The Church Fathers on this verse

Mark 7:17Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And when he was come into the house from the multitude, his disciples asked him the parable.

Douay-Rheims

και οτε εισηλθεν εις οικον απο του οχλου επηρωτων αυτον οι μαθηται αυτου περι της παραβολης

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The apostles, possessing a deeper comprehension of the Lord's message, approached Him to inquire about the 'parable,' which signifies this concealed communication (a parable is a form of hidden discourse)...

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

What, then, does the profound statement, "It shall not enter into the mouth," signify? Does it nullify the Mosaic laws regarding clean and unclean foods, or not? If it does, how can this be reconciled with the reverence for the law, which led the Lord to reject the tradition of Korban? Conversely, if it does not nullify the law, what is its meaning? The disciples were puzzled by this and sought clarification from the Lord. Peter inquired about the interpretation of this parable. The Lord, surprised by their lack of comprehension, explained that food itself, being an external element, does not cause internal spiritual defilement. However, this does not imply that all food is neutral for an individual.

Read more (139 words)

Given the existence of divine commandments, as long as these remain in effect, consuming food that violates the law will indeed make one unclean, as it stems from a heart that disregards the law and satisfies the flesh. The other aspect of the parable indicates that the origin of moral impurity resides in the human heart; thus, those who aspire to remain pure before God must cleanse their hearts. The Lord did not address the regulations regarding clean and unclean foods, as these were destined to be rendered obsolete with the end of the Old Testament order, upon the initiation of the New Covenant between God and humanity, and the establishment of spiritual law within the hearts of the new Israel. Nevertheless, He disclosed to His disciples that these external laws are of lesser significance than the internal ones.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

After addressing the hypocrisy exhibited by the Pharisees, the Lord drew the crowd nearer and taught them about true defilement and guilt before God. He emphasized a fundamental principle: what is ingested does not make a person unclean, but what emerges from the mouth can indeed defile one. Following this explanation, as recorded in Mark’s Gospel, the Lord entered a house where His disciples approached Him, with news (noted only by Matthew) that the Pharisees were offended by His teachings. The apostles may have felt troubled that the teachings of Jesus, aimed at enlightening them, had instead led to temptation among the Pharisees, or they could themselves have been troubled by His declaration regarding the non-defilement of food (v. 11).

Read more (260 words)

They brought this issue to Christ to seek clarification about His earlier declaration concerning what truly defiles (v. 11). The saying in verse 11 had scandalized the Pharisees. They had become so accustomed to the requirement of ritual handwashing for spiritual cleanliness that they perceived Christ’s words as undermining this law.

The Pharisees were likely offended as Christ had directly addressed the people, thereby challenging their authority through His teaching. In response to the news about the Pharisees’ offense, Christ indicated that He was referring either to their man-made traditions, which lacked divine origin and needed to be renounced, or to the Pharisees themselves. These leaders, although they served as shepherds and educators for the people, were not rooted in God’s truth—they did not act in accordance with His will and thus lacked His protective guidance, rendering them destined for destruction (έκριζόω cf. 13:29-30). Therefore, He instructed the people to disregard them. This could imply not adhering to their teachings, lest they end up in the same downfall, or it could suggest leaving the concerns for them and letting them be.

Subsequently, the apostle Peter, speaking for all the disciples, sought clarification from the Lord on His puzzling statements about what defiles, whether through ingestion or by other means. The Lord explained clearly that by what enters the mouth, He meant food, while what comes forth from the mouth referred to wicked thoughts, desires, and intentions issuing from the heart. Such words reveal the uncleanliness of the human spirit, whereas food, once consumed, exits the body without affecting the soul.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

After Jesus had spoken these words, he entered the house, accompanied by his disciples. The Pharisees were upset with Jesus due to his open condemnation of their hypocrisy and remained among the crowd, likely beginning to clarify to the people that Jesus' statements posed a challenge to true Jews striving to be devout and uphold the traditions of their forebears. As the disciples followed Jesus inside and overheard the Pharisees' discussions, they turned to him and asked, “Do you realize that the Pharisees were offended by this statement?" According to John Chrysostom, the disciples expressed this concern not out of care for the Pharisees but because they felt uncertain about the implications of Jesus' words, though they were reluctant to expose their own confusion.

Read more (83 words)

This inner struggle became clear when Peter approached Jesus and requested, “Please clarify this parable for us.” While Peter’s request reflected his own bewilderment, he did not explicitly admit he was feeling challenged; instead, he sought an explanation of the parable. Following this, Peter inquired about the parable concerning what enters the mouth. His question was representative of all the Apostles, as shown by the Gospel of Mark, which mentions that when Jesus entered the house, his disciples sought clarification about the parable.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The decision was ultimately made. Up to this moment, Christ had held back His righteous wrath, eager to enlighten the scribes and Pharisees through compassionate instruction. However, it had become evident that these staunch figures were beyond redemption. Consequently, decisive action was required. It was essential to demonstrate to those who followed the scribes and Pharisees the true value of the faith and morality they espoused. The essence of the gospel would remain unheeded as long as the hearts of the people were corrupted and shrouded in darkness due to such leaders.

Read more (104 words)

Thus, releasing the scribes to their ineffective malice, Christ addressed the gathered crowd with a loud proclamation: ‘Hear and understand!’ He then instructed the crowd and His disciples that, in the kingdom of heaven, the integrity of the heart holds greater significance than mere external cleanliness, ‘for out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witnesses, blasphemies.’ Indeed, ‘all these things defile a man; and eating with unwashed hands does not defile a man.’ This principle arises from a commonplace obligation of ritualism, lacking the absolute moral weight that the Pharisees, the “blind leaders of the blind,” attributed to it.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

As the Lord and His disciples returned to the house, Peter, speaking for the other apostles, inquired about the meaning of this parable. They were unaware of the concept of inner spiritual impurity and were perplexed by how the Lord upheld the commandment of God while simultaneously dismissing traditions that seemed to stem from the same divine instruction.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 15 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. ὅτε
    hote
    when
    G3753 · ὅτε
  3. εἰσῆλθεν
    eisēlthen
    I go in
    G1525 · εἰσέρχομαι
  4. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  5. οἶκον
    oikon
    a house
    G3624 · οἶκος
  6. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  7. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. ὄχλου
    ochlou
    a crowd
    G3793 · ὄχλος
  9. ἐπηρώτων
    epērōtōn
    I interrogate
    G1905 · ἐπερωτάω
  10. αὐτὸν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  11. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. μαθηταὶ
    mathētai
    a learner
    G3101 · μαθητής
  13. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  14. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. παραβολήν
    parabolēn
    a parable
    G3850 · παραβολή