The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 24:35Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And they told what things were done in the way: and how they knew him in the breaking of bread.

Douay-Rheims

και αυτοι εξηγουντο τα εν τη οδω και ως εγνωσθη αυτοις εν τη κλασει του αρτου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 28 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

And therefore our Lord goes on to shew that all these things did not happen in a common way, but from the predestined purpose of God. Hence it follows, And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, he expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself. As if He said, Since ye are slow I will render you quick, by explaining to you the mysteries of the Scriptures. For the sacrifice of Abraham, when releasing Isaac he sacrificed the ram, prefigured Christ’s sacrifice. But in the other writings of the Prophets also there are scattered about mysteries of Christ’s cross and the resurrection.

This was said not of their bodily eyes, but of their mental sight.

For He did not shew Himself to all at the same time, in order that He might sow the seeds of faith. For he who had first seen and was sure, told it to the rest. Afterwards the word going forth prepared the mind of the hearer for the sight, and therefore He appeared first to him who was of all the most worthy and faithful. For He had need of the most faithful soul to first receive this sight, that it might be least disturbed by the unexpected appearance. And therefore He is first seen by Peter, that he who first confessed Christ should first deserve to see His resurrection, and also because he had denied Him He wished to see him first, to console him, lest he should despair.

Read more (46 words)

But after Peter, He appeared to the rest, at one time fewer in number, at another more, which the two disciples attest; for it follows, And they told what things were done by the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Because the above-mentioned disciples were troubled with too much doubt, the Lord reproves them, saying, O fools, (for they almost used the same words as those who stood by the cross, He saved others, himself he cannot save.) And He proceeds, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken. For it is possible to believe some of these things and not all; as if a man should believe what the Prophets say of the cross of Christ, as in the Psalms, They pierced my hands and my feet; (Ps. 22:16.) but should not believe what they say of the resurrection, as, Thou shall not suffer thy Holy One to see corruption. (Ps.

Read more (64 words)

16:10.) But it becomes us in all things to give faith to the Prophets, as well in the glorious things which they predicted of Christ, as the inglorious, since through the suffering of evil things is the entrance into glory. Hence it follows, Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and so to enter into his glory? that is, as respects His humanity.

But He also implies another thing, that the eyes of those who receive the sacred bread are opened that they should know Christ. For the Lord’s flesh has in it a great and ineffable power.

For He had not such a body as that He was able to abide longer with them, that thereby likewise He might increase their affections. And they said one to another, Did not our hearts burn, within us while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?

Their hearts then were turned either by the fire of our Lord’s words, to which they listened as the truth, or because as He expounded the Scriptures, their hearts wore greatly struck within them, that He who was speaking was the Lord. Therefore were they so rejoiced, that without delay they returned to Jerusalem. And hence what follows, And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem. They rose up indeed the same hour, but they arrived after many hours, as they had to travel sixty stades.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Now this relates not to falsehood. For not every thing we feign is a falsehood, but only when we feign that which means nothing. But when our feigning has reference to a certain meaning it is not a falsehood, but a kind of figure of the truth. Otherwise all the things figuratively spoken by wise and holy men, or even by our Lord Himself, must be accounted falsehoods. For to the experienced understanding truth consists not in certain words, but as words so also deeds are feigned without falsehood to signify a particular thing.

For they walked not with their eyes shut, but there was something within them which did not permit them to know that which they saw, which a mist, darkness, or some kind of moisture, frequently occasions. Not that the Lord was not able to transform His flesh that it should be really a different form from that which they were accustomed to behold; since in truth also before His passion, He was transfigured in the mount, so that His face was bright as the sun. But it was not so now. For we do not unfitly take this obstacle in the sight to have been caused by Satan, that Jesus might not be known.

Read more (41 words)

But still it was so permitted by Christ up to the sacrament of the bread, that by partaking of the unity of His body, the obstacle of the enemy might be understood to be removed, so that Christ might be known.

Or because the Lord feigned as if He would go farther, when He was accompanying the disciples, expounding to them the sacred Scriptures, who knew not whether it was He, what does He mean to imply but that through the duty of hospitality men may arrive at a knowledge of Him; that when He has departed from mankind far above the heavens, He is still with those who perform this duty to His servants. He therefore holds to Christ, that He should not go far from him, whoever being taught in the word communicates in all good things to him who teaches. (Gal. 6:6.) For they were taught in the word when He expounded to them the Scriptures. And because they followed hospitality, Him whom they knew not in the expounding of the Scriptures, they know in the breaking of bread. For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. (Rom. 2:13.)

It had been already reported that Jesus had risen by the women, and by Simon Peter, to whom He had appeared. For these two disciples found them talking of these things when they came to Jerusalem; as it follows, And they found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them, saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon.

But with respect to what Mark says, that they told the rest, and they did not believe them, whereas Luke says, that they had already begun to say, The Lord is risen indeed, what must we understand, except that there were some even then who refused to believe this?

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Luke’s account includes more disciples and recounts events that unfolded on the evening of the day when Christ was resurrected. During that night, two disciples pitched their camp with the Lord, where He was suddenly recognized by them. They quickly returned to share the news with the others, and soon after, Christ appeared to all of them, allowing them to touch Him.

It seems that the Lord had shown Himself to the eleven disciples previously, and in the evening, He revealed Himself specifically to Ammaon and Cleopas. These two, along with the eleven, gathered to offer encouragement to the others. They were the ones who initially were startled, as noted in Luke 24:37, but then He opened their understanding to the Scriptures, as stated in Luke 24:45.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Following this, you will also observe this. It is important to note that as He left, He bestowed upon them His peace, as articulated in John (John 14:27), and upon His return, He grants peace—a profound peace in action and in essence.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

By which is implied, that the words uttered by the Saviour inflamed the hearts of the hearers to the love of God.

Greek Expositor

5th centuryChurch Father

But since the Evangelist said before, Their eyes were holden that they should not know him, until the words of the Lord should move their minds to faith, He fitly affords in addition to their hearing a favourable object to their sight. As it follows, And they drew nigh to the fortress whither they were going, and he feigned as if he was going further.

Gregory the Great

6th centuryChurch Father

Because then He was still a stranger to faith in their hearts, He feigned as if he would go further. By the word “fingere” we mean to put together or form, and hence formers or preparers of mud we call “figuli.” He who was the Truth itself did nothing then by deceit, but exhibited Himself in the body such as He came before them in their minds. But because they could not be strangers to charity, with whom charity was walking, they invite Him as if a stranger to partake of their hospitality. Hence it follows, And they compelled him. From which example it is gathered that strangers are not only to be invited to hospitality, but even to be taken by force.

Now behold Christ since He is received through His members, so He seeks His receivers through Himself; for it follows, And he went in with them. They lay out a table, they bring food. And God whom they had not known in the expounding of Scriptures, they knew in the breaking of bread; for it follows, And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave it to them. And their eyes were opened, and they knew him.

Whoever then wishes to understand what he has heard, let him hasten to fulfil in work what he can now understand. Behold the Lord was not known when He was speaking, and He vouchsafed to be known when He is eating. It follows, And he vanished out of their sight.

By the word which is heard the spirit is kindled, the chill of dulness departs, the mind becomes awakened with heavenly desire. It rejoices to hear heavenly precepts, and every command in which it is instructed, is as it were adding a faggot to the fire.

Isidore of Seville

7th centuryChurch Father

But although it behoved Christ to suffer, yet they who crucified Him are guilty of inflicting the punishment. For they were not concerned to accomplish what God purposed. Therefore their execution of it was impious, but God’s purpose most wise, who converted their iniquity into a blessing upon mankind, using as it were the viper’s flesh for the working of a health-giving antidote.

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

But if Moses and the Prophets spoke of Christ, and prophesied that through His Passion He would enter into glory, how does that man boast that he is a Christian, who neither searches how these Scriptures relate to Christ, nor desires to attain by suffering to that glory which he hopes to have with Christ.

