response from Peter. Refer to the texts of Matthew 19:16-30 and Mark 10:17-31 for further clarification. The phrase “A certain one of those in authority” is translated in Matthew as a specific individual (Matthew 19:16), described as a young man (Matthew 19:20); in Luke, this individual is characterized as one of the rulers, possibly a synagogue leader, as seen in Matthew 9:13.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

The removal of the young man illustrated how the attachment to material wealth can be a formidable barrier for many seeking to enter the kingdom of heaven. The Lord turned to His disciples and remarked, “How difficult it is for those who possess riches to enter the kingdom of God! Truly I tell you, it is easier for a person who is not wealthy to enter into the kingdom of heaven.” Wealth, as St. John Chrysostom notes, “is inherently neutral; it can be good or bad depending on its steward,” while St.

Read more (240 words)

Basil the Great affirms that, “for the righteous soul, wealth is a tool for good works, but for one who is self-indulgent and hedonistic, it becomes merely an instrument of luxury.” The gravity of the Lord’s message struck the disciples; they were deeply troubled by the harshness of this teaching. He then reiterated with renewed emphasis, “Children, how difficult it is for those who rely on riches to enter the Kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the Kingdom of God." The path to the Kingdom of Heaven is narrow, while wealth is often burdensome and inappropriate, as St. John Chrysostom asserts. The Savior employed a well-known saying of the time to convey the extreme challenge, if not impossibility, of such a situation. The disciples, astonished by this revelation, questioned one another, “Who then can be saved?” They were themselves of humble means and expressed their bewilderment not about their own circumstances but concerning others among them, who were perceived to be less devout. The Teacher of divine wisdom, with a calm and gentle gaze, soothed their troubled hearts and alleviated their confusion, as St. John Chrysostom states, teaching them to evaluate salvation not through human frailty, but by divine might, as Blessed Theophylact recounts. "With man,” He explained, “this is impossible, but not with God; for with God all things are possible.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 16 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. εὐκοπώτερον
    eukopōteron
    easier
    G2123 · εὐκοπώτερος
  2. γάρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  4. κάμηλον
    kamēlon
    a camel
    G2574 · κάμηλος
  5. διὰ
    dia
    through
    G1223 · διά
  6. τρήματος
    trēmatos
    hole
    G6085 · τρῆμα
  7. βελόνης
    belonēs
    needle
    G6011 · βελόνη
  8. εἰσελθεῖν
    eiselthein
    I go in
    G1525 · εἰσέρχομαι
  9. ἢ
    ē
    or
    G2228 · ἤ
  10. πλούσιον
    plousion
    rich
    G4145 · πλούσιος
  11. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  12. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. βασιλείαν
    basileian
    kingship
    G932 · βασιλεία
  14. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  16. εἰσελθεῖν
    eiselthein
    I go in
    G1525 · εἰσέρχομαι