John Chrysostom
Though Christ addressed numerous topics without resorting to parables, in this instance, every aspect of His message was conveyed through a parable. Remarkably, no one posed a question to Him, despite their frequent inquiries of the prophets like Ezekiel and others. His statements were substantial enough to engage His audience and provoke questions, yet even the mention of the severest punishment in the parables seemed to have little impact on them. Consequently, the Lord withdrew from them, as noted by the Evangelist, and turning away from the nations, He returned to His own house. Not a single scribe chose to accompany Him, indicating their motivation for following Christ was solely to trap Him in His words.
Read more (257 words)
Since they did not grasp His teachings at that moment, the Lord departed from them. However, His disciples approached Him to inquire about the parable of the tares. Previously, they had wished to understand but lacked the courage to ask. What inspired their newfound boldness? They had heard the declaration, ‘It is given unto you to understand the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven,’ which emboldened them to inquire privately, not out of jealousy towards the crowds, but in obedience to the Lord's command, who had said, ‘But to them it is not given to eat.’
Why did they choose to question the parable of the tares while leaving aside those of the leaven and mustard seed, which were the most straightforward? Their interest in this parable stemmed from its connection to the preceding one, suggesting deeper implications that justifying their inquiry; this was evident as they recognized that the last parable contained a significant warning. Thus, the Lord did not rebuke them but rather expanded upon what He had previously stated. As I have often underscored, parables should not be interpreted literally, as this approach can lead to various misunderstandings. The Lord illustrates this by stepping away from a literal interpretation in His explanation of the parable. He refrains from identifying the servants who approached the master, implying their presence serves merely for the sake of narrative completeness, and chooses to clarify only the essential elements of the parable—the very reason it was shared—to demonstrate that He is indeed the Judge and Lord of all creation.