The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 20:5Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But they thought within themselves, saying: If we shall say, From heaven: he will say: Why then did you not believe in him?

Douay-Rheims

οι δε συνελογισαντο προς εαυτους λεγοντες οτι εαν ειπωμεν εξ ουρανου ερει δια τι ουκ επιστευσατε αυτω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Through this inquiry, He silences their voices and reveals that if they could not accept the testimony of a prophet like John, whom they regarded as esteemed, how could they trust His explanation regarding the authority behind His actions? Regardless of what He proclaimed, they would find a way to misinterpret and mock His words, just as they had disregarded the esteemed declarations of John, who was held in high regard among them.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Observe the profound unrighteousness of the Pharisees: they turn away from the truth; they spurn the light; they possess no fear of sin. They are, in fact, hesitant to proclaim the truth, anxious that they might be questioned, ‘Why did you not have faith in Him?’ Yet, they do not rebuke the Forerunner, lacking reverence for God and instead fearing the opinions of the people. Consequently, they mask the truth, responding, 'We do not know.'

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

The Sanhedrin had already resolved to execute Him and sought to cloak their actions in a semblance of justice. They aimed to find grounds on which to accuse Him either on spiritual or political matters, hoping to extract statements from His teachings that could imply ecclesiastical misconduct or raise suspicions about His political views. When they encountered the Lord again in the temple, the members of the Sanhedrin quickly challenged Him, asking by what authority He performed such actions. This inquiry likely concerned not only His conduct in the temple but also His overall mission as the Messiah. The Lord discerned their hidden motives and chose not to provide a direct response.

Read more (118 words)

Instead, He posed a question to them that complicated their deceptive agenda: Who gave John the right to perform his ministry? Was his authority of human origin or Divine? If they affirmed the latter, they would have been apprehensive about the implications that could arise from such an acknowledgment. However, they were also reluctant to reject it openly, fearing that doing so might incite the public, who regarded John as a prophet, against them. Consequently, they offered the ambiguous response, "We do not know," prompting the Lord to reply in kind. They ought to have been truthful in their response; had they done so, they could have ultimately been guided toward answering the very question they had raised.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

When Jesus Christ entered the temple on Tuesday and began teaching, His interactions with the crowd were interrupted by the chief priests and scribes. They approached Him as representatives of the Sanhedrin, similar to how a group had approached John the Baptist (John 1:19, etc.), and inquired about the source of His authority—whether it was divine or merely human—specifically who conferred this authority upon Him, such as who ordained Him for this role. In response, Jesus posed a question of His own: Was John a prophet or a fraud? Since it was evident that John was a prophet sent by God, Jesus’ query indirectly revealed His own identity, for John had testified of Jesus as the Messiah. The chief priests and scribes recognized this implication but were unwilling to confirm it. They feared admitting John's prophetic status, as they would do so in front of the crowd that revered John. Thus, they responded, "We do not know!" Consequently, Jesus declined to provide them with a direct answer to their inquiry.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

The Sanhedrin dispatched the priests and Levites affiliated with the Pharisees to inquire about John’s identity. John clarified that he was not the Messiah, indicating that the Messiah was already present among them (John 1:26). After a period of fasting and temptation lasting forty days, Jesus arrived at the Jordan, where John was explaining his mission to the Sanhedrin's envoys. John then pointed to Jesus and proclaimed, “Behold, He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). He also shared with them how the Holy Spirit descended upon Jesus during His baptism and how a voice from heaven proclaimed Him as the Son of God. The members of the Sanhedrin were well aware of these events.

Read more (152 words)

Therefore, if they had acknowledged Jesus’ inquiry affirming that John was a prophet sent from God, they would have had to concede that the divine envoy had stated the truth and that Jesus was indeed the Messiah, the Son of God. The question posed by Jesus astonished the Sanhedrin due to its unexpected nature. They had likely prearranged their inquiries and responses, but they did not anticipate such a profound question, necessitating a discussion among themselves in the temple to formulate an answer. They considered that if they claimed, “From heaven,” Jesus would respond, “Why did you not believe him when he testified to you about me, calling me the Christ, the Son of God?” This would lead the people to declare Him King of Israel and potentially incite rebellion against Caesar, resulting in the Romans taking control of both their position and their people. Thus, they deemed this an unsuitable response.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

There was no way to dismiss it as unimportant. John openly testified about Jesus, acknowledging Him before the highest authorities of the Sanhedrin, not just as a prophet, but as the greatest prophet, the Messiah. Did they accept this testimony or deny it? It is evident that Christ was justified in seeking a response from them before providing His own. However, they could neither provide an answer nor were they willing to do so. He had them in a difficult position. They would not declare, “from heaven,” as they had rejected this idea; nor could they assert, “from men,” since their faith in John, as even noted by Josephus Flavius, was so robust and unanimous that openly contradicting it would have endangered their safety.

Read more (71 words)

Therefore, these leaders of Israel found themselves shamefully compelled to respond, “We do not know.” Such an answer from those tasked with studying and explaining the law and religion was utterly disgraceful, particularly in front of a large crowd. Nevertheless, Christ, in His boundless compassion, refrained from pressing further for answers, simply responding, “And I will not tell you by what authority I do this,” before continuing to teach the people.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. συνελογίσαντο
    synelogisanto
    I reason
    G4817 · συλλογίζομαι
  4. πρὸς
    pros
    to
    G4314 · πρός
  5. ἑαυτοὺς
    heautous
    himself
    G1438 · ἑαυτοῦ
  6. λέγοντες
    legontes
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  7. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  8. Ἐὰν
    ean
    if
    G1437 · ἐάν
  9. εἴπωμεν
    eipōmen
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  10. Ἐξ
    ex
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  11. οὐρανοῦ
    ouranou
    the sky
    G3772 · οὐρανός
  12. ἐρεῖ
    erei
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  13. Διὰ
    dia
    through
    G1223 · διά
  14. τί
    ti
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  15. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  16. ἐπιστεύσατε
    episteusate
    I believe
    G4100 · πιστεύω
  17. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός