The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 22:46Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And no man was able to answer him a word: neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.

Douay-Rheims

και ουδεις εδυνατο αυτω αποκριθηναι λογον ουδε ετολμησεν τις απ εκεινης της ημερας επερωτησαι αυτον ουκετι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 21 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

He first asked His disciples what others said of Christ, and then what they themselves said; but not so to these. For they would have said that He was a deceiver, and wicked. They thought that Christ was to be mere man, and therefore they say unto Him, The Son of David. To reprove this, He brings forward the Prophet, witnessing His dominion, proper Sonship, and His joint honour with His Father.

But He rests not with this, but that they may fear, He adds, Till I make thine enemies thy footstool; that at least by terror He might gain them.

This conclusion He put to their questionings, as final, and sufficient to stop their mouth. Henceforward accordingly they held their peace, not by their own good-will, but from not having aught to say.

The Jews tempted Christ, supposing Him to be mere man; had they believed Him to be the Son of God, they would not have tempted Him. Christ therefore, willing to shew that He knew the treachery of their hearts, and that He was God, yet would not declare this truth to them plainly, that they might not take occasion thence to charge Him with blasphemy, and yet would not totally conceal this truth; because to that end had He come that He should preach the truth; He therefore puts a question to them, such as should declare to them who He was; What think ye of Christ? whose Son is He?

I suppose that He formed this question, not only against the Pharisees, but also against the heretics; for according to the flesh He was truly David’s Son, but his Lord according to His Godhead.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

This passage is out of the 109th Psalm. Christ is therefore called David’s Lord, not in respect of His descent from him, but in respect of His eternal generation from the Father, wherein He was before His fleshly Father. And he calls Him Lord, not by a mere chance, nor of his own thought, but by the Holy Spirit.

This question is still available for us against the Jews; for these who believe that Christ is yet to come, assert that He is a mere man, though a holy one, of the race of David. Let us then thus taught by the Lord ask them, If He be mere man, and only the Son of David, how does David call Him his Lord? To evade the truth of this question, the Jews invent many frivolous answers. They allege Abraham’s steward, he whose son was Eliezer of Damascus, and say that this Psalm was composed in his person, when after the overthrow of the five kings, the Lord God said to his lord Abraham, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool.

Read more (50 words)

Let us ask how Abraham could say the things that follow, and compel them to tell us how Abraham was born before Lucifer, and how he was a Priest after the order of Melchisedech, for whom Melchisedech brought bread and wine, and of whom he received tithes of the spoil?

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

As he prepared to face his death, he spoke to them about profound matters, not only rendering them speechless but also filling them with apprehension regarding what lay ahead.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

For God puts Christ’s enemies as a footstool beneath His feet, for their salvation as well as their destruction.

For had their question sprung of desire to know, He would never have proposed to them such things as should have deterred them from asking further.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

Hence we learn that the poison of jealousy may be overcome, but can hardly of itself rest at peace.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

That He says, Sit thou on my right hand, is not to be taken as though God had a body, and either a right hand or a left hand; but to sit on the right hand of God is to abide in the honour and equality of the Father’s majesty.

But till is used for indefinite time, that the meaning be, Sit Thou for ever, and for ever hold thine enemies beneath thy feet.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryCommentator

The deceitful Pharisees, seeking to ensnare Jesus Christ with their words, dispatched their disciples from Herodiana to inquire, “Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar or not?” Jesus responded, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's” (Matthew 22:17, 21). On the same day, the Sadducees approached Him, questioning Him about the resurrection from the dead. His replies astonished the crowd, as they were in awe of His teaching (Matthew 22:33). Subsequently, a lawyer attempted to challenge Him, but his encounter led him to exclaim, “Well said, Teacher, You have truly spoken” (Mark 12:32).

Read more (68 words)

Finally, Jesus posed a question regarding whose Son the Christ is and, by referencing prophetic scripture, silenced their objections, leaving them without a response. They were utterly hushed, not only during that moment, but afterward, feeling disheartened as their attempts yielded no fruit and the people, captivated by His answers, placed their faith in Him. From that day forward, they refrained from posing any further questions to Him.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

His adversaries ultimately came to the realization that even a single glimmer of His divine understanding could eliminate all the shadows cast by their complexities. "With this, their struggle with the Lord concluded," notes Innocent, Archbishop of Kherson. The primary Jewish sects—the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians—all seemingly conspired to confront Jesus Christ, presenting Him with questions and tests designed to highlight the utter inadequacy of their meager knowledge in the face of the boundless wisdom of the presumed carpenter from Nazareth. The inquiries they posed might seem trivial and straightforward today, yet at that moment, they were such that even the most erudite rabbis were at a loss for answers.