It seems that our Lord appeared to Peter first of all those whom the four Evangelists and the Apostle mention.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Imagine, referencing the journey of the two disciples of Christ, that I proclaim to you, modern followers of Christ: The blessings that are within your reach can be yours if you wholeheartedly dedicate this period, set aside for the solemn commemoration of Christ's resurrection, to sincere reflections and discussions steeped in faith and love. Conversely, you miss out on these blessings if you squander this sacred time on trivialities and indulgences that are excessive and sinful, binding yourselves to sin during the very moment you celebrate your liberation from it. What do you think of this? Do you believe that these are no longer times for divine revelations and visions?

Read more (232 words)

While it is true that we no longer expect revelations to unveil new truths of faith or additional mysteries of grace, who has convinced you that the opportunity for nurturing a gracious relationship with Christ has ended? Has He not made a promise to all His followers throughout the ages: “He who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him, and I myself will appear to him” (John 14:21); “I am with you always, even to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:20)? Remaining faithful to His words, He continues to dwell among those who believe in Him, love Him, and honor Him, those who turn away from vanity, and He is ready to reveal Himself—not necessarily to their eyes, but to their hearts, igniting within them the flame of divine comfort, just as He did for Luke and Cleopas. Surely, He reveals Himself to the soul earnestly searching for Him, not to one lost in trivialities. The well-intentioned travelers, having experienced such a joyous encounter during their journey to Emmaus, accomplished something remarkable: they did not keep their joy to themselves but rushed to share it with the other disciples of Christ, who were also grappling with uncertainties at the dawn of the new day. They returned promptly to Jerusalem, entered the assembly of the apostles, and conveyed to them their extraordinary confirmation of Christ's resurrection.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

On the contrary, there were still those who did not believe (Mark 16:13). Moreover, not all the faithful had a comprehensive understanding of His current state. It was essential for the Lord to provide them with new spiritual nourishment after their days of turmoil, aligning with their future mission, and to reinforce His previous connections with them. For this purpose, the Lord aimed to present Himself to them collectively. During this time of wavering faith, the grace of the Holy Spirit would temporarily leave them; it would return fully poured out on the day of Pentecost, ushered in by the sound of the Spirit. First, however, the Lord wished to bring back some who had strayed from Jerusalem.

Read more (319 words)

Among them was Cleopas, a relative of the Lord (Mary, the wife of Cleopas, is described as the sister of the Mother of God in John 19:25). The identity of the other traveler remains unknown. Both were making their way from Jerusalem to Emmaus, a village located 60 stadia away. They departed before the news of the Lord's appearance to Mary Magdalene reached them. As they walked, they engaged in conversation regarding the recent events in Jerusalem. The dishonorable death of Jesus dashed their hopes of seeing Him as the Restorer of Israel. The Lord approached them, partially altering His appearance (Mark 16:12) and also veiling their eyes (Luke 24:16), and initiated a dialogue, illustrating that it was necessary for the Messiah, the Restorer of Israel, to suffer according to the Scriptures, as this was the pathway to His glory. This discourse encouraged them to understand that if they regarded Jesus as the Messiah, His death ought not to seem like a failure of His mission; rather, they should anticipate the glorification promised by Scripture in His resurrection. Jesus spoke for an extended period (as the journey was long), explaining the significance of the prophetic texts concerning the Messiah, His suffering, and His resurrection. The Evangelist does not detail which Scriptures the Lord referenced, but it is likely they were the same ones that the disciples and apostles Peter and Paul later invoked in their proclamations and letters. The words resonated sweetly with the disciples, igniting their hearts. When they reached their destination, the companions wished to continue, but they urged Him to stay and share a meal. At this moment, He revealed Himself to them during the breaking of the bread; possibly, the disciples recognized the marks on His hands, but He abruptly became unseen. This intensified their assurance that they had encountered not an ordinary man, prompting them to immediately return to Jerusalem to inform the Apostles.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Other manifestations of Jesus Eight days had elapsed since Christ’s initial manifestation to the ten apostles. It remains unclear if He had shown Himself to anyone else during this period. Luke the Evangelist recounts the encounter of the Lord with two disciples journeying to Emmaus. Upon their return to Jerusalem, these disciples found the eleven apostles and those with them gathered, proclaiming that the Lord had indeed risen and had appeared to Simon. Luke is the sole Evangelist to mention this event involving the Lord's appearance to Peter, suggesting it occurred prior to His revelation to the ten apostles, although he does not specify when or where it happened.

Read more (338 words)

From the sequence in which Luke narrates the story of Christ appearing to the two disciples, it is reasonable to infer that the apostles informed these disciples of His encounter with Simon at the moment they recounted their own experience of seeing the Lord. However, during Jesus’ manifestation to the ten apostles, Peter did not affirm their faith in Christ’s Resurrection; rather, he joined them in perceiving the Lord’s appearance as that of a spirit. To assuage his confusion, Peter touched Him with his hands (1 John 1:1). This raises an inquiry: Did Christ truly appear to Peter on the first day of His Resurrection, prior to His appearance to the ten apostles? If Peter had encountered Jesus before the return of the two disciples from Emmaus and had believed in His resurrection, Mark, who conveyed his Gospel based on Peter's accounts, would not have stated that the two disciples returned to declare their news to the others, who also did not believe them (Mark 16:13). Given Peter’s own declaration (as recorded by Mark) that he did not believe the two disciples’ testimony of Christ’s resurrection, we must conclude that the manifestation of Jesus to Peter occurred after His revelation to the ten apostles, although the specifics of when and where remain unknown. It is already understood that Luke, despite his efforts to chronicle events in order, did not always maintain strict chronological precision in his narrative. According to tradition, after His resurrection, Jesus Christ appeared to all, particularly to the Mother of God. Although the Evangelists do not mention this event, it seems implausible to think that Christ would not have revealed Himself to His Blessed Mother, especially after He had shown such care for her at His crucifixion. It is equally unlikely that Christ did not appear to her first. The Evangelists may have chosen to remain silent about this appearance, perhaps out of reverence for the Mother of God, who continually expressed gratitude to the Lord for recognizing the humility of His servant (Lk. 1:48).

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

As they reached Emmaus, they were engaged in profound discussion. The unfamiliar traveler intended to continue on His way, yet they urged Him to remain with them. When they settled down for a humble meal, He took the bread, blessed it, broke it, and shared it with them. In that moment, their eyes were opened, and despite His altered form, they recognized that He was their Lord. However, as soon as recognition dawned, He became invisible to them. They asked each other, "Did not our hearts burn within us while He spoke to us on the way and opened the Scriptures?" Without delay, they got up and returned to Jerusalem with their extraordinary and joyous message. Doubts about these events no longer lingered. They were welcomed with enthusiastic confirmations that "the Lord has indeed risen and appeared to Simon."

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

At that same time, evening had already begun to settle in; however, had it been the middle of the night, the travelers would have swiftly journeyed to Jerusalem to share the good news. The dinner likely remained uneaten, as the travelers felt a greater compulsion beyond their physical needs (see John 4:31-34)—the imperative to announce the joyful message to the apostles. Upon arriving, they found the eleven gathered together, despite the doors being locked (John 20:19); yet, the doors opened at once for these friends, prompting a joyful exchange of news. The selfless endeavor of the travelers was met, as is often the case, with immense joy for themselves.

Read more (101 words)

They learned from the apostles that the Lord had indeed "risen and appeared to Simon," and in turn, they recounted their experience of the Risen Christ. The Gospels make no further mention of the Risen Lord's appearance to Peter, aside from this account—suggesting that the evangelists chose not to detail everything they were aware of, leaving out much that was well known to them. The Apostle Paul refers to this event, undoubtedly based on reliable sources, claiming that the Lord appeared to Peter before revealing Himself to the other disciples (1 Corinthians 15:5). However, the specifics regarding this appearance remain unclear.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 16 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. αὐτοὶ
    autoi
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  3. ἐξηγοῦντο
    exēgounto
    I explain
    G1834 · ἐξηγέομαι
  4. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  6. τῇ
    tē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. ὁδῷ
    hodō
    a way
    G3598 · ὁδός
  8. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  9. ὡς
    hōs
    as
    G5613 · ὡς
  10. ἐγνώσθη
    egnōsthē
    I come to know
    G1097 · γινώσκω
  11. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  12. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  13. τῇ
    tē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  14. κλάσει
    klasei
    a breaking
    G2800 · κλάσις
  15. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. ἄρτου
    artou
    bread
    G740 · ἄρτος