The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 10:4Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Simon the Cananean, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him.

Douay-Rheims

σιμων ο κανανιτης και ιουδας ισκαριωτης ο και παραδους αυτον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 33 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

He makes them confident not only by calling their ministry a sending forth to the harvest, but by giving them strength for the ministry; whence it follows, He gave them power over all unclean spirits to cast them out, and to heal every sickness and every disease.

This is no small honour (done to Peter), He places Peter from his merit, Andrew from the nobility he had in being the brother of Peter. Mark names Andrew next after the two heads, namely, Peter and John; but this one not so; for Mark has arranged them in order of dignity.

Observe that he does not place them according to their dignity; for to me John would seem to be greater not than others only, but even than his brother.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Upon encountering Judas, he did not label him as 'this wicked man, this adversary of God,' but instead referred to him as Iscariot, noting his origin, since there was another Judas—Levi or Thaddaeus. Similarly, there were two individuals named James: one being Zebedee’s son and the other the son of Alphaeus. Additionally, there were two Judases: Judas Thaddaeus and Judas the betrayer, as well as three men named Simon: Peter, the Canaanite, and the betrayer, as Judas Iscariot was also called Simon.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Some copies have Lebbæus; but whoever prevented the same man from having two, or even three different names?

These therefore He chose for His disciples, whom also He named Apostles, humbly born without honour, without learning, that whatever they should do that was great, it was He that should be in them and should do it. He had among them one that was evil, whom He should use in the accomplishment of His Passion, and who should be an example to His Church of suffering evil men.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

Simon Chananæus is the same who in the other Evangelist is called Zelotes. Chana signifies ‘Zeal.’ Judas is named Scarioth, either from the town in which he was born, or from the tribe of Issachar, a prophetic omen of his sin; for Issachar means ‘a booty,’ thus signifying the reward of the betrayer.

A kind and merciful Lord and Master does not envy His servants and disciples a share in His powers. As Himself had cured every sickness and disease, He imparted the same power to His Apostles. But there is a wide difference between having and imparting, between giving and receiving. Whatever He does He does with the power of a master, whatever they do it is with confession of their own weakness, as they speak, In the name of Jesus rise and walk. (Acts 3:6.) A catalogue of the names of the Apostles is given, that all false Apostles might be excluded. The names of the twelve Apostles are these; First, Simon who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother. To arrange them in order according to their merit is His alone who searches the secrets of all hearts. But Simon is placed first, having the surname of Peter given to distinguish him from the other Simon surnamed Chananæus, from the village of Chana in Galilee where the Lord turned the water into wine.

The other Evangelists in this pair of names put Matthew before Thomas; and do not add, the Publican, that they should not seem to throw scorn upon the Evangelist by bringing to mind his former life. But writing of himself he both puts Thomas first in the pair, and styles himself the Publican; because, where sin hath abounded, there grace shall much more abound. (Rom. 5:20.)

The Evangelist couples the names throughout in pairs. So he puts together Peter and Andrew, brothers not so much according to the flesh as in spirit; James and John who left their father after the flesh to follow their true Father; James the son of Zebedee and John his brother. He calls him the son of Zebedee, to distinguish him from the other James the son of Alphæus.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

He was not chosen among the Apostles unwittingly; for that truth is great, which cannot be harmed even by having an adversary in one of its own ministers.

Beda Venerabilis

8th centuryChurch Father

For the number twelve, which is made up of three into four, denotes that through the four quarters of the world they were to preach the faith of the holy Trinity.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

Thaddæus or Lebbæus is interpreted ‘a little heart,’ that is, a heart-worshipper.

This number is typified by many things in the Old Testament; by the twelve sons of Jacob, by the twelve princes of the children of Israel, by the twelve running springs in Helim, by the twelve stones in Aaron’s breastplate, by the twelve loaves of the shew-bread, by the twelve spies sent by Moses, by the twelve stones of which the altar was made, by the twelve stones taken out of Jordan, by the twelve oxen which bare the brazen sea. Also in the New Testament, by the twelve stars in the bride’s crown, by the twelve foundations of Jerusalem which John saw, and her twelve gates.

The Greek or Latin ‘Petrus’ is the same as the Syriac Cephas, in both tongues the word is derived from a rock; undoubtedly that of which Paul speaks, And that rock was Christ. (1 Cor. 10:4.)

This James is he who in the Gospels, and also in the Epistle to the Galatians, is called the Lord’s brother. For Mary the wife of Alphæus was the sister of Mary the mother of the Lord; John the Evangelist calls her Mary the wife of Cleophas, probably because Cleophas and Alphæus were the same person. Or Mary herself on the death of Alphæus after the birth of James married Cleophas.

Also He willed to be betrayed by a disciple, that you when betrayed by your intimate might bear patiently that your judgment has erred, that your favours have been thrown away.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

Jude is interpreted ‘having confessed,’ because he confessed the Son of God.

It is well said, the son of Alphæus, that is, ‘of the just,’ or ‘the learned;’ for he not only overthrew the vices of the flesh, but also despised all care of the same. And of what he was worthy the Apostles are witness, who ordained him Bishop of the Church of Jerusalemb. And ecclesiastical history (Hegesippus. ap. Euseb. ii. 23.) among other things tells of him, that he never ate flesh, drunk neither wine nor strong drink, abstained from the bath and linen garments, and night and day prayed on his bended knees. And so great was his merit, that he was called by all men, ‘The just.’ Thaddæus is the same whom Luke calls Jude of James, (that is, the brother of James,) whose Epistle is read in the Church, in which he calls himself the brother of James.

The Evangelist had related above that the Lord exhorted His disciples to pray the Lord of the harvest to send labourers into His vineyard; and He now seems to be fulfilling what He had exhorted them to. For the number twelve is a perfect number, being made up of the number six, which has perfection because it is formed of its own parts, one, two, three, multiplied into one another; and the number six when doubled amounts to twelve.

Wherein is openly shewed that the multitude were troubled not with one single kind of affliction, but with many, and this was His pity for the multitude, to give His disciples power to heal and cleanse them.

There have been some who in this name Peter, which is Greek and Latin, have sought a Hebrew interpretation, and would have it to signify, ‘Taking off the shoe,’ ‘or unloosing,’ or ‘acknowledging.’ But those that say this are contradicted by two facts. First, that the Hebrew has no letter P, but uses PH instead. Thus Pilate they call Philate. Secondly, that one of the Evangelists has used the word as an interpretation of Cephas; The Lord said, Thou shalt be called Cephas, (John 1:42.) on which the Evangelist adds, which being interpreted is Petrus. Simon is interpreted ‘obedient,’ for he obeyed the words of Andrew, and with him came to Christ, or because he obeyed the divine commands, and at one word of bidding followed the Lord.

Read more (59 words)

Or as some will have it, it is to be interpreted, ‘Laying aside grief,’ and, ‘hearing painful things;’ for that on the Lord’s resurrection he laid aside the grief he had for His death; and he heard sorrowful things when the Lord said to him, Another shall gird thee, and shall carry thee whither thou wouldest not. (John 21:18.)

Andrew is interpreted ‘manly;’ for as in Latin ‘virilis’ is derived from ‘vir,’ so in Greek Andrew is derived from ἀνὴρ. Rightly is he called manly, who left all and followed Christ, and manfully persevered in His commands.

James is interpreted ‘The supplanter,’ or ‘that supplanteth;’ for he not only supplanted the vices of the flesh, but even contemned the same flesh when Herod put him to death. John is interpreted ‘The grace of God,’ because he deserved before all to be loved by the Lord; whence also in the favour of His especial love, he leaned at supper in the Lord’s bosom.

Thomas is interpreted ‘an abyss,’ or ‘a twin,’ which in Greek is Didymus. Rightly is Didymus interpreted an abyss, for the longer he doubted the more deeply did he believe the effect of the Lord’s passion, and the mystery of His Divinity, which forced him to cry, My Lord and my God. (John 20:28.) Matthew is interpreted ‘given,’ because by the Lord’s bounty he was made an Evangelist of a Publican.