Read more (232 words)

The Holy Evangelist Mark further emphasizes that as the scribes were humiliated, the audience's admiration and devotion to Jesus grew. "And the multitude of the people listened to Him with delight," he states (Mark 12:37). Indeed, it was both astonishing and gratifying to witness how a single individual could silence and expose the ignorance of those who were then considered the wisest in Jerusalem. This public revelation of their shortcomings was particularly excruciating for the unrepentant narcissists, the arrogant scribes and Pharisees, as it occurred in front of a crowd of eager onlookers gathered from across the world for the Passover feast. They scarcely anticipated that after being admonished for their ignorance, the Galilean Teacher, who had always treated them with gentleness and kindness, would publicly unveil the harsh truth of their spiritual hypocrisy, harmful deceptions, and repugnant complacency. He delivered a formidable address against them, which even today inspires a deep sense of trepidation when we read the solemn "woe unto you" directed at the Pharisees of old. We must honestly reflect: do we not recognize similar vices present within ourselves? Is there not a hidden Pharisee residing in our hearts? It is indeed chilling to contemplate how frequently our pride and self-importance rob us of the genuine worth of the small acts of goodness we believe we perform for God's glory, transforming them instead into offerings for our own self-adoration!

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

During these discussions, the topic of the Messiah’s identity arose. The Lord posed a question to the Pharisees surrounding Him: “How is it that David, inspired by the Spirit, refers to the Messiah as both the son of David and His Lord?” This inquiry likely aimed to reinforce through Scripture His teaching on the Messiah's supreme, Divine essence, which was dismissed by the spiritually blind literalists—as seen during the Feast of Tabernacles—and in relation to the temple's restoration. However, this question was left unanswered. Just as they hesitated to respond regarding John for fear of contradiction, they similarly refrained from addressing the question about the Messiah Himself.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

With this inquiry, Jesus Christ is not attempting to dismiss the prevalent belief among the Jews that the Messiah should be of David's lineage. Rather, He seeks to refine and elevate their understanding of His identity. The Pharisees, along with the entire nation following them, overlooked the crucial truth that, as revealed in David's own prophetic words, the Messiah is also his Lord, signifying that He is the Son of God. This question was prompted, as previously noted, likely because the Pharisees recalled the Lord's affirmations about Himself as the Son of God and sought to elicit these statements again to accuse Him of blasphemy.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

The Pharisees, ensnared by a rigid interpretation of Scripture and lacking the insight to grasp its true significance, failed to recognize that Christ the Messiah, as the God-man, had to be - in His divine nature - the Son of God, and in His human nature - a descendant of David. They anticipated the Messiah as the liberator who would deliver the Jewish people from Roman domination and subdue all nations. With such distorted beliefs, they were unable to respond to Jesus' inquiry.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The crowd enjoyed the discussion, while the Pharisees and scribes remained frustratingly quiet, filled with resentment over their humiliation and powerless to challenge the despised teacher.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

How do you explain that David refers to his descendant as his Lord? The title "Lord" suggests that David's son possesses a greater honor than David himself. If the Messiah is simply a descendant of David, as others are, or if He is merely a human being, as you Jews believe, and if He did not exist at the time David spoke of Him, how could David address Him as Lord? If He is indeed David's Lord and existed then, how can He also be regarded as his descendant? This question stumped the Pharisees. The solution lies in understanding that, in His humanity, the Messiah is a son or offspring of David, but in His divine nature, as the incarnate Son of God, He is the Lord of David.

Read more (52 words)

The Pharisees failed to grasp this dual relationship of the Messiah to David, nor did they comprehend the mystery of the God-man. Thus, a profound impact was made upon them to the extent that they ceased to challenge Him, for it is recorded, "from that day no one dared to question Him."

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

The discussions with those contesting the truth reached a conclusion. The educated and scholarly representatives of the Jewish factions, located in the heart of wisdom—Jerusalem—stood before a crowd of people and inquisitive visitors from all around the world, who had gathered at the temple for the Passover celebration. They found themselves in a contest against the supposed son of a carpenter (Matthew 13:55), and how dismal their efforts appeared when juxtaposed with the self-existent hypostatic Wisdom of God! Had their hearts not become hardened, and had they truly listened with their ears and not shut their eyes (Matthew 13:15), they could still have heeded the final warnings and exhortations of the Savior.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 16 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. οὐδεὶς
    oudeis
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  3. ἐδύνατο
    edynato
    I am powerful
    G1410 · δύναμαι
  4. ἀποκριθῆναι
    apokrithēnai
    I answer
    G611 · ἀποκρίνω
  5. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  6. λόγον
    logon
    a word
    G3056 · λόγος
  7. οὐδὲ
    oude
    neither
    G3761 · οὐδέ
  8. ἐτόλμησέν
    etolmēsen
    I dare
    G5111 · τολμάω
  9. τις
    tis
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  10. ἀπ᾽
    ap
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  11. ἐκείνης
    ekeinēs
    that
    G1565 · ἐκεῖνος
  12. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. ἡμέρας
    hēmeras
    a day
    G2250 · ἡμέρα
  14. ἐπερωτῆσαι
    eperōtēsai
    I interrogate
    G1905 · ἐπερωτάω
  15. αὐτὸν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  16. οὐκέτι
    ouketi
    no longer
    G3765 · οὐκέτι