The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 15:20Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

These are the things that defile a man. But to eat with unwashed hands doth not defile a man.

Douay-Rheims

ταυτα εστιν τα κοινουντα τον ανθρωπον το δε ανιπτοις χερσιν φαγειν ου κοινοι τον ανθρωπον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 22 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

He said not that to eat the meats forbidden in the Law defiles not a man, that they might not have what to answer to Him again, but He concludes in that concerning which the disputation had been.

Or, The Lord blames him, because it was not from any uncertainty that he asked this, but from offence which he had taken. The multitudes had not understood what had been said; but the disciples were offended at it, whence at the first they had desired to ask Him concerning the Pharisees, but had been stayed by that mighty declaration, Every plant, &c. But Peter, who is ever zealous, is not silent even so; therefore the Lord reproves him, adding a reason for His reproof, Do ye not understand, that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught?

But the Lord in thus speaking answers His disciples after Jewish infirmity; He says that the food does not abide, but goes out; but if it did abide, yet would it not make a man unclean. But they could not yet hear these things. Thus Moses also pronounces that they continued unclean, so long as the food continued in them; for he bids them wash in the evening, and then they should be clean, calculating the time of digestion and egestion.

For the things which are of the heart, remain within a man, and defile him in going out of him, as well as in abiding in him; yea, more in going out of him; wherefore He adds, Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts; He gives these the first place, because this was the very fault of the Jews, who laid snares for Him.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The desire for immorality, lurking within the heart, intensifies, and when it manifests as action, it sins against a person.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

And the Lord includes herein man’s two mouths, one of the body, one of the heart. For when He says, Not all that goeth into the mouth defileth a man, He clearly speaks of the body’s mouth; but in that which follows, He alludes to the mouth of the heart, But those things which proceed out of the mouth, come forth from the heart, and they defile a man.

The nourishment of the body being first changed into corruption, that is, having lost its proper form, is absorbed into the substance of the limbs, and repairs their waste, passing through a medium into another form, and by the spontaneous motion of the parts is so separated, that such portions as are adapted for the purpose are taken up into the structure of this fair visible, while such as are unfit are rejected through their own passages. One part consisting of fæces is restored to earth to reappear again in new forms; another part goes off in perspiration, and another is taken up by the nervous system for the purposes of reproduction of the species.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

A heart that is pure for the sake of righteousness is preferable to merely clean feet, as the latter may be a disguise for hypocrisy, and washing that shows favoritism lacks true integrity.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

He is reproved by the Lord, because He supposed that to be spoken parabolically, which was indeed spoken plainly. Which teaches us that that hearer is to be blamed who would take dark sayings as clear, or clear sayings as obscure.

Some cavil at this, that the Lord is ignorant of physical disputation in saying that all food goes into the belly, and is cast out into the draught; for that the food, as soon as it is taken, is distributed through the limbs, the veins, the marrow, and the nerves. But it should be known, that the lighter juices, and liquid food after it has been reduced and digested in the veins and vessels, passes into the lower parts through those passages which the Greeks call ‘pores,’ and so goes into the draught.

The principle therefore of the soul is not according to Plato in the brain, but according to Christ in the heart, and by this passage we may refute those who think that evil thoughts are suggestions of the Devil, and do not spring from our proper will. The Devil may encourage and abet evil thoughts, but not originate them. And if he be able, being always on the watch, to blow into flame any small spark of thought in us, we should not thence conclude that he searches the hidden places of the heart, but that from our manner and motions he judges of what is passing within us. For instance, if he see us direct frequent looks towards a fair woman, he understands that our heart is wounded through the eye.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Understanding what corrupts a person, we shall also turn away from the impurity that tarnishes the spirit. While one might cleanse the flesh with flowing water, such efforts are in vain if that which is purified by tears and the righteousness of virtues remains tainted.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

Having named the vices which are forbidden by the divine Law, the Lord beautifully adds, These are they that defile a man, that is, make him unclean and impure.

The Lord was used to speak in parables, so that Peter when he heard, That which entereth into the mouth defileth not a man, thought it was spoken as a parable, and asked, as it follows; Then answered Peter, and said unto him, Declare unto us this parable. And because he asked this on behalf of the rest, they are all included in the rebuke, But he said, Are ye also yet without understanding?

Symeon the New Theologian

10th centuryChurch Father

Our revered ancestors, reflecting on the Lord’s words that evil thoughts, murder, adultery, fornication, false witness, and blasphemy arise from the heart, understanding that these are the elements that corrupt a person (Matt. 15:19, 20), also noted the Gospel’s teaching that we must cleanse what lies within so that our outer selves may be pure (Matt. 23:26). In response, they set aside all other spiritual endeavors to fully focus on the preservation of the heart, convinced that through this effort, they would effectively cultivate all other virtues, recognizing that without this foundational work, they could not truly stand in any virtue.

Read more (100 words)

The fathers referred to this essential practice in various ways: some called it heart stillness, others attention, some sobriety and resistance to thoughts, and still others contemplation of thoughts and mindfulness. They dedicated themselves to this discipline and through it were able to receive divine gifts. Ecclesiastes supports this understanding, instructing, "Be happy, young man, in your youth... and walk in the ways of your heart with purity" (Ecclesiastes 11:9), further advising to guard one's heart from wicked thoughts. He elaborates elsewhere, warning that when the enemy’s temptations approach, one should not allow them entry into the heart (Ecclesiastes 10:4).

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

It is a defilement of a person, yet eating with unclean hands does not tarnish one's spirit. Has anyone ever witnessed harvesters enjoying their bread in the summertime with hands muddied from the earth? Are there not numerous occupations where individuals are unable to wash their hands? Is this held against them as sin? Certainly not. Thus, the words of the Lord do not pertain to different types of food; He does not suggest that food itself or what enters the mouth defiles a person. The discernment regarding food was so rigorously maintained that even after Christ's resurrection, Peter declared, "No, Lord; for I have never eaten anything common or unclean" (Acts 10:14).

Read more (351 words)

Saint Philaret of Moscow pointed out that in this single image, not only does Christ reject visible impurities, but He also reveals hidden defilements. When wicked thoughts arise from the heart and manifest in actions, they corrupt the entire person—his inner being and his outer expressions, affecting the heart and the physical body. However, if evil thoughts linger in the heart without translating into actions, they still taint the inner man, the soul. This internal impurity might go unnoticed by others observing one's outward demeanor; yet before God, who examines the heart, it holds the same severity as external immoral acts and is equally repugnant. Thus, the Lord categorizes malevolent thoughts with the same abhorrent labels we apply to sinful actions: evil thoughts, murder, adultery, insurrection, false testimony, and blasphemy. You may not have taken a life physically, yet the wish for another's demise arises in your heart: remember, such a thought is regarded as murder by the Lord. Your lips may not have uttered blasphemies against God, yet your heart may harbor ungracious and rebellious thoughts about His providence: take heed, for it is likely that your heart has already whispered blasphemy.

From this, it is evident that true heart purification, which enables one to behold God, requires the renunciation of not merely unlawful and sinful actions, but also each wicked thought, within which the potential for sinful behavior lies dormant like a seed. Saint John Chrysostom teaches us to discern what truly defiles a person and to avoid it. We observe many within the church meticulously adhering to the practice of entering with clean garments and washed hands, yet they give little thought to approaching God with a pure soul. In saying this, I do not discourage the washing of hands or face, but I encourage that this cleansing be thorough—not just with water, but with the virtues themselves. The tongue of the devoted is the hand by which we grasp the knees of God; hence, do not tarnish it, lest the Lord respond to you with, "And when you multiply your prayers, I will not hear" (Isaiah 1:15).

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

What, then, was the significance of the cryptic statement, "It shall not enter into the mouth"? Does it invalidate Moses’ laws regarding clean and unclean foods, or does it not? If it does, how can this be reconciled with the reverence for the law that led the Lord to dismiss the Korban tradition? Conversely, if it does not invalidate the law, what is its interpretation? Unsure of how to address these questions, the disciples approached the Lord for clarification. Peter requested that the Lord elucidate this parable. The Lord, surprised by their lack of comprehension, explained that food, as an external matter, does not cause inner moral impurity. However, this does not imply that all types of food are morally neutral.

Read more (139 words)

As long as divine statutes remain in effect, consuming food that contradicts the law can defile a person, as it stems from a heart that disregards the law and seeks to gratify the flesh. The other aspect of the parable indicates that the root of moral impurity resides within a person's heart, thus highlighting that those who seek to maintain purity before God must cleanse their hearts. The Lord did not delve into the regulations concerning clean and unclean foods, which were to be rendered obsolete with the cessation of the Old Testament system and the establishment of the New Covenant between God and humanity, along with the advent of the spiritual law in the hearts of the new Israel. Nevertheless, He disclosed to His disciples that these external regulations are, even now, vastly inferior to the internal laws.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

After addressing the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, the Lord drew the crowd near and taught them about what truly renders a person unclean and guilty before God. He emphasized a key principle: that what is ingested does not defile an individual, but rather what emerges from the mouth can make a person unclean. Following this teaching, as noted in Mark, He entered a house, where His disciples approached Him with the information—mentioned only by Matthew—that the Pharisees were perturbed by His instructions. It is possible that the Apostles were unsettled by the fact that the words of Jesus, which were meant to instruct, seemed to lead the Pharisees into temptation. Alternatively, they might have been troubled by the implication that nothing entering a person’s mouth could defile them (v.

Read more (252 words)

11), prompting them to inform Jesus of the Pharisees' disturbance, hoping He might elucidate the previous statement (v. 11, 12, and 15).

The statement in verse 11 had clearly vexed the Pharisees, who had grown accustomed to the practice of ritual handwashing for spiritual cleanliness, interpreting Christ’s words as a challenge to this traditional law. They were likely offended, as in verse 11, Christ publicly addressed the people, undermining their authority with His teaching. In response to the disciples’ report regarding the Pharisees’ offense, Jesus referred either to the Pharisaic traditions, which were human inventions rather than divine mandates and thus should be discarded, or to the Pharisees themselves, who, although they were supposed to lead and teach the people, were not truly acting according to God's will and therefore lacked His special favor. They were destined to be uprooted (cf. 13:29-30). Therefore, He instructed not to follow them, lest they fall into the same pit of destruction, and to leave them to their own devices.

Subsequently, Peter, speaking for the disciples, requested clarification on the teachings about the defilement that enters through the mouth versus that which comes out. The Lord then explicitly stated that the food entering the mouth was not what defiled, but the evil thoughts, desires, and intentions that arise from the heart were what truly demonstrated the impurity of the human soul. While food passes through the body without affecting the spirit, the evil that emerges from the heart unveils the true condition of one's inner self.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

"Do you not comprehend?" Christ inquired. "Understand that nothing entering a person from the outside can render him impure?" (Mark 7:18). It does not contaminate him, as it does not penetrate his heart but rather goes into his stomach and is expelled, thus purifying all foods (Mk. 7:19). What proceeds from the mouth, stemming from the heart, is what defiles a person; for from within, out of the human heart, come malicious thoughts, adultery, sexual immorality, murder, stealing, greed, wickedness, deceit, obscenity, envy, slander, arrogance, and folly—all these evils emerge from within and corrupt a person (Mk. 7:21-23). Eating with unwashed hands does not make one unclean. Jesus Christ’s words require no further addition; the message is clear.

Read more (244 words)

Nevertheless, based on these sayings, some believe that Christ dismissed the practice of fasting. We must disagree with this interpretation. Fasting, whether through complete abstention from food or by consuming minimal amounts required for survival, has long been seen as a potent method for mastering the desires of the flesh. Individuals aiming to live a rational and moral life have consistently sought to restrain their passions and bring them under the governance of reason (spirit). They recognize that an abundant diet and certain types of food, such as meat and wine, tend to inflame passions and dull the conscience; hence, they have chosen either total abstinence from all meals for a period or limited their intake of meat and wine, or maintained a very modest diet overall. Christ Himself encouraged His disciples to combat the urges of the flesh and, as a model for us, He fasted for forty days in the wilderness. Thus, from His statement, "Not that which enters the mouth defiles a person," one cannot conclude that He dismissed the significance and necessity of fasting. He merely pointed out that it is not food consumption, disregarding the external purity valued by the Pharisees, that renders a person unworthy of the Kingdom of Heaven; rather, it is the evil thoughts and wrongful actions that do so. He emphasized that eating with unwashed hands does not render a person impure, and with these concluding remarks, He clarified the true essence of this discourse.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The Savior instructed both the crowds and his followers that in the realm of heaven, a clean heart holds greater significance than merely clean hands. "For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, thefts, false testimonies, blasphemies." These are the things that truly "defile a person; but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a person." This particular guideline arises solely from a common expectation of cleanliness and does not carry an absolute moral weight, contrary to the interpretation of the Pharisees, who are referred to as "blind guides of the blind."

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

From the inner being arise those elements that can render a person impure, not all of them but rather representative examples of more typical behaviors (see Mk. 7:21-22). The term ‘evil thoughts’ refers to the origin of all sinful deeds, as intentions and contemplations typically precede actions, leading to wrongdoing. An evil thought that originates in the heart (and is not merely momentary) can defile us, even if we strive to banish it; it inevitably leaves a mark on the soul, which can vary in depth.

Read more (113 words)

‘Murders’ can be understood as either physical, taking another’s life out of malice, or spiritual, which inclines one towards serious sins as noted in the sixth commandment. ‘Adulteries’ refer to desires and actions against the sanctity of marriage, as illustrated in Matt. 5:28 (seventh commandment). ‘Thefts’ involve seizing a neighbor’s possessions without consent, constituting an offense against the clear directive of God found in the tenth commandment (eighth commandment).

‘Perjury’ involves deceit motivated by a desire to harm another, violating the ninth commandment as part of the tenth commandment. ‘Blasphemies’ can refer to offenses against God (third commandment) or others. The pluralization suggests varied occurrences and forms of murder, theft, and similar wrongdoings.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

In this discourse, he highlighted typical sinful behaviors, referencing transgressions against the 3rd, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th commandments. Such sinful thoughts arise from the human heart, manifesting in actions like adultery, fornication, murder, treachery, greed, false testimony, blasphemy, deceit, flattery, idolatry, envy, pride, and foolishness. All of these vile actions originate from within and render a person unclean. Conversely, consuming food with unwashed hands does not make one unclean. Food, which only interacts with the body, is irrelevant to spiritual impurity, which is, in fact, the true form of impurity.

Read more (234 words)

The root of this uncleanness lies within the heart, encompassing the soul and its various faculties, particularly the mind and will. In His teachings, Jesus did not address the regulations concerning pure and impure foods (Leviticus 11), which had been misinterpreted by the Pharisees; these statutes were meant to become obsolete with the end of Old Testament laws. Through His statements, the Lord indicated that there existed a higher principle of spiritual purity and impurity, beyond the Mosaic laws of external cleanliness that had been contorted by the misguided interpretations of legalists, and this principle would later apply to all.

Moreover, He did not assert that all types of food are neutral for humanity, as excessive indulgence and a selfish desire in the selection of food, which contradicts pious traditions and guidelines, are manifestations of gluttony that reside in the heart and contaminate a person. Earlier, addressing the confusion faced by John's disciples, Christ mentioned that His followers would fast when the heavenly Bridegroom was no longer with them (Matthew 9:15). He subsequently cautioned against overindulgence and becoming ensnared by life’s distractions, emphasizing that these wicked tendencies stem from the heart: “take heed to yourselves, lest your hearts be weighed down with gluttony and drunkenness and worldly sorrows” (Luke 21:34). Therefore, according to the Lord's perspective, food that is ingested, when combined with the immoral desires of the heart, ceases to be morally neutral.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 15 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ταῦτά
    tauta
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  2. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  3. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. κοινοῦντα
    koinounta
    I make unclean
    G2840 · κοινόω
  5. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. ἄνθρωπον
    anthrōpon
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος
  7. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  9. ἀνίπτοις
    aniptois
    unwashed
    G449 · ἄνιπτος
  10. χερσὶν
    chersin
    a hand
    G5495 · χείρ
  11. φαγεῖν
    phagein
    I eat
    G5315 · φαγεῖν
  12. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  13. κοινοῖ
    koinoi
    I make unclean
    G2840 · κοινόω
  14. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. ἄνθρωπον
    anthrōpon
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος