Ambrose of Milan
The disciples, in their confusion, perceived they were witnessing a spirit (Luke 24:37). In response, the Lord, to illustrate the reality of the resurrection, instructed them, “Touch Me and see; for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have” (Luke 24:39). This was not due to His immaterial essence but rather to the characteristics of His glorified body, which enabled Him to traverse barriers typically deemed insurmountable. The tangible presence is the body; it is through the body that we experience resurrection. The natural body is sown, and the spiritual body is raised (1 Cor. 15:44). While the spiritual is more refined, the natural remains linked to the decay of our physical existence. There was certainly substance to His form!
Read more (194 words)
It carried the marks of wounds and the signs of injury, and the Lord permitted them to be touched, not only to reinforce their faith but also as a gesture of esteem. He did not shy away from carrying the wounds He endured for us into heaven; instead, He presented them to God the Father as the cost of our liberation. Accordingly, the Father exalted Him at His right hand, graciously accepting the tokens of our salvation, with the sufferings He bore for us being the most valued treasures in His crown.
The numerous demonstrations of virtue convince us that Peter did not waver in his belief in the Lord's resurrection. John, upon seeing the Savior, could not doubt; he had already believed when he found the tomb empty. So, why does Luke mention their agitation? First, the state of mind of the majority of the disciples may have affected the others. Second, Peter, despite already believing in the resurrection, could have been unsettled by witnessing his Lord suddenly appear in the upper room through closed doors and solid walls. Luke, therefore, details the sequence of events while John focuses on the pivotal moments.
Numerous instances of righteousness suggest that Peter's faith was unwavering. It is evident that John had faith as well when he beheld the Lord, especially when he witnessed the vacant tomb devoid of a body. So, why does Luke indicate that they were perplexed (Lk 24:37)? Firstly, the consensus of the majority often drowns out the perspectives of the few. Furthermore, even if Peter had faith in the resurrection, he may have felt bewildered witnessing the Lord’s physical presence suddenly manifest in an enclosed space, with doors shut and walls intact. Thus, Luke meticulously chronicled each element in a historical sequence; one focused on the culmination of events, while the other examined their connections. When Luke states, ‘Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures’ (Luke 24:45), it is clear that he acknowledges the faith of the disciples.