The Church Fathers on this verse

Mark 7:16Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.

Douay-Rheims

ει τις εχει ωτα ακουειν ακουετω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The Lord addressed the crowd in a manner that was not entirely explicit, stating, ‘He that hath ears to hear, let him hear,’ which means that those who comprehend should seek to understand.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

In response to the situation at hand, He conveyed the essential truth that genuine purity is not to be found in adhering to external regulations, but rather in the cleansing of the heart from all that contradicts God's commandments. He presented this concept to the people through a brief parable: "not what goes into the mouth defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth defiles a man," and He concluded with the exhortation: "Hear and understand." The allegorical nature of the parable draws from the context of the discussion and likely serves as a direct reply to the objections raised by the Pharisees, who believed that consuming food with unwashed hands rendered one unclean by the mere act of eating.

Read more (69 words)

The Pharisees were not only dissatisfied with the exposure of their traditions as conflicting with God's law, but they were also troubled by the Lord's direct characterization of their religious pretense as hypocrisy. His recent statement could be understood as a generalized critique of the food laws, providing further ground for their discontent. However, the Lord chose not to elaborate further on the topic and departed from the crowd.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

After addressing the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, the Lord drew the people closer to Himself to clarify what truly renders a person unclean, defiling him and resulting in guilt before God. He emphasized a fundamental principle: it is not what enters the mouth that defiles a person, but rather what comes out of it that can. Following this teaching, as recorded in Mark, Jesus retreated into a house, where His disciples approached Him to convey that the Pharisees had been offended by His message (only Matt. mentions this). The Apostles may have felt uneasy that Jesus' words, meant to instruct, had instead provoked those they were intended to enlighten, or they themselves could have been troubled by His remarks regarding the lack of defilement from what enters the mouth (v. 11. λόγον).

Read more (281 words)

They brought the news of the Pharisees’ offense, probably hoping to seek clarity on His earlier statement (v. 11. λόγον v. 12 = παραβολην ταυτην v. 15). The matter in v. 11 had led the Pharisees to be misled; they were so accustomed to the requirement of ritual handwashing for spiritual cleanliness that they interpreted Christ's words as dismissing this law.

Moreover, the Pharisees may have taken offense because Christ had spoken directly to the people, undermining their authority with His teachings. In response to this news about the Pharisees' entrapment, Christ either referred to the Pharisaical doctrine, which was not divinely instituted but was a human invention set to be dismantled, or He directly addressed the Pharisees themselves, suggesting they were misled. Though they served as leaders and teachers, they were not genuine plants of God, acting according to His will and therefore lacking His special care; they were destined for destruction (έκριζόω cf. 13:29-30). Thus, He instructed the people to disregard them. In this context, the warning was twofold: do not follow their teachings, lest you fall into the same pit, and leave the concerns of those individuals to their own devices.

After this, the Apostle Peter, representing all the disciples, requested clarification from the Lord regarding the perplexing statement about the defilement from what enters the mouth versus what comes out of it. Jesus explained clearly that what enters the mouth refers to food, while what comes out of the mouth pertains to all sinful thoughts, desires, and intentions that originate from the heart. These latter elements reveal the impurity of the human soul, highlighting its condition, whereas food, after entering the body, exits without affecting the spirit.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

The Pharisees, revealed as hypocrites and having strayed from the Law, remain mute and do not respond to Jesus' inquiry. In a desire to avoid sharing precious truths with those unworthy, Jesus chooses to leave the Pharisees to their concealed wrath and refrains from further engagement with them. However, to prevent the crowd behind the Pharisees from remaining confused, He clarifies for the people—rather than the Pharisees—that it is not what enters a person's mouth that renders them impure, but rather what comes out of their mouth that makes them unclean.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The decision was made. Up until that moment, Christ had held back His just wrath, intending to enlighten the scribes and Pharisees with compassionate teachings. However, it became evident that these rigid individuals were beyond hope. Consequently, a decisive action was required. Those who were influenced by the scribes and Pharisees needed to be presented with a clear representation of the honor inherent in the faith and morality they espoused. The genuineness of the gospel could not penetrate the hearts of the people as long as their understanding was corrupted and obscured by such teachers.

Read more (122 words)

Thus, Christ chose to leave the scribes to their ineffective malice and addressed the crowd with a commanding voice, exclaiming, “Hear and understand!” He subsequently instructed both the assembled throngs and His disciples, imparting the profound truth that within the Kingdom of Heaven, the purity of the heart is far more significant than that of the hands, “for out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witnesses, blasphemies.” Indeed, these are the things that “defile a man; and eating with unwashed hands does not defile a man,” as this teaching stems merely from a standard practice of ritualism, lacking any intrinsic moral authority as suggested by the Pharisees, who are referred to as “blind leaders of the blind.”

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

Subsequent to this, the Lord chose not to engage further with those who questioned Him, deeming them ‘unhealable.’ Instead, He turned to the crowd to impart profound wisdom. "Listen, all of you, and pay attention!" was how He initiated His discourse, elucidating the nature of true defilement: “It is not what enters a man's mouth that defiles him, but what comes out of it.” "If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear!" This teaching perplexed the Jewish legal experts, who were fixated on superficial and external regulations concerning purity.

Read more (94 words)

The disciples asked Him, "Do you think the Pharisees were offended by this teaching?" In response, the Lord, using the imagery of plants, illustrated that any doctrine failing to align with God's revealed truth will inevitably lose its effectiveness and worth, much like the teachings of the Pharisees, who were spiritually blind guides for the people. He stated, "Every plant that My Father in heaven has not planted will be uprooted; let them be, for they are blind guides; and if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit."

The original text

Greek text, 6 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ει
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  2. τις
    tìs
    any one
    G5100 · τὶς
  3. εχει
    échō
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  4. ωτα
    oûs
    the ear
    G3775 · οὖς
  5. ακουειν
    akoúō
    I hear
    G191 · ἀκούω
  6. ακουετω
    akoúō
    I hear
    G191 · ἀκούω