Scarioth is interpreted ‘The memory of the Lord,’ because he followed the Lord; or ‘The memorial of death,’ because he plotted in his heart how he might betray the Lord to death; or ‘strangling,’ because he went and hanged himself. It should be known that there are two disciples of this name, who are types of all Christians; Jude the brother of James, of such as persevere in the confession of the faith; Jude Scarioth of such as leave the faith; and turn back again.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

SIMON THE CANANITE, likely named after the town of Cana or due to his fervent adherence to the law, is referred to as Zealot by the other Gospel writers. The Hebrew term for Cananite conveys a similar meaning to Zealot in Greek. JUDE ISCARIOT is also mentioned here. Saint Chrysostom notes that the Evangelist Matthew lists the Apostles not by their status but in a straightforward manner, and when addressing the betrayer, he does so not as an adversary but as a chronicler. Rather than labeling him as the sinful and lawless Judas, the enemy of God, he identified him by his origin as Iscariot. The Apostle Matthew was not reluctant to refer to him in this way, indicating his role in the betrayal. The Gospel writers remained transparent, revealing even those elements that may seem objectionable.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

As the days passed, it became increasingly important for the Lord to distinguish a select group from the mass of His followers. This would enable Him to extend His mission more broadly and better prepare them for future ministry. The rising approval from the general populace contrasted sharply with the intensifying animosity from His adversaries. These forces, while allowed by Divine foreknowledge, never overstepped their bounds nor interfered with the Divine liberty of our Savior, who laid down His life for us out of pure love, free from any external compulsion. However, according to the Divine plan, their outcomes were destined to unfold in the near future.

Read more (228 words)

Thus, in an effort to avoid the Pharisees’ persecution for a time, the Lord sought to establish a deeper connection with a few of His disciples. To accomplish this, He intentionally withdrew one evening to a quiet mountain to engage in prayer.

What might have been the content of the Lord’s prayer during this time? It is reasonable to consider that as the Divine Advocate laid the groundwork for the Church of the New Covenant, He sought His Father’s blessing on this endeavor, requesting fortitude in the face of the forces of evil, “and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it,” “I have seen Satan fall from heaven,” and “Satan has desired to have you that he may sift you as wheat, but I have prayed for you, Simon.” It is likely that the Son of Man implored His heavenly Father for strength for the challenging task ahead, as He was to soon bring Judas Iscariot close to Him, fulfilling the Father's will and good pleasure, thereby always keeping the grim reality of betrayal in His awareness.

The following morning, after summoning His disciples to the mountain, He appointed twelve of them to be with Him continuously and to serve as witnesses to what they had seen, heard, and felt. These men were to serve as leaders of the new twelve tribes of the renewed Israel.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

After recounting the events surrounding the second-first Sabbath and the subsequent one, Luke does not suggest any notable change in the location of Christ's ministry. However, according to the Gospel of Mark, the first occurrence following this was the selection of the twelve apostles. The Gospel of Matthew does not include this event but merely presents the names of the apostles when they were commissioned to preach, as if their selection had previously been established. Neither Mark, who mentions that they went up on the mountain, nor Luke, who notes that it occurred during those days, places this event in a sequential context with what preceded it. Luke informs us that the Lord devoted the entire night before this significant event to prayer.

Read more (200 words)

These twelve disciples were summoned to be Christ's closest associates throughout His earthly ministry and to carry on His work following His ascension to heaven. Thus, from this point onward, He drew them near to Himself, establishing a shared community and familial bond, with Himself as the guiding leader. The apostles' names are consistent with those recorded by the evangelists, with only minor variations in their order. In Mark's account, while mentioning James and John, it is noted that Jesus referred to them as "Boanerges," meaning sons of Thunder. It is possible that this designation for the sons of Zebedee occurred not at this moment but during an event that showcased their passionate spirit (perhaps related to Luke 9:54). Similarly, regarding Simon, Mark notes that Jesus named him Peter, although this happened at a different time (John 1:42). Some of the apostles listed by the evangelists are already recognized from their accounts of approaching Christ (John 1:37 ff.) and being called to follow Him (Matthew 4:18 ff., 9:9 ff., and parallels), such as Peter and Andrew, James and John, Philip and Nathanael or Bartholomew, and Matthew the tax collector. The details surrounding the calling of the other apostles remain unknown.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

He selected twelve individuals from among His followers on the mountain and appointed them as Apostles. The term Apostle originates from Greek, meaning messenger. The mission of these selected twelve was to be sent forth to proclaim the Good News, which is why Jesus designated them as Apostles. Anticipating the need for miraculous signs during their missions, Jesus empowered them to heal illnesses and cast out evil spirits. Among the twelve Apostles chosen, some had previously been called by Jesus to follow Him, including Simon and his brother Andrew, John and his brother James, Philip, Nathanael, also known as Bartholomew, and Matthew. The remaining Apostles were chosen from a larger group of disciples.

Read more (381 words)

The Gospel writer Matthew does not detail the selection of the twelve Apostles, mentioning their names only in the context of sending them out to preach; he also refers to himself as Matthew the tax collector. The Evangelist Luke chronicles the calling of the Apostles in alignment with the account given by Mark. While there may appear to be inconsistencies in the names of certain Apostles among the Gospel writers, these discrepancies can be clarified by noting the Evangelists’ efforts to differentiate between those with the same names. For instance, Matthew and Mark refer to the second Simon as Simon the Cananite, while Luke describes him as Simon the Zealot; both "Cananite" and "Zealot" derive from the Greek and Hebrew terms for the same concept, indicating the same individual. The second Simon possibly received the title Zealot because he was part of a Jewish faction that championed the autonomy and independence of their people before his calling by Jesus. Regarding the Apostle Levi, Matthew notes that he was known as Thaddeus, a name also used by Mark, while Luke refers to him as Judas son of James. The presence of two Apostles named Judas is evidenced by the Gospel of John, which recounts that during the Last Supper, after Judas Iscariot departed, Jesus remained with the eleven, including Judas—who was not Iscariot—who asked, "Lord, why are You going to reveal Yourself to us and not to the world?" (John 14:22). Therefore, this Judas, distinct from the betrayer, is referred to by Luke as Judas son of James, by Matthew as Levi nicknamed Thaddeus, and by Mark simply as Thaddeus. The name Iscariot attributed to Judas denotes his origin from Kerioth, with "Iscariot" interpreted as a combination of the Hebrew words for man and the town's name. Nathanael, acknowledged by all three Evangelists as Bartholomew, which means son of Pholomew, was also specially designated by Jesus. When Jesus first called Simon, He bestowed upon him the name Peter (John 1:42), which He likely reiterated. Jesus also named James and John, the sons of Zebedee, as the sons of thunder, symbolizing their vigorous and passionate temperaments. These traits were soon revealed when they sought Jesus' permission to call down fire from heaven upon those who rejected Him in a Samaritan village (Luke 9:54).

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The names of the foundational figures of New Testament humanity include Peter and Andrew, the sons of Jonah; James and John, the sons of Zebedee; and Philip, all hailing from the small fishing community of Bethsaida. Following them are Nathanael, also known as Bartholomew, Thomas, Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus (or James the Less), Judas the brother of this James, Simon the Zealot from Cana, and Judas Iscariot, who originated from the Jewish town of Carioth. Among this esteemed group of apostles, three - James the Less, Judas (brother of James), and Simon the Zealot - remain largely unfamiliar to us.

Read more (449 words)

The Gospels provide little insight into their identities, and only in the account of the Last Supper does the Evangelist John mention ‘Judas not Iscariot’, who, along with others, posed a notable question to the Savior (John 14:22). Simon is recognized solely by his title of Zealot. The terms ‘Zealot’ and “Cananite” carry the same implication, indicating that he was once part of the tumultuous and fervent followers of Judas of Giscalcus. The Greek names of Philip and Andrew, alongside the fact that Philip was approached by Greeks wishing to see the Savior before His earthly ministry concluded, suggests a possible link between them and the Hellenists; however, aside from their initial calling, there is scant information regarding them, as is the case with Nathanael and Matthew. Thomas, also known as Didymus, meaning ‘twin’, is merely a Greek rendering of his Hebrew name and presents an intriguing character, described as straightforward and pure-hearted, yet fervent and noble; ready to sacrifice but cautious in his faith. Judas from Carioth, likely the sole Jew among the Apostles, is typically listed last, seemingly indicating his lesser qualifications for the solemn role of an apostle, a deficiency he later exemplified through his grievous betrayal. Among the entire assembly of apostles, Peter, James, and John were bestowed the greatest privilege of belonging to the inner circle of Christ's chosen companions. They alone witnessed significant events, including the resurrection of Jairus' daughter, the transfiguration, and Christ's anguished prayer in the garden of Gethsemane. Little else is known about James except that he was honored as the first martyr among the apostles. Though he and his brother John were fishermen, they presumably enjoyed better material conditions than their peers. Their father, Zebedee, not only owned a boat but also employed hired hands; John notes in his Gospel that he was recognized by the high priest, likely due to his frequent presence in Jerusalem engaged in selling fish from the Sea of Galilee. John, still quite young, enjoyed the special favor of his Divine Teacher for the purity of his believing heart; he is often referred to as ‘the disciple whom Jesus loved’. However, the most distinguished among this select trio was Peter, whose very essence warranted the designation of rock (Cephas - Peter), the foundation on which Christ’s revelation of God was established. In Peter, Christ had a deeply devoted disciple, unwavering in his dedication to proclaim his love and profound loyalty. Even his denial of Christ in the pivotal moment of Judas' betrayal served merely as a catalyst for his profound regret, ultimately deepening his love and devotion for the One he had first affirmed to be the Messiah, the Son of the Living God.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

Simon the Zealot is referred to by Luke as "Zealot" (Luke 6:15, Acts 1:13). This designation likely stems from his prior affiliation with a radical Jewish faction known for their intense adherence to the Law of Moses, a group that sometimes allowed for subjective interpretations of their zeal. The name "Cananite" has led some to speculate that he was from Cana in Galilee, but it is important to recognize that "Canani" is a Hebrew equivalent of the Greek term for Zealot, meaning that the terms Cananite and Zealot convey similar ideas.

Read more (99 words)

Judas Iscariot is identified as a man from Kariot, a location situated within the tribe of Judah (Num. 15:25). He appears to be the only apostle not hailing from Galilee. The evangelist speaks of Judas not simply as an adversary but as a chronicler, refraining from labeling him as a "profane and lawless man." Instead, he refers to him by his city of origin, Iscariot, and does not shy away from stating that he was the one who betrayed the Lord. This demonstrates that the evangelists were committed to honesty, even when recounting events that might be viewed unfavorably.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot were two of the apostles. The Gospel writers, Matthew and Mark, refer to Simon as the Canaanite, while Luke identifies him as the Zealot (Luke 6:15; Acts 1:13). Both designations carry the same significance and were likely assigned to Simon due to his previous affiliation with the Zealots, a group that staunchly adhered to the teachings of Moses and resisted pagan influences. Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon (John 6:71; 12:4; 13:2, 26), is distinguished from Judas, the brother of James the Less, by his surname, which indicates his origin from the city of Kerioth. In his role as an apostle, Judas managed the collection of alms, utilizing a box for donations (John 12:6; 13:29).

Read more (135 words)

Ultimately, he betrayed his Lord and, filled with remorse, took his own life (Matt. 26:47; 27:5; Mk. 14:43; Lk. 22:47; Jn. 18:2, 3). Jesus, who foresaw all future events (Jn. 18:4), included the traitor among the apostles and permitted him to be part of the blessed community to fulfill Divine Providence regarding humanity's redemption (Acts 1:16). Peter and Andrew, along with James and John, the sons of Zebedee, as well as James, the son of Alphaeus, and Matthew, shared familial ties. From the moment of their calling to apostleship, the entire group of twelve was united, as echoed in the words of a hymn, in a new bond of love for their Master and among one another, governed by a shared conviction, aspiration, and mission — to proclaim the gracious Kingdom of God on earth.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 11 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Σίμων
    simōn
    Simon
    G4613 · Σίμων
  2. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  3. Καναναῖος
    kananaios
    a Canaanite
    G2581 · Κανανίτης, Καναναῖος
  4. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  5. Ἰούδας
    ioudas
    Judah
    G2455 · Ἰούδας
  6. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. Ἰσκαριώτης
    iskariōtēs
    Iscariot
    G2469 · Ἰσκαριώτης, Ἰσκαριώθ
  8. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  10. παραδοὺς
    paradous
    I hand over
    G3860 · παραδίδωμι
  11. αὐτόν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός