After numerous probing questions, the Pharisees sought His permission to pose one final query they had debated: Is it acceptable to divorce? The two predominant rabbinical schools, Hillel and Shammai, had differing perspectives on this matter. Hillel permitted divorce for even trivial reasons, while Shammai imposed stricter conditions. In response, the Lord offered His own teaching, founded on the fundamental, divine intent of marriage. He indicated that divorce should only occur in cases of infidelity. What God has united, let no one divide. When challenged about Moses permitting divorce, He explained that this concession was a result of the people's inability to uphold the original law.
Read more (112 words)
This response, considering the prevailing weak understanding of the indissolubility of marriage, seemed too severe even to His disciples. They later inquired at home (Mk. 10) if they had truly grasped His message, and upon receiving confirmation that the Lord permitted divorce only in cases of unfaithfulness, they concluded it might be better not to marry at all. The Lord responded that it was not feasible to impose such a requirement on everyone. Nonetheless, those who, either by divine design or personal choice, found themselves unable to marry or who chose to serve the kingdom of God must receive the gift of celibacy from God's grace and remain faithful to their calling.