Alexander Gorsky
What, then, is the significance of the cryptic phrase, It shall not enter into the mouth? Does this undermine the Mosaic laws regarding the differentiation between clean and unclean foods, or does it not? If it does, how can this be reconciled with the respect for the law, which led the Lord to dismiss the Korban tradition? Conversely, if it does not invalidate these laws, how should it be interpreted? The disciples struggled to grasp this and sought clarity from the Lord. Peter inquired of the Lord to elucidate this parable. The Lord, with astonishment at their lack of insight, clarified that food, as an external element, cannot cause internal moral defilement. (However, this does not imply that all forms of food are morally neutral.
Read more (145 words)
As long as divine laws remain in effect, consuming food that contravenes these laws will indeed defile an individual, since such actions stem from a heart that disregards the law and serves the flesh). The latter part of the parable teaches that the root of moral impurity resides within the human heart, indicating that those who desire to remain pure before God must seek to cleanse their hearts. The Lord did not directly address the laws concerning what is permissible and impermissible to eat, which were destined to be rendered obsolete with the termination of the entire Old Testament framework upon the inception of the New Covenant between God and humanity, alongside the establishment of a spiritual law in the hearts of the new Israel. Nevertheless, He revealed to His disciples that these external laws are significantly inferior to the internal laws even at present.