The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 2:6Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And it came to pass that when they were there, her days were accomplished that she should be delivered.

Douay-Rheims

εγενετο δε εν τω ειναι αυτους εκει επλησθησαν αι ημεραι του τεκειν αυτην

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Among the celebrations, there exists a feast that deserves the utmost honor and reverence, more than any other, and can rightfully be regarded as the foremost of all feasts. What is this significant feast? It is the Nativity of Christ in the flesh. This event serves as the origin and foundation for the Epiphany, the holy Easter, the Ascension, and Pentecost. If Christ had not taken on human flesh at His birth, He would not have been baptized, which corresponds to the Epiphany; nor would He have suffered crucifixion, which is commemorated at Easter; nor would He have bestowed the Holy Spirit, as celebrated during Pentecost. Therefore, these sacred occasions flow from the Nativity of Christ, akin to various rivers that arise from a common source.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The Gospel account meticulously traces the lineage up to Joseph, a descendant of David, indicating that the Virgin also belonged to the Davidic line, in accordance with divine law that stipulates spouses must share the same tribe. The great Apostle Paul, who elucidates the heavenly truths, affirms this by declaring that our Lord arose from the tribe of Judah (Heb 7:14). Although the natures involved in this true unity are distinct, they are both encompassed within one God the Son, for the uniqueness of each nature was not negated by their union, which consists of both natures coming together. Thus, we profess one Christ, one Son, one Lord.

Read more (136 words)

Emphasizing this indivisible unity, we declare the holy Virgin as the Mother of God because the Word of God became incarnate, uniting with the human temple taken from her during this miraculous conception. We observe that the two natures are joined in a bond that is indissoluble, marked by their inseparability. While flesh remains flesh and does not equate to divinity, even though it has been elevated to divine status, so too, the Word is God and not flesh, despite having taken on flesh. Since the natures involved in this unity are distinct and unequal, yet there exists only One who encompasses them both, we do not separate the Lord Jesus Christ into humanity and divinity, but rather affirm that Jesus Christ is one and the same, recognizing the distinct natures while maintaining their inseparable connection.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

St. Luke presents a concise account of the circumstances surrounding the earthly birth of Christ. For insights into His divine birth, one should consult the Gospel of St. John, which starts from the heavenly realm and moves to our earthly existence. In this Gospel, you will uncover answers to the pivotal questions of when He existed, how He came to be, what His nature was, His actions before His incarnation, His works during His time on earth, where He was, and from where He descended. It states, "In the beginning was the Word," which addresses His existence, and "the Word was with God," which explains His nature. Furthermore, it affirms, "the Word was God" (John 1:1).

Read more (794 words)

It reveals His previous actions: "All things were made by Him" (John 1:3), and His deeds during His manifestation: "There was the true Light which lights every man coming into the world" (John 1:9). It also notes His presence in this world: "He was in the world" (John 1:10) and His arrival: "He came unto His own" (John 1:11). The manner of His coming is expressed as "the Word became flesh" (John 1:14). John the Baptist clarifies the timing of His arrival: "This is He of whom I said, 'He that cometh after me is preferred before me, for He was before me'" (John 1:30). Additionally, John reveals the purpose of His coming: "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world" (John 1:29). After understanding both of His births, their significance, and the purpose of His mission—to embody the speech of a dying world, to eradicate sin and the plague of death (cf. 2 Tim. 1:10) by Himself, who transcends death—it is now time for Luke the Evangelist to instruct us on the paths of the Lord following the Incarnation.

We believe the absence of John’s early life narrative serves a greater purpose, which should not perplex anyone—Christ’s youth is indeed addressed. It is not given to everyone to say, "To the weak I became weak, that I might gain the weak. I am made all things to all men" (1 Cor. 9:22). No one else can claim that He was "wounded for our transgressions," and became frail because of our sins (Is. 53:5). He was an Adolescent, a Child, so that you might attain spiritual maturity (cf. Eph. 4:13). He was wrapped in swaddling clothes that you might be released from death's chains (cf. Ps. 17:6), laid in a manger so that you might approach the altar, He descended to Earth that you might rise to the heavens; He had no accommodation in an inn so that you could have a multitude of heavenly dwelling places (cf. Eph. 2:6, Jn. 14:2). He, who is rich— as the apostle states—-became poor for your sakes, that through His poverty you might be enriched (2 Cor. 8:9). This poverty is wealth to me, and the Lord’s frailty is my power. He accepted poverty to offer abundance to all. The cry of His infancy reaches me, and His tears have cleansed my transgressions. Lord Jesus, I owe more to your sacrificial acts that redeemed me than to your creative essence that formed me. Our birth would have been of no value without redemption.

However, let no one confine the divine essence to physical form and actions. One pertains to the flesh, while the other embodies the glory of the divine. He assumed frailty for your benefit, yet remains strong in divine essence; He embraced poverty for your sake, yet is wealthy in divine nature. Do not judge by appearances, but recognize the redemption prepared for you. You see Him in humble attire, but not His glory in heaven. You hear the infant's cry, but do not notice the ox's lowing, which acknowledges its Lord; for the ox knows its master and the donkey its master's manger (Isaiah 1:3). The distinction in terminology matters little to me if the meaning remains unchanged. If a renowned orator—among those who appreciate eloquence—argued that the fate of Greece does not hinge on his words but on the essence of the matter, and if esteemed philosophers, known for their debates, fail to use language correctly simply to convey their thoughts more precisely, how much more should we prioritize understanding the mysteries of God over mere words? Such mysteries hold the real significance, as the wonders of divine actions shine with the light of truth, unadorned by embellishments. Indeed, even the insightful donkey (see Num. 22:21-23) was nourished by the sacred manger, not by deceptive words, but by true sustenance.

Consider the Lord and the manger, which reveals the divine mystery: the unreasonable nations, akin to cattle in a feed trough, shall be nourished with the abundant sacred food. The sheep, symbolizing the Gentiles, recognizes her manger, proclaiming, "The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want" (Psalms 22:1). Are the signs that attest to the divinity of the Child insignificant: angels ministering, wise men worshiping, and martyrs confessing (see: Lk. 2:9, Mk. 1:13, Mt. 2:1-12, 16)? He emerges from the womb yet shines from heaven, He lies in an inn yet reigns in divine radiance. He was born of a woman but conceived by a virgin; conceived by a woman yet born of a virgin. St. Matthew has shared many mysteries, which St. Luke deemed unnecessary to reiterate since they were already shared, feeling enriched to convey the story of the manger in which the Lord lay.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

While they were present, the moment arrived for her to deliver; and she brought forth her firstborn Son. We have already examined the significance of the term 'Firstborn' at the conclusion of the preface to the Gospel of Matthew, where it states, "and knew her not, when at last she gave birth to her firstborn Son." She wrapped Him in swaddling clothes and placed Him in a manger, for there was no space for them in the inn. An inn serves as a refuge, yet due to the lack of room, He was laid in the feeding trough of uncommunicative animals. For He, being the Word, was about to nourish humanity with the message of the gospel and liberate us from our base instincts.

Read more (60 words)

Consider also the initial chapter of Matthew's Gospel for the clarification of the phrase, "And when they entered the house, they saw the child." The child was in the manger. The manger symbolizes the world, and the uncommunicative animals represent us. Thus, in order to deliver us from irrationality (wordlessness), it was His pleasure to be placed in a manger.

Gregory the Great

6th centuryChurch Father

He was not born within His parents' dwelling but rather during their journey, illustrating that due to the humanity He embraced, His birth occurred in what seemed like a distant land. I refer to this as a foreign territory not by authority but by essence. For concerning His dominion, it is written, “He came into His own” (John 1:11). However, in His essence, He existed before time, and in our human experience, He entered at a designated moment. Thus, He who is eternal manifested in a temporal existence, making the place He descended to unfamiliar to Him.

Romanos Melodos

6th centuryChurch Father

Opened is Eden, come and let us witness; we have discovered the concealed nourishment; come, let us enjoy the blessings of paradise found in the manger. There is a root untouched by water, offering forgiveness; there is a deep well, which David yearned to taste; there, the Virgin, upon giving birth to the Child, promptly satisfied the thirst of both Adam and David. Let us hasten to the spot where the new Child, the Eternal God, was born.

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

Luke refers to the Lord as the firstborn of all humanity, not implying that the blessed Virgin Mary had other children after Him or that the blessed Mother of God bore other offspring, for she remained perpetually chaste alongside her husband Joseph. It is essential to note that he aptly designates Him as the firstborn, as John declares: To those who received Him, He gave the right to become children of God (Jn 1:12). Among these children, the one who is rightly acknowledged as having precedence is He who, even before His incarnation, was the Son of God, eternally begotten without a beginning. Yet He descended to our world, born of our nature, and graced us with His divine participation, as the Apostle stated, ‘Let Him be the firstborn among many brethren’ (Rom 8:29).

Read more (136 words)

He is the sole begotten in the essence of the Godhead, the firstborn in the experience of human form; firstborn in grace, uniquely begotten by nature. He was wounded for our transgressions and afflicted for our iniquities (Is 53:5). It is significant to note that the sign of the Savior's birth is a Child swaddled not in royal purple but in humble garments, found not in a throne of gold, but in simple cloth. He embraced not only humility and mortality for our sake but also the simplicity of poor attire. Though He was rich, He became impoverished for us, so that we might be enriched through His poverty, as the Lord of heaven willingly embraced earthly poverty to teach those born on earth the value of humility, in order to inherit the kingdom of heaven.

Innocentius of Kherson

19th centuryChurch Father

Why is it that the evangelist does not mention Bethlehem directly? Previously, the evangelist included specific details, referring to ‘the city of David, Bethlehem,’ yet now simply states ‘there.’ When we reflect on the traditions surrounding the birthplace of Jesus Christ, we find ourselves unable to pinpoint with certainty His exact location of birth. He was indeed born in Bethlehem, but also possibly in its vicinity. The stable where Christ was born may have been located at the outskirts of the city, intended for the ease of travelers. ‘The days were fulfilled.’ This phrase also applies to John, who came into the world after a designated time.

Read more (127 words)

Origen notes that such terminology is particularly relevant when discussing the births of the righteous; thus, in the case of the Holiest One, this fulfillment is of utmost significance. The fulfillment of time encompasses not just Mary, but all of creation. One could argue that the conception of Jesus Christ resonates within the heart of all humanity. He Himself stated, ‘the Son of Man will be in the heart of the earth’ following His death (Matthew 12:40). His presence on earth unifies all forces of both the human and angelic realms, encompassing all time. This understanding of time transcends our comprehension, leading to various interpretations of Revelation. As we examine the Gospel accounts regarding the life of Jesus Christ, we delve into the mystery of His Nativity.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

Since Mary resided in Nazareth and received the messenger's revelation there, one might assume that her Son would be born in that same place, as the angel announced. However, the One who orchestrated all the details surrounding this birth had significant reasons to alter that plan. The Messiah, being a descendent of David, was destined to be born in Bethlehem, the city of David. It was essential for His lineage to be clearly established, especially considering that the humble descendant of David would later depart from his ancestral town and settle in Galilee, a region that was looked down upon by the proud citizens of Jerusalem.

Read more (426 words)

Additionally, it was widely known from ancient prophecy—given prior to the Babylonian exile—that Bethlehem would be the birthplace of the illustrious Leader of Israel, as foretold from ancient times (Micah 5:2). Although Bethlehem had diminished from a town to a mere village, the people still directed their hopes toward it in their search for the Messiah (Matthew 2:5-6; John 7:42). Divine Providence did not require supernatural intervention to guide Jesus' parents to Bethlehem or to reveal their Davidic lineage. Both prerequisites were fulfilled by the census mandated by the Roman government in Judea near the close of Herod’s reign. This census expressed Augustus’ disdain for the Jewish king, and since Herod greatly coveted the emperor's favor, the census was to be conducted swiftly. However, the Jewish law mandated that individuals be registered in their ancestral town rather than the place of residence. Therefore, Joseph, despite the need to remain in Nazareth, traveled promptly with Mary to Bethlehem. Upon their arrival, the town was overflowing with people gathering for the census, leaving no accommodation available for the impoverished but noble strangers from Nazareth in the inn, which would have been more suitable for Mary in the late stages of her pregnancy. Instead, they took shelter in a cave nearby, likely situated on the very hillside of Bethlehem, where flocks had often been pastured (1 Kings 17:15). In this humble setting, the Lord was born! Tradition holds that the cave was filled with light at the moment of Jesus' birth, enveloped in a radiant cloud that dazzled all who approached. Yet, Christ would be venerated by the faithful even in the absence of such illumination; the child still required concealment. Mary herself received Him, wrapped Him in swaddling clothes, and laid Him in the manger, the most practical resting place available. It is left to individual interpretation what those present during this divine nativity felt or thought. Perhaps their sentiments were more bewilderment than exalted joy. The Son of the Most High was encountered in such a lowly state! The One whom John leaped for in his mother’s womb lay in a simple stable, among animals. When John, herald of the Messiah, entered the world, all relatives rejoiced with his mother; yet Mary remained solitary with her child. The Messiah was meant to liberate the people from oppression—yet, the ongoing census signified a tightening grip of foreign rule over God's people. Who could remain unaffected by such thoughts, and how could the feelings of delight not wane among those still unacquainted with the mission of this new arrival?

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

While Joseph and Mary stayed in Bethlehem, the moment arrived for her to deliver her child. Due to the overwhelming number of people in the town, the humble family had no place to stay in a conventional home, prompting Mary to lay her newborn in a feeding trough. This likely occurred in the same modest inn where they were lodged, characterized by its limited space, which left no suitable area for them among the occupants.

Read more (158 words)

The inns in that region typically consisted of simple structures built from uncut stone, often featuring a central courtyard for livestock and a covered area for travelers that did not provide separation from the animals. The floor, known as the leevan, was elevated above the area where the cattle were kept, with no furnishings available for guests. Travelers seeking comfort were required to bring their own rugs for sitting or resting. If a later-arriving horse owner found all the rugs occupied, they would face the challenge of finding a small corner on the unclean floor free from the presence of other animals. Many similar accommodations, where animals were housed, could also be found in the numerous caves and gorges prevalent in the limestone hills of the Palestinian landscape. It is believed that the inn in Bethlehem may have been constructed from such a cave, a belief supported by the long-standing traditions of both the Eastern and Western Churches.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

The Eastern Churches commenced the observance of Christ’s Nativity only towards the conclusion of the fourth century, adopting December 25 as the date based on the precedent set by the Western Churches. John Chrysostom elucidates the rationale behind the celebration of Christ’s Nativity on this date by both Western and Eastern Christians; it was believed that Zacharias served as the high priest and that the angel appeared to him behind the veil in the Holy of Holies, a place the high priest entered once each year during the Feast of Atonement. This feast occurred at the end of September, specifically on the tenth day of the seventh lunar month (see Lev. 16:29). Consequently, the day corresponding to the conception of Christ was recognized as the first day of the Holy Spirit.

Read more (289 words)

The conception of the Forerunner was thought to take place on September 23; counting nine months from that date leads to the understanding that John the Baptist was born on June 24. Following this, in March, the angel's announcement to the Virgin Mary occurred six months after John's conception. Following this announcement, Mary visited Elizabeth and remained with her for about three months before returning home prior to June 24; thus, the Annunciation is celebrated on March 25, leading to Jesus Christ’s birth on December 25. Similarly, the Circumcision is commemorated on the eighth day, January 1, and the Purification on the fortieth day, February 2. These calculations assume that Zechariah held the high priestly position; however, this notion is questionable, as Josephus Flavius does not list him among the high priests of that era. Furthermore, as recorded by the Evangelist Luke, Zacharias was a priest from the lineage of Abijah, and high priests were not classified by lineage. He might have taken on the role of high priest for the priestly division of Abijah during the incident described, as he was selected by lot to enter the Sanctuary for incense burning. Nevertheless, this does not classify him as the high priest. Additionally, Luke indicates that Zacharias entered the Lord’s temple for incense as one chosen by lot from the regular priests, thereby entering the Sanctuary where the altar of incense was located, rather than the Holy of Holies. Thus, while we commemorate December 25 as the birthday of Christ, we remain unaware of the true date of His birth, just as we do not have knowledge of the dates of John’s conception, the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, John’s birth, Jesus’ circumcision, and His encounter with Simeon.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Because Joseph could trace his lineage back to King David, he was required to travel to Bethlehem, the birthplace of his esteemed ancestor, to register his name. This journey likely occurred during the winter, approximately 750 years after the founding of Rome. However, the winters in Palestine can be relatively mild, often resulting in greenery in the fields after the November rains, where shepherds would take their flocks for grazing. Thus, despite the long journey ahead, Joseph decided to bring Mary along with him, who also descended from the line of David and felt a strong urge to visit the land of her royal forebear, especially with the imminent birth of her son, who was named David.

Read more (583 words)

After making necessary preparations for their arduous trip, including packing provisions calculated for their travels, Joseph and Mary set out.

After leaving the mountainous region where Nazareth was situated, they took the route that led through the valley of Jezreel, an area that seems desolate now yet was once vibrant and bustling with industry. According to the historian Josephus, Galilee at that time was densely populated, with around 240 towns and villages, each containing no fewer than fifteen thousand inhabitants. Even if this account features some exaggeration, it is irrefutable that the region had a very high population density. An Arabian legend even mentions that one could travel there for an entire year without spending two nights in the same village. Their journey took them through various towns and sites that stirred treasured historical reflections in any discerning traveler. Passing the rounded summit of Mount Tabor on their left, their road continued directly south towards Jezreel, which was formerly the proud capital of the wicked King Ahab. A little to the east of Jezreel lay the hills of Gilboa, where the ill-fated King Saul had perished in a fierce battle against the Philistines, and to the right was Dothan, known for its lush pastures, where Joseph had once sought out his brothers and fell victim to their treacherous malice.

The road led them through rich gardens, vineyards, and fertile fields towards Samaria, which had recently been renovated by Herod to an impressive extent, earning it the Greek name Sebastia, in honor of his Roman lord Augustus. However, the righteous travelers could not linger in Samaria or any Samaritan towns, as they were often met with disdainful or unfriendly attitudes due to the long-standing animosity between Samaritans and Jews. Thus, perhaps after a brief stop at Jacob's well near Shechem, they hurried to depart from the Samaritan territory in search of rest in the sacred land of Israel. Upon crossing the hill of Akravvim, the boundary between Samaria and Judea, they entered Judea and were greeted with memories cherished by every Jew.

Their first sight was the sacred site of Shiloh, where the tabernacle had once stood and where the devout Hannah had come in her deep sorrow to seek the Lord. Next came Gilgal, where her great son, the renowned prophet Samuel, was later established. Then their path led them through numerous cities and locations rich in historical significance, ultimately arriving at the very gates of Jerusalem. However, Joseph and Mary's destination was not the capital of Israel, but rather the birthplace of their royal ancestor, David, located in Bethlehem, about ten furlongs south of Jerusalem.

Bethlehem was situated on the steep slope of a mountain, with its narrow, winding streets forming irregular patterns and offering breathtaking views of the surrounding hills. On one of these hills, about five furlongs to the east, stood Herod's fortress, Herodium, while further east, beyond the Jordan River, loomed the majestic Moab mountains, where sunlight danced in captivating hues at dawn and dusk. The mountain of Bethlehem itself was encircled by cliffs that descended in broad ledges into the valleys below, with areas adorned by vineyards and diverse fruit trees, including olives, figs, and pomegranates. In the small plain adjacent to the city, barley fields turned green during certain seasons; this was the same field that once belonged to the wealthy Boaz, where Ruth, the great-grandmother of King David, gleaned leftover grain and found the happiness that immortalized her name in the annals of the chosen people.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 13 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἐγένετο
    egeneto
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  4. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. εἶναι
    einai
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  6. αὐτοὺς
    autous
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  7. ἐκεῖ
    ekei
    there
    G1563 · ἐκεῖ
  8. ἐπλήσθησαν
    eplēsthēsan
    I fill
    G4130 · πλήθω
  9. αἱ
    hai
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. ἡμέραι
    hēmerai
    a day
    G2250 · ἡμέρα
  11. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. τεκεῖν
    tekein
    I bear
    G5088 · τίκτω
  13. αὐτήν
    autēn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός